Jump to content

User talk:Educatedblkman1914

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Educatedblkman1914, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Equendil Talk 15:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject South Park

[edit]

I have thought of creating a WikiProject for South Park since it is now near its' 10th anniversary and has more articles than ever. I feel we could all do the following things through this project:

  • Cleanup any short/poorly written/unformatted articles
  • Merge/lengthen the many character articles
  • Improve the South Park main page

I have seen your South Park fan template and wondered if you were interested in joining. If so reply to my talk page and I'll get back to you as quick as I can. Thanks, Mr. Garrison

Sorry

[edit]

I wasn't aware of his change in ring name. I apologize for my mistake. The Hybrid 07:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 6 - October 13 is N/A. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 14.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 14 - October 20 is N/A. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 21.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 21 - October 27 is Hulk Hogan. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 28.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 28 - November 3 is Bobby Eaton . Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 28.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Delivered on 22:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for November 4 - November 10 is Adam Copeland. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, November 11.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Delivered on 12:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Collaboration of the Week

The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for November 11 - November 17 is World Wrestling Entertainment. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, November 18.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week!Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

From the Editor

Welcome to the inaugural edition of the WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter! I hope this will be a good source of news to those people interested in what's happening around our pro wrestlimg community. I plan to release it every Sunday.

This newsletter will just be a way to get the community announcements to people who don't have the time to check the mesageboards, as well that to those just curious about the news. The newsleter will consist of a project news section (to do with what's happening on Wikipedia), and a current events section (relating to news in the "real world"). The newslette will also contain the Collaboration of the Week announcement.

That's all. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please post them at this talk page.

~ The Chronic

Contributors to this Issue: Gavyn SykesLAXNahallac SilverwindsThe ChronicThe Hybrid

Delivered: 18:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

Phi Beta Sigma NavBox as Template.

[edit]

I noticed that you added the more or less identical navbox to both Phi Beta Sigma and Phi Beta Sigma members, and have been working on your X7 template. I've made fraternity-related templates (Alpha Phi Omega) before, if you would like help. Your additions to the Phi Beta Sigma related articles have been great!Naraht (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the new template, specifically what happens when you click the "v" in the "v d e", I'm still getting that going to the wrong place, but that may be things that are cached on my system. I thought I'd managed to fix it by changing the name of the navbox. I've put in the template on the main page, the brothers page and the chapters page. My personal option is that the template navbox does not belong on Howard University and NPHC. Whether it belongs on the ZPhiB page, I'm not sure. ZPhiB has a "part of a series" box, just like Alpha Phi Alpha and Phi Beta Sigma isn't in their part of a series box... In fact if you want to completely change the template to be like Z Phi B's that could work.Naraht (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Beta Sigma chapter references.

[edit]

There are a couple of things that could be improved on the Phi Beta Sigma chapter references. The first is that all of the PBS southeastern region can be combined. Instead of <ref>[http://www.pbs1914se.org Phi Beta Sigma Southeastern Region]</ref> again and again, you can use named references. The first one in the file would be <ref name="pbs1914se">[http://www.pbs1914se.org Phi Beta Sigma Southeastern Region]</ref> and any later ones in the file would be <ref name="pbs1914se"/><nowiki>'''. Note that you don't need a '''<nowiki></ref> for the later ones, but you do need the / at the end. (It doesn't have to be the first one that actually has the website, but some people find it confusing if it isn't) Also, the link should be to the actual page that has the information, so I think the link should be to http://www.pbs1914se.org/links.htm which is the page actually brought up as a subpage when you click the appropriate link on http://www.pbs1914se.org/. Also, more than one reference is good, so for the ones where you actually have a chapter list from links page, go ahead and use pbs1914se anyway. I'll start a few of these.Naraht (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Had a few minutes, so I made the changes. A couple of other things, it seems wierd, at least to me, to see chapter in English Alphabetical order, I'd rather see them in Greek Alphabetical order, presumably in the order they were assigned, taking into account the rule that ending in Sigma is grad chapter and no Omega. It just seems wierd to see a new Alpha Alpha Rho chapter come before Beta (if they were in the same region) and similarly Alpha Alpha Rho Sigma before Beta Sigma for grad chapters. And having Xi after Sigma (in english alphabetical) seems wierd, it should be before, IMO Also, in terms of new data. http://www.gulfcoastsigma.com/gulfcoastchapters.php

List of Conclaves

[edit]

I know that you are mentioning specific conclaves as you go along, but you may also consider a page for all of the conclaves the way that it has been done for AKA Boules, OPP or DST. See [[Category:Fraternity and Sorority National Conference Lists]] for the ones that have been done already. I'll be happy to help research these.Naraht (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, didn't notice that there was an entry for that in the box that you made. I guess it will happen eventually.Naraht (talk) 16:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia "adoptees"

[edit]

You may want to take a look at Adopt-a-User, to see if you want me to "adopt" you. (However you may be moving fast enough to "graduation" that you may not need it.Naraht (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you....Naraht (talk) 17:42, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the entry to my user page. You need to add {{adoptee|Naraht}} Naraht (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the College Basketball Project

[edit]

Hi, and welcome to the College basketball Wikiproject! We are a group of editors who love college basketball and work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of this sport.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any ideas you would like to share or if there is any way your fellow college basketball fans can help you, please feel free to ask on the project talk page.

I've noticed you have been doing a lot of nice work on the MEAC, particularly in creating the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference Men's Basketball Tournament and some of the yearly tournament pages. If you're interested, there is a College Basketball project that you are welcome to take part in. Thanks for the nice work! Rikster2 (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NCCU Secondary Logo Cropped.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCCU Secondary Logo Cropped.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All grown up...

[edit]

And out there on his own... :) Naraht (talk) 10:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! When i didn’t see the adoption box on your page, I thought you were telling me it was time to leave the nest. I Still have so much to learn, but my goal to have the phi beta sigma article gain GA/FA status by the centennial (2014) is well within grasp. I couldn't have made the progress that was made without your guidance...Thank You So Much :-)--Educatedblkman1914 23:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PBSMillionManMarch1995.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PBSMillionManMarch1995.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AEClassiclogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AEClassiclogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leonard F. Morse, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.omicronsigma1914.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=182064&module_id=11014.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:A. Langston Taylor.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:A. Langston Taylor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonard F. Morse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethel College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made a review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Phi Beta Sigma/archive1. Hope it helps.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

You may want to delete the AFC for Leonard F. Morse given that you created the article in the mainspace.Naraht (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leonard F. Morse.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leonard F. Morse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Alumni may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • League|NFL's]] [[Houston Oilers]]; First N.C. A&T alum elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 30 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University alumni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woolworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colleges and Schools of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NCA&T thanks

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for all your hard work on the North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University and related articles. They are looking so much better. Hope to get more of the NC HBCU articles up to that level. -- Shrikesong (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue and Gold Marching Machine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Drum and bugle corps, Plume and Spats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warmoth T. Gibbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woolworth’s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Warmoth T. Gibbs) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Warmoth T. Gibbs, Educatedblkman1914!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers/Dumping Ground

[edit]

Hello Educatedblkman1914,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Phi Beta Sigma brothers/Dumping Ground for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanley F. Battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University alumni may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Scott Hall during 1969 Greensboro Uprising.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Hall during 1969 Greensboro Uprising.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agricultural and Technical College of North Carolina Historic District, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Herringbone and Rustication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ferdinand D. Bluford.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ferdinand D. Bluford.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lewis C. Dowdy.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lewis C. Dowdy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Samuel DeWitt Proctor.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel DeWitt Proctor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Warmoth T. Gibbs.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Warmoth T. Gibbs.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward B. Fort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superintendent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kkj11210. I noticed that you recently removed some content from History of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KJ «Click Here» 02:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically User:Educatedblkman1914/sandbox/Blue and Gold Marching Machine, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. See WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ezell Blair, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segregated. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greensboro Four, Feb 1960.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greensboro Four, Feb 1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited February One, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Provost and Bicentennial. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T Aggies football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 1 October

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T Aggies football, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bill Hayes and George Small. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T–Winston-Salem State rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Hayes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T–South Carolina State football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winning streak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T Aggies baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lineman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Celebration Bowl

[edit]

For the two predominant Historically Black Division I athletic conferences sentence, I think predominant should be the replaced with prominent. Using predominant is redundant and misplaced, all schools in the conferences are HBCUs. And the MEAC and SWAC are in fact prominent black athletic conferences, they draw more black fans/spectators than any collegiate conference due to their unique and cultural appeal.Broadmoor (talk) 16:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aggie Stadium (North Carolina A&T), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Definition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebration Bowl Logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celebration Bowl Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to 2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some copyright violations from the draft article in your sandbox. This is your final warning: All content must be written in your own words; don't copy anything directly from your sources. -- — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Eugene T. Alexander in Military Uniform.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eugene T. Alexander in Military Uniform.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Educatedblkman1914 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I submit this appeal to my blocking on the grounds that I have both read and understand Wikipedia's copyright policy and understand the actions that have lead to this. As a contributing wikipedian for 5+ years I have have worked very hard to make positive contributions in good faith to make Wikipedia better. My contributions to wikipedia can be found in a number of articles such as North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, North Carolina A&T Aggies football, and Phi Beta Sigma. I noticed that the first warning, that was issued was for material that was within my sandbox, and not within the articles of a wikipedia page. As noted in Wikipedia:About the Sandbox, "The Sandbox was created as a place with fewer rules and policies than other pages on Wikipedia. For example, you don't have to follow the Manual of Style or reach community consensus before making a major change. However, it must not be used for malicious purposes, and policies such as no personal attacks, civility, and copyrights (such as non-free content criteria) still apply." I do understand that copyright rules still do exist in the sandboxes, however the material that you used for my first warning was not in a main article, did not appear on an article, and was used for notekeeping purposes as a piece of information to be re-written in my own words and cited as a source. Again, I accept responsibility for my violation of Wikipedia's Copyright policy, and accept the resulting punishment. I intend to regain the trust of the wikipedia community by displaying the best in conduct. I also pledge that in the future know that when fatigue sets in, it is better to log off and refresh than to cut corners for the sake of trying to finish an article. I implore the administrators to lift my suspension so that I can continue making positive contributions to Wikipedia such as the ones that I have mentioned. Wikipedia is a cause that I am fully invested in and nothing would please me more than to be able to positively contribute to the encyclopedia. I Thank you in advance for your consideration and sincerely hope for a positive resolution. Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am unwilling to unblock you at present, as what you say about the circumstances which led to the block is highly inaccurate. As Diannaa has described below, you have recently been warned several times about copyright, and not only in sandbox pages. Moreover, what she says relates only to recent editing: you have received a number of messages about copyright infringements over a period of almost six and a half years. An editor who ignores a string of warnings about copyright until blocked, and who then appears to accept what he or she has been told about the reason for the block, but who on closer examination turns out to be accepting only a small part of the problem, and appearing to be unaware of the whole story, even though it is visible on his or her talk page, must raise doubts about whether he or she has really taken the issue on board. I suggest that if you consider making another unblock request, you first think very carefully about the whole picture. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are incorrect when you say that the first warning was for copyright material you placed in a sandbox. What brought your editing to my attention was copyright violations in article space, added to the article 2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team on December 26. The violating content was added from over a dozen different sources. You received a warning for these violations on December 27; I removed the material from the article and revision-deleted it. Through daily monitoring of your contributions I discovered copyright violations being added to a sandbox on January 7, and issued a final warning, again removing the content from the article and hiding the revisions. I noticed further copyright violations being added to a different sandbox on January 11, and at this point you were blocked. Copyright material is not permitted anywhere on this wiki, not even in a sandbox, not even temporarily until you have the time or inclination to edit it. Please store such material off-wiki in a Word document or a text file and make sure to paraphrase it thoroughly before moving it onto this wiki. Please confirm that you have read the guideline Wikipedia:Plagiarism and the policy page Wikipedia:Copyrights. You can comment below my post if you like. — Diannaa (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read and understood the pages regarding Copyrights and Plagiarism, however it seems that I am now having to plead my case again with your fellow administrator regarding my entire history. I am requesting further explanation as to what it is exactly that needs to be done to reinstate my account. As user:jamesBwatson noted that I am not only being sanctioned for the original series of infractions but now an even broader history of infractions. As I previously noted, I intend to regain the trust of the Wikipedia Community through correcting my actions however frustration is beginning to set in as it feels like i'm having to plead my case again after stating that efforts would be made to be a better editor. I type all of this not to complain or vent, but to truly get an understand of What more can be done? any insight that can be provided would be greatly appreciated. Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Next step

[edit]

I'm looking for what the next step is for User:Educatedblkman1914 , it seems that a review can only occur if the a {{request unblock}} is used. Would the statement made in response to User:Diannaa as part of a request unblock be part of it? It has been two and a half weeks since that comment was made.Naraht (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: My apologies, that I did not include you in the original message.Naraht (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@JamesBWatson: Again apologies.Naraht (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, Educatedblkman1914, I see that you tried to link to me above, but I didn't get a notification, because you gave my username as "jamesBwatson" instead of "JamesBWatson", and the software needs an exact match to the username. Consequently, I had no idea that you had posted here, and probably no other administrator did either, which explains why there was no response to your message. Thanks, Naraht, for reopening discussion, and pinging me and Diannaa.
Educatedblkman1914's, I declined your unblock request mainly because you seemed not to have actually taken on board the full message: you wrote "I noticed that the first warning, that was issued was for material that was within my sandbox", whereas the first recent warning was in fact for editing of "2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team", and only the second warning was about sandbox content;you then continued to write as though you thought that the only problem was copyright infringement in sandboxes. However, from what you have written, it does look to me as though you realise that copying text from other sources is not acceptable. I also see that the older messages about copyright, from past years, are about images, rather than text, and also that most of them relate to Wikipedia's policy on non-free images, so perhaps they are of limited relevance to this block.
As I have said above, from what you have said it seems that you probably do understand that you must not copy and paste text from other sources into any Wikipedia page, whether article, sandbox, talk page, or whatever. I would have considered that enough for you to be unblocked, were it not for the fact that you made it appear that you had done so only in sandboxes, failing to accept that you had also done so in at least one article, was what held me back from unblocking. Unfortunately, over the years I have found that if an editor is unblocked because he or she has appeared to accept the main point of the reason for the block, but he or she has denied or failed to accept some aspect of it, all too often he or she then continues to edit in the same way. Sometimes this appears to be deliberate evasion, but I think very often it is simply that the editor in question really did not understand the point; however, whatever the reason, repeated experience of that sort of thing has made me reluctant to unblock editors who appear to be holding back on part of the issues that led to the block. Another thing which discouraged me from unblocking was the fact that experience shows that in cases like this, it is not common that a long-standing editor has suddenly started infringing copyright, and has done so several times in a short period despite warnings, and despite never having done so before: it is far more common that he or she has in fact been doing so for years, and it has only just been noticed. In that situation, if, rather than saying "I realise that what I have been doing in articles was a mistake, and I won't do it again", the editor simply denies having done it in articles, it does not give confidence that he or she has really accepted the point.
Please note that when I declined your unblock request I wrote "I am unwilling to unblock you at present", not "I am unwilling to unblock you ever", precisely because I wanted to hold out hope for an unblock. You certainly have a history of much positive contribution to the encyclopaedia, and I am willing to consider unblocking you now, but I will be more confident that doing so is a good idea if you can clearly state that in future you will not copy content from other sources to any page on Wikipedia, and accept that in the past you have done so at least once in an article, as well as in sandbox pages. Also, you will know whether you have in the past been in the habit of copying and pasting text into other articles, even if you can't remember specific examples: if you know that you have done so, it will help if you can say so.
Diannaa, do you have any comment to make on the suggestion of unblocking Educatedblkman1914, on the understanding that he will not copy content from elsewhere in future? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to consider an unblock request under these conditions and have nothing further to add, other than to say I will resume daily checks, and any further violations whether in article space or a sandbox will result in an immediate re-block. It would be highly unlikely the your account would be unblocked a second time. The request for unblock has to come directly from you, Educatedblkman1914. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Educatedblkman1914 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am formally resubmitting an appeal to the block placed upon this account which occurred on 11 January 2016 by administrator @Diannaa: and the subsequent appeal that was denied by administrator @JamesBWatson: on 15 January 2016. I would like to start off by stating that I Accept full responsibility for violating Wikipedia’s Copyright and Plagiarism policies that occurred in the 2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team article, within my personal sandboxes, and within at least one other article in wikipedia. I now understand that copying and pasting copywritten materials into any section of Wikipedia, including but not limited to Articles and sandboxes, is in fact a violation of this very policy. I plan to regain the trust of the Wikipedia community by making a conscious effort to no longer copy and paste content from other sources into any page on Wikipedia. As a condition for reinstatement outlined by Diannaa, I have reread the Copyright & Plagiarism policies and would be open to additional improvement planning. Lastly, I would like to thank Diannaa and JamesBWatson for their corporation and consideration during these proceedings. I would also like to thank @Naraht: for his assistance and advocacy; he is truly a mentor and friend. It is my hope that we are able to reach a resolution and begin a new chapter. Again thank you for your consideration. --Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

You have now been unblocked. I will resume daily checks, and any further violations whether in article space or a sandbox will result in an immediate re-block. Good luck, and happy editing. — Diannaa (talk) 23:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would just like to say that I agree with Diannaa that you should be unblocked now, in view of the assurances you have given. I hope that from now on you can carry on editing, without similar problems. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join our editathon?

[edit]

Hi! I'm just writing to invite you to join an edit-a-thon that I'm hosting in Charlotte. We will focus on adding and editing articles for visual artists from Charlotte of the African Diaspora. I'm looking for experienced Wikipedians to help new users and also just more people to come out. Here is our event link for the first event (every Thursday in February): [[1]] Thanks for any help! --Heathart (talk) 00:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite, however I wouldn't be of much use as I have been indefinitely blocked. I wish you all the best with your edit-a-thon and will be there in spirit. --Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio detector

[edit]

Hi Educatedblkman1914. Did you know we have available a copyvio detection tool, https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ ? This is an easy way to check content for unacceptable amounts of overlap with source material that is accessible online. Your recent additions to Sandbox 26 show some phrases copied directly from the source page here. Sometimes when providing list-type data or statistics it's unavoidable to have overlap, but we can and should re-work the material as much as possible, by changing the phrasing, adding or removing details, or presenting the material in a different order. I have done some amendments to the page, reducing the percentage overlap as shown by the copyvio tool from 34.2 per cent to 20.6 per cent. — Diannaa (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Diannaa: I really do appreciate the help. This tool will be really helpful :-)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deon King (February 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 16:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Educatedblkman1914, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 16:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deon King has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deon King. Thanks! Naraht (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina A&T Aggies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference athletic director navbox

[edit]

Template:Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference athletic director navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan 05:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alcorn State Braves bowl game navbox

[edit]

Template:Alcorn State Braves bowl game navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob13Talk 15:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deon King

[edit]

Hello, Educatedblkman1914. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Deon King".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 15:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football navbox

[edit]

Template:2015 North Carolina A&T Aggies football navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. UW Dawgs (talk) 04:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deon King has been accepted

[edit]
Deon King, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 14:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Educatedblkman1914. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NCAT Bulldog Logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCAT Bulldog Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

invitation to editathons at UNC

[edit]

Hi! I'm helping to organize two editathons at UNC Sloane Library and was hoping you would want to join us or spread the word. The first is March 25 and our scope will be the immigration system in the US. The second will be on April 1 and the scope will be visual artists of the African Diaspora who have been based in Chapel Hill. Hope you can make it! Thanks --Heathart (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Score format in season article schedule tables

[edit]

There's currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Score format in seasons article schedule tables that you may be interested in. Kobra98 (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NC A&T Student Center Rendering.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NC A&T Student Center Rendering.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New updated Fraternity map

[edit]

Frat can we get an updated Fraternity map on the site that reflects NM as now part of the GCR? Also your handle is misspelled as related to the map. Thanks and G.O.M.A.B.

Bro. Kevin N. "Slo" Williams Theta Delta Sigma Chapter GCR Director Military Affairs

New Page Reviewing

[edit]
Hello, Educatedblkman1914.

I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. User:Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 07:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Educatedblkman1914. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebration Bowl Logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celebration Bowl Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable people" section at Full Sail University

[edit]
Resolved

Hello! I am reaching out to you as an active editor and member of WikiProject Universities. I've been working with Full Sail University to suggest improvements to the Wikipedia article on its talk page (where I've also disclosed my COI). I've proposed adding a sourced list of notable alumni, similar to other university articles. However, I've struggled to get a volunteer editor to review and implement the proposed markup. Would you be willing to take a look at the sourced list of people here and update the article appropriately? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 19:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This request has been answered. Take care! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Educatedblkman1914. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019 North Carolina A&T Aggies football team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

l~m~lm

[edit]

~lm~mlm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.233.42.24 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebration Bowl Logo, 2017.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celebration Bowl Logo, 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scott Hall during 1969 Greensboro Uprising.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Hall during 1969 Greensboro Uprising.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phi Beta Sigma Seal.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phi Beta Sigma Seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NCAA FCS football yearly game has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox college football game. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North Carolina A&T Aggies baseball roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]