Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Shelton Benjamin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 16:20, 5 November 2007.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I think it follows all the featured article criteria, and is an excellent article which can easily pass FA. User:Lex94 21:33, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The article predominately sourced from the onlineworldofwrestling.com website. Can you describe the reliability of the website in accordance with the policy of the same name? Thank you. 22:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Reply, the site is only used to source event results, which are hardly controversial, and in that respect they are very reliable. They have a staff of writers that list the results, checking the accuracy before they are posted. While they do accept columns from outside writers, none of those are cited in this article, so it isn't an issue. Nikki311 23:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Even so, someone else may not think they are reliable. I would replace the results with either WWE.com sourcing, or as I did with December to Dismember (2006) article, replace some with SLAM! Sports references. Davnel03 17:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply, the site is only used to source event results, which are hardly controversial, and in that respect they are very reliable. They have a staff of writers that list the results, checking the accuracy before they are posted. While they do accept columns from outside writers, none of those are cited in this article, so it isn't an issue. Nikki311 23:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: A well sourced, well written article that stresses out of universe style.Gavyn Sykes 23:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pass & support, Good enough. Leranedo 10:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pass: I'm on 70:30 now. 70 Pass, 30 not... It's still a pass for me. BariumSULFATE ilyk2learn 11:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good. FamicomJL 16:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.