User talk:Durraz0

Thaçi

Thank you for your efforts in fis articles. A good source about Thaçi is Etnografia Shqiptare, vol 7-8. It's more preferable to the use of Elsie's book about tribes whenever possible.--Maleschreiber (talk) 19:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

thanks :) Durraz0 (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ardita Sinani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ardita Sinani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ardita Sinani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 06:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

G'day Durraz0. I noticed your recent additions to 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg included some material that was effectively word-for-word from p. 186 of Fischer's 1999 book Albania at War, 1939–1945. This is definitely NOT ok on WP. See WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPYPASTE for details of the policy, which has legal ramifications for WP. I have changed the wording of your additions to comply with the policy. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

good evening Peacemaker67. im sorry for your inconvenience, I thought I did a good enough job by changing some some words and replacing them with synonyms. thanks for "cleaning it up". anyways did you see the message i left on the talkpage? yeoman literally talks about the german occupation of albania not the italian one. it was said by Rexhep Mitrovica, the full quote is on his wiki page. Durraz0 (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vasojevici Muslims.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vasojevici Muslims.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Illyria

Hey Durraz0, you may have an interest to be a member of WikiProject Illyria since you are an active Wikipedian and interested in articles concerning Albanian history, geography and culture. I would be very happy to hear from you. Cheers! Iaof2017 (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I joined. Thanks for the invitation! Durraz0 (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great. You're welcome! Iaof2017 (talk) 19:20, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Blablubbs (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

You have been mentioned at an ANI/I discussion. Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete removal of template:kosovo-note

This edit is not complete - you need to also remove the reference to it. This is why this process is manual, what you did can be automated. --Joy (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I did not see it until later, my mistake. Durraz0 (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise here. Please go through your edits like this and clean up after yourself. TIA. --Joy (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Durraz0 (talk) 21:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please warn problem editors

You can template them. See wp:WARNINGS - also, for your overwhelming pleasure: {{Single notice links}} and {{Multi notice links}}. You can add them to your user page if you wish as I have done to mine. wp:vandalism templates should only be used in obvious cases. wp:AGF! Warning problem editors can help get them wp:blocked. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 04:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Durraz0

Hey Durraz0, I am Vasojević and I was speaking Serbian way before your tribes and country existed. Do not take it personally. We Vasojevici are mixature of Slavs and old-Balkan people. You are lucky wikipedia is defending you, otherwise you wouldn't be banned for vandalism, boy. Baltazarvs (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Kruje

Siege of Krujë (1467) Can you explain why it was an Albanian victory? Keremmaarda (talk) 18:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because the siege failed. Albanian victory is the stable version, you would have to gain consensus to change it. Durraz0 (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fortress was not seriously besieged and the Turkish army was not defeated or routed in battle. Siege lifted due to Plague epidemic Keremmaarda (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keremmaarda You're completely right for asking for an explanation or source, as it currently has no citations added to back that claim. You have to start to cooperate more on Wikipedia, @Durraz0, instead of Stonewalling. --Azor (talk). 22:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kurds/Kurdistan

Hi Durraz0, this is just a formal notification about something you are aware of and have reported a violation of. Feel free to remove this message.

You have recently made edits related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This is a standard message to inform you that the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: the topic is not Kurdistan but the Balkans. They are both messy topics, but still seperate ones. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right of course. And you have already received one about the right topic, even.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Durraz0. Thank you for your work on Pastasel massacre. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Mythology, would you be interested in a sub project on WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 14:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thank you for the invitation :) Durraz0 (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce :) Kowal2701 (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Durraz0 (talk) 12:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nashville International Airport on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Storrs, Connecticut on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:John Rustad on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Hello, I'm MersmanD. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MersmanD (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You posted the template on the wrong guy. Durraz0 (talk) 15:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. MersmanD (talk) 02:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]