User talk:Keremmaarda

Turkish sources

Hi, do you have Turkish sources about the battle of John Hunyadi and Şehabeddin in 1442? OrionNimrod (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, there is a war in M. Tayyip Gökbilgin's book Murad II. I can help you open the page. Keremmaarda (talk) 11:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Could you send me the link? OrionNimrod (talk) 12:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

https://veyseldikme.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/ii-murad.pdf page=5

I only have this source in PDF form, but I can give the (unseen) source from M. Tayyip Gökbilgin's book Murad II. Keremmaarda (talk) 12:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! OrionNimrod (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I see only 1 sentences about this: "Ertesi yılın Eylül ayında Mezid Bey'in intikamını almak isteyen Şehabeddin Paşa da Vazag Muharebesi'nde aynı akıbete uğrayıp yenildi ve büyük kayıplar vererek geri çekilmek zorunda kaldı." Do you have sources about more description of this battle? OrionNimrod (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

No in PDF, but I'll try to find it. Keremmaarda (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I will edit and add the resources I find here.

https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/murad-ii

Serbian margrave Mezid Bey was ambushed. The following year, Şehabeddin Pasha's army was raided and dispersed in Upper Yalomitza. These defeats aroused the enthusiasm in the Christian world to launch a Crusade against the Turks. Yanko's victory was celebrated with a great ceremony in Venice (Jorga, I, 428). Byzantium, under Ottoman pressure, also had new hopes. Already in 1437, the emperor took all the high Orthodox priests with him and went to Europe to discuss the union with the Catholic church, signed the church union at the Council of Florence, and planned to organize a Crusade.

https://asosjournal.com/?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=&makaleurl=1594882604_1217%20muhittin%20kapan%C5%9Fahin.pdf&key=33715 Page=6

To avenge this defeat, the Ottoman Empire invaded Rumelia in September of the same year. under the command of beylerbeyi Kula Şahin, also known as Hadım Şahabeddin Pasha42 Rumelia and Anatolia 43 He was very confident in his power and Kula Şahin Pasha, who acted recklessly because of this, was attacked by Jan Hunyad in the Vazağ region. suffered a defeat. Fifteen of the valuable and experienced commanders lost their lives in this war. 44 These two victories of Jan Hunyad led to the establishment of a Crusade against the Turks. and the management of the expedition was given to the Polish and Hungarian King Vladislas. Keremmaarda (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! OrionNimrod (talk) 16:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Probably Vazag means Vaskapu because this is the name of Hungarian in that battle. Vaskapu means literally "Iron Gate". OrionNimrod (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, Mr. OrionNimrod. Are you going to open a page about the war? Keremmaarda (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1150432870687580191/1153433585165025491/Halil_InalckKurulus_Donemi_Osmanl_Sultanlar.pdf

page=146

Hungarian Counterattacks, izadi (1443) Belgrade failure II. A turning point for Murad It happened. İsa Bey was removed from Bosnia. Hungarians, Yanko (Hunyadi Yanoş) against the Ottoman forces They carried out a successful operation (1441). Serbian margrave Me- Zid Bey was ambushed. The following year, Şehabeddin Pasha His army was raided and dispersed at Upper Yalomitza. This The defeats sparked a crusade against the Turks in the Christian world. It aroused the enthusiasm to open the ferry. Yanko's victory in Venice was celebrated with a great ceremony. 1 5 Under Ottoman oppression Byzantium also had new hopes. Already in 1437 the emperor Catholicism, taking with him all the high Orthodox priests He went to Europe to discuss the union with his church, He signed the church union at the Council of Florence and was a Crusader. He planned to organize an expedition (1439). The Ottomans greeted the Council of Florence with concern, As soon as the emperor returned to Istanbul II. Murad's ambassadors He sent and asked for assurance. 16 In 1442, the emperor's delegation His ambassador, Janaki Torzello, visited the palaces of Italy and Hungary. Derek made great efforts to implement the Crusader plan as soon as possible. The load operated. With Byzantine Emperor Karamanoğlu He was also in contact. Karama-, who received the news of the defeat in Transylvania noğlu İbrahim Bey marched on Akşehir and Beyşehir (1443). II. Murad immediately took action with his Kapıkulu soldiers. ti. On the other hand, prince Alaeddin with his Amasya forces walked. This time it's the Ottomans. Including Konya and Larende, They plundered and destroyed Karamanili; but in Rumili Considering the situation II. Murad signed peace and He returned to Edirne.

Keremmaarda (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hi Keremmaarda! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

You're right, I'm sorry, I'll be careful. Keremmaarda (talk) 06:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Military career of Mehmed the Conqueror moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Military career of Mehmed the Conqueror. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is composed only of empty sections. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok thank you Keremmaarda (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Notice

You unfortunately left me no other choice. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.AlexBachmann (talk) 21:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Reliability of sources

Hello. You asked me regarding the reliability of a source, or an author to be more exact. It's better to take it up to WP:RSN and let uninvolved editors give their opinion, especially if you are still in disagreement with the involved editors. I also have a word of advice for you - when you get reverted, immediately start a discussion. Even when you believe that you are right. Wikipedia functions on the principle of collaboration, so it is necessary to have a discussion with other editors sometimes. If a discussion with involved editors goes nowhere, there are ways to get the opinion of uninvolved editors to get the dispute resolved. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice #2

Since the last report was accidentally dismissed. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.AlexBachmann (talk) 16:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Contact

Hello, do you have an e-mail address that I can use to contact you? Wallis sabiti (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

why? Keremmaarda (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Topic ban enacted

Per consensus at the Administrators' noticeboard (permalink), the following topic ban has been enacted:

Keremmaarda (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from Ottoman history, broadly construed

Please read Wikipedia:Banning policy#Topic ban, Wikipedia:Banning policy#Exceptions to limited bans and Wikipedia:Banning policy#Evasion and enforcement.

Details regarding appealing a community-imposed topic ban are contained at Wikipedia:Banning policy#Appeals of bans imposed by the community. This topic ban will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions.

Regards
Daniel (talk) 04:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Keremmaarda. Thank you for your work on Battle of Tekirdag. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Expedition to the Morea (1458)

Hello, Keremmaarda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Expedition to the Morea (1458), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Koyulhisar (1461) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Koyulhisar (1461) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Koyulhisar (1461) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 23:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keremmaarda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Keremmaarda (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You seem to be overreacting here. No one has said that you should be "banned permanently". You are free to, if unblocked, appeal your topic ban. You are also free to edit any other topic amongst the millions of articles here. You are also free to edit the Turkish Wikipedia(where you are not blocked). Once you click "publish changes", the edit belongs to Wikipedia and will not be removed merely because the editor wants it to be. If you don't wish to participate here any longer, you should just stop editing, not threaten to be disruptive which is an unfortunate escalation. I hope that you don't choose to do that. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello good day. I don't think I made a destructive edit and I gave sources for the things I mentioned. Wikipedia uses academic and reliable sources, so I wanted to cite a real source about army numbers and military losses on the Siege of Svetigrad page. Francıone's work given on that page is not an academic work and Francıone has no academic achievement in the field of history. This violates Wikipedia:Reliable sources rules. However, I leave the decision to you. Keremmaarda (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

You violated a topic ban. See above, the message by Daniel. Drmies (talk) 16:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

So is there a way to remove this violation? Keremmaarda (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

No, there isn't. It doesn't matter if your edits are 'good' or not. You are flat out not allowed to edit anything even vaguelly in the topic area of Ottoman history, broadly construed. I honestly don't think the message at User_talk:Keremmaarda#Topic_ban_enacted could be any clearer, including the links to supplementary information to make it 110% clear. I won't review the block to decline it formally, as I was the person who implemented the topic ban, but these edits (summary) is a bright line violation and Drmies's block is clearly correct. You are probably lucky it is only one week; any future similar egregious violation will lead a block that is significantly longer. Daniel (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

If my edits on Ottoman articles will not be removed, please ban them permanently. Kind regards. Keremmaarda (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I do not understand what you mean by this. Daniel (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I request you to ban my account permanently. I hope you will try to use Wikipedia's academic resources. You are interested in articles based on nonsense sources. Instead of dealing with these, I get banned for no reason. Very different system. Keremmaarda (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

As per above, I won't be declining or actioning any part of this ban appeal. Another administrator can review this entire thread and action as they see fit. Daniel (talk) 20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I request you to ban my account indefinitely. Keremmaarda (talk) 20:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Daniel--yes, your message was clear enough; I'm surprised Keremmaarda didn't get it. In fact, every single edit they made since then has violated the topic ban. No, Keremmaarda, you weren't "banned for no reason"; you were topic-banned, which is something entirely different, for a very good reason. The quality of this or that edit or article or source has nothing to do with it. I put a relatively short block on your account because--well because I didn't wan to drop an indefinite block on you, and next week you'll have a chance to return to editing--of other topics. Drmies (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

I didn't claim otherwise, I don't care how you think. Wikipedia is full of moderators and users with political interests. I hope one day everyone will realize this. You think I may be guilty, but I think I'm not. I will not be making any other edits to the wiki. If you do not ban me permanently, when my ban is lifted, I will continue to edit articles about Mehmed the Conqueror. Keremmaarda (talk) 22:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Buddy you clearly have more "political interest" than anyone here. You're goal is clearly to glorify anything Ottoman related. Emre Özgür Yildirim (talk) 03:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Emre, don't comment on subjects you don't know and have no control over. Keremmaarda (talk) 13:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I can comment on whatever I please this is Wikipedia. I have looked into your edit history quite clearly you are pushing an Ottomanist adgenda here. I can edit as I please and I will do so as Wikipedia is an encyclopedic resource and no place for nationalism. Emre Özgür Yildirim (talk) 03:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Could you please explain which of my edits you saw wrong? Give just 1 example. And you accuse me of nationalism, I was punished for calling someone else a nationalist, do you want the same thing to happen to you? Keremmaarda (talk) 07:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Halicarnassus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• "You are flat out not allowed to edit anything even vaguelly in the topic area of Ottoman history, broadly construed". If any of this is not clear to you, then perhaps the account needs to be blocked indefinitely for lack of competence. Drmies (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

  Are you kidding me? You ban as you wish. I have not edited any Ottoman articles and have not resorted to subversive editing in any article. I request that my ban be removed immediately. If you keep blocking people as you wish, block them indefinitely. I don't have time to deal with your stupid games. Keremmaarda (talk) 08:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  You edited Draft:Wars of Mehmed the Conqueror 14 times between 12 June and 22 June. All edits are breaches of the topic ban. The article mentions the term 'Ottoman' 30 times, and 'Ottoman Empire' 8 times. This is as cut-and-dry as one could expect. Daniel (talk) 09:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  And before you even try it, your topic ban includes all namespaces, not just articles. It includes talk pages, drafts, Wikipedia-space, everything. Per Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Topic_ban, "Unless clearly and unambiguously specified otherwise, a topic ban covers all pages (not only articles) broadly related to the topic, as well as the parts of other pages that are related to the topic, as encapsulated in the phrase "broadly construed"." Daniel (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  It is a created article, not an edited article. Keremmaarda (talk) 09:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  What? There is no difference. You cannot create, edit, redirect or anything, on any page that has any relation to Ottoman history. This has been spelled out in black and white for you before. Daniel (talk) 09:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

  Then you can complete the article, sir. :) Keremmaarda (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

  I might look into completing the draft myself if I find free time, as it looks promising. I was working on a similar project myself by editing the pages for Mehmed II and Mehmed II's campaigns, alongside other articles, to expand information within the wiki regarding Ottoman wars during his reign, as much of the current info is primarily or exclusively sourced from European primary documents or secondary sources written using European sources that barely make any use of Ottoman comtemporary documents, causing issues regarding bias. Cannotpick (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

  Yes, I was also editing the articles about Mehmed II with sources to fix this problem, but some users complained about me because it made them upset. Thank you. Keremmaarda (talk) 05:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)