User talk:Dough4872/Archive 2010

What's next on the article list for you?

Although I am not pleased with 347, we'll have to deal with it. We have Route 1 Business left in the US portion along with 9W. We have less and less state routes left: 153, 164, 1, 18N, 92 and 60. Outside of interstates and the main list, what's the plan?Mitch32^{(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!)} 16:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am possibly thinking to keep 171 as-is and strike it. I'd also say go for 195 first. Remember this, 195 is internally the former Route 37 Freeway. When they do construction contracts for Route 195, they have to name (Route 37F) in the name as well. I will probably do the rest of the state routes, although 92 is getting more and more boring the more I have to write about it. 164 needs its history and it should be done - its still in its sandbox. 153 has a waiting sandbox still. 1 and 18N when I bother to finish it.Mitch32^{(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!)} 16:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

92 done! Finally. I see the work on 195 and now 280, nice job! We're getting there slowly but surely.Mitch32^{(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!)} 19:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC) IRC? Haven't seen you there in a while.Mitch32^{(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!)} 19:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IRC? Also I replaced some imagery in 53 with my newer ones. Also, great job on 676, would like to chat.Mitch32^{(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!)} 20:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"When they do construction contracts for Route 195, they have to name (Route 37F) in the name as well." What? http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/capital/tcp04f/route/sec3rt195.pdf doesn't mention 37F at all. --NE2 19:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAC replies...

I've made a few changes and replied at the FAC. Imzadi1979 (talk)

Featured List of roads in Kawartha Lakes

Hey, just wanted to let you know that I have bent and removed the Google Maps footnotes from the article. I assume that was your major nuance from supporting at this point. Dabomb has asked that I have you respond to this discussion, if that is the case, before I renominate the article. Cheers, ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 20:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAN of Eastern Air Lines Flight 663

Hello. According to your recommendations, I've improved the article. Would you please take a look on it again? Thanks. Blodance the Seeker 16:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MDUSbus

Template:MDUSbus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of state highways in Marquette County, Michigan/archive2

Hi, can you revisit this FLRC? The AfD for the article was closed as a keep, so the current status of the article is unclear. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, Dough4872. You have new messages at Talk:Saginaw Trail/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hummelstown

Care to help me make the Hummelstown, Pennsylvania page better? The Rypcord. 05:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 46

The article has been reviewed for GA status and the review can be found here. It is currently on hold at WP:GAN until 3/8/2010. WTF? (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

US 322 in PA major intersections

Why did you remove the table? It took me a lot of time to do it. I'm putting it back unless you can give me a good reason to remove it. Thanks.

Move it down to the Exit list section, not in the middle of the PA section.Mitch32^{(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.)} 12:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, we oughta have a US 322 in PA article eventually.Mitch32^{(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.)} 12:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Join the WP:USRDCUP 2010!

We're going to go ahead and try this again! The contest will begin April 1. It is a contest to encourage editors to improve teh quality of WP:USRD articles and participate in USRD. Precautions will be taken to make sure that people do not "game the system" and bring article quality down. Please sign up ASAP! Announcements regarding the contest will be made at WP:USRDCUP, Twitter, and/or IRC. --Rs chen 7754 06:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review query

Please see my comments at Talk:Interstate 275 (Michigan). Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 359

Hello! I noticed you made a few edits on the Interstate 359 article to revert to MoS. Thanks for that as I have not been very active in road pages as of late. However, if you have a couple of minutes, could you give me some thoughts on what else is needed to get this to GA status? I modeled it after the Interstate 296 article which was recently promoted to GA and is of a similar length to I-359. Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You did a damned good job. I can tell you that now, and I give you a lot of credit :) - Had to fix the junction list, but good job. Mitch32^{(Growing up with Wikipedia 1 edit at a time.)} 22:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good words. I'll tweak it a little more and then see if I can make it the first Alabama road-related GA! Patriarca12 (talk) 01:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstate 195 (New Jersey)

The article Interstate 195 (New Jersey) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 195 (New Jersey) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –Grondemar 04:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delaware Route 299

Hi, just to let you know that I have placed the GA review for Delaware Route 299 on hold pending resolution of one minor issue. Regards. --Jameboy (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now passed the article, good work. --Jameboy (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old New Jersey Routes

I see on the WikiProject US Roads/Shields Requests page you said if you find a photo for US 9W you would make a request. Well, this may not be what your looking for, but I found one from New York. [1] – Gfoley4 (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PA 45 to US 46

You recently undid my revision to the article navigator in the infobox at Pennsylvania Route 45. Please advise on whatever rule or guideline requires the ridiculous navigation to US 46 from PA 45, when there is also a Pennsylvania Route 46 that currently exists in the state. PA 46 is more notable, in relation to PA 45, than US 46 which does not even currently exist in Pennsylvania, making this article navigation scheme nonsensical. If there is a US highway but no state highway of the same number (such as US 19 after PA 18), the scheme makes a little more sense. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 04:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PA 653 Truck

I see you've replaced the bad information. First, do you have a source for "The highway was created to bypass a narrow bridge over Coxes Creek"? It could have been a wide weak bridge, or a narrow roadway leading up to the bridge, or several other things. Also, I don't have the ADC map, but the Google Maps source you added shows Garrett Road, not Gebhart Road. Google also shows a length of 1.4 miles, a far cry from one mile on each roadway. Finally, Google is unclear about whether the name is Water Level Road or Main Street (the former might also continue into Rockwood); perhaps the PennDOT videolog would be a better source (as the roads are state-maintained quadrant routes). Please be more careful with sources. --NE2 19:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. There's still no source for the bridge being the reason for the truck bypass; for instance trucks may be banned from congested areas (doesn't apply here) or narrow roads. --NE2 01:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 30 in Iowa

Hello, I see you nominated U.S. Route 30 in Iowa to GA, but you forgot to put a {{good article}} on the article. I have some fun putting |oldid parametre on the GAs template on the discussion pages, so I hope you will do that too. Christian75 (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just stumbled upon the Lincoln highway page and saw your edit. Thanks for Bannered routes. I also saw you edited the Rt. 35 and 36 pages. BTW, I live at the intersection of those two roads in Eatontown. Major construction going on there. It used to be circle, up until late 80's. Ttoclad (talk) 15:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

973 (New Jersey bus) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 978 (New Jersey bus). Since you had some involvement with the 978 (New Jersey bus) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter


Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief	Features Infobox road upgrade Editing needed near bottom of leaderboard Junction list updates	State and national updates Project reports
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 02:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Route 232

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GA status. Good luck. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 16:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will fail it if you do not respond to concerns by September 6. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 00:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PA 263

Congrats! Pennsylvania Route 263 passed GA review. --Ishtar456 (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you! Your review helped Capitol Loop pass its FAC. Imzadi 1979 → 00:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A1 (Croatia)

Hi! I have posted A1 (Croatia) article for hwy peer review as I'd like to improve it sufficiently for GAN at least. I saw you reviewed similar articles before so could you please review this one as well. Thanks--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pulaski Skyway

As there is a discussion regarding how to define the Pulaski Skyway in light of contradictory information and opinions your input would be appreciated Djflem (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture PR

Since you commented at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/M-15 centerline 1917, you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Picture peer review/M-15 centerline 1917. Imzadi 1979 → 22:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter


Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup News in brief Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Bot automates graphics creation, saves work Featured Article, eh? Reviews needed at ACR	State and national updates Project reports for Delaware Maryland Michigan Minnesota
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

— JCbot (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible incorrect procedure

Hi Dough. I am suggesting that your announcement of a move proposal for Dover does not comply with the instructions at WP:MOVEand therefore a maximum exposure of the proposed move has not been possible. The proposal may therefore be procedurally invalid.--Kudpung (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Little Help

Hello Dough4872. I would like to know if there are any suggestions that you can tell me to make to Pennsylvania Route 731. Mjkline (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Working Man's Barnstar

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work destubbing Nebraska! Admrboltz (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] This barnstar is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by accepting it.

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, Imzadi 1979 → (22:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

GA Reviews

Thank you for reviewing Virginia Route 27. In the future, I suggest that you at least drop the nominator a message on his/her talk page when starting or finishing a review, so that the nominator can follow your actions. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old Lincoln Highway

I'm not sure I agree with your decision to make the page a redirect to Lincoln Highway, but it's not my pet project, and I'm not going to fight it. However, it would be nice if you would clean up Lincoln Highway to reflect the change you made to Old Lincoln Highway. Argyriou (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Line

Thank you for the review and the helpful comments. I am a bit puzzled as to why you did not put the review on hold to give the editors a chance to meet your criticisms. However, we will address your concerns and renominate. Racepacket (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the highway shields?

Dough: I see that in the article List of Canada – United States border crossings, you removed the highway shields that I had included in the table of junctions with Canadian highways. What was your rationale for doing this? Wbaron (talk) 01:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ho ho

Merry Christmas to you! My my, how this year has flown by, and hopefully next year is prosperous for us all. And may the GA and FA gods shine upon yourself and the project in the new year. --Admrboltz (talk) 01:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BL-80 FAC

Can you strike your completed comments? --Admrboltz (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]