Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Peer review

WikiProject Highways Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing a featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other. For feedback on articles that are less developed, use the article's talk page or requests for feedback. For general editing advice, see Wikipedia style guidelines, Wikipedia how-to, "How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment.

The path to a featured article Start a new article Develop the article Nominate it for Good article Check against the featured article criteria Get creative feedback from fellow WikiProject members Get creative feedback from other Wikipedia contributors Apply for featured article status Featured articles

WikiProject Highways General Project home (WP:HWY) talk Portal talk Project category   talk Roads category   talk Chat (WP:DISCORD) Article alerts (WP:HWY/AA) talk • All article alerts (WP:HWY/AAA) talk Subprojects Australian Roads (WP:AURD) talk Canada Roads (WP:CARD) talk Indian Roads (WP:INRD) talk U.S. Roads (WP:USRD) talk Task forces Africa (WP:HWY/AF) talk Asia (WP:HWY/AS) talk Europe (WP:HWY/E) talk Hong Kong (WP:HKRD) talk Latin America (WP:HWY/LA) talk Oceania (WP:HWY/O) talk South Africa (WP:ZARD) talk United Kingdom (WP:HWY/UK, WP:UKRD) talk Project resources Assessment (WP:HWY/A) talk • A-Class Review (WP:HWY/ACR) talk • Project table (WP:HWY/A/P) • Live assessment table (WP:HWY/A/L) Route markers (WP:HWY/RM) talk New articles (WP:HWY/NA) talk Participants (WP:HWY/P) talk Popular pages (WP:HWY/PP) talk Precedents   talk Recognized content (WP:HWY/RC) talk Rockland County Scenario   talk Road junction lists (MOS:RJL) talk TFA suggestions (WP:HWY/TFA) talk Templates {{WikiProject Highways}} (doc) talk {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Userbox}}   {{HWY Announcements}} talk {{Infobox road}} talk {{Infobox road small}} talk {{Infobox road junction}} talk {{Jctint}} talk {{Jct}} talk {{Welcome-roads}} talk {{WikiProject Highways Barnstar}} talk Nomination procedure Anyone can request peer review. The best way to get lots of reviews is to reply promptly and appreciatively on this page to any comments. If you post a request, please do not discourage reviewers by ignoring their efforts. While not required it is strongly encouraged that users submitting new peer review requests choose an article from those already listed to peer review. Preference should be given to those articles which have been listed the longest with little or no response (not including automated peer reviews). WikiProject peer reviews This inactive or historical peer review page has had its instructions updated for posterity's sake. That's because there is now a Wikipedia Peer Review that peer reviews can be listed at, and the old instructions were out of date and may cause problems (or disappointment as not many people may see your review). If this page ever becomes active again, see here for a way to keep reviews up to date. To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here. Your review may be more successful if you politely request feedback on the discussion pages of related articles and/or send messages to Wikipedians who have contributed to the same or a related field. How to respond to a request Review one of the articles below. If you think something is wrong—e.g., article length, the lead section, poor grammar/spelling, factual errors—post a comment in the article's section on this page. If you create a subsection within a review for your comments, please do not link your username: it is easily confused with an article title. Feel free to correct the article yourself. Please consider noting your edits here to keep others informed about the article's progress.

Archives

• Links to all previous peer reviews and featured content discussions