User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 6

Nomination of Jairo Lombardo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jairo Lombardo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jairo Lombardo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paolo De La Guardia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paolo De La Guardia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo De La Guardia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lulzim Aliu

The article Lulzim Aliu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Aigbogun moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paul Aigbogun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marek Godlewski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marek Godlewski, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cedric Bolima for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cedric Bolima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Bolima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russian translations

Hi, thank you for your contributions. Please note that, if a player isn't Russian, we don't usually include the Russian version of their name in the article. Spiderone 11:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle Butler (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Butler (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Butler (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kareem Knights

The article Kareem Knights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kareem Knights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kareem Knights, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kareem Knights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For creating articles on underappreciated footballers Spiderone 21:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent creations

Can you please explain to me why do you create articles when you're clearly making them with ZERO effort? Clear examples are Héctor Martínez (Spanish footballer) and Antonio Perera, and I'm pretty sure that a LOT more would look like them.

Please improve your creations, you were once blocked and it seems like you didn't learn a thing until now. Competence is required. MYS 77 ^✉ 02:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MYS77:, I am not making them with "zero" effort but I will improve. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please check the difference between your last edit and the latest version of both articles that I've pointed you to see what should be done in some parts. It's okay if you don't want to develop the storyline like I did, but a correct infobox and some decent references to back up the article are required. Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 17:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to defend Das osmnezz and say that their articles are quite good considering how obscure some of the footballers are. There's always at least one good source. We have to start somewhere and at least the footballers are generally notable enough to pass WP:NFOOTBALL and referenced to more than just database websites like Soccerway or World Football. Also, no typos generally and they come with an infobox and correct categories. I am interested where you get the appearance stats for Mateusz Marzec though... Spiderone 22:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone:, I got the appearance stats from 90minut. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, consider some of the corrections that I and other users like @MYS77: make to your articles. They really are simple things having to do with the infoboxes and format that there is no reason for us to continue correcting. Thank you for all your contributions, it really is appreciated but it gets pretty repetitive fixing the exact same problems on each of your articles. All it should take is one look at another footballer article (or our corrections on yours) to see the correct formats. I suggest copy-pasting the infobox from another footballer article and filling in the specifics for the footballer you are writing about. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 09:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG: That was exactly my point. It's pretty tiring to fix the very same mistakes in all of those articles he/she creates. The two I've cited before were done in such a rush (or such a negligence) that they didn't even match with the simplest source to look into, Soccerway. Both were missing simple things that a quick look into other normal sources would've easily done the trick. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joakim Balmy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joakim Balmy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Balmy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 09:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naoufal Boumina

The article Naoufal Boumina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 09:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stjepan Radeljić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stjepan Radeljić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stjepan Radeljić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 14:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anton Rücker

The article Anton Rücker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 09:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ingo Peter

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ingo Peter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move articles that are not at all ready for mainspace, to mainspace. Ingo Peter is badly formatted and lacks information about his coaching career. Geschichte (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cheung Kwok Ming

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cheung Kwok Ming".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Sheldon

The article Jamie Sheldon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this passes either WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Govvy (talk) 11:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jamie Phoenix

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Jamie Phoenix.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Problem loading the only reference to this page, 1 of the 2 external links does not credit him with any game time in Albabia 1st tier (the only one which would meet WP:NFOOTY)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 19:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yacine Hadji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yacine Hadji, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yacine Hadji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amraj Lally for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amraj Lally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amraj Lally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

I note that an increasing number of your article creations - which I have always felt have been largely poor/of questionable worth - have been deleted due to notability failures. Please can you confirm what you intend to do about it - do you intend to slow down, seek input from other editors before publishing, or will we need to seek sanctions/restrictions against you again? Giant Snowman 22:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ping to @JTtheOG and MYS77: who have raised concerns with you previously. Giant Snowman 22:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I previously said, I think it's okay if you don't want to develop a very complete storyline, but your articles (when not deleted) have simple issues of infobox standards and/or simple information issues (dates of birth formatting, place of birth missing, height missing, wrong club info)... I would say that you should focus on creating a good article instead of creating 10/20 where all of them are of poor quality. Plus, please remind to follow WP:FOOTY/Players. Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 22:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:, From now on I will only create articles of players that clearly satisfy WP:FOOTY/Players, who have not just made few appearances/minutes and not pass WP:GNG. I have tried and will continue trying my best to have correct formatting both in infobox and the article. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I have checked a sample of your recent article creations. Despite what you said above, not one of those I checked had good enough sourcing to establish that their subjects satisfy the general notability guideline. I very strongly advise you to stop trying to create as many articles about footballers as you can, and instead concentrate on creating a much smaller number for which you do provide sufficient sourcing. Otherwise you are likely to be blocked from editing again, and in view of the number of times that has happened before, including two indefinite blocks, you may well be approaching a situation where you will find it much more difficult to ge unblocked. JBW (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:, Thanks for the feedback. I will try to put as many sources as possible (and not just one or two) about all my articles about footballers from now on to establish that theysatisfy the general notability guideline. I also will not rush. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to avoid any risk of misunderstanding, I should perhaps say that I have no idea whether the players you have written about satisfy the notability guidelines or not. I hope they do, and if so I hope you can provide suitable sources. JBW (talk) 23:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references to articles

Hi. If you find an interesting reference for an article but don't know what to do with it, please don't simply dump it somewhere in the article like you seem to have done here. If you don't want to think about how to use a reference you've found then perhaps leave it on the Talk page of the article. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on:, I edited the article Piotr_Świerczewski with information found on the reference. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! That's the way to do it. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sergio Aure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergio Aure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Aure (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Corey Donoghue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corey Donoghue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Donoghue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dávid Berežný

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dávid Berežný".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wisdom Onyekwere

The article Wisdom Onyekwere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – robertsky (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andreas Pachipis

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Andreas Pachipis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Reference 3 (soccerway) and the External Links point to a different player (D Andrews from England)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 21:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it out - typo in soccerway - you had 214571 and should be 214751 so fixed and all good, thanks for the article JW 1961 Talk 22:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Othniel Dossevi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Othniel Dossevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Othniel Dossevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference ideas to articles

Hi there. I recently came across Template:Refideas which might be useful to you when suggesting references for an article. I have used it at Till Schumacher where I moved links which you and others added to "External links" to the article's Talk page. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luke Giverin

The article Luke Giverin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, has been deleted twice previously for the same reasons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Luke Giverin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke Giverin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Giverin (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Sinior

Hi. Thanks for your work on Jakub Sinior. Please note that, despite the fact that – confusingly – we all say Boro, the place is actually Middlesbrough without the extra O, unless you want the one in Kentucky. The footie team is therefore Middlesbrough F.C. and if you'd dropped the A you'd be right as rain! Hope this helps, all good wishes DBaK (talk) 09:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emir Plakalo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emir Plakalo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emir Plakalo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quentin Cheng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quentin Cheng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Cheng (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Purosinaloense T/K 06:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giordano Vanin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giordano Vanin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giordano Vanin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 13:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tan Binliang

Hello, Das osmnezz

Thank you for creating Tan Binliang, I do believe that this page meets Wikipedia's Wikipedia:GNG and Wikipedia:FOOTY/Players guidelines. Unfortunately I do believe that this article is lacking: The Club career/ Career section is written in bullet points (this is an article), the Infobox is spotty and missing major gaps and you are missing a Career statistics section a major part of the Wikipedia:FOOTY/Players guidelines.

On your user talk page I have read numerous people criticizing your work but few give out any actual solutions. Here are my thoughts on solutions to issues I have with your article.

When writing in the Club career section you are creating a narrative/ storyline, unfortunately in the Wikipedia:FOOTY/Players guide it doesn't actually give you a template on what to write but here are my basic suggestions:

When the player was signed
When they made their debut
When they scored their first goal
Any major event while they were at the club i.e. winning a trophy, promotion, relegation etc

You have been criticized for making "zero effort" in your editing by User:MYS77, while I do believe that is excessive language, in the case for the spotty Infobox you could of gone to languages on the sidebar it would of given you the Chinese version of this article and it would have given you all the information that you required to not only fix the gaps in the infobox but given a fuller account of Tan Binliang. While this may have been in Chinese, this could of easily been translated on google translate. More importantly I have seen that you are well aware of Baidu Baike after you edited Wang Zixiang. Why then did you not make the effort to see to see if Tan Binliang had a page on that website? because he does, this again would have given you a fuller account of this person. While I don't agree that you made "zero effort" in your editing I do believe that you did not give your full effort and it shows.

Please add a Career statistic section, the Wikipedia:FOOTY/Players requires it. A complete version will show that you know everything about this persons professional career. The extra work you put into this section would have filled the gaps in the infobox as well.

Finally I highly suggest that you read the Thierry Henry page because it is a gold star page. While I do not expect you to be writing a gold star article you will at least understand what is required of you and hopefully you will strive to edit something as good because that is what you are being judged on.

Kai Lau ( talk) 23:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of William Anane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Anane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Anane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 21:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Moss

The source does not support what you said, so why did you add it? Giant Snowman 16:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:, the article said "Moss, who spent a four-month spell playing for Ventura County Fusion in the United States Premier Development League". Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying - I searched for 'United States', 'USA' and 'America' and nothing came up. Strange. In any event please do not add such references to the lede, better served in the main body, where I re-located the ref. Giant Snowman 17:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panuwat Hengthaveephokasub for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panuwat Hengthaveephokasub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panuwat Hengthaveephokasub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for creating so many football biographies - I know when I see your name as the creator that the subject is going to pass NFOOTY JW 1961^Talk 11:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad Domoń moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Konrad Domoń, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

""Antoni Milina"" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Antoni Milina". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13#"Antoni Milina" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moussa Bakayoko

The article Moussa Bakayoko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NFOOTY, as their league is not recognized at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Hi, please stop adding unsourced sentences in player biographies. Every sentence must be sourced, thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember this. You keep adding unsourced sentences... Also, please follow the manual of style at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players, and don't write seasons as "2018/19", rather as "2018–19". The career statistics table shouldn't have stuff like "-|-" (look at the players manual of style). Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:, I will source all sentences in my pages from now on. Also, I already have been wroting seasons as "2018–19". I will look at the playerd manualm of style for tables. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you aren't listening... Notice how here you still use 2019/20? Also, the page is still not being formatted correctly. Try to make sure that all your next article are formatted like this please. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:, Got it. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please remember this? The source format isn't correct. Please pay attention to how I keep fixing your new articles, and make sure that your new articles follow the correct format. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 23:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And please remember to add the WikiProjects in the talk page. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 23:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He Shihua

Hi, can you re-visit the table for club appearances - the league links to the Albanian rather than Chinese league. Thank you for the article JW 1961^Talk 09:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: Done. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das osmnezz, Thank you, happy editing JW 1961^Talk 18:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrian Stawski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stomil Olsztyn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luo Xin (footballer, born 2000)

The article Luo Xin (footballer, born 2000) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY as he has never appeared in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Saydee

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christian Saydee for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 15:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Saydee

The article Christian Saydee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bbb23 (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ingo Peter

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ingo Peter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michał Kokoszanek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stomil Olsztyn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

I have moved some of your recent additions back to draftspace. This is because of the glaring holes in the infobox. When the sources are so readily available and you even included them in the article, I expect that these sources are used to fill out the missing years at least, instead of piling such tasks onto other editors. Thanks in advance. Geschichte (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte: I've been having "problems" with this user's new articles for a while. While not glaringly disruptive behaviour, having to constantly "clean up" their bad formatting is infuriating. Check the discussion above (#Unsourced). Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte:, @Nehme1499:, I will not have any missing years on my articles from now on if I have sources and will add the WikiProjects in the talk page. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz: Which article do you use to copy-and-paste the information (as a template) for new article you create? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 17:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:, I do not use a specific article to copy and paste info as a template for new articles. Would you reccomend I do that? Thanks for the feedback, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, take one of your created articles I have reviewed/corrected, and try to use that as a sample for future articles. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 18:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:, This is unrelated but on August 23 I created a page, Alex Cvetkovic. After that, however, User:Davidlofgren1996 created the page of the same player and named it something else- Alexander Cvetković. After that, he removed my article and redirected it to his even though I created it first. Is that allowed? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, just to clarify this situation: I went to create this page on 23 August as Alexander Cvetković, as this is his name according to Soccerway and WorldFootball, two reputable sites. Once I had created the page, I went to create redirects at Alexander Cvetkovic, Alex Cvetković and Alex Cvetkovic, before realising a page had already been created, which I then redirected to the (presumably) correctly spelled article. @Das osmnezz: in future, when creating articles for people with names with accents, or names that could be shortened/lengthened, you must create redirects (in this case, just a simple page reading "#REDIRECT Alexander Cvetković"). If you had done that in this case, I would've realised that a page had already been created, and we could then have had a quick discussion regarding the "correct" spelling/accents, and gone from there. Thanks. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, take one of your created articles I have reviewed/corrected, and try to use that as a sample for future articles. Please remember this. Your articles are still poorly formatted. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bjorn Gugger

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Bjorn Gugger.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs to meet notability for living persons. More references are needed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rinor Nushi

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Rinor Nushi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

* Twitter is not an acceptable source
The Wayback Machine link is dead

Kindly supply more sources as per WP:SOURCES. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Murad Gerdi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Murad Gerdi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]