User talk:Dartslilly/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dartslilly. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Example
This page is an example of an archive of a talk page. If this was a real page, Old discussions would go here. This is not an actual archive page though, because this page is only an example. --Example (talk) 03:14, 19 January 2038 (UTC)
Belated Welcome!!
Hello, Dartslilly/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like it here! I apologize that I did not think to send you a welcome message when I first noticed you here.
Here are a few links for newcomers that I hope you'll find helpful:
Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:CITE, WP:V and WP:NPOV
How to edit a page; How to develop articles; Editing tutorial
Manual of Style; Writing better articles
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Editing by consensus – working well with other Wikipedians
If you'd like some help with editing or otherwise, you can sign up at the new users log, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me on my talk page.
It is a good idea to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the Talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it, to see if your proposed change has been discussed before. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the Talk page to see if others disagree with the approach.
Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the warm welcome! Dartslilly (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Dartslilly, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Dartslilly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC) |
July 2019
Discussion is open at the article's talk page |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. You are WP:EDIT WARring at Kismet (musical), where you reverted to your preferred version before building a WP:CONSENSUS to add this information to the article. I suggest that you revert your own edit and wait for a consensus to develop on the Talk page. Please read WP:EDIT WAR for more information. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ssilvers: This last comment was unnecessarily aggressive. I have already de-linked New York, fees and royalties only because you didn't like them. I don't want to step on any toes, I appreciate the work you have put into these articles before I arrived. I do not consider these common words, but I also do not think they are essential background information for this article, which is about a musical. Costumes, on the other hand, is a relevant link for an article about a theatrical production.Dartslilly (talk) 18:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
|
Trip hop
Hey again. I removed Mandalay from trip hop as they are not reliably sourced as such at the trip hop article or on the band's article page. Robvanvee 05:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Robvanvee: Oh no, I may have relied on the band's article. There are many sources for this available, but not all are easily accessible on Google Books. Does something like this still need a direct citation? Dartslilly (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, if like me and most other committed editors, you want only the highest quality articles on Wikipedia then yes, I can't overemphasize the importance of sourcing. Especially genre's! Do you need help adding sources? Robvanvee 09:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Robvanvee: Can Spotify be used as a source for genres? They say it has a "dream pop aesthetic" with "trip-hop loops"...Dartslilly (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- No. Also neither are explicitly called their respective genre's. "Aesthetic" and "loops" suggest they have those elements but it needs to state the genre categorically. I found the link we discussed at the Silverchair page here btw. Robvanvee 12:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Robvanvee: Can Spotify be used as a source for genres? They say it has a "dream pop aesthetic" with "trip-hop loops"...Dartslilly (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, if like me and most other committed editors, you want only the highest quality articles on Wikipedia then yes, I can't overemphasize the importance of sourcing. Especially genre's! Do you need help adding sources? Robvanvee 09:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Quds Mosque Hamburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Sedalia, Missouri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Joe Harris and Fines
- The Devil's Blood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Banking in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Muskogee
- Cross of Saint Peter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Motif
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
Hello, I'm SounderBruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seattle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please include a properly-formatted citation with a book page and title. For Featured articles like Seattle, higher-quality sources are needed to back up new claims. SounderBruce 06:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know I wasn't watching the article and almost missed this I'll review the link before editing that article again.Dartslilly (talk) 06:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Cinema of the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Béla Zsolt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Communist Hungary
- Sedalia, Missouri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Joe Harris
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring?
I want to follow up with you about this. How exactly do my edits at Europe Supported by Africa and America constitute edit warring? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 04:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps I was mistaken, it would be better to continue on the article talk page where I have started a new discussion. Dartslilly (talk) 05:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Article talk pages are for discussing issues that pertain to the article content. Discussing user conduct (as we are doing now) should be done at user talk pages. I'm just confused about why you thought it was appropriate to war warn me against "repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions" when I reverted your edit only once. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Nikolai Lopatnikoff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Snare
- Zelnik István Southeast Asian Gold Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Khmer
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Billy Bitzer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pathe
- Persian art (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lotus
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikolai Stepanov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Honeydew (secretion) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sinai
- Muskmelon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cucurbit
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
September 2019
September 2019
"Nu-goth" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nu-goth. Since you had some involvement with the Nu-goth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
"Pop-trap" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pop-trap. Since you had some involvement with the Pop-trap redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Coffey lawsuit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pledge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- William Andrew Archer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Chili and National Arboretum
- Nasrid dynasty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jaén
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Edit warring
You are encouraged to discuss any changes that are disputed, rather than edit warring as you have chosen. The choice is yours. SolarFlashLet's talk about it 18:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cinema of the Soviet Union, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kino and Nikolai Lebedev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Stereophonic sound § Common usage (Reverted?)
In common usage, a "stereo" is a two-channel sound reproduction system, and a "stereo recording" is a two-channel recording even though the etymology of the word stereo does not limit its definition to two channels. This is cause for much confusion, since five (or more)-channel home theater systems are not popularly described as "stereo".
"even though the etymology of the word stereo does not limit its definition to two channels." -I don't understand why this needs to be sourced as it only clarifies the existing statement. Also, the etymology given near the top of the page supports the statement and I've found no other etymology that negates it. Please explain. Quickfix333 (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- If it has never been discussed by any reliable source it should not be in the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, random facts or trivia. You should discuss these concerns on the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's self-evident that the etymology does not limit its definition to two channels. When I first read the preexisting paragraph, it took me some time to understand what it was getting at. I thought that my addition only clarified the point. I understand that Wikipedia is not for random facts or trivia, but you've offered no explanation as to why something that's self-evident needs to be sourced.Quickfix333 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- You should discuss your concerns on the article talk page, not here. Dartslilly (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's self-evident that the etymology does not limit its definition to two channels. When I first read the preexisting paragraph, it took me some time to understand what it was getting at. I thought that my addition only clarified the point. I understand that Wikipedia is not for random facts or trivia, but you've offered no explanation as to why something that's self-evident needs to be sourced.Quickfix333 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Cross linkage on Wakefield fraud pages
There is an existing page on the Lancet MMR autism fraud. Many of the details on the Andrew Wakefield page are duplicative and the lack of a cross linkage makes in difficult for users to find this information regarding the fraudulent items in the 1998 paper. Thus I am trying to cross-link to the more detailed page which now cites to the original literature.
I understand there have been problems with editing on the Wakefield page and it is semi-protected. I guess I would need some sort of approval to change this? Or perhaps you can approve the changes? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterNSteinmetz (talk • contribs) 21:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- @PeterNSteinmetz: I'm not involved with the article. You could ask at the talk page. We can't use Wikipedia articles as a cross-linked source so anything you wanted to add would have to be sourced in the article you were adding it to. Dartslilly (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Endcliffe Park
Why did you rollback my edit. Did you read https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1001502 ? Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_Brook The millpond, or dam as it is referred to locally, for Endcliffe Wheel mill at the east end of the Wood was adapted for bathing; the dam for Holmes Wheel mill, in the middle, for skating; and the dam for Nether Spur-Gear Wheel mill, at the west end, for waterfowl. Walks were created alongside the dams, and their outfalls modified into waterfalls and cascades. Are you engaging in some sort of vandalism ? I'm not going to restore my content. What's the point with people like you involved in Wikipedia. I was going to greatly expand (with cite notes) all articles on the Porter Valley Parks. 86.179.247.253 (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know which edit you are talking about. If you feel I've made a mistake, feel free to restore your edit or start a discussion on the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 00:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Endcliffe Park (again)
Only minutes ago (as ip user 86.179.247.253)I asked you why you reverted my edit of Endcliffe Park, the only text in the section on Ponds with a cite note. You responded by saying, I don't know which edit you are talking about. If you feel I've made a mistake, feel free to restore your edit or start a discussion on the article talk page. You then, very promptly archived my comments on your talk page. If you know how to archive an article then I think it unlikely you don't now how to view the Endcliffe Park: Revision history page. You don't know which edit I am talking about? Yeah! With people like you, making, then attempting to bury their mistakes I think it is time I stepped back from making edits to wikipedia. Congratulations! 2A00:23C6:3B83:EC00:94C7:D4F8:4277:59B4 (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- You were reverted because you were adding LINKSPAM to the article and self-reverting yourself and now you are ip hopping. [1]. I'm skeptical, but you are welcome to continue to making productive edits. I do advise you against yelling at good faith editors and patrollers. If you were reverted by a patroller there was probably a sound reason and you are free to voice your disagreement, as you are now, and restore your content if you feel it was in error.Dartslilly (talk) 00:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Constantinople
You've justified your reversion of Evliya Çelebi by claiming a need for citation at the talk page- without reviewing the extensive talk on the contested topic at the very location suggested! Wiki convention may be a great tool or a crude bludgeon - which that is depends entirely on us. Mavigogun (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- What you are calling "Wiki convention" are policies that have broad community consensus. Some "conventions" or community customs are optional, but WP:V and neutrality are fundamental to producing encyclopedic content. I believe this has broad support from the community of editors and reflects a community consensus. I hope this has helped answer some of your questions about our policies, please let me know if I can help with anything further.Dartslilly (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- You made no attempt to discus the issue on the talk page- despite citing a need for talk to justify your reversion. Yes, community consensus is essential to the function of the Wiki- but you are not attempting to employ that mechanism as intended, but, seemingly, as defensive bluster. I did not ask you a question about 'our' policy. You have been in no way helpful- instead, confrontational and combative, all under the veil of faux civility and overt condescension. Do better. Mavigogun (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
---
As well placed here:
Your recent editing history at Evliya Çelebi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mavigogun (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Constantinople
You've justified your reversion of Evliya Çelebi by claiming a need for citation at the talk page- without reviewing the extensive talk on the contested topic at the very location suggested! Wiki convention may be a great tool or a crude bludgeon - which that is depends entirely on us. Mavigogun (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- What you are calling "Wiki convention" are policies that have broad community consensus. Some "conventions" or community customs are optional, but WP:V and neutrality are fundamental to producing encyclopedic content. I believe this has broad support from the community of editors and reflects a community consensus. I hope this has helped answer some of your questions about our policies, please let me know if I can help with anything further.Dartslilly (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- You made no attempt to discus the issue on the talk page- despite citing a need for talk to justify your reversion. Yes, community consensus is essential to the function of the Wiki- but you are not attempting to employ that mechanism as intended, but, seemingly, as defensive bluster. I did not ask you a question about 'our' policy. You have been in no way helpful- instead, confrontational and combative, all under the veil of faux civility and overt condescension. Do better. Mavigogun (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
---
As well placed here:
Your recent editing history at Evliya Çelebi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mavigogun (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
Animations
Hi Dartslilly, on the dipole antenna page you recently removed the first and then the second animation. Did you perhaps intend to remove the first and third animations? The third animation is of a similar nature to the first, whereas the second was not obviously objectionable.catslash (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- They are the worst graphics I've seen anywhere on this project. Readers should be given the option to view these types of graphics. I worry that they may be damaging for readers who have vision problems. Dartslilly (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Broadcasting reform movement moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Broadcasting reform movement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- I was adding more sources to it now before you moved it, please move it back, I don't know how. Dartslilly (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Public broadcasting in the United States
Please don't just leave the full material stuck at Public_broadcasting#United_States - since you performed the copy part of the split, there's some expectation that you also clean up the origin. Based on cursory inspection, a summary paragraph plus {{Main}} template ought to do it? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for this comment, since it was a bold split (based on the proposal being unopposed), I wanted to open the discussion to input from editors who have been working on the article longer and if there are no objections I'm going to go ahead with the clean up. Dartslilly (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, other editors are more likely to chime in once they see something happening in the article, so I wouldn't quite depend on there being no objections yet :) But if you remove stuff now, it can always be undone in that case. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Assistance please
Hello can you please assist me to format the articles right? I'm still not good at it. 194.247.60.2 (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Before you publish your changes you can use the "Show preview" button in the edit window to review your changes to see if there are any citation or formatting errors. I would suggest making small, incremental changes if you are having problems with the markup, instead of big changes all at once, so it is easier for you to keep track or your changes and see where the errors are, or you could try the Visual Editor and see if that works better for you. Dartslilly (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Edited My Edit
On Roxanne, you reverted my edit, I’m not mad, just want to know why? AdvisoryOnMixer (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- It was an unsourced, grammatically incorrect addition to the lead section of the article. Dartslilly (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Zack Snyder edit
Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead was nominated for the Camera d' Or at 2004 Cannes Film Festival. I'm sorry for not providing source before.
It's on IMDb (extremely reliable and controlled source) https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0811583/awards?ref_=nm_awd
Santideis (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Santideis
- Please discuss article content at the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Reverted My Edit
Hello! I saw you reverted my edit on the Throne of Fire Wikipedia page. I understand that the former version was much more detailed, but since the summary has been described as "too long or excessively detailed," I thought that it should be cut down a bit. Were the changes I made not satisfactory?
Purplemoonsong (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please discuss article content at the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 16:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Constantinople was the name of the Ottoman capital until 1923- read more about the name-history here: Istanbul
Mavigogun (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- The content in our articles is based on WP:RS and must be neutral and verifiable. We don't accept Wikipedia articles as sources. I would be happy to answer any questions you have about our policies like WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:RS to the best of my ability but discussion about content would be better on the article talk page. Dartslilly (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Remove External Link
Hii Dartslilly, Recently you have removed my external from wordpress main body because you think that was not related to the content but the link i have made is completely realted to that content. Mohit Chaprana 17:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrmohit (talk • contribs)
@Mcrmohit: Did you read the policy that I posted on your user talk page? Dartslilly (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Yardbirds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howling Wolf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Kalashnikov Concern
Sorry about editing the Kalashnikov Concern page. I was trying to prove to my teacher that Wikipedia IS a reliable source and has good moderation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.174.188.202 (talk) 17:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I just wanted to suggest that you be a bit more verbose on your edit summaries for pending changes when you don't accept the change. The edits caught in pending changes are by newer editors who won't be familiar with common Wikipedia shorthand. For example, on this set of pending changes, you reverted it with the summary el. The new editors aren't going to know or understand that the edit wasn't approved because it contained external links in the body. Either more words in the edit summary or a link to the Wikipedia page that explains it would be more educational for these new editors. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Btw, I do see that you left explanatory messages on two of the editor's talk pages explaining, which is great, thank you! Schazjmd (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (December 2019 and January 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 12th issue issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests |
Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
I hope everyone is having a great year so far! --DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
- Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts now also shows the number of active users for each script. It will now be updated by a bot periodically.
- Twinkle's Morebits library added a new
Morebits.date
class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were usinggetUTCMonthName
orgetUTCMonthNameAbbrev
withDate
objects, those have been deprecated and should be updated. - User:SD0001/find-archived-section was made a gadget. You can enable it from your gadget preferences, in the Browsing section.
Hope everyone stays safe. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Limp Bizkit on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Yapperbot (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Black Sun (symbol) on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rupert Sheldrake on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lana Del Rey on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Game of Thrones title sequence on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Food and agriculture in Nazi Germany on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (May and June 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 16th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
If anyone else would like to contribute to future issues, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Broadcasting reform movement
Hello, Dartslilly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Broadcasting reform movement".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Margot Robbie on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stateless nation on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tucker Carlson on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Devi Sridhar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Political history of the United Kingdom (1945–present) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hanging Gardens of Babylon on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zhang Xueliang on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kamala Harris on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Black Is King on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Live PD: Roll Call on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chadwick Boseman on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (July and August 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 17th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
Stay safe --DannyS712 (talk) 19:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kiki Camarena on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Czech Republic on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shooting of Mark Duggan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andrew Hastie (politician) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Skyscraper on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abigail Savage on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Andy Ngo on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyberpunk 2077 on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wendy Carlos on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:To Pimp a Butterfly on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past three months (September, October, and November 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 18th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
- Twinkle has made a number of improvements, including using a change tag to identify actions made with it and automatically filing edit requests for protected XfD nominations.
- SD0001's shortdescs-in-category is now compatible with scripts modifying category listings, such as Equazcion's CatListMainTalkLinks
- GhostInTheMachine's TalkHelper2 is a newer version of their prior script, TalkHelper
- GeneralNotability's spihelper updated to 2.2.10, fixing a number of small bugs, automatically tagging globally locked socks as such in the sockpuppet template, and restoring open cases following an SPI history merge.
- Enterprisey's script-installer gadget has been updated with more internationalization of messages, as well as addition of a user preference,
window.scriptInstallerInstallTarget
to allow controlling where new scripts are to be installed.
- Enterprisey is looking for beta testers for their new section-watchlist user script. See the announcement.
- The second edition of the m:Coolest Tool Award will be taking place in December.
- Enterprisey's links-in-logs script has now been implemented as part of MediaWiki core, see gerrit:640761 and phab:T207562.
My apologies for the delayed issue. As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (December 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 19th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
- Voting in the m:Community Wishlist Survey 2021 is ongoing until December 21, 2020. There are 15 proposals in the "bots and gadgets" category that may be of interest.
- A script to help list discussions at WP:ANRFC (request)
- A script to allow undoing edits despite conflicting intermediary edits (request)
- ...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests
- The Watchlist Expiry feature worked on by the Community Tech team has been enabled on Wikipedia. For scripts that include watching or unwatching pages, developers may want to update their code to take advantage of the new functionality. See the documentation on mediawiki.org.
- As noted in the prior issue, Enterprisey's links-in-logs script has now been implemented as part of MediaWiki core. By my count, this is his third script that was replaced by implementing the code in MediaWiki core or an extension, along with link-section-edits and abusefilter-hide-search. Additionally, his reply-link script is being converted in part to mw:Extension:DiscussionTools. Are there any other scripts that might be worth integrating directly in MediaWiki? Thoughts would be welcome at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++.
As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, and happy holidays! --DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Season of the Witch (song) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (January 2021).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 20th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
- As a reminder, the legacy javascript globals (like accessing
wgPageName
without first assigning it a value or usingmw.config.get('wgPageName')
instead) are deprecated. If your user scripts make use of the globals, please update them to usemw.config
instead. Some global interface editors or local interface administrators may edit your user script to make these changes if you don't. See phab:T72470 for more.
- For people interested in creating user scripts or gadgets using TypeScript, a types-mediawiki package (GitHub, NPM) is now available that provides type definitions for the MediaWiki JS interface and the API.
- A GitHub organization has been created for hosting codebases of gadgets. Users who maintain gadgets using GitHub may choose to move their repos to this organization, to ensure continued maintenance by others even if the original maintainer becomes inactive.
- A script to ease reviewing Good Article nominations
- A script to help manage Z number templates
- ...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests
As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, including nominating a featured script, help is appreciated. Stay safe, and happy new year! --DannyS712 (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Isa Briones on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:MasterChef Australia (series 13) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Iranian Revolution on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct music venues
A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct music venues indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Dartslilly! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over a year.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{Frs user|Dartslilly|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)