User talk:DSN18

Speedy deletion nomination of "Lakshman Chadalavada"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Lakshman Chadalavada" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148 it's an alternate name for Telugu actor and producer known professionally as Laksh Chadalavada . That is why it was redirected. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the reason I tagged it for speedy deletion was because you had blanked the redirect shortly after creation. Also, if it had stayed a redirect, the quotation marks in the title would have caused it to be an implausible redirect and would have likely been deleted through WP:RfD. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 00:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148 Yes. I agree to your observation. and I agree it should be nominated for speedy deletion. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palak Purswani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palak Purswani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palak Purswani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CGGCA201 (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CGGCA201, There are enough verifiable or notable references to verify the content of the article which can prove it meets the criteria. If any content do not have notable reference it can have citation needed tag and do not require deletion. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jyoti Deshpande for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jyoti Deshpande is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyoti Deshpande until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CGGCA201 (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CGGCA201, The content and the article styling issues can be edited / resolved and does not require deletion. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DSN18 It's just not about the content. Can you please furnish a sources' analysis on the AfD discussion page? CGGCA201 (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CGGCA201, thank you for giving me good chance to place my view on article. will do give sources analysis on AFD discussion page as suggested. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 04:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Saharasri

Hello, DSN18, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username The9Man, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Saharasri, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saharasri.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|The9Man}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

- The9Man ^(Talk) 19:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The9Man I agree it's not ready and it can be moved to draft. DSN18 (talk) 03:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shamir Tandon

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DSN18 (talk) 11:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strivedi1

Hi - you invited Strivedi1 to edit a couple of articles. Please could you outline your connection to that person? Thanks. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Girth Summit, The user commented on my article for deletion discussion, I have invited other users too to contribute to my articles. DSN18 (talk) 15:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed that - in fact, almost all of their edits after their account was created were to AfD discussions about articles you had created, or to your articles themselves. That struck me as rather odd, especially since you invited them to edit more articles. Are you sure it isn't someone you know - perhaps a work colleague? Girth Summit _(blether) 19:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Girth Summit, Yes sure, i am not aware of who is this user. DSN18 (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Soniya Bansal

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Soniya Bansal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OMG 2 Movie Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OMG 2 Movie Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hansraj Raghuwanshi

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DSN18 (talk) 15:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dheera 2023 Movie First Look Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dheera 2023 Movie First Look Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Noesis Capital Advisors

Hello, DSN18, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username RPSkokie, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Noesis Capital Advisors, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noesis Capital Advisors.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|RPSkokie}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

RPSkokie (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @RPSkokie, I have put forward my views and references to verify notability on discussion page. Also, improving the article. I have also added an high court case filing reference also. DSN18 (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noesis Capital Advisors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noesis Capital Advisors, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noesis Capital Advisors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Manish Gupta (director)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Manish Gupta (director), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

hello Can we talk about our Wikipedia page Kartik Paliwal (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kartik Paliwal, Yes sure. Tell me. DSN18 (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit my Wikipedia Also... Dr Mehmood Khan Wikipedia redirect automatically can you check this Wikipedia

Share Your contact number also Kartik Paliwal (talk) 03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kartik Paliwal, you must pass notability grounds to be considered to be having wikipedia page. I searched for your name on google and could not find much notable references telling about you. If you can share few references which can verify your notability kindly share DSN18 (talk) 04:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia creation

Please check reference Kartik Paliwal (talk) 15:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DSN18. Thank you for your work on Hansraj Raghuwanshi. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please consider replacing gossip/routine sources with more reliable secondary sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 10:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Thank you for reviewing the article and for the suggestions. Would work on the suggestions and update the article with more reliable sources. DSN18 (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello DSN18. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Vinod Bhanushali, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DSN18. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DSN18|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GeneralNotability, I am not associated or have any connect with the person nether i am paid any compensation or i expect to be paid for creating the article, i have just created this article as i have interest in media and film industry and love to contribute in this area. I understand the Wikipedia standards and if incase while writing an article i have written anything which might conflict with wikipedia standards, i would love to get it corrected. With do respect to your observations, i would not edit or do any changes to this article until you revert to this. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 05:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DSN18. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Tweak India, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DSN18. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DSN18|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 00:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Glane23, I have just created this article as i have interest in media and film industry and love to contribute in this area. If in case while writing an article i have written anything which might conflict with Wikipedia standards, i would love to get it corrected. I am not been paid or compensated for this article or nether i expect to get paid. With do respect to your observations, i would not edit or do any changes to this article until you revert to this. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 02:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read, understand and respect the Wikipedia standards, i agree that while writing i would have made some edits which looks promotional or violates Wikipedia standards but i have not been paid or have any connections with them. In future, i would be very careful in editing or writing article so that i would not make such mistakes again, I understand why i have been blocked and so will be very careful while editing articles. kindly unblock and consider my request. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GeneralNotability, Kindly review my request to unblock the account. I have read and understand the Wikipedia rules and standards and i understand why account have been blocked, but its also true that i am not associated or paid for any edits. I will be very concern and very careful in future while i write an article or edit any article. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GeneralNotability, Kindly review my request for unblock. As its been long time i have not been able to contribute. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There appear to be discussions on this very talk page between you and other users who are asking you to create articles about them, here and here. My unsolicited advice is to follow the instructions in your declined block request. And admins are volunteers—you will have to be patient. Matuko (talk) 22:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kindly check the discussion i cant avoid others writing on my talk page. anyone can write on my talk page to discussion i have shared knowledge not created article for them. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 08:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DSN18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand and respect the Wikipedia standards, i agree that while writing i would have made some edits which looks promotional or violates Wikipedia standards but i have not been paid or have any connections with them. In future, i would be very careful in editing or writing article so that i would not make such mistakes again, I understand why i have been blocked and so will be very careful while editing articles. kindly unblock and consider my request. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 03:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're going to need more than your pledge to be careful, please specifically describe what will change about your editing in the future. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Ghe Double

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghe Double, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:DSN18/Saharasri

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:DSN18/Saharasri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ghe Double

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghe Double".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:DSN18/Saharasri

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saharasri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laksh Chadalavada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laksh Chadalavada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laksh Chadalavada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aronitz (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noesis Capital Advisors

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noesis Capital Advisors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hansraj Raghuwanshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hansraj Raghuwanshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hansraj Raghuwanshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saharasri

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saharasri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saharasri

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saharasri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Satyajit Padhye

A tag has been placed on Draft:Satyajit Padhye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:G11, unambiguous promotion; page creator is an "SEO specialist, indeffed in October 2023 for WP:UPE, no reasonable doubt that this is more of the same

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Makarand Narwekar

The article Makarand Narwekar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability standards. The cited sources aren't substantial coverage of him, and being a local councillor does not constitute notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Mukund moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Suresh Mukund. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laksh Chadalavada

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laksh Chadalavada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noesis Capital Advisors

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Noesis Capital Advisors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laksh Chadalavada

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Laksh Chadalavada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hansraj Raghuwanshi

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hansraj Raghuwanshi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Suresh Mukund

Hello, DSN18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suresh Mukund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Suresh Mukund

Hello, DSN18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Suresh Mukund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]