User talk:Coeusin

List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil

Hello, Coeusin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ambassadors are not inherently notable; also need to use reliable sources that are not WP:ROUTINE coverages.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coeusin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced content

Please do not remove sourced content without good reasoning - as done here FOX 52 ^talk! 16:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to leave that phrase you kept on the page. If you wish to put something there remake the tables you removed (without reasoning). Coeusin (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited StarFist series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lazarus Rising. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Contact

Hi there, I see you removed the redirect on this article, and another editor has put it back. Rather than trying to expand out any of the individual books, I suggest working on StarFist series first. If you end up with a big chunk on one of the books that doesn't have its own article, you can always spin the individual book back out later. This way you won't have any of your work redirected for lacking notability, so it will stay up on Wikipedia instead of being hidden behind a redirect. -- asilvering (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand your language; why would you say another user when you did it yourself? Frankly, this should have been discussed in the articles' talk pages, rather than done outright; this is an unconsulted deletion of articles, violating WP:DP blatantly.

I shall thus revert your changes made to the individual books' articles, so that in their talk pages arguments can be presented for/against their permanence.

Cheers. Coeusin (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said another user did it because they did; here is the diff: [1]. The action was a WP:BLAR, not a deletion, and does not violate any deletion policy. Arguments presented for or against an article's redirection or deletion don't tend to be made on the individual talk pages, but at WP:AFD. -- asilvering (talk) 00:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He did it for one book - you did it for five or six others. Thanks for explaining the policy for me though. Coeusin (talk) 12:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not [do] it for five or six others. The "it" here is putting a redirect back on an article after you'd removed it. You'd only removed the one, so there is no way I could have done it for five or six others. What happened is that I saw your rationale, which was that all the other books had articles, reasoned that they were all likely just as non-notable and undersourced, found that they were, and did a WP:BLAR on them also. Again, I really suggest developing the article on the series, and expanding back outwards only if sufficient material is found. -- asilvering (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is, with all due respect, a sophistry. What the other user did was turn an article which was once a redirect into a redirect again; you made articles which were never redirects into redirects. The end result is the same.

The seemingly likely conclusion to the AFD discussion will be weird. The latter books of the series will be kept as articles because they have easier to find sources. The earlier ones won't. I will have to add the information on the earlier books and the latter books to the main series article, which will clutter it (needlessly imo). Coeusin (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't at all see what is sophistic about saying I see you removed the redirect on this article, and another editor has put it back. and then being confused when you said I was being unclear and I had done this action myself. I wouldn't call the outcome of the AfD yet; for all we know, someone might find sources that merit a keep on one or all of those books. But developing a main article and then spinning out individual subtopics once they become unwieldy is perfectly normal - see WP:SPINOUT for some basic guidelines. You're absolutely welcome to do that. -- asilvering (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of First to Fight (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First to Fight (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First to Fight (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

asilvering (talk) 01:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starfist Blood Contact cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starfist Blood Contact cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Coeusin. Thank you for your work on Juan Crisóstomo Centurión. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article, thanks for putting it together!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 22:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Coeusin (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

StarFist: Force Recon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to StarFist: Force Recon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Goodreads , Penguin Random House listings and author's own books are not reliable sources. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 03:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Augusto Leverger, Baron of Melgaço

Hello, Coeusin,

Thank you for creating Augusto Leverger, Baron of Melgaço.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add more references to reliable sources to the unreferenced statements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Simongraham}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

simongraham (talk) 11:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil has been accepted

List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Honduran Army has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Honduran Army. Thanks! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 20:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Lea Giménez

Hi Coeusin, you added a birth date to the article Lea Giménez in this edit. I can't find a reference to this date in the sources used by the article so far (quick control-f search in each source). Can you provide an additional source or identify which existing source was used to add this birth date? Thanks, Shazback (talk) 02:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shazback, thanks for the heads up. You were right, I just thought one of the references in the article would specify her birth date since the Spanish article has it written as 1981. I couldn't find any conclusive information anywhere, but I added 1980-81 from the sources already in the article. I'll be more careful next time. Cheers, Coeusin (talk) 09:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for taking the time & for your work improving Wikipedia! Shazback (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Honduran Army (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Honduran Army and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Coeusin! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Honduran Army has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Honduran Army. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Timtrent, thanks for the suggestion! I still haven't gotten to that part, I want to see if I can find where the Spanish article got their info from and if it's a single reliable source I'll just cite it and keep it that way. If I can't find it, or it's a bad source, I'll probably spin it out like you said and try to remake it. Cheers, Coeusin (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've remade it from the sources I've found, and now that it's done I don't think it's deserving of its own article. While not the best equipment table ever, it's at least properly sourced. I looked at, for instance, the Nicaraguan Armed Forces article and, well, this is much better than that. I'll resubmit, but I'll still be glad to hear any other feedback you might have. (I regret having taken up this article in the first place - so hard to find proper sources on this) Coeusin (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paraguayan Freemasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Paraguayan Freemasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aliero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maurya Empire on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Maurya Empire Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! Just trying to help :) Coeusin (talk) 07:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]