User talk:Cinadon36/archive2

Kornetis

Hiya, can you mail me the Kornetis passage relevant to the RfC? czar 14:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

You 've got mail. Cinadon36 10:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Help me!

I would like to add some info about the fatalities of EOKA's struggle (as per two RS). I inserted the info, I was reverted and when I took it at the Talk Page (almost a month ago), nobody participates. Can anyone help me to resolve this issue without initiating an edit war? Cinadon36 10:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Have you directly asked the person who reverted your edit to comment? You can't force anyone to comment if they choose not to. You can use one of the various avenues of dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks 331dot, that was fast! Well, I asked him at the talk page to contribute his opinion, but I hadn't pinged him as he is a regular so I assumed he must be watchlisting the page. Anyway, I 've made another attempt to reach him, (I ve pinged him this time) [1] and we 'll see how it goes. Cinadon36 09:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of anarchism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of anarchism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Albert Camus

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Albert Camus has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Twofingered Typist you did a fine job once more! Cinadon36 12:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

History of Anarchism

Hello:

I've run through the article again for you and fixed the issues I found. You might want to consider converting the notes that are now in the Reference section to footnotes.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello, Cinadon36,

Thank you for helping out with the recent copyright violations at Holy Fire against a particularly persistent vandal who then branched out into sockpuppetry. The article is protected for a while but it would be great if you could add it to your watchlist. Again, thanks for reverting. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you @Liz: for your all your efforts to protect that article. I am watchlisting it already. Cinadon36 18:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandros Schinas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alexandros Schinas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Kaiser matias, Great! Cinadon36 06:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandros Schinas

The article Alexandros Schinas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alexandros Schinas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Bravo! czar 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Bravo to you too @Czar:! Your contribution, especially when dealing with heated discussions at the talk page was enormous and it served as a guidance on how to discuss at talks page. Αντικαθεστωτικός deserves credit as well, his efforts and AGF contra-arguments improved the article. Of course, last but not least, Levivich who took into consideration the points of each one of us and re-wrote the article from the scratch. So...congrats mates! Cinadon36 06:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

• I am not trying to defend my accidental rollback, since accidents cannot be defended, otherwise they would not be accidents. But I think WP:AGF was written for many good reasons. One of them would be to avoid putting twin question marks around the word :accident in edit-summaries. The other would be to avoid posing the question in an edit-summary where it would be difficult to reply. I detected my accidental rollback while my watchlist was loading and I actually rolled back my edit, but your fast revert did not give me the chance to successfully conclude my self-rollback. Dr. K. 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

No prob. Dr.K. (not pinging as apparently you are watchlisting the page and have made it clear elsewhere, that, in such cases, you believe pings are unnecessary) 06:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

New WikiProject Socialism membership system

Hello! I'm in the process of introducing a new membership system to WikiProject Socialism (designed as part of WikiProject X and adopted by a few other projects). The new system works by filling a form which creates a WikiProject Card. I'm manually creating WikiProject cards for current members. You can find and edit yours here. Any change to your WikiProject card will be automaticalle updated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism/Members. If you have any doubt, please, feel free to contact me by replying here using the {{re}} template. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Anarchism

Hi, what exactly were you referring to about my edit? I actually added the Citation needed template where there was no citation. If you're referring to the lead, as far as I know it should summarise the text and thus it isn't necessary to add sources. Either way, can you please help me find reliable sources to add in the page? I'm not an expert and I don't know how and where to find them, or even how to start and how to make sure that the source is actually reliable, because finding a source may be easy but find a source that is realiable is another thing; I found out about Google Scholar only now. What was wrong in adding to the lead anti-statist and libertarian? What was wrong in adding that another thing that distinguishes anarchism from all other ideologies, besides opposition to the state (which is also shared by other ideologies like communism), is opposition to authority and hirerachies (something unique to anarchism)? Indeed, it could be argued that anarchism is both the most consistent form of left-wing politics and the total antithesis of right-wing politics. Or adding As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy to clear why it's considered a far-left ideology? All anarchism is (libertarian) socialism, but not all socialism is anarchism, or even libertarian. Economically, communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, etc. are all different variants or flavors of (libertarian) socialism. Anarcho-capitalism isn't part of anarchism; it didn't even originate from it (all influences from so-called individualist anarchists were minor since Rothbard turned them upside down), but rather originated in the United States from European liberalism and is considerated New Right liberalism, or stateless liberalism, rather than anarchism. Free-market anarchism is actually part of anarchism because it's (libertarian) socialist. If a philosophy support undisputed, permanent or absentee private ownership of either land or industry, it cannot be considared anarchist or even socialist; as it would be a form of authority and hierarchy that deprive people without it of their liberty. Anarcho-capitalism also support wage slavery, one hierarchy all anarchists have fought against. This is not to be confused with wage labour, which certain anarchists like collectivists and individualist anarchists like Tucker support; they support wage labour not because it's "voluntary" (it cannot be voluntary in a capitalist society), but because in their philosophy it would guarantee the worker the full value of his or her labour. Either way, any property rights that isn't based on possession and use, but rather on absenteeism and receive income by the simple virtue of "owning" something, cannot be considered anarchist. I also removed the Libertarianism and Revolution sidebar simply because they were disruptiving the images below, but they could be added in another sections, for instance the Libertarian one in the Schools of thought and Revolution on anarchists thought about revolution, violence, pacifism, etc. I also re-ordered alphabetically the Post-classical and contemporany anarchism section because it didn't seem to be ordered in any meaningful and I moved anarcho-capitalism in a sub-section like Anarcha-feminism. Thank you for the attention.--87.17.95.218 (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. Let's keep the conversation in one place. [2] Cinadon36 18:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your question at Help desk

That was a good question. I've not come across any Wikipedia policies or guidelines that address the issue of how to decide whether a bit of information (verified) should be included in an article or not. We have What Wikipedia is not, but that's more at the article level. If you want to hear from other editors how they make that call, you might want to try starting a discussion at Village Pump (miscellaneous). You won't get The Answer (it will be, it depends), but you might hear people's different views and approaches that you can use to help you form your own approach to it. Schazjmd (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Schazjmd! I 'd re-post it at the Village Pump and I let you know! Cheers! [3] Cinadon36 08:46, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Material

Re your reply on the Anarchism in Greece page, how can I share material about Drakoulis with you?

Well, what I do is I take photos of a few pages with my phone, I upload them to dropbox and I sent the url-link to the email account of the fellow wikipedian.Cinadon36 13:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cinadon36. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akritas plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taksim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eleni Antoniadou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eleni Antoniadou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 08:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eleni Antoniadou

Hello, Cinadon36,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Eleni Antoniadou, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

@Onel5969: thanks for letting know but cant find the article on deletion log. Cheers, Cinadon36 23:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please have a look

Here.Αντικαθεστωτικός (talk) 11:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

History of Anarchism

Hello:

I've received your request to look over the article History of Anarchism. I am in the middle of a copy edit of a 10,000+ word article and will not be able to get to it for a couple of days.

It would be helpful if you could indicate the specific areas you want me to go through and look at or the specific issues that are preventing this from passing.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

It was a misunderstanding, it has been taken care of. Thanks for your prompt reply Twofingered Typist, it is also nice knowing that there is a helping hand near by. Cinadon36 08:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of anarchism

The article History of anarchism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:History of anarchism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

		The Anarchist Barnstar
		for your labor on history of anarchism and its six-month review! Well done! czar 04:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Michel Gallimard moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michel Gallimard, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

BLP’s With No Sources

Hey I have moved an article of yours which appeared to be a BLP back to your draftspace as it had no citations none whatsoever as BLP’s are apparently very delicate & it is customary to include some citations to substantiate claims made in the article. Celestina007 (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Celestina007 Thanks for the notice. I thought it was ok, since it is translated from another WP, I supposed the notability issue was settled. I have translated some other articles as well the past hour, creating stubs, you might want to take a look. Sorry for the inconvenience. I 'll see what I can do to fix it. Cinadon36 22:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Aziz Kessous moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aziz Kessous, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Cinadon36 leave any questions in my talk page so I can see it faster & explain certain things to you.Celestina007 (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

ok.Cinadon36 23:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Jean de Boë moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jean de Boë, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Révolte dans les Asturies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Révolte dans les Asturies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 05:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Draftification of translations

Hello Cinadon36 -- I see you are experiencing a flood of moves to draft of articles that you have partially translated from the French wiki. Could I suggest that (1) you put at least one source from the original article into your translation; and (2) you link the French article using "add links" under "languages" in the left bar. That way everyone can easily refer to the original and verify that the topic appears notable and references are available. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes, will do, thanks for the tip Espresso Addict. Cinadon36 07:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

an additional hint from my own experience : move not just one source, move all the sources, even though you can not immediately do the work of converting the format. Others might help. Some source formats in the frWP can needsubstantial work , such as their reliance upon general links to library catalogs where we would give specific titles and ISBNs

History of anarchism has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Cinadon36. History of anarchism, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Merci dear bot. Cinadon36 12:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anarchism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Schinas FA?

Hi Cinadon. Would you be interested in co-noming Alexandros Schinas for FA with me? Levivich 06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

@Levivich: Hi there! I 'd love to! Let me know when and how. Cinadon36 07:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Great! It's been a while since the last time I looked at this article. Over the next day or so I was going to check it the article against the FA criteria. WP:FAC says to get a mentor. I wonder if czar might be available/interested to mentor us? – Levivich 07:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cin. FYI, I made a few tweaks to the article, but other than those, I didn't see much to change. Czar hasn't edited since I pinged, so maybe we should wait a while until they get a chance to respond. Though I think the article is ready to nominate, I think we should get somebody who has FA experience to look it over before it's nominated. What do you think? Levivich 22:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I responded on on the talk page czar 03:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for History of anarchism

On 11 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article History of anarchism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1939 defeat of Republican Spain in the Spanish Civil War marked the end of the "classical era" of the history of anarchism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/History of anarchism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, History of anarchism), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Coronavirus disease

Hi, you added this as a citation:

Vetter & Meyer 2020, p. 1: The estimated overall case fatality rate is around 2% but outside of Hubei province the figure is around 0.05 or less, not so far from the mortality observed with seasonal influenza Harv error: link from CITEREFVetterMeyer2020 doesn't point to any citation.

We need the full citation here please.Graham Beards (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Yeap, sorry about that. Cinadon36 17:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Cinadon-- the coronavirus in Albania article needs a f* ton of work. I'm gonna do some. Will drop sources on the tp. Wanna hop over there and leave the drama boards in the past? Cheers --Calthinus (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite @Calthinus:, but beside the drama board I have been editing COVID-19, and I have lot of of work to do over there. Though I will be more than happy to help in small areas in coronovirus and countries of Balkans- as you might know already, I love Balkans. Cinadon36 18:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Absolutely. That place was turning more toxic than Qom province, Iran. Except Iran has a government that is now at least doing something about toxicity -- unlike Wikipedia. I wanted you out of it. --Calthinus (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks mate, I know what you are talking about. ;) Cinadon36 19:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coronavirus disease 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

We all make mistakes. But know that there are many who really appreciate your work. I read the anarchism articles too :). Calthinus (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

How you knew that I adore Baklava? Thanks Calthinus! Cinadon36 19:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

All people with functioning taste adore Baklava :) --Calthinus (talk) 20:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification regarding community-authorised general sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MrClog (talk) 22:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)