User talk:Cece GFI

This is Cece GFI's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korty eo (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blogs, Linkedin.com and YouTube are not generally reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korty eo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cece GFI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yinka draft (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, take a look at WP:INHERIT, because "His imprints have also been worn by South African model, Bonang Matheba, Tony Elumelu, Asake, Kehlani, Bonang Matheba," does not make him notable. This is WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yinka draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review my block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cece GFI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.215.15.119. Place any further information here. Cece GFI (talk) 11:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2023

Hello Cece GFI. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cece GFI. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cece GFI|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331 dot. No I am not receiving any compensation for the article or editing the draft. I have whatsoever no contact with the person whom I have written about neither anyone related to the person. In the case that I am ever paid to edit an article in the future, I will disclose it as advised by Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you. Cece GFI (talk) 09:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olayinka Ashogbon has been accepted

Olayinka Ashogbon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So happy to have my first Wikipedia article accepted. I will be making ,ore contributions now that I am conversant with the guidelines Cece GFI (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I had taken over the major contribution of this article when I joined Wikipedia and was informed that it was a stub account that needed work. I'm sorry I didn't reach to you sooner but at the time you were deemed as blocked and I couldn't raise a conversation on your talk page. As i began working on it, I made some mistakes along the way and the prevalent issue was the UPE tag; no matter how I explained it, it fell to deaf ears, and now despite my efforts because I feel its unfair for him to suffer because I'm the overzealous contributor, it has been nominated for deletion. the UPE tag comes from just one editor in particular, who claims that at the genesis of the article itself you were a possible UPE, which I think he believes that any other contribution post that is an automatic UPE/COI. I would love your take or advice on this. This is all so humiliating and embarrassing. I'm pretty sure he'll say me reaching out to you is canvassing and meat puppeting but you are the original author. Anoghena Okoyomoh (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It IS canvassing, and the UPE tag actually referred to Cece GFI, not you, but you never bothered to ask about that. As Cece GFI was using an open proxy right from the start of their editing career (on that account, anyway) it seems very likely that account was being operated by someone who had used a previous account and gotten blocked, and was block evading by using the proxy. Once caught, that account went dormant. I doubt you'll see an answer here from them. Fred Zepelin (talk) 23:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm this is interesting, as the tag always happened after my edit, I had just assumed it was directed at me.... my bad. I kept looking at your reason for the tag and your questions directed at me when trying to decipher if I'm a UPE that I never thought to ask about the history prior to me becoming a contributor. Thank you so much Fred for the new perspective and insight, I will note same for future endeavours.

Additionally, it wasn't my intention to Canvass and I noticed this editor has as well created and contributed to new articles post the above subject-matter article, didn't know they were dormant. That being said I'll go through WP:CANVASS again to get fully antiquated with the concept.

Thank you for your concern and attention to this matter.

Kind regards, Anoghena Okoyomoh (talk) 06:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fred. I appreciate your contributions. However, Cece GFi has been my first and only account on Wikipedia. Yinka Ash was the first article I ever edited. My IP keeps getting blocked for reasons unbeknownst to me. However, I do not appreciate the assumptions made about my integrity as a Wikipedia editor Cece GFI (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anoghena Okoyomoh. I appreciate you reaching out. Over the duration of your contributions to the Yinka article, I felt you were taking a direction that was not necessarily in line with Wikipedia's guidelines which I did not appreciate. I however chose to watch what you do without raising concerns. I am not surprised that the article has been nominated for deletion, so what do you suggest moving forward? Cece GFI (talk) 12:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cece GFI,

I'm going to vote "keep" in the deletion discussion and state why the article should not be punished because of me. And then I am going to quit, I would have greatly appreciated your concerns had you raised it, but I understand you not doing so, if you experienced what I experienced you probably just chose to wash your hands of it and move on, that's where I am at right now. I read your other articles they were good. But I'm resigned, I'm out of my depth and I can't keep convincing persons who don't wanna listen it's too exhausting. And I'm tired of being called a fraud; I started this battle because I wanted to prove that I am not what they say I am; but even I have my limit.

The weird thing was, the final edited version was really good, the one that other parties had edited and made better, I failed, it's life, sometimes you fight and sometimes you quit, so I'll see the deletion process through and then I'll leave.

oh and sorry for messing up your original work and about your IP being blocked, that must be far more annoying than what I'm facing.

Kind regards, Anoghena Okoyomoh (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of women

Hi there, Cece GFI. I see you have now written three informative biographies of women. If you intend to continue along this lines, you might be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yinka Ash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yinka Ash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yinka Ash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 05:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Korty eo

Hello, Cece GFI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Korty eo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jayda Cheaves Draft

Hello, Cece GFI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jayda Cheaves Draft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jayda Cheaves Draft

Hello, Cece GFI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayda Cheaves Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cece GFI. Thank you for your work on Lonely at the Top (Asake song). Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Korty eo (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Korty eo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of H art The Band

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on H art The Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H art The Band moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to H art The Band. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Corteiz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel. Hello. Noted. However, kindly enlighten me what about the article does not use Wikipedia writing tone. I have revised the article multiple times and even read other articles discussing fashion brands. I am conversant with Wikipedia guidelines and do not deviate from any of them. I have published multiple articles and I have never faced a similar problem. Kindly advice Cece GFI (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It reads like a magazine article at the moment, with phrases like "exclusive subculture", "gained popularity", "created a buzz", etc. I can clean it up myself if you like, when I get back to my laptop. Wikishovel (talk) 14:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikishovelOkay. Noted. I can ,Ake the edits mentioned and you can check to see if there are any other needed corrections. Thank you Cece GFI (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikishovelHello. I made some changes that you highlighted. But can you look at it and make any other changes needed. Thank you Cece GFI (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good, thanks! I've removed the template. Wikishovel (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox 9 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sandbox 9, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt hello. I have still not published it. The sandbox is my working space. I have published multiple articles on Wikipedia and used the sandbox as my work space. Kindly what is different about this case? I do not want to work on it from the draft space. Thank you. Cece GFI (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugene Mbugua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram. Hello. I would want to know what edits did not appear constructive. Thank you Cece GFI (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Posting your sandboxes in the mainspace again and again and again. Fram (talk) 10:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FramOkay. Understood. Assuming I want to create a new Wikipedia page without using Article Wizard, what would you suggest I use? Cece GFI (talk) 11:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you did here is OK, but what's not OK is creating Cece_GFI/Sandbox_13 without the "User:" part. Fram (talk) 12:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Understood. Thank you so much for the correction and guidance Cece GFI (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bounce Back Technologies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bounce Back Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bounce Back Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Niaz Support moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Niaz Support. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saqib. I appreciate the correction. I will be working further on the article Cece GFI (talk) 12:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Cece GFI. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Niaz Support, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cece GFI. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cece GFI|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saqib. I am not receiving compensation for the page. I appreciate the guidance on what to do in the case I am receiving any form of compensation for Wikipedia pages and edits. Thank you. Cece GFI (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Niaz Support.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Niaz Support.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niaz Support (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niaz Support and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal links

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Henrie Kwushue, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Using external links in the body of the article. scope_creep^Talk 07:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henrie Kwushue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henrie Kwushue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrie Kwushue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sandbox 9

Hello, Cece GFI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandbox 9, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:H art The Band

Hello, Cece GFI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:H art The Band, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandbox 9

Hello, Cece GFI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sandbox 9".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]