User talk:Brain Rodeo

Welcome

Hello, Spottacus, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 23:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tenny

I have been reading your edits to Tenney, Minnesota and find it quite interesting. Are you one of the six residents? -Ravedave ^{(Adopt a State)} 16:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a resident, although I will soon own a couple of vacant lots in town. I live in Fargo, ND with my wife and three kids. Many people have lake cabins or vacation properties - I can't afford those luxuries now, but I bring my family to Tenney about twice a month in the summer for exploring, yardwork, and bonfires. Someday soon I'll have a lot more disposable income, but for now my hobby is visiting Tenney, exploring, helping the folks who live there with upkeep and maintenance, and improving the Tenney page here at Wikipedia. If you're local we could sure use some help in the spring with a big cleanup project at the old Tenney church (now city hall). Let me know if you're interested! Spottacus 07:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I have never heard of Tenney until I stumbled across it. I'm in Shakopee, Minnesota. If you are interested in Minnesota articles you should join out Wikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota. There are some pretty dedicated people there. We recently got Minnesota and Climate of Minnesota to featured status, and History of Minnesota is up for it now, check it out. -Ravedave ^{(Adopt a State)} 02:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to remind you to keep the article encyclopedic. The section you added here is decidedly not. -Ravedave ^{(Adopt a State)} 20:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you're right, and I've edited the section in question. It may not be salvageable, but it seems like a courtesy that I owe to the folks in Tenney, since vandalism is a real problem for them. And if the articles I wrote for Wikipedia and Wikitravel get them any more slackjawed drivethroughs, then they may experience more vandalism as well. Spottacus 23:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good call on deleting the "Exploration" section altogether. I probably would have done it myself in the next few days. Now I need your advice on citing my source for most of the historical information in the Tenney article. The majority of it comes from an unpublished, uncredited booklet that was distributed at the city's centennial celebration in 1985. How in the world do I cite a source like that? Or can I at all? Secondly, I rely on the US Census Bureau for the statistics on Tenney's declining population. Is it enough to mention in the text that the stats are from the Census, which is well documented information in the public domain, or do I need to be more specific and provide a link to the Census Bureau's historical data website, or do I need to be even more specific and provide a link to the pdf download page for the specific census year referenced? (This gets very tedious after a while). Let me know what you think.Spottacus 14:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the matter of your article

The article is indeed written like an advertisement, though not blatenly obvious. Even if you don't think that it is, the article doesn't follow Wikipedia formatting guidelines. A quick rewrite can easily solve the problem. Have a nice day! (or night, depending on your time zone ;) ) --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 01:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC) No, it's written as a stub. It doesn't extol a company's virtues or solicit business, nor would advertising benefit this company in any case. A little constructive criticism would be welcome, but open-ended advice like "a quick rewrite can easily solve the problem" is useless if I don't know what the problem is, and so far the problem has not been defined. Any thoughts?Spottacus 01:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mountains

Do you have references for Sawtooth Mountains (Minnesota) or Misquah Hills articles? I looked around when I created the Eagle Mountain (Minnesota) page, but I couldn't find anything. -Ravedave 18:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dave, I just did a Google search. The info on the Misquah Hills came from http://www.rook.org/earl/bwca/lists/glossary/m.html and the article on the Sawtooths came mostly from memory. The Sawtooths is from some time ago, and I couldn't even tell you whether I did any research or just keyed in what I already knew for sure.Spottacus 19:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the Misquah Hills and the Sawtooths considered separate ranges? I thought that the Misquahs were inland and the Sawtooths were on the lakeshore. Kablammo 21:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm prepared to be proved wrong, but I believe that Warren Upham, the state geologist who wrote the great reference book "Minnesota Place Names," described Minnesota as having only one mountain range, and questioning the validity of describing the Sawtooths as mountains. That would mean that either the Misquah Hills are part of the Sawtooths, or they are a separate feature, but not mountains. Since they're part of the same geologic feature, and considering their close proximity, I've considered them to be a part of the Sawtooths but with their own geographical and political delineation. Spottacus 22:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I doubt that either range would be considered mountains by most residents of Alpine regions. Undoubtedly the Sawtooth and Misquah share the same geology, but without a source (whether Upham or someone else) say that one is part of the other, or that they are the same, it might be best not to assert that. I'll do a little digging myself with the meagre print resources available to me. Thanks for creating these articles; we need more articles on the features of Northeast Minnesota. Kablammo 22:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not being an expert myself, I think the best thing I can do is defer to a geologic authority. Upham is the only such person I've found who makes any kind of statement on the subject, although his original reference book was published around 1920 or earlier and the entire region may not have been surveyed by then. Make whatever adjustments you deem necessary, I'm agreeable. Spottacus 22:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On further review, I've determined that Upham didn't consider the Misquah Hills to be a part of the Sawtooth Mountains. In his entry on the mountains of Cook County, Minnesota Upham referred to Carlton Peak as the highest summit of the Sawtooths, and Eagle Mountain is 500 feet higher than Carlton. Later he refers to the Misquah Hills as an "east to west range," and doesn't mention the Sawtooths. So you were clearly right, and I'm making edits to that effect. Nice work on the Duluth Complex article, by the way. Short and sweet and well documented. Spottacus 03:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wrote a brief article on Palisade Head which perhaps could be referred to or linked in the pieces you wrote. I'm not sure if it considered one of the Sawtooths or if it is an anamoly, but it seems to be part of the Duluth Complex. I look forward to working with you on these articles. Kablammo 23:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I the Sawtooths article to your Palisade Head article. I liked the photo in the Palisade Head article so well I downloaded it and now I'm using it for wallpaper. Spottacus 20:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The photo (which is not mine) has some visible spots or artifacts in it-- I downloaded it myself and cleaned it up but I haven't yet figured out how to upload it to Wikipedia to use in place of the one now there. Incidentally, I found a source (Ojakangas) which says the the Sawtooths are east of Palisade Head, so apparently it may not be considered to be one of them-- I'll confirm that again next time I check the source. Kablammo 20:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hills or Mountains?

The Uncategorized tag has been placed on a few of your contributions. There does not yet seem to be a category for Hills of Minnesota or for Mountains of Minnesota (although there is one for Rock formations in Minnesota). It probably is time to create one. I have a hard time calling them mountains; what do you think? Kablammo 23:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There already is a cat - Category:Mountains of Minnesota -Ravedave 01:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as they're big hills that rise above the surrounding country, I'd call them mountains. I think to some degree the distinction between hills and mountains has to be relative and is somewhat subjective. Incidentally, are there also categories for hills and bluffs? Spottacus 15:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bluffs may fit under Category:Rock formations in Minnesota. On the question of hills vs. mountains, the wikipedia articles on them mention some British usage with the line between them set at 1000 or 2000' above sea level-- a definition which would make a mountain out of the entire state of Colorado. I suppose that if a hill is referred to as a mountain, it is not up to us to redefine it, so the Mountains of Minnesota is the category that should be added to any article which refers to a Minnesota "mountain". Kablammo 16:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bluffs have a somewhat different geological meaning--the term is usually used to mean sedimentary rock shelves with sides worn down by rivers. Barn Bluff in Red Wing, MN, along the Mississippi would be an example. Different geologists and geographers form different countries use the term mountains to mean different things, but the most standard geological term, and one which differentiates mountains from bluffs, applies to peaks generated by orogenic activity, or Orogeny. The Misquahs and Sawteeth both fit this bill, both according to Raisz and Ojakangas (and most likely any other geologist who has identified rock samples in or from this area--though these two are probably some of the best published and most readable authorities on Minnesota geology). As part of the Duluth Complex, they are also part of the Laurentian Shield, the precambrian super-range that includes the smaller ranges of the Misquahs and Sawteeth in Minnesota, the Penokee Range in Wisconsin, the Gogebic, Porcupine, and Huron Mountains in Michigan, Ishpantina Ridge, Mt. McKay and the Norwesters, and the Killarney Peaks in Ontario, The Laurentian Mountains and Gatineau Hills in Quebec, The Torngat Mountains in Labrador, and the Adirondack Mountains in New York. It might be an idea for Wikipedia to develop a geological category: "Mountain Ranges of the Laurentian Shield" or "Mountain Ranges of the Canadian Shield" in which all of these can fit. I would be happy to write any articles for this not yet written. As far as local references to "mountains," "hills," or whatever, in the Western United States 300 feet of topographic prominence is usually the standard of differentiating a mountain from whatever surrounds it--usually other mountains or foothills. In the Eastern US, using the Catskill Mountains as an example, locals tend to define individual mountains as having 200 feet of prominence. I think either category could serve the Misquahs, probably also most of the Sawteeth. But as some geographers joke: if the locals call it a mountain, whatever it is, one approach is to be nice and just agree with those nice folks, smiling and nodding if necessary.Geograph66n 21:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I favor Mountain Ranges of the Laurentian Shield and would love to help in any way I can. Let me know if you decide to spearhead such a project. Brain Rodeo 00:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brain Rodeo; this sounds great to me. I favor Mountain Ranges of the Laurentian Shield also. Thanks much for your offer of help. I'm right in the thick of paper/exam-grading at the moment, but I'd love to start work on this when the semester ends in December. I really enjoyed your article on the Leaf Hills Moraines. Hopefully I'll get to visit them one of these days.Geograph66n 22:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, although I can't take much credit for the Leaf Hills Moraines article. It was a very good collaborative effort with several significant contributors. I'm afraid that for all my enthusiasm I'm not very qualified for articles of a geological nature, but as always I'm very willing to try. Brain Rodeo 22:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

Dunno what to tell you about the Duluth complex pics. I am not sure the Minnesota Geological Society gives away much work. Another complication might be that it is owned by the MGS and not the author. You could start with the email address on the main page [1] and see if you can get the author's name. As for the other pictures you may want to check out this page, Wikipedia:Example_requests_for_permission, it gives examples of how to request permissions for pictures. Good luck, tell me what happens. -Ravedave 03:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

City

Looks like Tenny has a rival: Bear Head Lake, Minnesota :) -Ravedave 04:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes and no. If Bear Head Lake is an unorganized territory, that means that it's just a patch of land with no municipal government. So it might as well be a farm field or an island in a swamp. Bear Head Lake, you just got served! Spottacus 04:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenney Fire Hall

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Tenney Fire Hall, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikitravel.org/en/Tenney. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaf Mountains

You seem to have access to some good geography references. Do any of them say anything about the Leaf Mountains? They are prominently mentioned in my primary source for Red River Trails and perhaps they merit an article. Kablammo 23:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have guessed, I was hoping you's say that! If you do a stub I can add some material from the Gilman book on the Red River trails, which describes the area pre-settlement. Thanks. Kablammo 00:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great job-- I'll add some sources and text on geology and history. Due to other commitments (and nice weather) it may take me a couple of days to do more than dabble. Kablammo 14:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I might be done now. (Never say never.) Thanks for setting these up.

On another matter, see this suggestion: [2] To tell the truth, I'd do it-- and take a look at the Leaf Mountains and Inspiration Peak on the way, and catch Traverse Gap on the way there or back.

Regards, Kablammo 18:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think we should change name of article to just Leaf Hills, with Leaf Hills Moraines being a redirect? Leaf Hills may be a more common name.
I responded to your comment on my talk page. To keep threads together, I'll respond to your inquiries on my talk page, and watch yours for responses to mine, if that's OK.
There does not seem to be a lot of interest in a gathering even in the Twin Cities, much less a hamlet which makes Lake Woebegon look metropolitan. I nevertheless would be interested even in a small group if we could entice a few others -- perhaps CJLippert would come. When do leaves peak out on the prairie? (Oh, that's right-- you don't have trees. I'd have to catch them on the way.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kablammo (talk • contribs) 12:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see...

I would be okay with that, although I think it would be even better to have Leaf Hills redirect to the article as currently titled.
We'll do as you suggested.
I have a wife and three little boys, and my boys love to go to Tenney to run wild and have picnics and bonfires. In addition, the city owns a building called the "Social Hall," which is used for parties and events. I really enjoy having parties and picnics, and would love to host as many people as might choose to visit - whoever they are. Spottacus 14:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Someone was talking about me... I felt that unexplained tickle in my psyche for the past week, and wasn't sure why. BTW. WCCO-TV was saying that there are 2 areas where the leaves have 50% turned; one of those areas appeared on TV as the Leaf Mountains. Otherwise, in about 3 weeks, the Iskigamizigan area of the zaagajiwi-neyaashi ("Sugaring-grounds" of Shaw-Bosh-Kung Point) of Mille Lacs Lake will be changing colours here. CJLippert 18:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another name question . . .

. . . regarding "Blue Earth".[3] Can you help? Kablammo 23:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Town team baseball

FYI, I'm proposing merging all of the town team baseball articles into one. See the convo here. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 20:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider taking the teams listed here and making an article to the effect of List of Town Team Baseball teams in Minnesota, rather than let them idle on that talk page. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 05:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very reasonable suggestion. It would be a list of leagues in Minnesota, rather than a list of teams. I might do it, if I can figure out the proper way to configure a list. I'm a little behind the curve when it comes to formatting issues. Spottacus 07:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking of changing my user name

I'm thinking I'd like to change my user name for personal reasons, namely that it's also used by another family member in a different context (and has been for some time), and I want to avoid confusion and conflicts. I'm asking friends and acquaintances to share their wisdom with me. The following issues are bothering me:

Procedurally, is there anything I should do other than just click "move" and do it?
Will my past edits be adjusted to show the new name, or will the old one remain and merely redirect to the new one?
Will other users think there's something shady going on?
Is there a way for me to notify others that I'm doing so? (I think probably not)

I want to consult with those who I've met and worked with through Wikipedia. Please leave your thoughts and ideas here. Spottacus 01:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this will answer your Qs: Wikipedia:Changing_username I would personally go for it and put a note on your new user pages saying "Formerly known as Spottacus". You could also put something in your signature mentioning your old name. -Ravedave 02:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox (boxing)

This seems to be a duplicate of Orthodox stance. Is there some good reason why it should not be merged/redirected? Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss it at the article's talk page.Brain Rodeo 14:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vintagekits can't edit there for the moment. Best to use his talk page. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup RSVP

Minnesota Meetup

Sunday, 2007-10-07, 1:00 p.m. (13:00)
Pracna on Main
117 Main SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Map

Please pass this on! RSVP here.

Spam delivered by -Susanlesch 15:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hope to meet you somewhere else some other time. -Susanlesch 15:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. I live too far away for a meetup to be practical, but I've discussed a meetup in my neck of the prairie with Kablammo.Brain Rodeo 16:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Larry Givens

An editor has nominated Larry Givens, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Givens and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up quicker

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up quicker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up quicker. скоморохъ 06:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cedar

The problem with the article as it is now is that it looks, until the end, like it's its own community. Official existence (or lack thereof), you know, is a big thing with US geography articles, so it needs to be emphasised that this is not its own community, not something out in the township. I'm editing again, seeking this time to solve problems without restoring the ones you believe I caused with the first one. Nyttend (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Scandals in sports

Category:Scandals in sports, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panama Lewis page fraud by wiki against Aaron Pryor

The piece on Panama Lewis is a fraud against Aaron Pryor. Did you write this ? Aaron Pryor won the first fight against Alexis Arguello from start to finish. The fight was not even close. Have you actually watched the fight ? The page appears full of undocumented Point Of View content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnShocked (talk • contribs) 03:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=================================================================

=========================================================

Why are you Brain Rodeo fighting to perpetuate this slander against Aaron Pryor ? Why not let the truth stand, late in arriving as it is ? Where is the text you deleted which I wrote, and what are you claiming is in that text which is not acceptable. I documented what I stated in that piece with the facts: the tape of the fight itself. What could possibly be wrong with that ? (also, what is the official method for sending a Wiki editor, such as yourself, a message ?)

=========================

As I have stated, citing truthful statements about Pryor-Arguello-1 by boxing writers at that time is difficult, because of the promotion campaign pro-Arguello, anti-Pryor which Bob Arum had generated at the time. I do not know of a single boxing writer who told the truth about this fight.

And that is a big part of the reason why boxing fans like me stopped reading boxing writers and eventually lost interest in the sport, and ultimately why boxing is dying as a viable sport right now. Finding the accurate quote you state is required is simply not a likely development. Most people writing today about this fight, simply have not seen the fight.

Note references to a "black bottle" (it was transparent plastic) and the writer who wrote that wiki piece said that it was after the 12th round, when it was after the 13th, which I corrected. He simply had not watched the fight. What is the value of someone claiming a quote of someone else, when the fight tape is available ?

==========================

===========================================================

Speedy deletion of Antonio Johnson (boxer)

A tag has been placed on Antonio Johnson (boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Deletion is called for here. This boxer is a local fighter who has not participated in any notable amateur teams, nor has he fought for or wn any notable or recognized championships. Fails WP:ATHLETE. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Allen Litzau

A tag has been placed on Allen Litzau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same issues as with Johnson above. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better, and enough for me to remove the speedy delete tag for now — but I may put it back later. A few concerns: 1) "The American Boys" website may not be considered a reliable source, since it seeks sponsorships for these boxers. 2) Some of the acronyms needed to be spelled out, such as MBF and PAL. 3) It would help greatly if you could find some references from something like a newspaper or magazine to help establish credibility and notability. Keep working on it, and let me know if you need help. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 20 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duluth Complex, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 15:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BR-- Thanks for the note, and for the good start to this article! Regards, Kablammo (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Brunette

You might be right about Brian Brunette, but more talk about who he is may be helpful in establishing his notoriety. I made a few changes to help the page be a bit more clear. I also did a google search on the fellow, not much information was found. I have more google results than he does. Plhofmei (talk) 07:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bold

I'm just editing as per the Manual of Style guidelines that I'm sure you're aware of. Boldface is used for the title name and any acronyms and/or synonyms of such. If you're talking about other professional boxers then they should be red-linked as they meet the notability guidelines but have not had an article created about them.

Also, what is the deal with filling unknown information with a load of X's? It's not very encyclopedic or informative. Cheers, --Jimbo^[online] 00:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 meetup

Minnesota Meetup

Saturday, 2008-10-11 noon (12:00)

Please pass this on! RSVP here.

You said you wished you could have made the last meetup, so I wanted to make sure you knew about this one. Hope to see you there. Jonathunder (talk) 17:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minneapolis Meetups

Town Hall Brewery
maps.google.com
1430 Washington Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55454
(612) 339-8696
October 11, 2008
Saturday at 12:00 noon (midday)
Meetup RSVP

Muddy Waters
maps.google.com
2401 Lyndale Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55405
(612) 872-2232
October 10, 2008
Friday at 10:00 PM (at night)
Alternate meetup RSVP

Just updating the calendar. Feel free to pass along these invitations. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Micheal faulk

==Proposed deletion of Michael Faulk==

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Faulk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability issues: barring an actual professional debut, not notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tznkai (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Professional boxers from California

I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place {{db-author}} on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smug and self-satisfied

Doubtless you've seen Daedalus969's response at ANI. What do you suggest happens now? I've pointed out some intolerable behaviour. All seem to agree it to be so. The perpetrator is unrepentent, professing that his attitude has not changed one iota, and his behaviour continues. Paul Beardsell (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am sorry. :-) Thanks. Paul Beardsell (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My behavior continues? What a load of BS. That user was blatantly insulting me, calling me crazy/nuts just because I CSD'd a page he created. Why don't you stop stalking my edits and painting me red when I'm not.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting, you're stalking my edits, telling lies about me. You said I inappropreiately told a user he was personally attking me. Do tell me, how are "Are you nuts. Can't you see the source that is added?, User is total nuts, and Personal attack. Iam sorry even if adding reliable source is not reliable then you are total nuts" not personal attacks?— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Unishippers

A tag has been placed on Unishippers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution to Darfur, Minnesota reaps publicity

On March 16, 2008, you added information to the page on Darfur, Minnesota which does not jibe with its cited source. You will doubtless be happy to know that James Lileks has quoted this nonsense verbatim today in an article on buzz.mn.Bellczar (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edit on the AMX Sprint article

Btw, if you want to make links to sections in an article, then the easiest way to link say 'Section (section 1)' in 'Article' is with markup like '[[Article#Section (section 1)]]'. Nevard (talk) 06:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Meetup

2009

Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.
Details under discussion.

Please share this with anyone who may be interested.

Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 21:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: the meetup will be at 1 p.m. Sunday, October 11, in St. Paul. Click here for more details and to R.S.V.P. Jonathunder (talk)

Re: Tenney, Minnesota

Unfortunately it can't be included on Wikipedia as a City becuase it does not met the metropolis requirements for inclusion. Also, it is the smallest town by square milage and NOT by population, which according to the census is 6, another gore holds the record for one resident at the present time so this is untrue. I have undid your edit. --70.121.35.167 (talk) 17:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The city has a full complement of elected officials. It levies property taxes on its landowners and on the grain elevator. Tenney is a city of Minnesota by statute, and a proclamation from the governor of Minnesota hangs on the wall at city hall. Fortunately, it's state law that defines what a city is, not Wikipedia policy. I'll leave the article as it is for now, and I'll get a copy of the proclamation to post in the article before I change it to read 'city' again later. Brain Rodeo (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:TOWN and Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Guideline --70.121.35.167 (talk) 21:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When fact and Wikipedia policy disagree, which is correct? Brain Rodeo (talk) 22:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither, but to keep out confusion and wrong re-directs they use guidelines to set up a system so order is in place of what is considored a city, a town, a village or a gore. If you were to include Tenney as a City it would contradict the exact definition of a City is! It will be oxy-moronic. --70.121.35.167 (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Rodeo: I'm not sure what this is all about, but Tenney is a chartered city, as you mentioned. And I'm not sure why a Wikipedia definition, or any other, should supersede that fact.

Some other links of interest:

http://www.demography.state.mn.us/DownloadFiles/pdf/Census%202K7-%20Population.pdf p. 4, right-hand column
http://www.mba.state.mn.us/DocketResource.html?Id=4019 at end
http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/datanetweb/php/citycountylist.php#T
http://www.osa.state.mn.us/reports/spi/2001/tenney/report.pdf scandal! just like the big towns!

Kablammo (talk) 21:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your sources contradict each other, one calling it a "community" and town when the other lists it as a city. Without accurate proof, it should remain as a town. Also, when you said Wikipedia definition <-- no such thing exists becuase definition on Wikipedia is pretty much just that, the definition. cause it's based on sources. Wikipedia doesn't make definitions of words. --70.121.35.167 (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the sources say it is a city (except for the second, which does not use the word "city" even to refer to urban areas), and under Minnesota law, Tenney is classified as a city of the fourth class. The websites above are all official Minnesota state websites; the Minnesota Historical Society also has a data entry on Tenney, stating it was incorporated in 1901. Those are reliable sources; Wikipedia is not. As for other points: The "exact definition of a city" (if there is such a thing) clearly depends on the jurisdiction. While Minnesota has unincorporated areas, the term "gore" has no significance. In any event Tenney is, in fact, incorporated, and a comparision of it to an unincorporated area is not a true comparision. As an incorporated municipality, Tenney is a city; there is no other municipal classification that fits under Minnesota law and practice.

Now one can ask why and how a settlement, crossroads, village, tank town or one-horse town (sorry, Brain Rodeo) such as Tenney can be classified as a city. The answer is, that under Minnesota law, it is a city, and it is not for Wikipedia to say otherwise. Kablammo (talk) 19:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Description of classifications: [4] As shown, the state has 771 cities with populations of less than 10,000. Kablammo (talk) 23:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kablammo, if the authorities ever figure out what I've been doing with my wood chipper, I want you to defend me! Brain Rodeo (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP issues

Good to hear from you! I hope all is well out on the plains.

Here is the relevant policy: Wikipedia:Blp#Remove_unsourced_or_poorly_sourced_contentious_material. The WP:3RR restriction does not apply, and you should be able to revert without consequence (provided any admin who wanders by is aware of that policy).

You can also try WP:RPP if you wish, but my experience there has been mixed. With a BLP issue involved they might be more willing to protect a page.

And even if the claim were sourced, undue weight would be given to it in an article like this; it is, as you said, not encylopedic. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 23:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason McLeod

The article Jason McLeod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability outside of Fireproof (film), which has an article already

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SuaveArt (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gulshan Esther

A tag has been placed on Gulshan Esther, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. digitwoman (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gulshan Esther

The article Gulshan Esther has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The person appears completely unnotable other than having written an obscure book, and early life/conversion sections of the article sound like a fairytale. Only one source has been given for the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. digitwoman (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sawtooth Mountains redux

Hello again! I trust your favorite small town is still a city!

I was drawn to this article again by a recent edit, and in looking into Upham on Google books (which I don't beleive I had done before). he says the range is only 30 miles long, from Tofte to GM. I've edited the article accordingly, but some of the individual peaks may have to changed as well.

Upham gives the name of the entire range above the lakeshore as the Cabotian Mountains, which I had heard before, but doubt the name's in common usage. On the other hand, I don't know of any other name for it.

Regards, Kablammo (talk) 23:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tenney makes the big time!

Tenney has been discovered.[5] And it's a reliable source! Kablammo (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gulshan Esther

The fact is that apostasy from islam is a criminal offence in Pakistan and many other muslim countries. Gulshan wasn't imprisoned without charge because she was being persecuted for her christian beliefs; if in fact she WAS imprisoned (this claim, like all the others in the article, is not supported by credible references) then it would have been on a charge of apostasy. By converting to christianity she violated Pakistani law and was liable to imprisonment. Personally I am an atheist and I think all laws regarding apostasy, blasphemy etc are disgusting, but the fact is that apostates in islamic countries are liable to punishment under the laws of those countries. Had she become an atheist, hindu or baha'i she would also have been imprisoned.

Anyway, the article is dreadful. In its previous form it was a happy mix of POV and pseudoscience; the way it was written treated the alleged "miracles" as facts, which of course is not a safe assumption. There is no known mechanism by which a possibly mythical person from 1st century Judea can heal paralysis in 20th century Pakistan, so it is at best an unsubstantiated claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FergusM1970 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Persecution" is not limited to extra-legal acts. Marcus Aurelius persecuted Christians and Nazis persecuted Jews under statutes adopted for those purposes; history abounds with other examples. Kablammo (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Pakistani government does not support the persecution of religious minorities for their beliefs; theoretically at least (yes, I know exactly how much of a mess Pakistan is) if you are born a christian that is just fine with the authorities. IF any of the events in Gulshan's book happened (there is no supporting evidence for this, and a large body of scientific knowledge that says some of her claims are impossible) her imprisonment would not have been for the her christian beliefs; it would have been for her apostasy. FergusM1970 (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty extreme case of hairsplitting, Fergus. Persecution of Christians and minority Muslims does occur in Pakistan, [6] [7] and an expansive definition of persecution would include the punishment of former Muslims (apostates) as well. Brain Rodeo (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial currently scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonio Johnson (boxer)

The article Antonio Johnson (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable; no indication that he passes the criteria in WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maashatra11 (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Eyer

Hello, Brain Rodeo. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--11:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unishippers

The article Unishippers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unambiguous advertising (...a franchise organization connecting small businesses with shipping partners.... has grown into a full service freight logistics provider...) for a franchise business that makes no case for historical, technical, or cultural significance of the kind that leads to long term historical notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

In the area? You're invited to the
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting

	Date: 31 October 2010
	Time: noon
	Place: Midtown Exchange Global Market, East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W / 44.9493; -93.2612

Suggestions for next Minnesota meetup?

Hi, Brain Rodeo, do you have any suggestions for a next date or place for a Minnesota meetup? I was disappointed to miss last Sunday's meetup once a work meeting coincided with the time announced for the meetup. I would be happy to arrange a meetup soon. I noticed that you mentioned on the talk page for the meetups that you are in Fargo, and I wonder if having the meetup in St. Cloud would help shorten your trip. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To tell you the truth, what would really help me is more advance notice before the meetup, so I could plan a trip to the Cities to accommodate my social schedule. For me, traveling 240 miles to Minneapolis or 180 miles to St Cloud is "a horse apiece." Brain Rodeo (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Perhaps you have just seen the proposal by another editor to have a meetup at the Minnesota Historical Society in St. Paul when the society can arrange hosting the meeting. That would be a welcome opportunity to meet other Minnesota wikipedians. I have requested a Geonotice to editors with I.P. addresses associated with Minnesota to elicit more discussion on the meetup talk page about where and when the next meetup should be. I hope that allows people who are traveling greater distances time to plan the trip and allows everyone to clear their schedules. See you there, when we know where there is. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New meetup

In the area? You're invited to the
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting

	Date: 20 November 2010
	Time: 1:00-3:30 (click here for full agenda) R.S.V.P. by Nov. 17 for free lunch + parking
	Place: Minnesota History Center 345 Kellogg Blvd, St. Paul, Minnesota 44°57′00″N 93°06′20″W / 44.95°N 93.1055°W / 44.95; -93.1055

Nomination of Sedra Bistodeau for deletion

The article Sedra Bistodeau is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedra Bistodeau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travelbird (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brain, thanks for prodding me about the Minnesota Originals video. Watching it moved me off the fence to Weak Keep. Yakushima (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've since improved the citations. This can make a significant different in perceptions of notability. See, for example, Theo Botha. Sure, crap article, still, but you have to wonder why anybody ever thought he fell short of WP:GNG. Well, when it it was nominated for deletion, it looked more like this [8], before I spent about a day cleaning up the cited sources. There's something about footnotes containing not only bibliographic minutiae but blue text embedded within that minutiae that gives knee-jerk "delete"-voters pause. Anyway, good luck with this. Maybe you'll get a "no consensus" from the AfD closer, which will buy time for Sedra to become unambiguously notable by WP:MUSICBIO standards. (Which themselves could use some work, IMHO -- my Weak Keep here is almost a protest vote against their current imprecision). Yakushima (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate your work on the citations, Yakushima. I'm long on composition and short on formatting, always have been. Thanks for the assistance and the feedback. Brain Rodeo (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've since added a wikilink to National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest, and written it up. An article for it already existed, it turns out. However, mine substantiates notability via third-party sources, so it should help in determining whether the contest Sedra won with Alex Depue counts as "major" in WP:MUSICBIO terms. If it does, she's in. If not, well, maybe it'll slow 'em down. ;-) What might also help a little: she's named in one of the tracks ("Waltz for Sedra") of the Peter Ostroushko album she played on. Not many session musicians get that kind of billing from the star player. Yakushima (talk) 15:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not much more time left on the clock, for the relisted AfD. Let me tell you how I got that one "Overwhelming Keep" vote. I went to the Wikipedia Music Project participants list, and picked a recently active editor. The only way in which I might have flirted with WP:CANVAS violation is that the editor mentioned "copy-editing" as his likely contribution. Well, I thought, he'll like my copy-editing. And indeed, he seemed so dazzled by it that he didn't notice some slight weaknesses in his (otherwise well-argued) Keep case.

If I may suggest a strategy based on this one vote (which might only have been a wild stroke of luck, I admit): pick out other editors at the Music Project who

have been recently active,
aren't obviously Minnesotans,
show some evidence of citing guidelines and policies in AfD work.

Put a message on their talk pages, assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the case, admit that you're the article originator, admit that you can't be objective, and ask for their help. If the article goes down to Delete, and especially because you triggered a wave of Delete votes, well, at least you tried, and in a fair way. And surely a new Sedra Bistodeau will rise from those ashes eventually if not sooner, because she sure looks like she's got it in her. Wikipedia notability is forever, after all. And forever can wait. Yakushima (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked two good editors to take a look at the AfD and join the discussion. I think I'll leave it at that. Thanks for your interest and your effort, though. Brain Rodeo (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary, as it turned out. Closed as Keep, with no summary of reasons from the admin. (An admin I've got a few problems with, for relisting stuff that should clearly have been closed Delete[9], among other things. But I won't complain in this case. ;-) Yakushima (talk) 04:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Midwest Motor Express

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Midwest Motor Express requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --DGaw (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited Caleb Truax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. When you recently edited Eagle Bend, Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pioneer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries event

In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.

Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.

There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. —innotata 01:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Wikipedia meetups

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.

To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!

Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.

Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 14:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great American Wiknic

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm

Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 03:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup on August 3

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.

Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.

—innotata 23:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Carrier (boxer)

The article Mark Carrier (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 16:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Larry Givens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Givens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Givens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Day Meetup on January 18

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.

Place: Seward Cafe

2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404

Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
Time: noon

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 04:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Snow (boxer)

The article Thomas Snow (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOXING

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 22:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gulshan Esther

The article Gulshan Esther has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not establish that it meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Hoffman (boxer)

The article John Hoffman (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 15:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Peterson

The article Dave Peterson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 17:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the Minneapolis Institute of Art

Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015, 12pm–4pm
Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art Friends Community Room, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis
Sponsor: Minneapolis Institute of Art

You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at Minneapolis Institute of Art which will be held on Saturday, October 24, 2015. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to women artists.

For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←, you may register online for the event or call (612) 870-6323

--gobonobo ⁺ ^c 20:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center

The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon

Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016, 6–8pm
Location: Loft Literary Center, 1011 S Washington Ave, Room 203, Minneapolis
Sponsor: The Loft Literary Center

Hello Brain Rodeo! You are invited to attend an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center which will be held on Thursday, February 11, 2016. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to artists from marginalized communities. Please bring a laptop. Refreshments will be provided.

For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←

We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo ⁺ ^c 22:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Minnesota Boxing Hall of Fame

added links pointing to Danny Davis, Mike Collins, Jim Wells, Mel Brown and George Blair

Dan Schommer

added links pointing to TKO and Alberto Gonzalez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

Still in-and-out around here, I see. (I do it too.) It's good to see your name pop up on my favorites! (more specifically, at User:AlexNewArtBot/MinnesotaSearchResult. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First time in quite a while. I'm trying to make sure that all the members of the Minnesota Boxing Hall of Fame have Wikipedia pages, but the notability guidelines are pretty stringent. Would you look at the Charley Retzlaff page and suggest any improvements?Brain Rodeo (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will do so this weekend. Kablammo (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC) . . . and, I promptly forgot to do so. Now done; I reformatted the refs, but the text looked good. Kablammo (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry LaCoursiere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Lopez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brain Rodeo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brain Rodeo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brain Rodeo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troy Lowry

The article Troy Lowry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 02:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Androff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Androff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Androff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 14:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vitran Express

The article Vitran Express has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary Holmgren

The article Gary Holmgren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer; fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenny Kost

The article Kenny Kost has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer who fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 07:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rick Folstad

The article Rick Folstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer who fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marty Lindquist

The article Marty Lindquist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer who fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Bobby Rodriguez|concern=Non-notable boxer who fails [[WP:NBOX].}} JTtheOG (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Holt (boxer)

The article Chris Holt (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer who fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bobby Rodriguez

The article Bobby Rodriguez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer who fails WP:NBOX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Holt (boxer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Holt (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Holt (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Holmgren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Holmgren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Holmgren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTtheOG (talk) 21:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wilton Hilario

The article Wilton Hilario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX, having won only a minor title as a professional after a negligible amateur career. Not much WP:SIGCOV at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 01:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shang Stanton (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While very interesting, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show he was notable. Certain aspects of this article could certainly be incorporated into Clay County, Minnesota#History.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shang Stanton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brain Rodeo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mount Northrop

The article Mount Northrop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This mountain seems to be of questionable existence per the talk page and even if it does exist it certainly is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 03:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shang Stanton

Hello, Brain Rodeo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shang Stanton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shang Stanton has been accepted

Shang Stanton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phil Williams (boxer)

The article Phil Williams (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Dakota Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame

The article South Dakota Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Dakota Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Dakota Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dakota Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]