Talk:Mount Northrop

This page was proposed for deletion by TartarTorte (talk · contribs) on 26 December 2022.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Minnesota may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Name?

While this almost 100-year old source[1] describes a Mount Northrop, I can't find any contemporary source which names it. Perhaps Mount Northrop has been renamed?– Gilliam (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just for a kick I've submitted a request to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names for this. I found a few references to the name and location from back in the late 1800s/early 1900s but it seems to have disappeared after that. I'll post here if I get a response. Nsteffel (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Upham's book clearly is a reliable and independent secondary source. The age of a source is no more relevant to its existence than the age of a mountain. Here, there is a source, and no sources are given to dispute the name. Personal suspicion is not evidence. Kablammo (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]