Hi, I'm from Venezuela and my Internet server is CANTV. Currently because of the situation that is happening in my country, my Internet provider has blocked Wikipedia, so I do not have access and the only way to access Wikipedia is through VPN. · Bradford✉10:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in La vecina#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
A bunch of redirects in the user space of your old account name were brought up in a recent ANI report. The report has been subsequently removed as the IP editor was apparently evading a block, but before that happened, I thought it was a legit report and took a look. I'm not sure if they're harassing you or what is going on, but do you want me to delete all the pages in the user space of your old account name, which redirect to your current user space? Or is there a reason to leave them alone? If this guy is trolling you about this, and I've been tricked into helping with the troll, then I'm sorry. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Floquenbeam: Is David Steven, a user who was blocked from Wikipedia in Spanish, and now seems to be harassing me. Not only does he do it here, he also does it in Wikipedia in Spanish. There also makes the same requests see: [1] and [2]. The best thing would be to ignore it.-- · Bradford✉19:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bradford. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:Carmelo Alvarado.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
On 13 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bolívar (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Colombian television series Bolívar used 6,000 extras? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bolívar (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bolívar (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I am not rude to you. My edits are just mistakable edits and it's not nonsense edits. Please do not be mad to me. I am editing carefully and I sometimes replace dead links with newly replace URLs. Do not send an admin to block me. I have done nothing wrong. An apology is needed. Thanks. Steam5 (talk) 01:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Telenovelafan215: And what is the problem with which I have uploaded? That poster is also original. It is also the one that comes out here and is more representative, since it refers to the main character. José Ron appears in the other, but with another actor. I also do not see the problem of using another poster, which is also original of the series.--— Bradford (Talk)05:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradford: The problem is that there was nothing wrong with the file I uploaded. The original file was also "representative" as part of the main story was Ringo fighting for the custody of his son (who is seen on the original file). —Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Telenovelafan215: Since you have a great conflict, the same thing that happened in El corazón nunca se equivoca is repeated. The other poster is also original and you simply do not want to accept a change. Therefore, so that there are no preferences on either side, I will place the logo of the series. In addition, Televisa Internacional is not the one who distributes or creates the posters of each series. They simply place the poster that created the production company of the series.--— Bradford (Talk)06:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mi próposito eres tú.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Mi próposito eres tú.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
Hola, Bradford. Solo dejarte constancia de que cuando iba a escribir a la lista de bibliotecarios de eswiki para preguntarles por la viabilidad del cambio de nombre y enlazarles el hilo de enwiki para que comentaran en él, según habíamos quedado en IRC, me he encontrado con que el hilo ha sido archivado sin que al parecer hayas hecho nada al respecto. ¿Das el tema por cerrado y descartado? Ya me comentarás si queda algo que pueda hacer yo. Saludos, -jem- (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@-jem-: Hola, por ahora sí lo dejaré así. Quizás más adelante pida un cambio; pero por ahora mejor me quedo tranquilo un rato. Cualquier cosa yo te aviso. Pero creo que de igual modo sería bueno crear un hilo y que algunos biblios comenten, para que haya constancia y eso, y en futuro si pido un cambio de nombre, no haya que hace tanto revuelo. No sé si lo consideres, pero por ahora, no pediré un cambio de nombre. Gracias por tu ayuda. :))--— Bradford (Talk)11:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
De nada y de acuerdo, puedes contactarme más adelante. Yo creo que es mejor no comentar nada a los biblios, porque de cara a cualquier paso futuro puede incluso ser contraproducente: cuanto más tiempo lleven sin oír nada sobre ti, menos probable es que en ese momento digan «pero si hace solo X meses que ya hizo/intentó/consiguió que...», etc.). Así que yo también lo dejo así. Saludos, -jem- (talk) 11:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
Getting the queue to 0
There are now 805 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Tools
It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
Second set of eyes
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
Hello Bradford, why you delete my edit ? For example, you delete Arturo Peniche page information for example birth information about his son, his son is born 1986 and you write 1987 without source. The most recognized source for actors and there write his son Brandon Peniche is born 1986 is IMDB here you have link of that source https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1312149/ And of course you also delete David Chocarro what I make, so if you do again same thing I have to report to Wikipedia beacuse you also don't have a sources for example on Choccaro page. Now I report you beacuse you delete my all edit without putting sources. So mate you reported and could be blocked from Wikipedia like you blocked from Spanish wikipedia you probably be blocked and from English. Don't do again if you don't have reason for it. UNDERSTAND ?
Sí, pero yo no soy dueño del artículo, si aportas la fuente que me indicas entonces no habrá problemas con tú edición, y nadie tendría porque revertirte. Revertí por el hecho de que estabas alegando algo sin aporta fuentes.--— Bradford (Talk)08:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
porque estas nominando esos articulos para borrado? hay cientos de miles de articulos similares incluso de una línea de miles de actores. Los articulos tienen referencia y cumple todo lo que exige wikipedia, perdona que lo diga pero siento que estas atacando mi trabajo eliminas categorias, reviertes ediciones de buena fe y ahora quieres eliminar articulos de actores de Venezuela, ojala y en lugar de eso me ayudaras a traducir otros miles de articulos de Venezuela, lo que estas haciendo desmotiva muchisimo porque todo el trabajo fue hecho de buena fe, pero ver gente como tu desanima muchisimo --Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro: Lo siento si te desmotiva, con respecto a las categorías que mandé a borrar por ejemplo la de Club 57, es innecesaria; primero porque no tiene suficientes páginas notables enlazadas a ella, solo el artículo principal, lo que hace prácticamente que sea una categoría vacía e innecesaria que no aporta a nada. Los dos artículos de actores que nominé a su borrado recaen en WP:NACTOR. No tienen mucha cobertura como actor y apenas se están iniciando; ni han tenido roles importantes en múltiples proyectos como indica en el enlace que te mencioné. Es cierto que hay muchos artículos de una línea que están súper vacíos, de hecho yo creé algunos, un ejemplo claro es Juan Ríos; el problema es que ese puede permanecer en Wikipedia debido a que este tiene bastante cobertura y el actor no solo se le conoce por telenovelas, sino también por películas; inclusive ha protagonizado películas y a tenido roles de suma importancia en telenovelas. Eso artículos se denominan a veces "Stub" o "Start". Te dejo WP:ASSESS para que veas como se categorizan los artículos. Y por último IMDb no es una fuente confiable por lo que es imposible tomarla en cuenta como fuente para añadir información como fechas de nacimiento o lugares de nacimiento.--— Bradford (Talk)17:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, I'm Interstellarity. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Hache (TV series), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
explain to me why you don't let me use that image of Carmen Villalobos in her article, if it's the only one here on Wikimedia, who cares about the quality of the image, the important thing is to illustrate the profile of the person in your article, If there is no other image available, then what should I do? also if you are going to remove that image, why don't you remove the others that I have added to the recent articles of Margarita Ortega and Ángela Aguilar, I would also say that they have very poor quality, but they are the only ones that I managed to get, so if you think That image is deleted, then you are going to ask to delete the other two that I have uploaded to Commons? --The Salvator (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@The Salvator: Yo no estoy pendiente de todas las imágenes que usted sube, o los artículos en los que contribuye. Tengo el de Carmen en mi lista de seguimiento desde hace tiempo, e inclusive contribuyo en el. Y noté esa imagen de mala calidad en el artículo, por lo que no me parece apropiado utilizarla. Se lo expliqué en mi resumen de edición, y también en Wikimedia Commons. No sé que más desea que le explique. Inclusive le dejé un enlace en la última reversión que hice. ¿Qué necesita que le explique?, si no hay una imagen de buena calidad o por lo menos representable, es mejor no utilizar ninguna. Quizás en Commons la acepten, pero eso es Commos; otro proyecto distinto a Wikipedia.--— Bradford (Talk)00:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
I'm happy to clean the page.
Just please protect me from : they used to raid my page and eliminate any word I say anywhere, including just citing the rules.
You can check out this their purging on my ES page: full shutting up… Cheese WndJo (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bradford, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, Kingsif (talk) 01:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merry Christmas, Bradford! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. And for all the help you've thrown my way over the years. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity.CAPTAIN RAJU(T)18:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that you use bacteria, because a reporter with little or no scientific background wrote bacteria. The Wikipedia’s article about neurocysticercosis and Google could clarify . BTW , I am a pathologist. Luigo1 (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Guey, you don't have to come to an agreement with me, you have to do the right thing and in the process not waste someones's time when having no arguments. There's no need to explain what is obvious, the reference is clearly saying about the start of filming of the series and main crew, producers and directors, are listed on one of the images, come on... Zzz369 (talk) 22:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bradford, I agree with you that there should still be a template to list the Nickelodeon telenovelas because Nick actually made them. However, just about every other show on the "Nickelodeon co-productions" template outside of the Latin American column was not made by Nick at all. They were all just random acquisitions without any relation/involvement from Nick, with the exception of one in the European column (Club 57). I was wondering if giving you this info would help us reach a solution as to what to do with the "Co-productions" template. A possible solution, I think, would be to merge/redirect it to one listing all of the Nick telenovelas, since Nick actually made them. Any further comments on the templates-for-discussion are appreciated! Capcapandgengen (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thought I would say hi. Earlier this evening I had two images questioned for their contextual significance after it seemed the explanation in the photos and description made it plainly evident that there was significant contextual significance :-) It was then noticed that the same questions on contextual significance were placed on many pictures in a short time span with the same reason all of which were contextually significant. Your two pictures were of that group. I decided I should post an explanation on several of the pages as a way of helping out my fellow Wikipedians. Cool border on your page. Boston1775 (talk) 09:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Boston1775: Thanks for helping. According to me, the image is contextually justified, but due to what happened it seems that it does not. We must wait to see what an administrator decides.BRADFORDtalk10:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am an actor in Operacion Pacifico and have added my name to the Wikipage but it appears you have erased them repeatedly. My name is Gamal Dillard and I appear in about 9 chapters as head of the San Diego DEA Office, Agent Miller.
Creo que como Wikipedistas y adultos razonables que somos, debemos de dejar a lado los problemas que tenemos. Esto nos afecta a los dos. Se que quieres regresar a WP en español, pero ya no se puede dar marcha atrás. Siento que has crecido más en WP en ingles (aquí) que en WP en español (sin contar Commons). Y me alegro mucho, hasta tienes un mejor nivel de ingles que yo (el mio es, digamos, muy pobre), pero si te mando este mensaje, es con el propósito de dejar ya nuestras diferencias, afecta nuestro trabajo, si bien, que necesidad fue que mandara a plantillar la mayoría de los logos, si bien pudo haber ayudado a editarlos para que sean apropiados, como el de Soltero con hijas, la cual le agradezco mucho, pero sabotear de esa manera el trabajo de alguien, no tiene perdón de dios, más si sabia que la mayoría de los logos, son simples oraciones, con números, o simplemente texto (con diferente tipografía). Yo tengo algunos de los logos que se borraron, incluso su ultima versión de Médicos (la de fondo negro), la cual esta semana tenía pensado discutirlo contigo de subir una versión blanco y negro de fondo transparente de ese logo. Pero te me adelantaste, tambien el que me ayudaras a modificar el de Vencer el miedo, pero no dudaste 2 veces en plantillarlo, en vez de modificarlo y subir la nueva versión (como de ejemplo, la de SCH), y terminaste provocando mi bloqueo de 1 semana, la cual no evadiré, la respetaré. Si quieres ayudarme con los logos, te los envió por correo en un archivo ".Rar", y yo te ayudare en algo aquí, como por ejemplo, la tabla de episodios (actualizarlo semanalmente), y si no quieres, respetare tu decisión. No soy una persona hipócrita, ni mucho menos mala, solo lo que gana aquí es la avaricia y soberbia para ver quien es mejor, pero aprendí algo, nadie es mejor en esta vida, vas a ser mejor siendo tu mismo, y eso es lo que me hace ser una persona, a parte de que soy muy empático con la gente que me rodea, y con la que me termino relacionado en cualquier lugar. Un saludo sincero. --Luis1944MX (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Luis1944MX: Hola, tú eres el único que has estado en una conflicto personal aquí, meses atrás alegaba que por "yo estar bloqueado en eswiki no se me puede permitir editar en Commons por ser un vándalo", ¿eso es correcto?, con la mayoría de los logos no los edito porque simplemente no soy bueno con Photoshop y hago lo más que puedo, pero tienes usuarios como EEIM que por lo que pude notar tiene bastante experiencia, o al menos eso hizo con el logo de La Nocturna. En Commons muchos usuarios veteranos han sido bloqueado múltiples veces, y es lo normal cuando se desconoce las políticas de ahí, yo simplemente colaboro patrullando, si marqué tus logos es porque obviamente no son logos simples, por ejemplo el de Vencer el miedo, la mariposa era claramente algo que tenía derechos de autor y no era un figura simple. Al igual que con muchos logos que he mandado a borrar, tú dices "él me acosa", lo que es algo molesto, porque no es así. Así como he mandado a borrar logos que tú haz subido también lo he hecho a otros usuarios, como puedes ver en el enlace que te marqué. Y te diré esto, el hecho de que éste bloqueado en eswiki no quiere decir que no se me pueda permitir leer o ver el contenido de ahí, siempre entro a eswiki a buscar información para crear nuevos artículo aquí; o recabar información que se me escape. Y es ahí cuando mayormente me topo con logos no simple que suben bastantes usuarios. En Commos estoy haciendo notable mi participación porque me interesa el proyecto, de hecho cuento con la herramienta de verificador y reversor allí. El conflicto empezó por ti, que a pese de yo haber colocado plantillas de borrado rápido, tu te saltabas todo sin importarte nada, alegando que yo te acosaba, y te haz puesto a pensar, sí el del error era yo, ¿porqué terminaste tú bloqueado y no yo?, ¿porqué te borraron los logos si él que hacia mal las cosas era yo?, de hecho él último administrador que borró varios logos, lo hizo porque como administrador activo notó la situación, muchas veces te notifiqué de que dejarás de subir logos de esa forma, y no lo querías aceptar, más bien revertías mis ediciones y empezabas a alegar que yo te acosaba. Y te diré en Commons siempre chequeo la categoría de "Telenovelas" y todo lo relacionado a ella, y también patrullo en eswiki, en donde siempre que encuentro un error le comunico a un usuario de confianza para que lo arregle, o en este caso si puedo contribuir en Commons lo hago. Dejando de un lado esto, evidentemente no se puede seguir en un conflicto así. Yo jamás te he prohibido editar aquí (al igual que Eduardo, pero lo de Eduardo ya es algo sumamente personal que no cambiará con los años por lo visto), si tu no lo haces es porque no lo deseas, mi nivel de inglés no es tan fuerte, y de hecho el inglés es muy fácil y no necesitas saberlo al 100% para contribuir aquí o en Commons. Si tú inglés es tan malo, ¿cómo haces para copiar información que coloco yo acá en eswiki?, al menos eso hiciste en Preso No. 1, lo dejaste tal cual como está en la versión en inglés, no veo que es lo complicado.BRADFORDtalk11:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradford: Bueno, lo de Commons si te pido una disculpa, creo que lo del acoso fue por pura inseguridad de parte mía, creo que ahí no te debí reaccionar mal contigo, lo de Preso y otros, no me voy a llevar el crédito, todo lo que esta ahí es gracias a ti, en lo que fue más en Preso te rifaste (como decimos aquí en México cuando alguien se arriesga o logra algo) en la investigación y en la mayor parte de todo, lo de tus evasiones post-bloqueo, que quede en el pasado. En si cuando regresaste para pedir una vez más tu bloqueo te pido otra disculpa, pero también analizando esa situación, aunque yo nunca me hubiera dado cuenta de tu solicitud, Eduardosalg de todos modos, iba a intervenir. Hace poquito, no tiene mucho, el se paso con un usuario (que me echa la mano por las tardes en actualizar audiencias del primetime de aquí) debido a que en el artículo de la franquicia de Avengers, puso las películas que ya van a salir de la 4ta fase y que están en producción, y en eso, Eduardo le borro la información, porque siempre alega con WP:BOLA, pero ya no entraba en bola, mas si esta en producción. A lo cual algunos usuarios intervinieron a favor del usuario que luego me hace favor, lo defendieron como debe ser. Viendo más profunda la situación, el es el peor biblio de Wiki en español, y no te creas, tambien he tenido problemas con el, como este [3], pues digamos que fue en el tiempo en el que estaba verde (inmaduro), desconocía varias políticas de Wiki, a comparación de hoy. --Luis1944MX (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Luis1944MX: No hablaré de Eduardo porque allí creo yo que todos son consciente de la actitud de él para con otros usuarios, el punto es que uno no se puede quejar o decir algo, porque entonces es visto como sabotaje. Te diré esto, si deseas contribuir aquí, puedes hacerlo; no te aseguro de que nunca exista algún conflicto editorial, pues es algo normal que siempre hayan conflictos editoriales, pero nada se hace con afán de molestar o hacer que las personas se cohíban de editar. Siempre es en pro de que Wikipedia éste intacta con información necesaria. A veces yo puedo tener razón, como otras veces no y viceversa; la idea es dialogar y siempre llegar a un consenso. Lo que pasó el año pasado, se quedó en ese año, ya es un nuevo año y no hay que tener conflictos con nadie porque a fin de cuenta siempre nos toparemos porque editamos el mismo contenido y siempre estamos al tanto del mismo. En Commons si checas mi historial de discusiones pasadas, notarás los múltiples aviso que tenía hasta el 2018; hasta el momento en que se me dio un ultimátum, fue ahí que comprendí la situación. Solo tienes un bloqueo de una semana, la próxima vez que subas un logo trata de hacerlo lo más simple posible, o en tal caso si el logo ya es simple de por sí, solo basta con colocar sus respectivas plantillas de atribución y listo.BRADFORDtalk08:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradford: Vale Bradford, borrón y cuenta nueva. En si yo te puedo ayudar en actualizar aquí (semanalmente), las tablas de episodios que dejo inconclusas Telenovelafan, retomandolas, para que no se quede rezagados los artículos. En el reparto de Médicos, igual, de echo, yo actualizo semanalmente la sección de invitados. En esta semana, salgo de vacaciones, y ahorita estoy concentrado mas en crear 3 anexos de temporada para la eswiki, yo en los fines de semana te ayudaría a actualizar, ¿Te parece?. --Luis1944MX (talk) 08:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Luis1944MX: No hay problemas, ese usuario aportaba bastante actualizando el contenido de episodios y eso era de gran ayuda porque él solo se concentraba en eso, yo no hago lo mismo porque a parte de eso; siempre creo artículos y me concentro en expandir artículos o muchas cosas más, a veces es hasta un poco tedioso, a veces hasta dejo que termine la semana para actualizar todo de una vez.BRADFORDtalk09:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bradford, inicio mi participación ayudándote en las tablas de episodios, inicie con Vencer el miedo[5], nada más faltaría Soltero con hijas, Médicos (estos dos los actualizare cada fin de semana) y Cuna de lobos. --Luis1944MX (talk) 03:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Luis1944MX: Bueno, yo igualmente siempre actualizo los fines de semana, porque con la Universidad imposible tener tiempo de vaguear todo el día. Te daré estos consejos; esto es Wikipedia en inglés. Acá hay sí hay normas que seguir, nos las impuse yo, la comunidad las impuso, te recomiendo traducirte la documentación de Template:Infobox television, esto te lo digo porque si piensas incluir una lista de episodios, debes ir actualizando igualmente la cantidad de episodios emitidos en el infobox. En este caso muchos lo hacen a diario, otros cuando pueden, no es una obligación, pero lo ideal no es dejar el artículos desactualizado un mes. Otra cosa, cuando las series solo tienen una temporada y poca información en el artículo lo ideal sería mantener esa información en el artículo principal y no crear subpáginas (te recomiendo echar un ojo a Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television). Eso también puede varia por ejemplo si el artículo cuenta con suficiente información como es el caso de Mi corazón es tuyo y Preso No. 1 ya ahí sí podría existir la posibilidad de tener un apartado para los episodios, pero si son solo como La reina soy yo; ahí los apartados no son necesarios. Otra cosita que te digo es que bueno, es WP en inglés, las emisiones de las telenovelas en Estados Unidos también son importantes aquí. Por ejemplo con Cuna de lobos, tanto las de México como las Estados Unidos son relevantes, no es obligatorio incluir emisiones de USA; pero como aquí solo leen en inglés (también tiene importancia su emisión en lugares de habla inglesa). Bueno la idea es que te adaptes un poquito al pensamiento gringo si deseas participar aquí.BRADFORDtalk20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradford: Enterado, leyendo un poco de lo que me citó, y también viendo los ejemplos que hay aqui en WP en ingles, si me puedo acoplar a lo que dicta el manual. Trataré de también dame vueltas acá para ir actualizando información. --Luis1944MX (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Discussions and Resources
There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
Hola Brad, oye te escribo rapido para peguntarte si en la lista de Médicos coloco las columnas de No. en Serie y No. en temporada, ya que como fue confirmada una segunda temporada junto con la tercera de Por amar sin ley, nos evitariamos el estar haciendo copy-paste de los parámetros de la segunda columna y enumerarlos luego, y mejor ahorita para ya tenerla lista cuando se estrene la segunda temporada y también como te digo, kos evitariamos el estresante copy-paste. --Luis1944MX (talk) 12:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bradford. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguilltalk21:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hola. Lo lógico es que interpeles directamente al bibliotecario que ha realizado esa acción. Yo no he intervenido en absoluto y no dispongo de datos para confirmar o descartar la relación que él señala que existe. Montgomery (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Rosguill. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vencer el desamor, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
You're generally doing good work, but be advised that anticipatory coverage of TV shows and movies is generally WP:ROUTINE and does not contribute to establishing notability. This is both because such coverage is often essentially just a press release (and thus not independent), and because shows and films can end up cancelled despite having received pre-release press (which is especially true right now that much of the world is shut down due to the covid19 pandemic).
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
@Sarmiento 007: You are changing information without at least providing a source, and since the article was created several sources on the Internet claim that Jorge were born in 1991.BradfordTalk23:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
how can you say that i don't provide a source? i uploaded the birth certificate in the talk page of jorge lopez. so yes, there can be some sources that claims that he was born in 1991, but that is not true, i have the birth certificate, so is it possible any better source?
perhaps you may help me to put the certificate as a source, i honestly don't know very well how to. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7f/Certificate_of_birthdate.pdf here is the certificate. cheers--Sarmiento 007 (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarmiento 007:Here he changed the year of birth, without providing a source. This is Wikipedia, if you change information such as dates of birth you must provide sources, the source you provided does not seem reliable to me. You provided the source after i told him.BradfordTalk01:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
how a government certificate can't be reliable for you? even has the code of authentication, in case of any doubt. Anyway, he was born in Llay llay, not in Santiago, so i will change that. Saludos--Sarmiento 007 (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please, stop changing the birthdate of Jorge Lopez. I provided the most reliable source, a birth certificate. if you wanna check it out by yourself, put his RUT here: 17.628.195-2 and your email. https://www.registrocivil.cl/principal/servicios-en-linea
cheersCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
@Zzuuzz: Hi. An administrator had reversed the edit of the person who added the image and blocked the IP address. But suddenly the user started to reverse. Given these events the IP began to evade its block, and as far as I understand when users evade its blocks, their edits should not be taken into account. Regarding the report I made, I was wrong, sorry. .BradfordTalk21:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it seems clear that the IP user is probably the same user who uploaded the image, and they are blocked for whatever reason. The IP I blocked was also being fairly abusive. However the image seems appropriate, the licence seems to check out, and using the image may actually help reduce further disruption while improving the article. I'm all about that. I'll put the image back at some point if that's all there is to it. And yes, accurate and meaningful summaries are so helpful. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk)21:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your file change on Sueña conmigo per WP:BRD since you have not explained why it was changed. At this point, you need to either gain a consensus at the article's talk page or take the original file to WP:FFD. If you continue to revert without a consensus, you will be edit warring and you could be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aspects (talk) 05:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Aspects: I also don't see a clear reason for your opposition. It just popped up and reversed my edit on a whim. When you're not even interested in the theme, I'll put an erase template for the logo file to erase, since there is also no prohibition on using the series poster.— Bradford💬06:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the speedy deletion template from the intertitle file because it does not fit any of the criteria for speedy deletion. I have already explained one of the two steps you could take next and you chose neither. Aspects (talk) 06:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Discussions and Resources
A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
Every episode list requires topics related to the series like directors, staff members, dvds or themes like List of Psycho-Pass episodes or List of Puella Magi Madoka Magica episodes. The thing with that Boruto's is that since we haven't divided them into section due to lack of sources specifying a change, we had no choice but to reorganize the prose into a table so that it would be easier to follow.Tintor2 (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since the beginning. The table was created when the theme songs started increased so much that following it in prose it was confusing to read. We follow the anime guidelines too. There are also other big examples like this list or this. More FAs also have to provide the themes to cover every element of the series. Removing so much notable content that happens to be properly sourced it's pretty much blanking. Bear in mind that before making another revert.Tintor2 (talk) 01:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you have filed a Sock Puppet Investigation (SPI) and YisusMoon20 was confirmed to be a sock puppet of JesusLuna19 pretty quick by an admin just about an hour. It looked like a duck to me. That's the fastest SPI confirmed and closed I ever seen. — YoungForever(talk)15:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Bradford. Te pido que por favor elimines esta entrada de tu blog. Es inadecuada e innecesaria, y además compromete mi privacidad y la de los participantes del wikicafé. Agradeceré que tengas en cuenta este mensaje y la elimines. ㅡRomanLier (talk) 02:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RomanLier: Eres el único que tiene acceso a esa página, ahora de hecho, no. Ahora todos tendrán acceso a ella. No recuerdo con que correo creé ese blog, así que no puedo hacer mucho ahora.BradfordTalk06:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
De hecho, una simple búsqueda en Google permite acceder a esa página, así que siempre fue accesible por todos. Si tú no puedes eliminarla, agotaré las vías que me ofrecen Blogger y Google para solicitar la eliminación a través de denuncias. ㅡRomanLier (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of the Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Your recent editing history at The Pandemic Special shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SanAnMan (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
