Jump to content

User talk:Babitaarora/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Babitaarora, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Siddharth Sagar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - MrX 11:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Siddharth Sagar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - MrX 11:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoaib Ibrahim for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoaib Ibrahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoaib Ibrahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 12:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vipul Gupta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lakshya and Airtel
Bharat Chawda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Crime Patrol

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ajay Chaudhary may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s and 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''''Ajay Chaudhary''''' {born; 1983) is an [[India]]n [[television]] [[actor]] and [[Model (person)|model]].
  • web | url=http://www.lifeok.com/myshow.aspx?pid=72318| title=Junoon – Aisi Nafrat Toh Kaisa Ishq >> official website}}</ref> || Akash || [[Life OK]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sayantani Ghosh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swapna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Khelti Hai Zindagi Aankh Micholi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [http://www.zeetv.com/shows/khelti-hai-zindagi-aankh-micholi Official Website]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aatisha Naik may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{issues|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Madhurima Tuli

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Madhurima Tuli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 13:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Arya

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nikhil Arya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Faizan Kidwai

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faizan Kidwai for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 14:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mansi Verma

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mansi Verma for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Preeti Gupta

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Preeti Gupta for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ujjwal234goel (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nivin Ramani may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''[[Bade Achhe Lagte Hain]]]'''......Pihu's friend

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Zohaib Siddiqui

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Zohaib Siddiqui, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Atractotomus

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Atractotomus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The The A7 criterion is not applicable to taxonomic pages about insects.

Please be sure to read WP:NPP and WP:DELETION before patrolling any more pages, and if you need any help don't hesitate to ask me. Thank you. 08:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion criteria

[edit]

Please take more care in applying speedy deletion tags to articles. I have noted a worryingly high number of incorrect taggings in your recent history. The speedy deletion criteria are highly specific; please don't invoke them unless they are very clearly met. We appreciate patrollers identifying inappropriate pages, but continued inaccurate tagging may result in your account being blocked. Yunshui  09:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for your PROD notification. I shall remove it, seeing as, as a former first-class cricketer, the individual is notable. These were a series of articles I created in something of a rush, and I must have done something wrong there.

All the best. Bobo. 10:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you find any more

[edit]

If you find any more that I clumsily overlooked, please tag them and notify me so I can fix them - these days I'm never (intentionally) that clumsy! Bobo. 10:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for a Haven article

[edit]

I think you are being exceptionally hasty to slap a speedy delete tag on a new article after only two hours. It is so unnecessary. -- I.Hutchesson 02:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you bothered to tag the article. The page is put up by people anticipating the episode, but it gets completed over the following days. I even put a message in one episode article for taggers not to bother tagging. I've got to find a way to stop this unnecessary tagging. -- I.Hutchesson 08:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Article on Zuleikha Chaudhuri

[edit]

Dear Babita Arora, Thank you for your message. However, I am aware about Wikipedia's notability policy and the article does not need to be deleted. It is still under construction.Chenkon3 (talk) 10:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

[edit]
Hey! You have been doing some good work on television and their actors' articles. Keep it up and enjoy! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chandragupta Maurya (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vishal Singh and Ravi Patel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Channel V India for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Channel V India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel V India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs broadcast by Channel V India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Channel V India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tarun Khanna (TV actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afzal Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Naaginn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Anchal Dwivedi]] ... Sneha (Karan's wife) (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Tere Liye (TV series)

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change.Actually your edit doesn't covers the content under the heading "Reception" which was there prior to your edit. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Skr15081997 (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Welcome to wiki!! Gaurav Pruthitalk 05:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ishq Kills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No context to indicate what this article is about, except that it's something "upcoming", in which case no evidence has been provided that it's received any press coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Psychonaut (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ankit Narang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Extraordinary People has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Tassedethe (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ringa Ringa Roses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of R Dhanarajan

[edit]

At the request of another editor, I've undeleted R Dhanarajan; since you proposed the article for deletion, I'm notifying you as a courtesy.. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 09:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteing my writing

[edit]

I spent a lot of time writing the article in Rajbeer Singh. Who gives you the write to just come and delete all my writing as you please? carry on deleting my work, I will carry on undoing your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuryaHanuman (talkcontribs) 09:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anjana Mumtaz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ittefaq, Kasak and Janani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Comedy Nights with Kapil episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Huma Qureshi
Sunil Grover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sirsa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Viraj Dobriyal

[edit]

Hello! This is Rajan. I strongly oppose your opinion for it. I want an answer from you. You call yourself a Proud Indian. Good. So tell me one thing does representing of Indian stuff is wrong? Character Viraj Dobriyal is a notable character. Ok tell me one thing, i am new to Wikipedia but i will question you. Does the video game character Sam Fisher is highly most highly notable, ok say highly notable in India? If no so why that article had been created. Its a non notable right? Even if Dobriyal isn't famous worldwide then it must deleted, Respresenting an Indian character is not a shame. American soap opera character pages too been created so do they are highly sorry super highly notable? This article is valid not invalid! RajanSinghSidhu (talk) 13:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ek Hasina Thi (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhupinder Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prem Ratan Dhan Payo for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prem Ratan Dhan Payo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Ratan Dhan Payo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skr15081997 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Azim Rizk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the mummy of Pinudjem I

[edit]

Dear Babitaarora,

just out of curiosity. Why did you remove my remark that the present whereabouts of the mummy of Pinudjem I are unknown? Allthough it probably is someplace in the Cairo Museum, to the best of my knowledge nobody knows where. Do you have any recent evidence to the contrary? That would greatly interest me.

Best regards Neferkere (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of Lim Yew Hock

[edit]

Hi, I saved my draft at Draft:Lim Yew Hock and will transfer the expanded content to the article after that. 175.156.242.240 (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First Crusade

[edit]

The paragraph on a supposed massacre by the first crusaders is written without any first hand accounts being quoted. "The eyewitness accounts from the crusaders themselves leave little doubt that there was great slaughter in the aftermath of the siege." Where are these eyewitness accounts quoted? The only link provided is to one author Tyerman in 2006, hardly an eyewitness account. This paragraph is poorly written and seemingly purposefully misleading. If there was a massacre, it was a massacre of unarmed Christian pilgrims by the Turks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.94.31 (talk) 07:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Suhag Raat Ek Mohabat Ki Liye

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Suhag Raat Ek Mohabat Ki Liye, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not an obvious host. If you are certain that it is, please list at WP:AFD and explain why it is. (The same applies to Ek Naaye Badi Aii). Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing block notices

[edit]

Is fine. Removing declined unblock requests wouldn't be ok. We had a long discussion on this recently. The editor is blocked indefinitely anyway, doesn't matter what they do. Dougweller (talk) 13:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Hungame pe Hungama

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hungame pe Hungama, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Check out WP:CSD, particularly WP:CSD#Non-criteria. For a non-notable film, you will have to consider PROD or AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About removing some of my edits

[edit]
About removing some of my edits
Hi Babita, I edited some pages of Bollywood celebrities and put their Facebook page links here on Wiki, They were removed by you, I don't know why. As I am official representative of those celebrities and was advised by Facebook representatives to add my page on Wikipedia.

So why can't I add them here? Mangeshkarlata (talk) 07:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gautam Sharma has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PAW Patrol, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Depressed Loser (I am not here) 00:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PAW Patrol has been accepted

[edit]
PAW Patrol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Reventtalk 20:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. The manual move didn't clean up the headers and such, so I moved it back to draft, submitted it as you, and reaccepted it with the script. Reventtalk 20:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione Message 08:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My page

[edit]
Hi why is it that when I edit my page, the edit is not there? My page is <   Stacey Hollywood  

Thank you --Staceyhollywood (talk) 06:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perfect Hair (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Kalpakkam page

[edit]

Hello. As per your edits on kalpakkam page we have noticed the information that we have deleted has a no reliable source. Taking newspaper info into account and putting into wikipedia gives a wrong direction to people who are looking at it. As an Indians its our responsibility to promote the news which are well verified and here its a rare sight giving a general statement of "based on RTI". Who has filed RTI and waht was the number etc were not listed. Please delete the paragraph or make yourself clear on the paragraph before you publish. If you still think it is a raw data then please provide the valid reference.

We wont bother if you dont support our noble cause but dont distract the main attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.205.25 (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP policy

[edit]

Please note that WP:BLP policy takes precedent over other considerations when editing, and that you are responsible for material you restore in an edit, regardless of your motivation for doing so. Specifically, I draw your attention to this edit [1], where you restored material which clearly violated WP:BLP policy - reporting allegations as fact - with an edit summary of "unexplained content removal (HG)". Though edit summaries are advisable, they are not compulsory - but adherence to WP:BLP policy certainly is. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admiral Robin K Dhowan

[edit]

Dear Babita,

The edits made are genuine and cited. You may like to check the given references at the 02 web links that i have provided in the reference column of the page.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajblue145 (talkcontribs) 09:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I noticed you reverting vandalism here and there. Good work! Thank you for keeping the encyclopedia away from vandals. Have a nice day. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 11:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stub Contest

[edit]

Hi Babita, thanks for entering the contest! Sadly Ashish Sharma was too big an article to qualify, but Divyanka Tripathi was eligible. The latter article still needs some more sentences to be expanded sufficiently. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you'll see this but paw patrol needs to be a little bit bigger to qualify. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stub contest

[edit]
The Stub Barnstar
To Babitaarora, thanks for getting involved in the Stub Contest and having a go. Cheers,Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Blaney

[edit]

My name is Chris Purvis. I apologize, I added the content about Michael Blaney and I can contest that it is accurate. Thank you Christimes (talk) 10:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evofosfamide

[edit]

Hello Babitaarora, please can you see my discussion regarding this topic with Edgar181 on his User talk:Edgar181 page. Please can you undo your edit? --LamasUI (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ई-मेल्

[edit]

आप कृपया लॉग इन करके, अपने यूज़र् पेज् के दाहिनि, ऊपरि कोने पर "प्रिफरेन्सस्" लिंक पर क्लिक करके अपना ई-मेल् सक्रिय करें — Preceding unsigned comment added by Сергей1 (talkcontribs) 15:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Hi.

How are you finding out whether the uploaded information is reliable or not. Will you read the entire article..? And if some changes are made in some page, how are you getting to know it..? Im not an intruder. I just wanna know these thing... But i really appreciate the job you do.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.221.102.121 (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sky King, Inc. edits

[edit]

AerLine Holdings LLC recently acquired Sky King, Inc. and would like to make edits to Sky King's Wikipedia web page. After making some edits, the changes I made were rejected.

How do I go about making edits that are authorized?

Nicolas Finazzo Manager AerLine Holdings LLC — Preceding unsigned comment added by AerLine Holdings LLC (talkcontribs) 16:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

on the topic Mastitis

[edit]

Isn't that the same way I am suppose to connect articles of two different articlesarticles ?

Please correct me if I am wrong .

Learnerktm (talk) 10:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to a biography page

[edit]

Hi, I am trying to fix an error on a biography page on behalf of that actual living person. There is continuously an error message at the top of the page which reads "This biographical article relies on references to primary sources. Please add references to secondary or tertiary sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. (October 2014)" I have tried to contact administrators for help regarding the text which is creating this error message but have had no reply, and today after taking out the references from the text I had a message from you that I may be blocked for vandalism. My edits have been deleted and the article reverted to an older version where the above mentioned error message has now returned. I'm trying to help the individual correct the Wikipedia page which has been created about him. Please let me know how to proceed without being blocked? Many indicated how I should proceed. --163.1.246.64 (talk) 11:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should have removed Primary sources and provided reliable Sources But you have removed reflist (Reference Section) which make the article inappropriate.Babita arora 10:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The No Spam Barnstar
For your Camera edit notice on User_talk:50.101.109.176 Crossark (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assemblywomen

[edit]

Hello, why did you revert my edit on Assemblywomen? Did you read my edit comment? Bever (talk) 07:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I was just passing through PendingChanges and noticed you beating me undoing vandalism. Your contributions are amazing. Happy undoing vandalism!! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Glover antiquarian article

[edit]

I am three-times great grandson of Stephen Glover. The recent edits by me (Graeme Ilkeston) are closely based on biographical work by my cousin, who is similarly relates to Glover, and which will form the basis of the introduction to his unpublished Notebooks. I should be grateful if my edits were not deleted; the existing article being perfunctory in the extreme and in no way reflecting Glovers workGraeme Ilkeston (talk) 17:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Mobile Omega Article

[edit]

Cherry mobile has its own article but creating a specific article for a re-branded phone with bad english should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invinzible (talkcontribs) 08:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is this?

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:200.120.80.123&oldid=644824598&diff=cur

"Vandalism"? Really?? --200.120.80.123 (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted Updating Failed

[edit]

Anotherclown/Babitaarora reverted my edits to '7th Battalion, the Roy Australian Regiment' citing that I had not even read revisions made by another editor. I shall address that: 1. Deletion of referenced information: there was very little/no deletion of existing information. There was some change of order which you would prevent you from seeing this if you clicked 'difference between revisions'. Some information was replaced because it was out of date/no longer relevant.

2. Undue weight being placed on recent operations. You will notice that: -Vietnam first tour contained 581 words. -Vietnam second tour contained 494 words. -RTF-1 contained contained 424 words. -MRTF-1 contained contained 629 words. -ATF-1 contained contained 171 words. -ATF-2 and Kabul contained 215 words. This demonstrates that the spread of operational commentary is fairly even, and leans towards less information relating to the most recent operations. It should be noted that the information pertaining to ATF 1&2 is very limited in the civilian sphere; not even held by the Australian War Memorial.

3. Addition of non-free images that will likely be deleted as they don't comply. Most of the images involved in the article were released by the Australian Department of Defence for Media use; the rest were previously available on Wikipedia or taken by members of the 7th Bn who release the images for public use.

4. A large amount of unreferenced text being added. I'll approach this in two parts: 4a. I can only see the following paragraphs without citations MRTF-1 Operations (this information was gained from the same reference as MRTF-1 Para, don't see a need to quote it twice) ATF-2 (There is very little written about this deployment, none on the internet or at the War Memorial. The information gained was through interview of 7RAR pers who were present. ADF Social Media policy indicates that Defence members cannot identify themselves on Social Media, nor would I want to identify them.) SIB/current composition (No civilian interest was apparent when 7 RAR transitioned to SIB. The information was gained first hand be people who were there last year) Hierarchy (This list is maintained current absolutely nowhere in print and cannot be referenced. Instead; I challenge anybody to disprove it.) Graham Cornes Football match (an initiative taken last year by LTCOL Wells, it has received nil media attention. There is nothing anywhere to reference to it either in print or digitally, except the picture of it occurring.) KIA (This list was transcribed from the honour roll displayed at 7RAR's barracks in Horseshoe Lines, Adelaide. I have subsequently revised this and included a reference.)

5. Lists of soldiers killed in action which is probably not appropriate per WP:NOTMEMORIAL There is no attempt to memorialize the list of 7 RAR members who died on operations; simply a list. It does not say 'in respect of' or 'lest we forget' or anything except that they were killed in action. The intent in future is to investigate each of these members and provide information regarding their background, service and manner of death. The leadership of 7RAR was canvassed IRT listing the Bn's KIA and overwhelmingly agreed that it was appropriate and in good taste, as I'm sure the families of the deceased would agree.

6. Quite a lot of "trivia" has been included (i.e. various dining in nights, football matches etc.) these really should not be included per WP:TRIVIA. This 'trivia' is included under the heading 'Regimental Artifacts and Traditions'. Yes; it is a list. It is an important list that defines factors of a the Bn's culture and identity; it is not trivia and should not be presented in another way.

Approximately 6,300 words of new information was presented in this revision, updating the article from about 2006 to 2015. It is the work of the Officers of the 7th Battalion. I may be new to Wiki Formatting etc (FYI this interface is extremely prohibitive and counter to Wikimedia's objectives). I do not believe that this knowledge, derived from subject matter experts, holds no value to Wikipedia and the world. I believe that the information should be left as posted. If people wish to add more information, or references become available in future, they can add them. I'm sure there are a lot of 'amateurish' Wikipedia edits out there that present new information. It should be up to the community to improve the presentation of the information; not to suppress it.

I'm going to re-edit the page with a few minor mods as per your suggestions. I noted that you could not have read the article in the time it took between posting and revert. I implore you to look at more than the comparison tool as it is misleading due to the change in order (which is why I wanted to restart the article initially). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7RAR (talkcontribs) 12:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No I have done correct thing as I am the Upadhyay Vibhour Upadhayy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.126.111 (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk

[edit]

Hello,

Today when I was searching for some topic on wikipedia, I received this "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:1.186.163.26&redirect=no" which says you undid my contribution to Mukesh Ambani. But I haven't contributed anything on Wikipedia. So I think there is some misunderstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.163.26 (talk) 03:00, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why you take down the truth about dion ?????

[edit]

24.137.218.26 (talk) 10:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Call me on +91-8561924762 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.126.111 (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen glover?

[edit]

Just wondering why you removed additions from Graeme Ilkeston about my relative. Knowing something of the history Graeme was approximately correct. His stated source was family papers. (I would like see them though). As far as I understand Stephen Glover's papers went into Derby Museum and there are some manuscripts scattered about, some in Cambridge which I have seen. Is it appropriate to edit family history pages of other people's families? I don't know Graeme Ilkeston but I thought he made an interesting addition.

GLOVER-JUSTSOITSNOTSIMILAR! (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Heggre

[edit]

Is a pornographer, the edit should not have been reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.246.16.116 (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

whatever

[edit]
whateveer
I make correct statement in public which is being done .what was written earlier is destructive.It might destroy student life as u r making false promises and fake ratings over there.Y donot u visit the college before commenting Hablukiller (talk) 12:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

y u delete mai editz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.104.106.195 (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Hi

Cosmic Emperor (talk) 10:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning vs. help

[edit]

You posted a warning at User talk:Textual solutions. Sometimes it is better to welcome the user. Welcome templates provide links to help the user know how to edit. Also, consider a personal note to address the user's problem. The editor in question was not vandalizing, but rather not knowing how to edit. We do not want to chase him away. We want to help him be constructive. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Hi

ਬਬਿਤਾ ਅਰੋਰਾ (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

E mail tepmplate

[edit]

I send a E mail to Darkness Shines and i wanted to add You have got mail tamplate but the page was semi protected. Why did you reverted my request. --ЗОРДАНЛИГХТЕР (talk) 05:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ЗОРДАНЛИГХТЕР: Sorry about that; It seems to me unconstructive edit. Now I have done your request. Babita arora 06:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
For protecting WP C E (talk) 07:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upadhyay

[edit]

Mrs./Ms. Babita Arora I am Vibhour Upadhyay who changed the wikipedia page of Upadhyay. I know everything about Upadhyay i.e. from its history. So I request you to revert changes to it. Thank You If you want any other help mail me at markecolven@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markecol (talkcontribs) 07:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you have time, could you take a quick look at Impalement? An IP extensively edited it (a good article) and really messed it up--in good faith. I reverted twice and don't want to go beyond since it is not vandalism. Thanks. --I am One of Many (talk) 07:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're no fun anymore

[edit]

You're no fun anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.124.144.11 (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]