User talk:Atlantic306/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Atlantic306. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
It's unclear why you reverted IABot. I can find nothing wrong with the edit. -- GreenC 14:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ah if you mean the last link to WebCite not working. That requires help from the community. Login to the IABot interface and update the database so IABot knows that link is not working. Explained on the article's talk page with links where to go and what to do. -- GreenC 14:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Will you restore the archive link to http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/quotes100.pdf?docID=242 which is not working? -- GreenC 14:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Declined PROD at Destination Imagination
I note that you declined the PROD that I tagged on Destination Imagination on the ground that it had survived a previous AfD in 2008. Should there not be some means of letting lesser mortals know of previous AfDs ? I was unaware and nor could I have been aware of the previous AfD unless I was a current admin (which I am obviously not). As an admin could you not perhaps promote an RfC to ensure that past deletion histories are summarised on article talk pages, if would help greatly and avoid a waste of ordinary editors time. Incidentally, I would regard it as a great travesty of logic for an article without a single independent reference to survive an AfD; but then logical process and decisions at AfD have often seemed to be running in dichotomous directions. Thanks Velella Velella Talk 21:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
CXT/Pages to review
Hi, Atlantic306,
Thanks for helping out with the review of the X2 articles in the list at WP:AN/CXT/PTR. I notice you approve a high percentage of the items you look at, and I'm just wondering what your methodology is. I'm looking at this sequence of edits and I see that you okayed articles in that batch that were originally translated from Dutch, Portuguese, Romanian, Telugu, and Welsh. Do you have some level of familiarity with these languages, or how are you able to verify that the translations of these articles are okay? Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 03:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 05:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Challenge: Champs vs. Pros - CM Punk Bio
As you are a recent editor on The Challenge: Champs vs. Pros would you mind leaving a comment and vote on the information we will be using for CM Punk professional experience. Click here to see survey --> CM Punk Bio WikiVirusC (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
CSD-G11 usage
I had to remove your tag from Mester Gyula. A resume of a reasonably academic scientist does not qualify under this criteria unless it is full of WP:PEACOCK. Even in the latter case a simple ani-PEACOCK cleanup will do. If you disagree, I would like to see your arguments discussed in WT:CSD. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello
|
Thank you |
| Thank you for your kind words on Chidera Okolie's page's proposed deletion. MirabelIkwuebe (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC) |
- Thanks, I hope its kept Atlantic306 (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 803 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
page Buried Seeds
Hello Atlantic306, Thank you for reviewing the page Buried Seeds. I believe deletion of almost the entire article and images was a mistake and I kindly request your review. I have indeed accidentally reverted your deletion of the first version of the synopsis and I appreciate catching the similarity to IMDB. In fact on the contrary, in the latest version the synopsis was rewritten based on a sources different from IMDB. There was absolutely no copyvio and all sources were accurately provided. I ask you to kindly restore the article or provide specific areas to improve rather than deleting most of the content. Thank you very much. - Sungoesup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungoesup (talk • contribs) 20:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Why new wikipedia article is not indexed in google search engine?
Hi, It is almost a week since the article "St. Joseph's institute of management, Bangalore" was published in wikipedia. However, it does not yet appear in google search result? What is the reason? Any solution for this? Frmanoj (talk) 02:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
ST contrib stalking
I noticed this. He's been doing it to me for awhile, I just ignore it, it's not worth bothering about IMO. My two cents. Waggie (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Robert Ferns Waller Referencing
Hello there, thanks for your comments on the Robert Ferns Waller page. I've now added some references pointing to the online obituaries. Are they sufficient to remove the sources banner at the top of the page? (the obituaries have basically drawn their information from the other sources cited). Thanks for your help with this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunemoons77 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
CCA Page
Greetings, thanks for flagging the Canadian Communication Association page. We did add three academic journal article (3/5) sources. Doesn't the flag seem a bit excessive considering this? Or is it just meant to encourage further editing? Best, Jaobar (talk) 20:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- The Canadian Journal of Communication does not seem to be independent of the association, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, while I see your point, suggesting that the CJC is an internal source is incorrect. It is true that there is an affiliation; however, academic articles are not overseen by the CCA. They are written by independent authors, at different academic institutions, edited and published by academics with CCA memberships who are not marketers or publicists. It is my understanding that your flag is more commonly used to identify articles where concerns about marketing and advertising are more obvious. While I appreciate your concern here, as well as the concerns of Diannaa, which I have commented on here, it does appear that these edits are a bit excessive, considering the consensus determined with similar articles for similar associations. Best, --Jaobar (talk) 18:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm not implying advertising as there is a specific tag for that its just that clearly independent refs are best so if you can find at least another 2 refs that have significant coverage of the CCA not from the CJC or CCA the tag can be removed, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, while I see your point, suggesting that the CJC is an internal source is incorrect. It is true that there is an affiliation; however, academic articles are not overseen by the CCA. They are written by independent authors, at different academic institutions, edited and published by academics with CCA memberships who are not marketers or publicists. It is my understanding that your flag is more commonly used to identify articles where concerns about marketing and advertising are more obvious. While I appreciate your concern here, as well as the concerns of Diannaa, which I have commented on here, it does appear that these edits are a bit excessive, considering the consensus determined with similar articles for similar associations. Best, --Jaobar (talk) 18:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- The Canadian Journal of Communication does not seem to be independent of the association, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Jacki Page
Dear Atlantic306, Thanks for reviewing this page. I have had the sections which required citations removed. Also, had the COI items removed. Could your help me remove the error boxes? thanks Majixdesign (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, it still needs inline citations for each of the facts, the coi tag should stay for the timebeing, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Could you help me point out areas, I could check for citations, thanks Majixdesign (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Firstly, the introduction, early life and infobox all need inline citations and then adding citations to the filmography would be very good. Please see WP:Reliable sources and WP:Referencing for beginners, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Each fact only needs to be referenced once so for example his birthday only needs to be referenced in the text or the infobox but not both, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- ThanksMajixdesign (talk) 16:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Each fact only needs to be referenced once so for example his birthday only needs to be referenced in the text or the infobox but not both, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, it still needs inline citations for each of the facts, the coi tag should stay for the timebeing, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Rachel Burks
You commented on Rachel Burks of New Bell Music's talk page that she should change her username because it could be construed as advertising. I think you may need to review WP:USERNAME. Read this part:
- However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc.
"Rachel Burks of New Bell Music" fits the definition of "clearly intended to denote an individual person". The person in question has now renamed to Rachel Burks, but keep this point in mind in the future. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 16:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for noticing !
Thanks for reviewing my efforts at creating the page The KGB and Soviet Disinformation ! What do you think of the article? Sagecandor (talk) 23:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Very good and should get good article status in my humble opinion Atlantic306 (talk) 23:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
hello
hello sir,
my pages not reviewed can you please do it for mt. thank you. wikibot 13:35, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Today I added to the Tomasz Wójcik external links three new reference links.
I would like to hope that this is enough to get Tomasz Wójcik's website to return to normal status.
Best regards from Warsaw/Poland --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Can you try and find some more references such as newspapers or magazine articles, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Tomasz Wójcik started as a poster designer in the early 1990s, when the newspaper editors kept their archives only in the form of paper prints, rather than on computer disks. Therefore references from this period are not available on the internet.
Wójcik is an outsider in the world of the Polish poster, he created himself an individual style of geometrical computer vector graphics. Therefore, the poster reviewers have difficulties to describe Wójcik’s posters.
I cited three reference articles from the 2000s: from “Dziennik Polski”, “Gazeta Wyborcza” and “Rzeczpospolita” newspapers and from four exhibition catalogs.
Despite my greatest efforts, I am not able to find more references available on the internet. I have exhausted all the possibilities to save this article. Please help! --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 08:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Music venues
Thanks for your input on the Ottobar page. It looks like you are a music lover and live in Scotland. Can you recommend any Ottobar-like (or Saint-like venues in Scotland? I'm creating a Clubs & Castles tour of Scotland (and maybe Ireland and Germany) for myself and a friend. No doubt some pictures from the tour will be used to illustrate WP articles. I'm more reluctant to commit to articles - they are more work. Lhcollins (talk) 03:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, glad to help.Regarding music venues can't help much as live in quite a remote northern place where the music is mainly occasional in pubs, sorry Atlantic306 (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
PRODs of Japanese people
I've noticed you've been throwing up a lot of PRODs of Japanese historical figures. These articles are uncited, but the Japanese versions appear to be (for the most part) cited, suggesting the articles should be improved rather than deleted—there certainly don't seem to be any WP:NOTABILITY issues. I'd volunteer to transfer over the refs myself, but you're PRODding at such a rate that I doubt I could keep up. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, Curly "JFC" Turkey I haven't actually prodded any of them I just added the prod edit summary with a dummy edit to make it clear whats going on as the actual prodder did not leave an edit summary, I actually deprodded one of them. I agree with your point and agree to you deprodding and adding refs if you choose to do so, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Also those prods were made last Wednesday, ive just been doing prodpatrol for that day Atlantic306 (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks—I just assumed it was you, since you added the templates. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't add the templates just an edit summary with a dummy edit, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Yellow people listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow people. Since you had some involvement with the Yellow people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Prisencolin (talk) 06:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Aron Wright (Songwriter)
Please give me specific advice to help improve this page. I work for this musician's management and all of these claims are factual. You say these are unreliable sources? How so? Which sources are you referring to? How can I improve this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChopShop123 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Rubinacci (Brand)
Dear Atlantic306, I created the page for this tailor company: Rubinacci. I'm a researcher of the fashion industry and I've realized that there are not historical tailoring companies present in Wikipedia. I thought that the page I created for Rubinacci was interesting. I saw that you sentenced that was kind of advertising. So, I'll do it again, but your advice is to do it more informal not entering in subjective facts right? Thanks and I will be very grateful for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergimartinezcarulla (talk • contribs) 10:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Dellamarie Parrilli
Atlantic306, thank you so much for the "thank you" notice re: my edits on the Dellamarie Parrilli page; I sure appreciate it. I saw that one or more unregistered user(s) was insistent on taking the article down, but the research I found and added should demonstrate in no uncertain terms that she is indeed notable and in fact has a pretty storied career.
The reason I am writing is that I suspect that the article may be eligible for a rating higher than "start class" at this time, and I would like to see if the article could potentially be reviewed and rated based on its adherence to Wikipedia standards. Are you able to review and rate articles? Or is there another way that I could request that the article be reviewed? Thank you in advance for your help.
Doing what I can to make Wikipedia better, Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. As an IP address I proposed Rob Dobrenski for deletion and you contested it; I have therefore started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Dobrenski if you'd care to have a say there. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
some musician
How would you know what the deleted version looked like if it was deleted in 2010 and you didn't start editing until 2015? Chris Troutman (talk) 00:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Because a substantial amount of content in this article was about his work post 2010 so G4 was inapplicable IMO Atlantic306 (talk) 00:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I hadn't thought of that. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:14, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- For G4s it is possible to check deleted versions in the Wayback machine, although I haven't seen it encouraged Atlantic306 (talk) 00:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- I hadn't thought of that. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:14, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Because a substantial amount of content in this article was about his work post 2010 so G4 was inapplicable IMO Atlantic306 (talk) 00:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Re article on Rod Diridon Sr
Dear Atlantic306 - Thank you for your comments. However, you are eliminating statements that are referenced and also editing out material in real time while I am adding the references. Please wait until I finish adding the references to edit or comment, or I will not be able to complete the referencing because the article keeps reverting to an earlier version without the information that I am referencing. This is interfering with the process of documenting the article. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalglo (talk • Globalglo (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)contribs) 14:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Also, please note the citation in the article regarding the archived papers of Diridion Sr. As a public official, his papers are archived in the special collections of a public library, the Martin Luther King Library in San Jose. The papers are indexed, the index is available online, and they are publicly available through the library. That fact is cited in the Wikipedia article. Virtually all references for the article can be found in the archive, and specific citations to the archive are being provided in the Wikipedia article as appropriate. Globalglo (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for adding references Atlantic306 (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Dear Atlantic306 - Thank you very much! I have finished virtually all of the references. Please let me know if you believe any of the citations need improvement. All the best! Globalglo Globalglo (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
About Page deletion
Hello Atlantic306,
today i recieved a message that the page i created which was informative has been deleted from your side due to over promotional content.
can you please help me to understand where i went promotional and what all changes i have to make to meet the guidelines
please help
please get in touch Damanbir (talk)Damanbir —Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Fronting coi against subject
Atlantic306: Requesting help in fronting Chris Troutman, as it seems he is has some coi against Kobi Arad.
As I see it subject meets notability in following sections: WP:GNG non trivial and objective coverage by reliable sources such as: ynet.com, Jewish Week, All About Jazz (article), Israel Times, The Forward and Jerusalem Post. WP:MUSICBIO 1,6,7,9
Please help in support the article. Ee212 (talk) 07:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Replied on user's talkpage Atlantic306 (talk) 18:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Haven't seen it there Ee212 (talk) 03:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Sent message at my userpage Ee212 (talk) 23:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thanks for taking the time to review so many of my articles. Bennv3771 (talk) 00:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC) |
- Thanks they are very good Atlantic306 (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply and assistance, Is there is any other mode where i can get in touch with you to get the help in content redrafting and review before publishing
Please get i touch
looking forward for your reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damanbir (talk • contribs) 05:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Twenty-Four Hours (TV program)
Hello, Atlantic306,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Twenty-Four Hours (TV program) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty-Four Hours (TV program) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Mduvekot (talk) 13:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Didn't create this article just moved it to draftspace because it had no references and then the author copy and pasted it back to mainspace while leaving out the early edits from its history, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)- Given that I now see you used rollback to do this edit war and did it also back in 2019, with your block history, i've pulled your rollback. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- My block history is one previous block in July 2019 for one hour. At Hetton-le-Hole I was reverting vandalism which is not edit warring. IP vandals have been changing the description from town to village or city when it is obviously a town with a town council (see external links with the link to the Town Council). Last night I discussed it with the ip 80.225.208.29 (talk · contribs) and asked for page protection. Today an obvious sock of that ip now 79.65.78.3 (talk · contribs) resumed the same editing and it is obvious that they were not a good faith editor as they last edited their talkpage with a smiley and lol. Also I had earlier reported both ips to AIV. Overall then this is very unfair as I was and have been reverting vandalism at Hetton-le-Hole, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- You need to review WP:Vandalism. The IP's changes were not vandalism. Disruptive, probably yes, edit-warring, absolutely yes, but not vandalism. Also, some IP's are dynamic, so I'd say it's more likely the other editor was just assigned a new IP, rather than intentionally socking. You won't be getting your rollback back until you demonstrate you have an understanding of what vandalism is. Also, repeatedly rollbacking another user on their own talkpage was beyond inappropriate. You've been here for long enough, you should have known about WP:OWNTALK by now. Per WP:REMOVED, restoring talk page notices is not an exception to 3rr either, which you also broke on the IP's talk page. Sro23 (talk) 21:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- My block history is one previous block in July 2019 for one hour. At Hetton-le-Hole I was reverting vandalism which is not edit warring. IP vandals have been changing the description from town to village or city when it is obviously a town with a town council (see external links with the link to the Town Council). Last night I discussed it with the ip 80.225.208.29 (talk · contribs) and asked for page protection. Today an obvious sock of that ip now 79.65.78.3 (talk · contribs) resumed the same editing and it is obvious that they were not a good faith editor as they last edited their talkpage with a smiley and lol. Also I had earlier reported both ips to AIV. Overall then this is very unfair as I was and have been reverting vandalism at Hetton-le-Hole, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Did you look at the page history of Hetton-le-Hole and the various vandalism. Also the ips last comment of a smiley and lol showed it was obviously vandalism. I shouldn't have reverted on his talkpage but I wanted the notice to be visible for WP:AIN. Suppose i'll have to take this to AN, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you check the contributions of the first ip you can see it is a static ip, so the second ip was very probably a sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 02:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Zak Smith on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible Merge Suggestion
Hi Atlantic306,
I do not feel that just because List of Bandbudh Aur Budbak episodes has more information about the episodes than the actual article Bandbudh Aur Budbak it should be allowed to remain. May I suggest a merge of the separate episodes into the main article? I think it will go better there?
Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 19:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Nevermind, I see the layout now. Thanks Bakertheacre Chat/My Contibutions 19:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
You may want to see my comment in the AfD, having found several sources. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Jooble
Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jooble, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. GedUK 10:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of page Renato Feder
Hello,
the page Renato Feder was translated from the Wikipedia in Portuguese, but the Portuguese version itself will soon be deleted, as it has been suggested "elimination by consensus" and the majority of the users participating in the discussion want the page to be deleted. Thus, I think that the English version of this page should also be eliminated.
--Lp.vitor (talk) 19:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, it is not bad enough for speedy deletion but WP:PROD or WP:AFD are available, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I understand. Thank you very much! --Lp.vitor (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Propaganda on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
NagalandExpress article undo - delete
NagalandExpress Digital News is the only online news service from Nagaland State in India. With a population of around 21 lakhs, people of Nagaland depends this service.
Could you please tell me what is the reason for deleting this article? It took almost two hours to make an article. It was very disappointing to see that it was removed. Can you tell me how is this relevancy decided? This news is even published in Google news within 4 months of launch, because there was no other online news service from Nagaland State.
Wikipedia Article name: 'NagalandExpress'
Google news: NagalandExpress. https://news.google.com/s/CBIwuLTMzEQ?sceid=IN:en&r=11&oc=1
Website: https://nagalandexpress.com Nagaland Express (talk) 07:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Replied on your talkpage, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
12th Mirchi Music Awards
Hey, I am inviting you to please see 12th Mirchi Music Awards page which I have recently been created.
Aftermath kindly give your valuable feedback on my talk page.
Thanks
DueMue (talk) 07:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- It has already been reviewed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:BMW Z3 on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Deletion proposals/nominations
Thanks for your concern, but a lot of the books I nominated were from the same non-notable series, for example Cooper Kids (3 books) and Spirit Flyer (4 books) and often included the author as well. Most of these books turned up next to no results beyond the expected (the books themselves, catalogue entries, author sites, etc.) Dronebogus (talk) 01:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi Jimmy,
You are really a rock star ... congratulation way to go... Playlikeastar (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC) |
- thanks, wish I was a rock star Atlantic306 (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
FOTBOT
Given that a google search shows the Racism controversy over the CEO, it's been Widley covered by the national Press in both Print and TV News Format. Which clearly mention both the charity and the CEO (Ref: CEO is cited as Key individual) this is clearly relevant to the page and should be allowed. Strong source citation from a leading UK newspaper also attached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23CC:C00:D00:5488:3986:D6EE:3B81 (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
How is a tracklist unencyclopedic?
While the formatting itself was probably off due to the base article being so old, it is relevant. Are you deleting it out of a sense of moral panic or do you really think tracklists are somehow only sometimes relevant to the articles of albums?--181.115.61.109 (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- It will be at AFD soon, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- There's a full article on it on AMG, plus it's heavily referred when discussing AC as a whole on news articles. It's far from being the most discussed album, but it scrapes by the notability threshold. --181.115.61.109 (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- One review is not enough, and the content related more to AC belongs in the main article,imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- There's a full article on it on AMG, plus it's heavily referred when discussing AC as a whole on news articles. It's far from being the most discussed album, but it scrapes by the notability threshold. --181.115.61.109 (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- It will be at AFD soon, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:I-League on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Joe Lentol Move
Hi there! It looks like you might not have completed the round robin move for Joseph R. Lentol and Joe Lentol, as the latter is still in draft space. Do you mind finishing that up when you get a chance? Thank you! Brooklynpedestrian (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, fixed it now, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Kinjaz
Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Kinjaz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. GedUK 15:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Welkin-Animation
Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Welkin-Animation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not completely promotional. Co-producing a notable series is a sufficient claim of significance. Thank you. SoWhy 07:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Re: Reversing edits on the J Sai Deepak article
Hi Jimmy! I noticed that you reverted the edits on J. Sai Deepak. I must say I find that most peculiar, since you provided no reasons for doing so, and the effect is that there is now outdated information on the article. Let me point out the key problems:
- The subject no longer works as an associate partner at Saikrishna & Associates, there are numerous sources substantiating this. I do not understand why this incorrect information needs to be reverted to.
- The phrasing is appalling and the content inconsequential; it reads like marketing again. He worked on cases pertaining to Medical Law and Constitutional Litigation among others. - this is not only badly written, it adds nothing. His notability is not as a lawyer and is not regarding his representation in medical law cases, he is notable singularly for his role in the Sabarimala case. Piggybacking off that notability factor to turn the article into marketing is not acceptable.
- The sections on Education, Career, Papers are extraordinarily short and do not need to be broken up like this. Again, this is not a resume or CV, we need it to be an article. The inclusion of papers is also unnecessary, what other notable lawyer has their papers listed on their Wikipedia articles? Deepak is not notable for his contribution to legal academia, and writing papers is a common activity by law students and lawyers alike. This seems like an obvious addition to fluff up the profile to me.
- There is only a primary source for him being the Legal Mentor of the Indic Collective, i.e. their own website.
- The sentence structure of the old version is thoroughly inappropriate and adds nothing of value to the article, particularly since the case in question had itself not received widespread media attention. See: ...who represented the State of Madhya Pradesh in the case where the state government moved the Delhi high court on the issue of challenging the cease in supply of Basmati breeder seeds from the Center to the state on the basis of office memorandum.
I'm undoing that change, please do reach out in case you feel there is still a reason to revert back to the Phil Bridger iteration. It would be appreciated if there is a discussion beforehand.
Blaspheme Byron (talk) 11:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Page Moving
Hello I need help with a little complication. Primarily I’ve used this flag to aid me in my new page patrolling duties as it draftifies articles without leaving redirects but sometimes when trying to perform a “move to draft” action I’m hit with the “Article already exists in draftspace” frustrating message. Could you help me identify the method in which I’m to take to successfully move the article back to draftspace? Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's a bit awkward because it usually means there are two versions of the article- one in mainspace and one in draftspace. Not sure what the proper procedure is but sometimes i've redirected the one in mainspace if there is a suitable target and left the one in draftspace, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
@Celestina007: move the article to "draft:XYZ 2", in edit summary mention draft:XYZ esists, then add a notice at the top of both the draft copies. One should ask such questions on talkpages of projects, where you would get opinions of multiple experts. For this question, it should have been WT:NPP/R, and not WT:RM. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 22:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran: and where is that stated in policy or guidelines? regards Atlantic306 (talk)
- usernamekiran (and Celestina007, since you asked originally), I'm going to overrule you a little bit here. If there is already a draft, and (99% of the time) the article is a copy of the draft, then the page needs to be taken to AFD. There is zero point in creating a dozen variants of a draft page if the creator is going to just keep creating the page in the article space. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Primefac: I completely agree with that too. But I would also make the decision based on the activity of creator; especially if the creators are different. That would fall in the remaining 1% of the cases I think. If there are similarities, and other doubts; then it would definitely be AfD + SPI. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- usernamekiran (and Celestina007, since you asked originally), I'm going to overrule you a little bit here. If there is already a draft, and (99% of the time) the article is a copy of the draft, then the page needs to be taken to AFD. There is zero point in creating a dozen variants of a draft page if the creator is going to just keep creating the page in the article space. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Primefac, HA! the universe is really crazy, I resolved to follow this course of action about 4 days ago & today you confirm it. If I see a BLP article I moved to draft moved back to mainspace with 0 sources still, the next step would be straight to an AFD! that is, following a before search though. Celestina007 04:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Yung Gravy Edit Reversal
Good day. You reversed the edits I made on the Yung Gravy page today, and I'm wondering if you can explain what additions felt promotional? I looked pretty hard to find sources for everything I added. I think I found every reliable source on his career thus far. I'd be willing to edit it based on your feedback as overall I think I greatly improved the article.
Thanks