User talk:Athaenara/Deletions 2011-2016

This is an archive of deletion discussions from 2011 through 2016.

Please do not edit the contents of this page.

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, do so on the current talk page.

2011

Deletion of redirect

re: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Church of Latter-Day Saints))

If you are going to close a deletion debate, that is your perogative. Nor will I necessarily argue with your assessment of the direction that the debate was going. You can not, however, delete using a speedy-deletion justification once any editor has argued in good faith to keep the page. The rules for speedy-deletion are unambiguous. They are for deletions which every reasonable editor would agree require deletion. Once dissent has been expressed, however, you do not have the necessary unanimity to use the speedy-deletion criteria.

Speedy-deletion criterion G6 in particular can not be used to delete the redirects that are automatically created during the pagemove process unless, for example, you are only temporarily deleting in order to complete a multistep pagemove or history merger. Rossami (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted (log) per your objection. – Athaenara ✉ 15:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Rossami (talk)

Thanks for the support

You have been kind enough to process a number of my speedy delete nominations - many thanks. It always worries me that my judgement might be at fault, so its good to see them disappear, and so quickly too ! Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of User talk:92.16.229.56

Hi, my watchlist says you G7'd this page. Did it appear to be at my request? If so, I think there might have been some impersonation going on. Can you sent me the diff for the G7 request, because I can't remember making such a request. I did post some vandalism warning messages there, though.... - Pointillist (talk) 00:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for undeleting. I thought I had only done that at User talk:78.86.213.106—apparently I was assuming more good faith than I realised, but the vandalisms and partial reverts at Bruce Forsyth took a lot of unscrambling, so maybe I made a mistake. Do restore the deletion if you wish: and thanks for the speedy response. - Pointillist (talk) 00:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you're welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 00:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated, anyway. Some of you admins work so hard it takes my breath away. - Pointillist (talk) 00:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:John David Duty

Hello, I started a new stub from scratch for John David Duty, which I see that you deleted for past copyvio issues. Would it be possible for you to restore just the talk page, so that I can improve the article from any past discussions that may have taken place? Cheers. KimChee (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another admin deleted the article four weeks ago (log). I deleted the talk page two days later (log) after it showed up here. – Athaenara ✉ 07:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, not much there after all, but thank you! KimChee (talk) 08:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 08:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NIFLA article re-created

Hello, A. The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates article was re-created, so I re-created a NIFLA page to re-direct to it. --Kenatipo ^speak! 01:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page for Tea Lore

Hi Athaenara. Isn't it a little funny to blank/delete the talk page for an article that is currently undergoing AfD? I'm trying to figure this out. Thanks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page (now restored, sorry I didn't notice the AfD) turned up in Wikipedia:Database reports/Blank single-author pages. – Athaenara ✉ 00:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

k thanks Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

→ see also: page log

Hello, and good evening. I noticed you deleted my 9th sandbox. May I ask why? I'm not mad, I just need to know. --Ryder 02:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryder Busby (talk • contribs)

It turned up in the Wikipedia:Database reports/Broken redirects because it was a redirect to a deleted page. – Athaenara ✉ 05:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion

→ in re: Mountaineer Middle School (Morgantown, WV)

Thank you for deleting my page so fast! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by ISponges (talk • contribs) 02:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 03:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

... for removing my archives. I'm going to try that Signpost-subscription you're using to avoid this in the future. Cheers! †TE†Talk 05:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. (What's the Signpost connection?) – Athaenara ✉ 06:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I could've explained that better. I was subscribed for talkpage delivery and during periods of inactivity the Signposts were triggering unnecessary archives. Thanks again. †TE†Talk 17:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, of course! Yes, {{Signpost-subscription}} is much more convenient than loading up on fast-expiring content. – Athaenara ✉ 19:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. :) †TE†Talk 19:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you so much for deleting all those stupid file talk pages! It was a major cleanup. The WikiProject Oregon members will be thrilled! :-) Jsayre64 (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 08:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also left a note to you here, in case you're not watching the page. Jsayre64 (talk) 04:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One more important thing: I was told that deleting the pages with G6, not G8, is the correct thing to do. Jsayre64 (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review

→ in re: Wikipedia:Editor_review/Hugahoody

Hi. Just a note to say thank you for deleting my editor review page. Hugahoody (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 22:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking Portal:Somerset/Did you know/X

Hi, I see you've just blanked Portal:Somerset/Did you know/ 40-49 I presume you will also be doing 21-40 as these are now also blank - thats fine, however can you help me with 50-97 I can no longer see these as I've changed the portal box template format as we were approaching the 100 dyk limit, to have 5 entries on a page. 50-97 will have one liners which are included in 1-20 but I can see them to blank them - are you able to delete them?— Rod ^talk 15:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 16:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.— Rod ^talk 16:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :-) – Athaenara ✉ 23:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: the above discussion refers to my deletion of pages, some of which had been blanked by Rodw, the sole author, who requested deletion per {{db-g7}}. – Athaenara ✉ 21:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhi linux

Thanks for deleting Bodhi linux. You may not be aware that Bodhi (operating system) was deleted earlier by your fellow admin Chrislk02 (talk · contribs). Both have been recreated repeatedly. Any chance you could salt them both? --Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 01:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted archives

I see you deleted Talk:Chester A. Arthur/Archive 3. Would you mind doing the same for Talk:Rutherford B. Hayes/Archive 3. It's the same situation: the bot started on Archive 3, for some reason. Thanks, Coemgenus 19:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I had just clicked on the page history for the Hayes one when the new message alert for your post appeared (both pages were here this morning). – Athaenara ✉ 19:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, cool. I didn't even know that page existed! --Coemgenus 19:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of redirect

Talk:List of indictees of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

You recently deleted this as a recently created implausible redirect; however this was the name of the page for several years before it was moved yesterday for unclear reasons. We usually retain long-standing terms as redirects in case of external linking to the old titles. Rmhermen (talk) 04:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It showed up yesterday as a broken redirect. I restored it (page log) per your request and fixed the broken redirect (page history). – Athaenara ✉ 05:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the redirect is linked on only this page ~~and another database report~~. – Athaenara ✉ 01:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the article redirect remains undisturbed and this is the only page on Wikipedia which links to the talk page redirect, I re-deleted the latter (page log). – Athaenara ✉ 06:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tweet

I saw a comment on someone's talk page about receiving a tweet and that there was no template for it, so I got the idea to start a template...but I see this was deleted. I think it would be equally as useful as the {{You've Got Mail}} template, so what happened that led to the template's deletion in the first place? CycloneGU (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keraunoscopia created it and requested deletion per {{db-g7}} in August 2010. – Athaenara ✉ 21:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think there would be any type of objection if I recreated it? CycloneGU (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't. – Athaenara ✉ 22:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, and thanks for your time. =) CycloneGU (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome :-) Athaenara ✉ 22:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All right, new template up at {{Tweet}}. Image could use some work, but I'm sure someone will link a better-quality one eventually. I may make the wording more unique later (I based it on the "You've got mail" template), but the background strangely was already blue. =) CycloneGU (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pierrot lunaire (book)

I've just seen that you've deleted the talk page of the above (Talk:Pierrot lunaire (book)), and I wondered why. Beebuk 09:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted it for you (see the page log). – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page of the above has been deleted again (see my query of 19 March above). Is there some glitch in the works that I need to correct? Beebuk 10:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The page log (linked in my first reply to you) shows that MuZemike deleted it several hours ago, quite likely because the weekly update of Wikipedia:Database reports/Blank single-author pages included it again. The talk page can be undeleted for a second time, but it will probably continue to appear in that database report as long as you leave it blanked.

Why do you want a blank talk page there? – Athaenara ✉ 11:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I don't want a blank page there—but I assumed that it remains blank until someone has something to say about the page. Should I activate it in some way? How to do that? Sorry. I'm rather new at this game. Beebuk 00:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MuZemike fixed me up. I'm grateful to both of you for your help. Beebuk 13:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pages of non-existant users

Could you please delete this page: User:SCG01, User talk:SCG01. Thanks. Jessy ^T^/^C 23:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 23:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Test MfDs

Thank you very much for deleting my Twinkle MfD tests. It's greatly appreciated. I hopefully shouldn't need to make too many more tests (although I am still ironing out a few issues). — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Testing is worthwhile and deletion takes only a few seconds, don't worry about it. – Athaenara ✉ 07:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User page deletion

Thanks! I appreciate the quick deletion. ICYTIGER'SBLOOD 02:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you're welcome! – Athaenara ✉ 02:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bot is looking for a page you deleted

Quick note. User talk:AnomieBOT #EditorReviewArchiver: Cannot find user for Wikipedia:Editor review/Strange Passerby --Shirt58 (talk) 09:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The review was deleted per {{db-g7}} at the sole author's request, so I removed it from the review page and followed instructions on the bot page. Thanks for the note. – Athaenara ✉ 11:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Banane fredde amico mio :-) --Shirt58 (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for deleting User talk:75.57.242.120/marias87. Did you see the note inside the wikitext? 75.57.242.120 (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I haven't ever performed a revdel, so someone else (I don't know who) will have to handle that for you, sorry! – Athaenara ✉ 08:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. 75.57.242.120 (talk) 08:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avalanche City

I'm wondering why the page for Avalanche City was deleted. They are a notable band from New Zelaand, and it sems that New Zealand bands get deleted quite quickly. This is the third time that a band has been at number 1 for a while, and then I've gone to look them up (to get a more neutral perspective than the bands website) only to find out that they have been deleted.

I would create an article, but I'm not sure that it is worth the effort if it is going to just get deleted because they are a New Zealand band, and therefore not considered notable in the rest of the world. Mykuhl (talk) 12:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It contained only one line, was blanked by the author, and deleted per {{db-g7}}. If your article cites independent reliable sources which show the band's notability per Wikipedia:Notability (music), it is unlikely to be deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 12:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Graffham

Thanks for the speedy. What happens now to the AfD? Should we just leave it alone for 7 days and it disappears (since you provided it as a ref)? -- Nczempin (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (diff). – Athaenara ✉ 21:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Your speed here is most appreciated. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 06:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relay Foods

RelayFoods.com

Hi Athaenara,

I'm preparing work on RelayFoods.com and noticed that a page on the topic had already been created - then deleted - a few weeks ago. Following the rabbit trail for clues, your G8 deletion of that previous page makes sense. Do you mind restoring? Thanks! Enerjos (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The page to which RelayFoods.com redirected was created in March by Wkl5n (talk), tagged for deletion per WP:CSD {{db-g11}} and {{db-a7}} by Wuhwuzdat (talk), and deleted by RHaworth (talk). You can ask RHaworth directly or post on Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 21:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks for the quick response and for the help. Enerjos (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 22:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are we done?

I think I wore out my mouse on the last batch. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean all those dozens of redirects to a page which was deleted per Articles for deletion/Deal or No Deal (United States) models? – Athaenara ✉ 00:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I think it is break time, all of those redirects have got me a little cross-eyed. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

x-) A. 00:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meyya Meyyappan deleted?

Hi, the article on Meyya Meyyappan is recently deleted by you. May I ask why? I did not see or found a discussion on this, and he looks notable to me. -- SchreyP (talk) 09:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The article was deleted under the G7 criteria. maucho eagle 09:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can this type of delete be done without a discussion, so other (minor) contributors can't provide their comments? -- SchreyP (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any article nominated under any WP:CSD criteria will be, if deletion is not declined, with no discussion unless the speedy deletion is contested. maucho eagle 10:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I understand how this happened. Thanks MauchoEagle. -- SchreyP (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dont mention it. maucho eagle 10:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for deleting my userpages for me. Sorry if it was a hassle. xD ℥^nding·start 19:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you're welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 20:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting my unused user subpage. --Sonez1113 (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 18:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Association for Legalizing American Lotteries

→ see also: page history and talk page

I am contesting the PROD for The Association for Legalizing American Lotteries, please restore it. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images

While I'm putting you to work deleting all my old files...is it necessary to delete old files when I upload a smaller size? If so everything here above the generals logo. CTJF83 01:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A non-free image not used in any articles would be orphaned fair use but a new version uploaded in an existing file which is used in articles is a different case in which deletion of only the larger version might be requested (I've had no experience with that). – Athaenara ✉ 09:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok, I'm not sure how to tag just the larger files...you can't. CTJF83 18:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Music of DJMax

So you just deleted the whole thing instead? No regard whatsoever about the content of those lists, or perhaps even move those lists to each game's pages? You may or may not know, but all of the individual games don't have those same extant lists on their page as they all link to the Music of DJMax page. Which you have just deleted. This results then in the DJMax pages not having any song list at all, in the same page or in a different page, here in wikipedia. Thus forcing someone looking for the list to go to deidicated wiki's like gaming wikia or djmax wikidot. In being too static and too keen in "following the rules", you ended up making a bigger problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wan2tri (talk • contribs) 05:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Database reports/Broken redirects current edition includes a dozen or more to pages which were deleted per consensus at AFD (which I linked in my {{db-g8}} deletion summaries) where discussion was open for more than a week from April 19. I've no idea why you didn't participate in that discussion but you can take it up at Deletion review if you like. – Athaenara ✉ 08:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pieter Hugo

You just deleted this article as a prod despite the fact that it had at least one good third party reference & since his work is in major museums, he meets WP:CREATIVE. Please restore. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 21:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and thanks, DGG ( talk ) 21:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...!

Are you ever fast.[1][2] Many thanks. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! (...zoom) – Athaenara ✉ 05:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica 2011 Tour

Hi, you deleted Metallica 2011 Tour as a G4, however the main concern has passed that the tour had not started yet, is now addressed by it starting, It could be time for a new AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same thought about a new AFD, but it closed just a month ago. Do you want to request undeletion or deletion review, or restore it yourself and re-nom? – Athaenara ✉ 20:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restore?

→ see also: page history, page log, and User talk:Nyttend#Restore?

Could you please restore User:Baseball Watcher/Sandbox? I was just testing with it. Thanks. Baseball Watcher 23:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done but as long as your {{db-reason|1=TESTING}} tag is there it's going to keep showing up in CAT:SPEEDY. – Athaenara ✉ 00:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteen inch gauge railway

→ see also: confirmed and suspected sockpuppet categories

I notice that you've just deleted this, under G8. I don't understand this - there should be a significant article there. There have been some recent disruptive edits to railway gauge related articles (a banned mega-sock, see WikiProject Trains) and it has likely been renamed. However it needs to be restored, and links to it (under this name) certainly shouldn't be restored. As you used G8, I'm assuming that the page had become a redirect to a deleted page. Can you please tell me which, so that I can try and track down the real page. Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 00:02, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was 15 inch track gauge (page log). – Athaenara ✉ 00:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just confirming the message from Andy Dingley (talk · contribs) - this is an important article within the Trains WikiProject, albeit still developing. It has been lost through the Wiki-rape of the trains articles experienced over the last few days by mega-sock TC. It is important that we get it back. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 11:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the article we're after probably wasn't deleted, but rather moved somewhere else. If this was G8'ed and didn't have a page history with content in it, it was presumably just a redirect. We still ought to find it, but it's "sideways" rather than "behind". Andy Dingley (talk) 12:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what was in 15 inch track gauge:

15 inch track gauge (381) is a common minimum track gauge.
{{15 inch gauge railways}}
{{Rail gauges}}
Category:Track gauge by size
Category:15 inch gauge railways

Then it was tagged {{lead too short}}, {{unreferenced}}, {{Proposed deletion}} ("pointless article--too short to be of any use, easily combined into another article"). – Athaenara ✉ 19:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Combined into what article? Before deletion the contents should perhaps been transferred say to track gauge and the deleted article should, or could, perhaps have been transformed into a redirect to that new section in that existing article?? Peter Horn User talk 02:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ask Hichiro16, the editor who prodded it. – Athaenara ✉ 02:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I partially undeleted Fifteen inch gauge railway and restored the original redirect to Minimum gauge railway. If this is not wanted, I can re-delete it. – Athaenara ✉ 02:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That redirect is as good a solution as any and better than the one I suggested. Peter Horn User talk 02:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Dunn

Hi there,

I've been researching Nate Dunn to create an article which you deleted. I know that the article did not have references. I am in the process of adding those and don't check my Wiki account often enough to have protested your proposed deleting. Can this be restored so that I can add the appropriate references?

Nate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurorocker (talk • contribs) 01:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but after this people who want expired prods* restored are going to have to seek wider input at Requests for undeletion. Proposed deletion is a deliberately gentle community process with a built-in seven-day grace period. Expiration and deletion shouldn't fall back on the heads of those administrators who follow through at the end stage of the process. – Athaenara ✉ 01:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[Those which I've deleted, that is.* – Athaenara ✉ 01:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)][reply]

You have been thanked...

→ in re: file deletion

...at Id4abel's talk page. Just letting you know. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, I replied there. – Athaenara ✉ 04:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kawthekar High School

Please restore this prodded article. All HS whose real existence can be proven are considered notable--oI cannot recallone exception in the last 3 years. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you thinking of the schools exception to speedy {{db-a7}} rather than prod? At any rate, feel free to restore it if you feel it is appropriate. – Athaenara ✉ 08:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will, but I think you may have missed the point that they should never be deleted by any process for reasons of notability. DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, yes, but must note as well that the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion policy page does not mention schools, nor does the prod template. – Athaenara ✉ 00:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Entertainment Group

Page blanking

Hi. I'm writing about Talk:Marvel Entertainment Group, which is listed as deleted as per my request. I'm involved in a merge proposal regarding Marvel Entertainment Group and Marvel Entertainment, and I'm unsure what I may have said or done to have that page blanked, but that was never my intention. For whatever I may have inadvertently indicated, I apologize. Is there any way to correct this? --Tenebrae (talk) 05:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored (history) (log). – Athaenara ✉ 05:30, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting guidance

Hi, Athaenara. You've been helpful to me and you have some passing familiarity with this page, so I'm hoping you can give me some guidance on how to proceed on a merger.

At Talk:Marvel Entertainment/Archives/2012#Merger proposal, after a week and after public notices on three pages (including WikiProject Comics and WikiProject Business), three disinterested editors hold a unanimous consensus for a merge of Marvel Entertainment and Marvel Entertainment Group. (Marvel Entertainment Group is the direct predecessor of Marvel Entertainment, so the material there would become the first part of the Marvel Entertainment article.) The one dissenter was the editor who split up Marvel Entertainment and Marvel Entertainment Group in the first place, without a split discussion — which, as the results here show, would likely have resulted in a "do not split."

What is the next step? Does an admin give approval? Does an editor afterward merge the material and notify an admin that it's done so that the talk pages can be merged? How does it work? With thanks, --Tenebrae (talk) 23:13, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking into that now. WikiProject Comics has a tag on the page, so might one or more members respond to a request on the project talk page? – Athaenara ✉ 08:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I went over there to see how active the project was and found a five-day-old Merge proposal post from you. Did nobody show up to help out? – Athaenara ✉ 08:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My ability to intervene is constrained by the limits of my expertise (which does not include the comics universe) and as I've no experience with merging disputes I haven't a clue about their usual course. Sorry I wasn't more useful! – Athaenara ✉ 08:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, you've been helpful and considerate, responding to requests and clarifying things. The extra work that you and other admins take on, in addition to your own editing, is much appreciated.

I've completed the merger (which also included apparently long-overdue copy edits of atrocious grammar and other issues), and all that remains now is to remove the empty page Talk:Marvel Entertainment Group, if you could again extend your help. With thanks and regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and you are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 00:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PROD tag at Maree National School

Hi, I'm not sure where it says it, but in practice primary schools are not notable enough for inclusion. If you want to merge it, fine, but it would be nice if you'd be bold and do it. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 01:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I might also add that there is no article for the school's town/city. (Or I couldn't find it.) Guoguo12 --Talk-- 01:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted one or two of these, but after DGG strenuously objected (Kawthekar High School discussion above) I decided to try a different approach rather than invite another objection. How about taking it up with him? – Athaenara ✉ 01:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think the difference is that Kawthekar High School is a high school (WP:WPSCH). But anyway, the page has been redirected to County Galway#Towns and villages by Kudpung (talk · contribs). Guoguo12 --Talk-- 19:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles only referenced to geographic.org

Hi I db-authored these. However for some reason since you delete Fram's templates they have been restored. Please delete the lot as a db-author. Thankyou.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All 1,991 (more or less) of them? – Athaenara ✉ 10:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just counted, apparently only 582. – Athaenara ✉ 10:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes for some reason those 582 now remain, please delete.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. – Athaenara ✉ 10:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its been sorted now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Kumar

Deletion of Post Vijay Kumar

Hi,

As per communication, I updated post and also added references. Further I added information to talk page. I feel that was sufficient. Saying that no objection is made is not fair. He is the owner of NGO and enlightened guru too having thousands of articles on hindu religion. I think you should have verified talk page and details updated before deleting this page. However, I haven't deleted the tag(to be deleted), as I am not the expert to decide the significance. I am talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_Kumar%28Spiritual%29 I will love to here more about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.111.73 (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC) [Deepeshdeomurari (talk · contribs)][reply]

I reviewed it thoroughly before deletion and agreed with Mike Rosoft's reason for {{proposed deletion}}: no evidence of notability, no third-party references. You are free to try Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 08:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pricespider.com

You speedily deleted Pricespider.com as spam. No quarrel with that; but the article had an open AfD discussion. I went ahead and closed it as moot, since the article had already been deleted. It is helpful to close the AfD discussion if the article has an open AfD but is also subject to speedy deletion, so we can keep track of who did what to whom. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I referenced the AfD in my deletion summary. – Athaenara ✉ 00:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/elgin-marcy treaty

I'm pretty sure the IP was intending to create Elgin-Marcy Treaty as a redirect to Canadian–American Reciprocity Treaty, but they misunderstood the process (should've submitted it through WP:AFC/R, but no big deal). I've gone ahead and created it myself. Just leaving you this message because I was unsure why you deleted it in the first place! Cheers — The Earwig ^(talk) 00:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having had the same perception, I created Elgin-Marcy treaty a few minutes earlier. – Athaenara ✉ 00:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Should've checked the capitalization then, my apologies. — The Earwig ^(talk) 01:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funny though :-) A. 01:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

India as a rising power - AGAIN

Hi there, you recently deleted a page that was nominated for deletion. I have no issue with that but I'm here to tell you another user (the original article author) has simply re-created that page word for word with no explanation. The page is here India as a rising superpower. What should be done about this? G.R. Allison (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India as a rising superpower regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. G.R. Allison (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Cornellians

I was thinking of recreating this article as just a redirect to List of Cornell University alumni since I searched it and I came up with "article doesn't exist" page. What are your thoughts? cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 12:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored and redirected per your suggestion. – Athaenara ✉ 23:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, my internal lazy side is happy. Have a good weekend sir! cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 14:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and it's ma'am if you're specifying. – Athaenara ✉ 20:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D.U.D.A.

Hi there, i just noticed that my D.U.D.A. page was deleted and I was wondering why exacly ? He is a famous rapper who is known in Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia and even Scandinavia. I was just wondering how I would get back all that information on there to create a better more reliable page. Thanks Oltianruci (talk) 23:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mute Nights Festival

I see, You are a great Deleter, I wonder why did you delete the article about the biggest Silent Film Festival in the Eastern Europe? What's your reasons and why you didn't discuss them with the author? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazepynetz (talk • contribs) 12:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The prod reason ("not clear how this might meet notability guidelines") was clear in the deletion summary and page log and can now be seen by clicking on the 20:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC) diff in the article history, as I restored the article per your complaint. – Athaenara ✉ 21:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

I see you were the one to delete my pages for me, yet again. Thank you! I swear I must have OCD. ℥^nding·start 07:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! – Athaenara ✉ 07:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

superman vs. freddy vs. jason

i was looking for this article and noticed that it has been deleted by you. i'm not the most proficient editor here, so besides the phrase; One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page i have no idea why it was deleted. can you give me more information before i dive back in and try to get it reinstated or start a new article? i thought that the article was talking about a prank pulled on a different website... is this incorrect? thanks! Killemall22 (talk) 03:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried it as Superman vs. Freddy vs. Jason and found that it was created and blanked in October 2010 by Matrix61312 (talk · contribs), so that would be the user to ask (the only content before blanking was a link to a nonexistent file). – Athaenara ✉ 06:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Katikenapally

Hey Athaenara, if you have a moment, can you tell me why you granted the 'author request' speedy for Katikenapally? Did you judge that no meaningful contributions were made by other editors? (I'm asking because I'm practicing with my new admin powers, so to speak: I'm looking at the history of deleted edits but am somewhat loath to start clicking away--before you know it I click the wrong thing and make the world end.) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article had been orphaned and unreferenced ever since Aarohan Mettu (talk · contribs) created the page in May 2009. The same user registered as Rohan12010 (talk · contribs) in October 2010, tried to delete the page, and was soon blocked as some of those attempts looked a lot like vandalism. An anonIP showed up this week to try again, replacing content with {{db-author}} and adding {{db-blanked}}, {{db-userreq}}, and {{subst:author wishes to delete|reason}} tags.

The original author finally logged in and tagged it {{db-author}} and {{speedydelete|author wishes to delete}}, at which point I took pity on the thing and deleted it. – Athaenara ✉ 21:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conduit (network and publisher platform)

Can you please provide an explanation as to why the Conduit (network and publisher platform) page was deleted? The page wasn't biased and used perhaps dozens of articles in order to support the claims within. What was the reason for the deletion? The sources used were credible, too. It makes no sense. Please advise. I would like the page to go back up, or at least there should be a discussion regarding its deletion. Beobjectiveplease (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it, it seems a user re-directed the page to go to "Conduit (virus)" instead of the "Conduit (network and publisher platform)" page. That page was subsequently deleted, which is why, it seems, the "Conduit (network and publisher platform)" page was deleted. Is it possible to put the legitimate "Conduit (network and publisher platform)" page back up? Conduit, as can be seen in the articles used to build the page, is not a virus and this user is simply acting maliciously. Would love your help here as I think the deleted was unwarranted (Conduit was even rumored to be the subject of a bidding war by Google and Bing recently, so for this user to paint Conduit as a virus is absurd).Beobjectiveplease (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 21:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will move forward with a Deletion Review, if that's the only way. However, what was the reason for the deletion? I am confused as to the logic behind it, to be honest. Not trying to be annoying. It's just a bit perplexing to me and I spent a significant amount of time building a solid basis for the Conduit page. Was it because the other user redirected to a "Conduit (virus)" page? Beobjectiveplease (talk) 21:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like User Kittins floating in the sky yay (talk · contribs) has something to do with this. I can't assess the notability of the Conduit platform independently and know nothing at all about any alleged "virus" called Conduit. I do hope editors with more expertise step in because you need more assistance than I can provide alone. – Athaenara ✉ 21:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Appreciate the assistance here. Hope to have the page up again soon! If I have any additional questions, I know where to find you :) Beobjectiveplease (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK :-) Athaenara 21:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Looks like the page is back up. Thanks for your help! Also, is it possible to look into the user's conduct for their actions on the entry. Seems as though they were working against Wiki guidelines (for instance, he / she claimed that adding a "speedy deletion" template to the page, after I had removed it, was a minor (m) edit). Thanks so much, either way! Beobjectiveplease (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the contribs show, "Kittins" etc. blanked his/her user talk page just before beginning to mess about with the article on the 25th, then came back four days later to do it some more. It was all very recent, so I can't judge whether the user is done with that or will try it again. – Athaenara ✉ 09:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my trailing dot move mistake on Conduit (publisher network and platform)! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! – Athaenara ✉ 09:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deleted Cubic Transportation Systems

Hi- In working on transit articles I have found many red links to this important company. When I began to start a article about it I found you had deleted it:

00:45, 2011 April 19 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "Cubic Transportation Systems" ‎ (G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page: the page to which this redirected was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous advertising / promotion.)

This is just to let you know I am starting from scratch as a commuter, not someone involved with Cubic. Robsavoie (talk) 01:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia Australia

Deletion of article Multimedia Australia

Australian school students often do essays on the company Multimedia Australia for their high school HSC multimedia course and rely on this article that you deleted for historical information. This article included a compilation of historical details that are not elsewhere available in aggregate form online.

The company which is the subject of the article has been trading for 10 years, so there is a substantial amount of information from various sources that can be cited to expand the article (online, magazines etc).

Can you please restore the article - thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.48.60 (talk) 01:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The {{proposed deletion}} added on May 22, 2011 included the following concern:

The sources provided are either self-published or do not mention the company, and I can not find any reliable sources myself. The article claims the "company is primarily known for its role in establishing the Software Industry Professionals", but I can't find any reliable sources for that either. Much puffery, but nothing to indicate it could meet WP:ORG.

It was posted that day on User talk:NewAspect as well. – Athaenara ✉ 02:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zh/format subpages

→ in re: T:Zh/format/Gleditsia sinensis, T:Zh/format/Expo 2010, T:Zh/format/People's Liberal Democratic Party

Thank you for your help with these. There is one more, "Template:Zh/format/People's Liberal Democratic Party", which I had mistakenly changed to "t", but should just be deleted instead. Thank you again. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! – Athaenara ✉ 02:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedies

→ see also: page histories for The Snottle (log) and The Toilet of Doom (log)

Hi there, I was looking over CAT:SD and noticed you deleted The Snottle and The Toilet of Doom, but should they not be undeleted and redirected to List of Jiggy McCue books, where the content now exists? You know, for attribution reasons? Just wondering. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 10:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 10:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User page deletion

Hi Athaernara, I just wanted to thank you for the deletion of my old user page. :-) Have a good day! Kiranerys-talk 00:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, and thanks, you too. – Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article writting

I've restored this page you just deleted - I was declining the speedy as you deleted it. I think it just needs moving to a proper title (Tarkhan Mughals) and wikification and can't see how it could qualify as a test page. Hope you don't mind. SmartSE (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem. My impression was that it had been tagged db-test because it looked like an unwikified partial copy of some other existing article. – Athaenara ✉ 17:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) As the one who tagged it, that's exactly why I tagged it. I'm still not 100% sure it wasn't copied from somewhere, but it's an interesting subject; definitely needs some work, though. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

_{<slow response>} I thought the same at first too, put it was apparent from a very quick google that it was a noob writing new content. I don't want to (or hopefully need to) lecture but it would be good if you could double check in the future to make sure you're not tagging/deleting hours of a noob's hard work. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan civil war (February 2011)

Is there a way you can undelete this page? "00:00, 28 April 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "Libyan civil war (February 2011)" ‎ (G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page)" There seems to be a consensus at Talk:Timeline of the 2011 Libyan civil war to split up the article by month. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011 in the Libyan Civil War, the page to which it redirected, was deleted by another admin (log) per WP:CSD#G5. I don't get involved in disputes about whether or not such pages should be resurrected, so I recommend Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 00:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of bridge uses

...maybe next time, I'll just delete it and see if anyone complains. - Denimadept (talk) 05:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's that (it was an amusing discussion :-) ... – Athaenara ✉ 06:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No argument, there or here. The “List of bridge types” article doesn't seem to be controversial, but the "uses" one was just, well, blah. - Denimadept (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Full Contact Association

Hi there, I'm from kickboxing and martial arts project, none of our members were notified of this deletion. I'm assuming you are Admin, whats the procedure to get this article back because it was well within the scope of our project and I strongly believe it was sourced. Thank you.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 03:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It had no cited sources (merely four external links which would never be considered independent WP:RS: www.wfca.info, www.fightclub.lv, www.wfca-germany.de, www.wfca-czech.cz) and had been tagged for lack of notability and needing references since January 2011. You are free to post on Requests for undeletion in spite of that if you are so inclined. – Athaenara ✉ 06:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vicci Laine

I noticed that you deleted the page for Vicci Laine. I was a contributor to this page and would like to know what the reasons were and ask that it be reinstated. She is a great influence on the GLBT community and has worked very hard for that community.

Thank you for your time and consideration

Ivey Mullis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.251.87.200 (talk) 21:00, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That article was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} 16:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC) by Harley Hudson (talk · contribs), whose concern was: There do not appear to be any independent reliable sources indicating that this person is notable per relevant guidelines. Per the proposed deletion process, seven days passed during which time the WP:RS and WP:N issues could have been addressed but were not, so it was deleted a week later. You are free to post on Requests for undeletion if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 21:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Athaenara, Thank you for your response, The person who proposed this page for deletion, Harley Hudson aka Oatto471 is a user that has been permanently blocked by Wikipedia. He has proposed that many other pages be deleted, MANY to do with gay or transgendered issues. I believe that the article about Vicci Laine was a target of discrimination by this individual. I did go to the request for undeletion page and then decided to make sure that it was the correct avenue to use. Thank you again. Ivey Mullis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baileysmom (talk • contribs) 19:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In light of that, restored. – Athaenara ✉ 21:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flashlight Brown

Hi Athaenara. I had meant to contest this prod before it was deleted. I'd be glad to add more sources to it, if you would be so kind as to restore it. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Emjay, if you wouldn't mind. I don't think that an article about an artist who was nominated for a couple of Juno Awards is an uncontroversial deletion. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support the WP:PROD concerns, so I won't be undeleting them myself. Requests for undeletion is the place to go for that. – Athaenara ✉ 07:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian football category talk deletions

→ in re: category talk pages in 06:10, 01 July 2011 (UTC) update of Database reports/Orphaned talk pages

You might want to check your deletions of the Category Talks for the Australia football ones. I think Unreal7 did a lot of moves of the Category talks before the Categories got moved. For example, Category talk:Football (soccer) in Australia articles by quality was moved to Category talk:Association football in Australia articles by quality. However, Category:Football (soccer) in Australia articles by quality is still there.

Unless I'm totally confused. There does seem to be some mass renaming going on, but I think a few of the moves were done early. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I decided not to risk becoming confused myself and (citing your message here!) restored every category talk page which I'd deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 07:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm all confused. I'll look things over and see what should be deleted and what should be moved back. Working on it... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had to turn away from it after reversing my nine because, having tended to approximately 150 orphans in the previous hour and a half, I didn't want to go shopping for beensy little wheelchairs for my eyes. – Athaenara ✉ 08:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think I've got it all worked out. These categories were never renamed, so I moved back to where they belong:

These were properly moved when the category got renamed:

I know what you mean about having to step away. My eyes are all messed up right now, so I'm going to step away, too. However, because I'm nuts and probably a little OCD, I finished off the orphan report so everything is clear now. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima College of Camiguin

About WP:G11 of Fatima College of Camiguin

Hi Athaenara! I was actually trying to chop the promotional material out of the article, but looks like I was unsuccessful. I've saved the version that was still as User:Shirt58/Fatima College of Camiguin - hope that's OK with you. I'll have a fiddle around with it to see what I can do. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original, as you know, was promotion by a coi spa. If you determine notability and find supporting WP:RS for it, more power to you. – Athaenara ✉ 03:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Chriscase48

→ in re: this edit

Thanks for clearing up my left over AfD template regarding Saint tarquin. Sorry for not clearing up after myself. I will try harder! — Fly by Night (talk) 02:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, no problem. – Athaenara ✉ 02:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hottest 100 Australian Albums Of All Time

This article was only half completed, and was tagged for AfD. The author, Tyler j1992, asked me what to do. I suggested that he develop it his own user space and in the mean time, to avoid deletion by AfD and so avoid WP:CSD#G4 when it was finished, to tag it for {{db-author}}. Well, the user did just that. The AfD was closed, and the user started work in his user space. To my horror, another user Ck786 has just created the same half-empty article (with two columns swapped), under a slightly modified title.

Can you look at Triple J Hottest 100 Australian Albums of All Time, 2011, please? It's not worthy or an article because half of the list is half empty. If there's nothing we can do, then can we re-open the AfD; it only had four days to run. I feel terrible, and this sets a very bad example for Tyler j1992: play by the rules, and get beaten to the draw. — Fly by Night (talk) 06:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I should single-handedly tackle something like this (highway robbery and deception?) so please post it on WP:ANI where lots of admins will see it, OK? – Athaenara ✉ 07:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that an AN/I is the place for this. If I mention it, they'll just say that no-one owns articles and it doesn't matter who creates them, as long as they get created. My experience of AN/I is that quite a lot of the admins don't actually want to deal with anything. It's usually: "What do you want us to do?" or "You're in the wrong place." It usually has to be very serious before it's even read. Besides that, I opened an AN/I yesterday. If I go back again today then I'll look like a moaning old git. What about re-opening the AfD? — Fly by Night (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see you acting like a moaning old git or being credibly accused of it. My view is that the issue needs more admins assessing it. – Athaenara ✉ 07:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've done as you suggested. — Fly by Night (talk) 07:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. – Athaenara ✉ 07:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Athaenara, just acknowledging your little note. Hehe, I've gotten personal notes in regular edit summaries before, but I think this was my first on a deletion. I know I had previously thanked you for being my personal cleanup crew for deletions in my user space, but someone beat you to my last {{db-u}} (and my most recent deletion was a personal request), so thanks for taking care of me again. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome as always. – Athaenara ✉ 12:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Series of Boxing

World Series Boxing Deletion

Dear Athaenara,

I am currently working for the organization World Series Boxing who's page you proposed for deletion. We had our webmaster update the page with content off our website. May I ask the reason for the proposed deletion so that we don't repeat this mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishi2hotty (talk • contribs) 15:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't propose it for deletion. Jakejr (talk · contribs) tagged it for {{proposed deletion}} at 14:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC) with the edit summary 'lacks both notability and reliable sources' and the concern 'article lacks supported claims of notability.' After seven days, during which time no reliable sources indicating notability had been added, it was deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 23:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil Ayad

Deleting the Page on Dr. Nabil Ayad

Hi Athaenara

I just noticed that you have deleted the page on Dr. Nabil Ayad at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nabil_Ayad&action=edit&redlink=1 quite surprisingly for your concern that 'Notability is not asserted'. I find it hasty and reckless because Dr. Ayad is a notable and distinguished personality of worldwide recognition and repute.

If you had just googled his name you probably would not have proceeded to delete the page.

Dr. Ayad is the founder head of the Diplomatic Academy of London which is world's top school of diplomacy and the only one of its kind. DAL has taught and trained generations of diplomats for over three decades and Dr. Ayad is the founder leader of the school. He has worked with Sir Peter Marshall and written a number of books on the subject. A detailed description of his achievement and contributions is available on the website of Global Diplomacy Academy. Please follow the links below for references:

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/bio.htm

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/symposia.htm

http://www.genevagsg.com/2010/12/dr-nabil-ayad/

http://culture-multicultures.blogspot.com/2010/11/interview-with-mr-nabil-ayad.html

Currently, he is Director, London Academy of Diplomacy, University of East Anglia, London and Professor of Diplomatic Studies, Nyenrode Business University , The Netherlands: http://www.uea.ac.uk/london/lad .

I hope you can restore the page with appropriate changes/additions/citations. Once it's back on the site, I'd add further details. I'll be looking forward to your quick response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarral 99 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That article was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} at 07:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC) by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) with the edit summary Propose deletion as insufficiently notable and the concern Notability not asserted, see WP:ACADEMIC. Per WP:PROD seven days passed during which time, if independent reliable sources existed per Wikipedia:Notability (academics) (there had been none since December 2009), other editors might have found and added them. That did not happen, so it was deleted a week later. You are free to consider Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The 22 June song

Hi, I just noticed that you deleted this page, after it had been prodded. I did not see the PROD - if I had, I would have probably objected. Looking at some Wiki mirrors I'm not seeing any support for the rationale given (according to your edit summary). Also, who nominated this? What would be the process for restoring the page and going through the AfD procedure? Thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per your objection. – Athaenara ✉ 06:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've removed the lyrics for now which is what I guess prompted the copyvio concern.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 07:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Undertakers sketch

→ see also: page log

21:12, 8 July 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Undertakers sketch" ‎ (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: created and blanked by Aaron Brenneman, who moved comment to main page)

Hi, just curious why you did this? Not that it hurt anything, just not sure I see the point? Thanks,
Aaron Brenneman (talk) 11:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was one of 96 pages in the 19:06, 08 July 2011 (UTC) update of Database reports/Blank single-author pages. I'll be happy to restore it if you like. – Athaenara ✉ 00:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Ward

Hello Athaenara, I just wanted to let you know that I've just restored Kyle Ward, an article you deleted as expired PROD, due to a request at WP:REFUND. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just restored Nabil Ayad too, due to another request. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for keeping me in the loop. – Athaenara ✉ 00:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wheel war alert

G'day, why have you deleted File:Brown College logo.jpg, again. See User talk:Armbrust#File:Brown College logo.jpg. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately restored, sorry I overlooked the discussion! – Athaenara ✉ 00:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no worries. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting those pix

→ in re: two files

Hey Athaenara - thanks for that - it sorted out this message sent to The Skier of Dudiness --Shirt58 (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 03:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hoban

Why did you delete the page for Jack Hoban? We updated it a few months ago and would like to continue to add material. Please advise. Mtpublicaffairs (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Athaenara - Forgive the talk page stalking. I see you're not active right now, and I saw this request posted. Since the page was deleted via proposed deletion, I'll go ahead and undelete the article. I'll also notify the prodder that it's been undeleted. I'll also explain what happened on Mtpublicaffairs' talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very helpful, thank you, I welcome it. – Athaenara ✉ 03:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Ritchie

I never saw the article before it was deleted. I object to its deletion and would like to see the article. I know for a fact he was a second round draft pick by the Dallas Stars and I watch him play for the Sarnia Sting. CycloneGU (talk) 01:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page was tagged 04:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Alaney2k (talk · contribs), whose concern was Article does not demonstrate that topic meets notability requirements of WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 02:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came here first as you were the deleting admin. - but alright, I'll note you referred me there instead. I had no knowledge the article had even been created; had I been aware of it I would have looked then. I would just recreate it myself but I prefer working on what's already there. CycloneGU (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. (I won't often undelete expired prods myself when my role was simply to follow through at the end stage of a community process.) – Athaenara ✉ 02:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, different admins. have their own policies regarding things like this; I have seen some admins. undelete themselves on an uncontested prod. under similar reasons as mine (didn't know the article existed).

Also, no one has responded yet; I hope I can take a look before I go to sleep tonite. =/ CycloneGU (talk) 02:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Not even restored for six minutes and already up for deletion. Apparently it's hard for a good faith editor to catch a break around here. CycloneGU (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take heart. If the AfD closes next week with a consensus to delete, you can ask that the article be moved to a subpage of your userspace so the original history will be preserved if sufficient notability can be shown next year as you expect. – Athaenara ✉ 00:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Midhurst & Easebourne F.C.

Can I ask why the page for Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. has been deleted (on July 3rd). They play at Step 6 which makes them notable - they are now one of only a handful of clubs at Step 6 and above that don't have their page. What was the reasoning behind its deletion? Madmax2011 (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page was tagged 21:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Charlesdrakew (talk · contribs), whose concern was Fails notability guidelines for sports organisations. Tagged unsourced for nearly two years. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 11:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for deleting my subpages! :) I like to clean them up every month or so. :) ℥^nding·start 05:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David S. Rose

Vandalism without a trace??

Hi. I see that you are the admin who deleted the Talk page for "David S. Rose", so perhaps you can help explain what's going on. Until a week ago there was a page titled "David S. Rose", which was a living person biographical page about the technology entrepreneur. The page had been in place for a number of years, was fully sourced, regularly updated by multiple editors (including me), in compliance with all guidelines, and non-controversial. Apparently at 05:15 on 13 July 2011 a user named Barsoom1988 (a new account with no other activity) deleted the page in its entirety, and redirected the original to a seven line article about David Stuart Rose, a nineteenth century mayor of Milwaukee. The strange thing is that the deletion seems to have been done without leaving a trace, and there seems now to be no edit history of that page. All the Wikipedia links to the original article are now coming up as invalid, including the link to the original article's Talk page (which I gather that you deleted, because with the original article vandalized out of existence, there was nothing to talk about.) Can you explain how a page can be deleted/vandalized without leaving a trace? And how the original article can be restored (and, I assume, the vandal banned)? Thanks! Yorker (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page had previously been tagged for multiple issues (primarysources, COI, like resume, puffery). It was tagged 00:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Westeros1994 (talk · contribs), whose concern as posted on User talk:Detailhound was You are David S. Rose and you (and Mark LaRose) wrote an advertisement for yourself. Keep that kind of thing to Match.com. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 05:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page restore

→ in re: page history and log

Hi. You deleted this talk page today. However, I have reason to believe this was the original talk page of Nélson Oliveira that had been moved to this page name. Could you please check, and if necessary restore the page and its history to Talk:Nélson Oliveira. Thanks --ClubOranje^T 10:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 10:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Return of Billy Jack

Abbythecat (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)AbbythecatAbbythecat (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC) Armbrust thought you might help. Awhile back I did a page called THE RETURN OF BILLY JACK. Nobody disliked it or wanted it removed. But I deleted it myself. I now think this was wrong, & it is important enough to be restored. I just listed it at REQUESTS FOR UNDELETION but not sure I did it right. If you can restore it, and want to, I hope you please will. Thanks. Abbythecat (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)AbbythecatAbbythecat (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Abbythecat (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)AbbythecatAbbythecat (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)RETURN seems to have been restored. Thanks. BTW, any opinion on it? Abbythecat (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)AbbythecatAbbythecat (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No personal opinion, but you can ask the people at WikiProject Film. (BTW, there's no need to have four signatures in your posts, you can sign just once at the end.) – Athaenara ✉ 04:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why'd you delete my page?

This is my page. Why did you delete it? Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note The above is meant as humor, hopefully you would have read it that way without the note but I am including this to clear confusion. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks by the way. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note The comment directly above is not meant as a joke. Hopefully you do not read it that way. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty silly, but if you hadn't posted here I might not have checked the deletion logs and found that I'd clicked the wrong reason on one of the two, so good job. – Athaenara ✉ 06:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused

Today, you've deleted the page named "Template:User Aleksa Lukic/Discussion Wiki.png". I am very concerned and confused, because I can't remember that I've created it recently. But, maybe it's dating from older time, don't know. Could you give me a code of that page and the time of creation (via e-mail or as a sub page in my namespace). If that is a new page, probably some individual takes over a control of my account/password. Sincerely, Alex^discussion 10:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You created the page last year:

05:53, 24 July 2011 . . This, that and the other . . (340 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G2). (TW))
09:26, 13 May 2010 . . Aleksa Lukic . . (305 bytes) (File talk:Wiki.png)
09:26, 13 May 2010 . . Aleksa Lukic . . (304 bytes) (←Created page with '== File talk:Wiki.png == On the page File talk:Wiki.png has started a discussion and voting for the file Wiki.png to be returned to older version...)

Do you need it to be restored? – Athaenara ✉ 12:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to. Alex^discussion 13:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 13:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White and the Huntsman

Snow White and the Huntsman movie page deleted

I don't quite understand why the movie page for Snow White and the Huntsman was deleted. The bookmark I saved for Snow White and the Huntsman now directs me to the generic Snow White page where there is a one line blurb about the film.

I found it in the deletion log and and it led me here and the codes used were "F5: Unused non-free media: WP:CSD#G7: one author who has requested deletion)" But the title in the deletion log is "File:Snow White and the Huntsman.jpg" But it wasn't just a jpg that was deleted it was the whole page (confused)

I am curious if the 'author' requesting deletion is someone official (with the film or otherwise) or just another poster like myself. And if it's one author, and/or an issue with an image(s) then why was that content not deleted without the entire movie's page being deleted?

Is the page going to be redone or can it be restored?

(sorry this is so long) Janna47 (talk) 10:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article (which was not deleted) was redirected per WP:NFF at least twice. The uploader of the file requested deletion, hence the WP:CSD#G7 aspect. – Athaenara ✉ 12:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Hi, I wish to understand why you deleted my file. I'm kinda new here, can you help me? Arijsrkhan (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because you (the uploader) tagged it {{db|CSD I5: Unused fair use}}. – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1491 (musical)

Hi Athaenara. You deleted the article during my work on it. I restored it with more references, as I think there's a possibility to compile a decent article based on reliable and independent sources. [3], [4] I hope you don't mind. Please let me know if you disagree. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 04:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good luck with it. – Athaenara ✉ 04:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, it might be a good idea to restore the original history. – Athaenara ✉ 05:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EGovMoNet deletion

Dear Athaenara, I noticed that you deleted EGovMoNet claiming that it was "(...) Nominated for seven days with no objection (...)." Unfortunately, I had added objections to the talk page and was in the process of improving the page. Please give me the opportunity to recuperate the content that I had created so that I can start over the article later. Best regards, ChristopheS (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I later deleted the article as the PROD tag was left on, have now restored it and userfied it for ChristopheS to continue working on it. Mjroots (talk) 10:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BalboaRV deletion

Why was I deleted? I am trying to build information about a rare motorhome built in the late 60's to early 70's. I need others out there to fill in a dying history of these RV's. I am not promoting a business. Just trying to build an imformation base. BalboaRV (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted it, but it's still tagged as spam. – Athaenara ✉ 02:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What part of it is spam? I'm not selling or promoting anything. What can I remove to help? I only have the links for reference material. BalboaRV (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The perception of spam on Wikipedia is probably the combination of the username and the subject matter. At any rate, it could be moved to a subpage of your userspace where you can work on it as a {{userspace draft}}. Would you like me to move it for you? – Athaenara ✉ 02:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure what ever works. I just want to create a page where others can contribute history on Balboa Motorhomes. I removed all the links if that helps. BalboaRV (talk) 02:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, now User:BalboaRV/BalboaRV draft. – Athaenara ✉ 02:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eyeka entry deletion

Hi, I wrote an entry yesterday about a French company called Eyeka, that I descrbed -to my opinion- quite objectively. It was flagged and removed within no more than 20 minutes, which is quite frustrating. It was my very first entry, so I might have not met the appropriate tone or structure for the description, but I did my best and looked at other corporate articles as benchmarks. Some of my friends also proofread it and did not notice "unambiguous promotion" as it was mentionned by Wikipedia. Now I'm here to learn, so I'd gladly review it in order to make it better... could you userfy the entry so that I can work on the draft? Thank you, Cookiz1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookiz1 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 15:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetuum

Deletion of article on Perpetuum

As this articles was marked for speedy deletion under 'G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion' (although this was done 'speedy' only several hours ago and now deleted, without me being able to contest it), I'd like to point out that the article was almost solely based on the article for EVE Online, a very similar entity and as such a good starting point (in fact, I did little more than change details). If this article was to be 'fundamentally rewritten', well, you can probably see where I'm going with this. Additionally, Perpetuum is a fairly new game, with little 3rd party sourcing possible, so I was actually more than careful to remain neutral and informative. I did put some hours into this, was given no prior warnings on deletion or a chance to discuss why or why not this article is not Wikipedia material. It all seems fairly counter-productive.

Thanks,

Doek (talk) 01:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was no indication that the game might be notable, it was promotional, and the only citations were to perpetuum-online.com. If multiple independent reliable sources (WP:RS) attest to its notability (WP:N), you could ask WikiProject Video games for help. – Athaenara ✉ 10:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right, in the meanwhile could you userfy the page? Doek (talk) 11:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 11:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete request

Would you please undelete my userpage: User:GrapedApe/Seal. I want to work on it again. Thanks!--GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 14:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--GrapedApe (talk) 16:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! – Athaenara ✉ 19:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image undelete

Hi -- you deleted Image:Super Science Stories issues grid 40-43.png at my (G7) request; I wonder if you could undelete it for me? I replaced it with an svg but now suspect that the png might be preferable in some cases, and would like to do a side by side comparison. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 21:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 21:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete this for me?

Hello. I was wondering if you could delete this for me. I was going to tag it with deletion, but I wasn't so sure on what category it would go under. Thanks! ℥^nding·start 18:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you meant the page which had redirected to it, so I deleted that (log). – Athaenara ✉ 22:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Avner Shats

On June 29, 2011 the article about Avner Shats was deleted for the following reason: '"Avner Shats" was a joke by a group of slam poets in Tel Aviv called Bama Hadasha. It's funny but not about an actual person.')

It's funny but Avner Shats is an actual person. I have personally met him and I also have read some of his books and short stories. I would herewith like to attest to the genuine and actual existence of the real Avner Shats on this planet. I don't know if there might have been any other reasons for deleting his article, however, Avner Shats not being an actual person is definitely not according to the facts. Sometimes reality is funnier than fiction.

Nosuchuser (talk) 13:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged 17:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by 75.172.81.185 (talk). Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. You may list it at Requests for undeletion if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 13:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image undelete requests

I'd like to request that you undelete a few images that you recently deleted as G7. I think the creator has requested these deletions as part of a retirement, but the images were used at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator/Five Problems with a Single Solution, where the same user's CSD request has been disputed by multiple users. With that essay being kept, I think it makes sense to keep the images that have been a part of it. The files are:

Thanks! --Tryptofish (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (Hammersoft restored one and removed speedy tags from all of them.) – Athaenara ✉ 20:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, you are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 23:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my work

Hello Athaenara, I realized that you deleted the page I wrote yesterday, thinking I was fully complying with the wikipedia rules of neutrality. The page I created was not intended to be promotional, and if something did not look like being objective, I would be pleased to know this and I will certainly accept to modify this. Please could you explain in more detail why the page has been deleted and how I could modify it to better fit the wikipedia rules? Thank you, Bryan T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorbiers93 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have no deleted contribs, so the article wasn't written from the account you used to leave the message above. What was the name of the deleted page? – Athaenara ✉ 18:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The West's Last Chance

I don't really understand this deletion. I have not requested the deletion of the page, and I have not blanked the page. Cs32en Talk to me 20:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

19:15 (Deletion log) . . Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The West's Last Chance: Will We Win the Clash of Civilizations? (2nd nomination)" (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: created and blanked by Cs32en)

Restored. – Athaenara ✉ 20:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! (I realize that I may have edited too much recently, as I have not remembered having blanked the page, although I actually did. I will adjust the content, so that the record for the deletion requests for that article remains complete and accessible.) Cs32en Talk to me 20:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 20:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?

This cryptic message appears on my Watchlist, and in the Deletion Log along with many similar to it::

(Deletion log); 18:57 . . Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:82.35.98.72"

(G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: created and blanked by Ornithikos)

The message also appears in the Deletion Log. I don't need the page restored, I don't even know what it was. I have no idea what this message means, but I'm hoping you do since it has your name on it. Can you enlighten me? Ornithikos (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"G7" refers to one of the standard criteria for speedy deletion. In the deletion log, it was linked to WP:CSD#G7. If you follow that link, you'll see the full explanation (shortcuts are used because the software can't fit long rationales in a deletion field). – Athaenara ✉ 21:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before writing you, I read everything I could discover, including G7. Author requests deletion. It is perfectly clear, but it tells me nothing. I did not knowingly create anything that would deserve deletion; blank anything, which would implicitly request deletion; or explicitly request any deletion. Whatever happened has no known connection to me of any kind, but my name is on it. Either I have something important to learn, and I hope to learn it, or I have been spoofed, which is what really worries me. Eternal vigilance is the price of online security! So I must ask you: do you know a way I can discover how this event relates to me? Ornithikos (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I undeleted it so you can see. – Athaenara ✉ 23:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I did indeed create that page, so I could extoll someone who had used only an IPA, then realized the futility of that technique and moved my message to the modified article. So I was wrong, I did blank a page, I just hadn't thought of it that way. I will blank it again and let nature take its course. Many thanks for your help! I was catastrophically spoofed once, and morbidly fear the slightest possibility of recurrence. Ornithikos (talk) 00:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David L. Gray

→ in re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Gray

As it's been CSDed, you might as well close the AfD, I think. MSJapan (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (diff). – Athaenara ✉ 04:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LEURRE deletion - Robotics project

Hi

Could you please userify the article for me [5] to see if there is anything worth keeping, or email it to me, as I did not see it on the list for deletion and would have probably had something to say about it if I had known. If the article was less than 75 words though, please do not bother with it. You can userify it to User:Chaosdruid/sandbox5.

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 19:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 00:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick request

Would you please delete this page if guidelines allow? I don't think its old contents are appropriate in any space on this website. And the author is a sock of Burns. Thanks, Nightw 22:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Nightw 22:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (log). – Athaenara ✉ 23:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

change of name incomplete

Hi,

Thanks for the speedy deletion. I changed my name because I didn't want one that looked like a real name anymore. Is there a way to delete the link between my current and previous usernames? right now it says the one page was moved to the other at the user space. 0¹⁸ (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion log says that, yes, where it's visible only if someone clicks on the link for the deleted page. It could be restored and re-deleted with a different deletion summary but then both summaries would have the same marginal visibility. If there's a way to make an old deletion summary disappear, I don't know what it is; maybe Atama knows. – Athaenara ✉ 20:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for your help. In the end, I think some level of record will exist but it is hard to dig out if you don't know that you are looking for it in the first place. 0¹⁸ (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK :-) Athaenara 20:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Farm Neck Golf Club

Hi Athaenara; I'm flummoxed to find that you deleted this article. The creator of the article has a spotty track record, with numerous articles speedy deleted, and some vandalism; I commented here: [6]. When they initially requested speedy on this, I did not consider it a good faith request, and took the trouble to find and add sources that would solidify its notability. Now it's gone and I'm shaking my head--literally. Were the sources and content not sufficient? It's received fairly broad coverage as one of the favored golf courses in New England [7]. Thank you, 99.155.206.229 (talk) 02:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored and removed {{db-g7}} tag. – Athaenara ✉ 02:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very fast service, and very much appreciated. If the article doesn't meet guidelines, that's another story. Thank you again. Cheers, 99.155.206.229 (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 02:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

for deleting that needless redirect from User:VanTucky/Navbar. Cheers, Steven Walling • talk 19:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete

Could you restore Wikipedia:Abuse response/Note1? You deleted it under G6, but if doesn't fit that criterion since its used alot for WP:ABUSE, I needed it 2 times after you deleted it. ~~Ebe123~~ ^talk_Contribs 22:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (log1). – Athaenara ✉ 22:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also Wikipedia:Abuse response/Note2 and Wikipedia:Abuse response/Note3? Forgot them. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs 20:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (log2) (log3). – Athaenara ✉ 21:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi this is MegaVergan the creater of the Mud and santa page. I just wanted to thank you for getting the message of deleating the article. I made it a blank page but for some reson I coud'nt deleat it officialy. Any way thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaVergan (talk • contribs) 02:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 05:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You just deleted User talk:75.82.99.249

→ see also: page log

I can't remember what happened there, is that an ip that I warned incorrectly and self-reverted? Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see what it was. I was using huggle and initially thought it was an edit to an actual page. It's not a huge issue, I was just curious. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. – Athaenara ✉ 20:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting the extra SW1500 talk page

→ see also: page log

It was a foolish moment in a repetitive process. How did you come across that? Is there a list for unlinked blank pages? New page patrol? I'm not a mop-wielder, so I'm not fully up, I might want wield a mop one day, so learning anything new is useful and appreciated. (I guess I should have tagged it for speedy myself, but in the heat of action I forgot.) BusterD (talk) 19:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was in Database reports/Blank single-author pages. – Athaenara ✉ 20:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Database reports. Groovy! BusterD (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted sub-usrpage

Can you bring back User:Kingjeff/Deutschland sucht den Superstar (season 9)? Please and thank you. Kingjeff (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (log). – Athaenara ✉ 08:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bambooforest12/Darrell Calkins

Hello,

Thank you for your response to my page.

I believe the subject to be notable, but recognize that my article was too bare and lacking secondary resources. Would you please undelete it so I can re-edit and expand it, have my work back? I see it is all gone. I would appreciate it, as I didn't save it elsewhere.

Thank you.

Bambooforest12 (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw that it's back under my username. Thank you!!

Bambooforest12 (talk) 22:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done (I didn't delete the article but only the userpage which was a redirect to it, so I undeleted the article and returned it to your userspace). – Athaenara ✉ 22:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - did me back in and had to go and lie down (not through editing - demolishing a greenhouse...). Peridon (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :-) Athaenara 23:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted script pages

Hello! Can script pages such as .js and .css be categorized? I was surprised to see that you deleted my script pages (just as I requested), so I'm wondering whether you took a look at my contributions log or simply saw the pages in the speedy deletion category? Thanks in advance, Hey Mid (contribs) 09:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template puts a page in a deletion category. – Athaenara ✉ 16:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering; I wasn't sure. Regards, Hey Mid (contribs) 16:26, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 16:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MakeMyTrip

Regarding MakeMyTrip.

Hey,

May I know y in the world did you delete the MakeMyTrip page. If you found it as an advertising page then why the hell you don't delete ebay or may be amazon.com wiki page. They also do the same things, help people get what they want. I need serious answers please, no bullshitting !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himmy.20 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pepper related articles

→ see also: GeisterXfahrer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Is it possible to SALT Peter Pepper and Peter Pepper (musician)? The latter has now had to be deleted three times in the past month. The first one was deleted four times in the past month, and seven times overall. Prior to this latest re-creation of the article, I explained to the author about G4 and why he had to go through DRV. He appears to be suffering from WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, and gave the same comments about why the article should be re-created when he re-created them this latest time. As was commented by the nominator in the most recent AfD:

"I suggest we salt this article, and the redirect, as this article has a high likelihood of being recreated. If the point of our policies not allowing these articles is not gotten after 2 years of trying, I think a little more eloquence is needed. If in the future the subject is notable enough, the article creator can go for AfC or the drawing board to create and then an admin cna unsalt".

Thanks! Singularity42 (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gogo Dodo and Starblind protected Peter Pepper (log), Ged UK protected Peter Pepper (musician) (log), and I protected Peter pepper (musician) (log) and Peter Pepper (Retard-O-Bot) (log). Are there more? – Athaenara ✉ 04:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I think that's it. Thanks! Singularity42 (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Charles Gregoire de Rothschild

I'm not sure what to make of this one. Suggestions? Though I'm signing off for the day, I'm a bit sleepy.-- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The complaint seemed to me to be well-founded, so I removed the name from Rothschild banking family of France#Family members (diff) and noted that in my {{db-g8}} deletion summary. – Athaenara ✉ 10:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Deleting all of the redlinked entries in Rothschild banking family of France#Family members might a good idea. A lot of them are only linked from there. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting and one more question

Hi! Thanks for deleting the page "Dilip jeste". I moved it to "Dilip V. Jeste" - it is a biography of the living person and both names should be capitalized. However, the wrong name is still visible as a "deletion log". Is there any chance to remove it from Wikipedia? I am not sure how to do it and I don't want to offend anyone (by this typo...). I would really appreciate your help. Thank you! M. MajaEdits (talk) 02:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand what problem may exist. – Athaenara ✉ 06:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was wondering how to delete the page with "Dilip_jeste" deletion log. In Google search it is in the second place and I wanted to delete it. Sorry for bothering you with this, I was trying to find more information on deletion logs in Wikipedia, but I couldn't find much. Thanks! MajaEdits (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about search engine phenomena to help with this, but you might get more information from the Wikipedia:Help desk. – Athaenara ✉ 09:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I posted a question there. MajaEdits (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 00:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yet again...

...for deleting my subpages. Another cleanup. ;) — Status {^talk_contribs 06:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. – Athaenara ✉ 09:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hi dear,

I deleted my own contribution 'Maryam Tarami' because a note showed up about the reliable source etc. that did not disappear even when a reliable note was added.

Best,

Javier

Javiermiami (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aww... – Athaenara ✉ 11:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

CSD of User:Cerejota/Sandbox :) Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 08:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, a kitten and a brownie on the same day! – Athaenara ✉ 11:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lego Island characters

Why

Did you delete List of Lego Island characters? --Lair of Rockwhales (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page was tagged 21:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Chzz (talk · contribs), whose concern was:

WP:NOTDIR, no references at all, no reliable sources, appears to be Vanispamcruftisement; no suitable redirect target; I can't see how to correct it, without simply deleting it.

Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 01:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't answer my question really. There was nothing wrong with it at all last I saw. If there was spam, why didn't someone just undo the revisions? --Lair of Rockwhales (talk) 01:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. – Athaenara ✉ 01:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

is there a way to post it all on my talk page or something, or is it dead? --Lair of Rockwhales (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it long enough to move it into your userspace as a {{userspace draft}} (see links above). – Athaenara ✉ 02:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

XUDA ?

And cookies ;-)
You've deleted on 10:17, 19 March 2008 a article about Xuda . At that time it was indeed a quite obscure library, but now it looks like it played a key role in the DigiNotar CA hack. Is there a way to retrieve back the article text? I'm asking because it seems the only information source about XUDA which Google was able to find. Thanks in advance. --84.57.95.235 (talk) 01:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 03:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official Workers Party

undelete request

Hi. Please undelete the Official Workers Party article. I, as creator of the article, was never notified about the prod and missed the posting (i have 10,000+ articles on my watchlist, and thus needs a user talk comment to be notified). As per notability, electoral results alone is not a good indicator of notability for political movements. --Soman (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 08:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

97X Green Room album articles

→ in re:

The 97X Green Room: Volume 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The 97X Green Room: Volume 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The 97X Green Room: Volume 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The 97X Green Room: Volume 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The 97X Green Room: Volume 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The 97X Green Room: Volume 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

If there were no objections to the deletion of those 97X Green Room articles, I never would've added those rescue tags there. ----DanTD (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could restore them, and you could then remove the {{proposed deletion}} tags, or you could list them at requests for undeletion. Which do you prefer? – Athaenara ✉ 10:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have been considering listing them on a single page. I even thought about adding it to the WSUN article itself. I just hope that if I do, the images of all covers will still be accepted. ----DanTD (talk) 13:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symbiosis Center of Health Care

Creating new page

Dear Athaenara, I have created a page of - Symbiosis center of Health Care: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiosis_Center_of_Health_Care

I am afraid that this will be deleted. How I can prevent it from happening so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs) 11:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged for deletion for three reasons: {{db-a7}} (no assertion of notability), {{db-g11}} (advertising), and {{db-g12}} (copyright violation). Have you read Wikipedia:Your first article? – Athaenara ✉ 12:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the deletions. I know its probably like pressing one button or two, but anyway. Much appreciated. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 06:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome (it is just a button or two but I'm learning to force left-handedness to save wear and tear on my right hand, arm, and shoulder). – Athaenara ✉ 06:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobson Flare

Hi, I was in the process of adding a paper referring to the 'Jacobson Flare' and it's use ion synthetic vision to the page and realised you have delete the page, it is possible to recover the page to cite the article? SeanT (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, {{proposed deletion}} tag removed. – Athaenara ✉ 02:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

iswlower

Hello I am the Wikipedia Campus Ambassador for the India Education program.A Wikipedia India Education Fellow Student started to create an article on iswlower and it was deleted. The user name of the student is - Nupuragrawal3 (talk · contribs). Currently no content on Wikipedia exists for the article topic "ISWLOWER". Please let the student create the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nupuragrawal3/Iswlower — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihir.khatwani (talk • contribs) 09:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The userspace draft appears identical to the second version of the page which was deleted after it was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} (per 'wikipedia is not a manual') and then blanked by the author (the first version consisted solely of the single word 'Iswlower'). – Athaenara ✉ 12:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked talk pages

Your deletion of User talk:99.28.1.30 and User talk:96.238.135.253 showed up in my watchlist as created and blanked my me. I don't have recollection of creating and deleting such pages; my only guess is that they were invalid warnings generated by inadvertant Huggle reverts, that I subsequently undid. Calabe1992 (talk) 21:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly right, it was 'message re. [article] (HG)' followed by 'undoing own edit (HG)' in each. – Athaenara ✉ 21:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for confirming. Calabe1992 (talk) 21:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! – Athaenara ✉ 21:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for clearing up after me by deleting my userspace drafts. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 10:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, thanks for the treat. – Athaenara ✉ 10:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of file left redlink

When you deleted File:DSCF0536cropped.JPG you created a redlink in the refdesk archive which was asking about the symbol in the image. DuncanHill (talk) 00:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated link for File:Unidentified symbol on a Scout Scarf.JPG in the discussion (diff), sorry I missed that one. – Athaenara ✉ 00:22, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion for a cure

fyi

I started what I thought was a new article, at Fashion for a cure -- only to see you had previously deleted an earlier version. The organization is a real organization, which has been covered by RS. I'll add some additional references tonight.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The previous version was spam authored by an editor who contributed nothing else. Your version doesn't have that problem. – Athaenara ✉ 03:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avner Shats again

Twilight zone?

Um, here goes an interesting story. I stumbled upon Avner Shats article by following a link from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 9#Template:Hoax, and just out of curiosity, found a couple of useful references, which hopefully proved he's real. So I fixed the article [8].

Then, I noticed that Nosuchuser (talk · contribs) requested that you remove the prod from that same article back in August. That was his sole contribution.

I'm not affiliated with Nosuchuser (although I admire his creativity in username selection :-) ), I don't know Avner Shats, I'm not from Israel... though he seems to have at least two fans nicknamed... No such user (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little startled to hear so much about someone I'd never heard of anywhere but on Wikipedia. Twilight zone indeed ... – Athaenara ✉ 03:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incognito (video game)

undelete request

We're requesting the un-deletion of Incognito (video game) article. I haven't had a chance to check the notice for deletion. We understand that there hasn't been any additions to the citations in the article however we were going to add more 3rd party links to the page today, however noticed it had been deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoxDiller (talk • contribs) 23:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It had one line, an infobox, four screenshots, and no improvement in the past year and a half. I won't undelete it but you can try RfU. Who's "we" btw? – Athaenara ✉ 22:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elton John tours

I see you've deleted a couple of fanmade Elton John tours. Let me direct you to a few more that should be deleted as well: Elton John 1970 World Tour, Elton John 1971 World Tour, Jump Up Tour, Too Low for Zero Tour, European Express Tour, Breaking Hearts Tour, Ice on Fire Tour, Tour De Force (tour), Songs from the West Coast Tour, Reg Strikes Back Tour, Sleeping with the Past Tour, The One Tour, Elton John & Ray Cooper 1993/1994 World Tour, Elton John & Ray Cooper 1995 Tour, Elton John 2006 European Tour, Big Picture Tour, Red Piano Europe, Medusa Tour, Stately Home Tour, Made in England Tour, Elton John 2004 World Tour, Peachtree Road Tour, and Face to Face 1994, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2009, 2010. Guess it was more than I expected there to be... WOW, this user is REALLY going at it with the tours. Not only are the only sources for each one fansites, a bunch of them are just (album title) Tour. I'd appreciate it if you would give the user who is creating these fancraft articles a warning/explaination about what s/he is doing. — Status {^talk_contribs 19:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The four I deleted were tagged {{db-g7}} by the author. For the rest, unless the same author tags them as well, WP:PROD or (perhaps better) WP:AFD as a group? – Athaenara ✉ 09:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Ellis was created by User:Grovyle4life not Mugginsx

Would you please explain you edit history remark? 30 September 2011(Deletion log); 22:54 . . Athaenara (talk | contribs)‎ deleted "Talk:Sir Ellis" (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: created and blanked by Mugginsx) I DID NOT create or delete Sir Ellis - or any page having to do with Sir Ellis. I have viewed it and perhaps commented on it as well as to the person who created it on both my page and the Battle of Poitiers Talk Page. User:Grovyle4life is the creator as he states at his page. Does this mean my password has been hacked? Thanks Mugginsx (talk) 11:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted it so you can see what's there. – Athaenara ✉ 00:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see what happened there. You may delete again. I thought you were stating that I created the article. Strange editor there and am somewhat suspicious. Apologies. Mugginsx (talk) 11:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 20:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Online

Yura87 (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC): Poorly written as it was, with too little outside reference, that article was about a MMORPG that was a Chinese/Korean attempt at making a MMORPG out of Super Robot Wars concept, though only Super-Type robots remained., and terrain is mostly Space, and generally done much poorer. 91.com is notable for theft of ideas/concepts, yet it operates one of the Might and Magic-themed MMO's.[reply]

You missed all the fun...

Wikipedia:Database reports/Orphaned talk pages got updated after nearly a month. I think I wore out my mouse button. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for deleting my surplus pages. --Northernhenge (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 06:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Crasharama?

I had the Crasharama page bookmarked for use annually.

I went to this page today to find out you deleted for what I consider is inaccurate information on your part:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crasharama

They have it every year at Thanksgiving at least:

http://www.crasharamaseries.com

Orlando Speedworld has it on their calendar as well: http://orlandospeedworld.org/?page_id=21#November%202011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msandi (talk • contribs) 15:13, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page was tagged 20:06, 15 June 2011‎ (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Neutrality (talk · contribs), whose concern was No reliable and independent sources to indicate notability of this subject. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. I restored it per your objection but it may again be tagged for deletion as long as no independent WP:RS which attest to its notability (WP:N) are cited. – Athaenara ✉ 10:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kingjeff/2011–12 1. FC Köln season

I would like to get back the above page back. Thanks. Kingjeff (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete request?

No idea how this whole thing works so sorry about my noobishness. But a few years ago you deleted a page without discussion as far as I can tell. The page was Talk:Pretentious language. As that page was appropriate and also included my only contribution to wikipedia, I am requesting that you undelete it. Thank you, (BWE the real one. (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC))BWE_the real_one.[reply]

ETA: Sorry, The deleted page is not the talk page (though that is also deleted) but the main article at /pretentious_language. Hopefully this is easy to straighten out.

Again, many thanks. BWE the real one. (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mob (American punk band)

Hi there Athaenara, I wanted to ask if you could you please reactivate the Wikipedia article for The Mob? The Mob is an influential New York Hardcore band referenced in a number of Wikipedia Articles including those below. Additionally, the Mob has a number of active projects in 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Apple_Rotten_To_The_Core (in which notes:Cover photos and PR were provided by Scott Eisner, one of the first writers to use the expression "hardcore punk", in a review of The Mob.[1])

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_Attack_(band) - lists the start of The Mob

In 2012, The Mob will be the first non-Clutch band to have have a set being released by Weathermaker Music: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weathermaker_Music. Joe Franz will be producing an accompanying documentary on The Mob: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Frantz

The timeline of The Mob can be found on the Mob Facebook Page:https://www.facebook.com/themob101?sk=info

I hope that you will consider reinstating a Wikipedia article on The Mob

Thank you, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.191.7.229 (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012-2016

Atlas of UTR Regulatory Activity page undeletion

Hi, could you please undelete the page Atlas of UTR Regulatory Activity ? You deleted it because there was "No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability". Now I have a scientific journal peer-reviewed published article to use as an independent source. thank you very much and have a nice day, Erik --Cibioltg (talk) 10:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That page was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} at 01:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC) by Neutrality (talk · contribs) and at 06:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC) by Fences and windows (talk · contribs). Their concern, as you noted, was No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 19:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Template:Allen Aircraft Engine Co

Hello and Happy New Year. I am requesting that you undelete Template:Allen Aircraft Engine Co as I have just created the Allen Aircraft Engine Co 0-675 article. I asked that the template not be deleted at the Templates for discussion page. Buster40004 Talk 21:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 19:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-04-29/Serboi

Hi. May I please have a copy of Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-04-29/Serboi before it was blanked? Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking you as a courtesy, as you deleted that page. I am sorry that I neglected to save a copy of that page before it was deleted. If you can't or won't, please let me know why (in private if you feel that is appropriate). Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apology for the delay! I undeleted the page and moved it to your userspace (link). – Athaenara ✉ 13:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add again an article about BigDFT

You deleted on 29 April 2011, the article "BigDFT" with the following reason :(WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection: reason was "unremarkable software product.").

I would like to create again a page about BigDFT which is cited on different pages on Wikipedia. This software is only used by physicists (one hundred roughly) but this area of real-space basis sets methods is growing and we use a lot wikipedia for our students. It is really important to have a good description in wikipedia of Quantum Chemistry and Physics Methods. Tdoune (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restored original article, which you are free to expand/improve per User:Tdoune/BigDFT. – Athaenara ✉ 09:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Kurukshetra War - day 1

Dear Athaenara, you deleted a page named 'Kurukshetra War - day 1'. I believe Kurukshetra war, 'the crux' part of world's largest epic - Mahabharata, requires a separate page, mentioning details of all the incidents of first day of war. Similarly, other days too require separate pages. There were total 18 days of war, each with its own significance. Hence don't delete the pages, rather invite others to make meaningful contribution. Janmeda1989 (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page which I deleted nearly a year ago [00:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)] was a redirect to an article which had been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurukshetra War – day 1. Your recent article with that title was deleted by admin Maxim (talk · contribs) yesterday. – Athaenara ✉ 11:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Fidelity Investment Managers

You speedied this article of a company with something like 4,000 employees and over 600k clients that is mentioned constantly in the news as "CSD#G11" (advertising spam)... Even if it was full of fluffery, at least a consensus decision would be warranted here? I put it to you that you have overstepped your boundaries as a janitor and abused the privileges given to you by the community.

Please undo your "work" as soon as possible, and list it through AFD if you can't be bothered to improve or stubbify it. -- Marcika (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball Victoria Summer League

Undeletion request

Hi, could you please undelete Baseball Victoria Summer League? As the highest level of baseball in Victoria, I think it is sufficiently notable. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 23:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Jenks24 (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flores-Villar v. United States

Why did you delete Flores-Villar v. United States? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.138.49 (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The author Tkobylski (talk · contribs) created it at 22:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC), at which time its sole content was an infobox giving the date and the docket number. One minute later, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs) tagged it for deletion per Wikipedia:CSD#A3 ("no content"). Currently, the explanation of A3 includes the following qualification:[reply]

"However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox, unless its contents also meet the above criteria. Caution is needed when using this tag on newly created articles." [emphasis added]

(In November 2010 the wording of the middle line was Similarly, this criterion doesn't cover a page with an infobox with non-trivial information.)

At any rate, Tkobylski blanked the page two minutes after that and Pdcook (talk · contribs) re-tagged it almost immediately per Wikipedia:CSD#G7 (author blanked page or requested deletion). I deleted it about ten minutes later.

I don't know the current guidelines for Wikipedia articles about U.S. Supreme Court cases so I recommend taking it to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion for discussion, because it could be undeleted and at least minimum referenced information identifying the issue(s) of the case added. – Athaenara ✉ 01:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About So Fresh: The Hits of Winter 2011

Hi Athaenara.
I noticed that you had deleted the talk page for this individual album. I have started a discussion on the parent article talk page about this. Perhaps you might like to take a look at the discussion?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restored (not much there though) per your request. – Athaenara ✉ 05:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request for BSA CF2

Hi Athaenara. I notice that page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSA_CF2 was deleted last year (22:34, 9 May 2011) by yourself. any chance that page could be restored? It is linked to from page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamo_(air_gun_manufacturer)#BSA_brand_Air_rifles. Although the BSA CF2 rifle may not be notable to everyone, Both the rifle and the manufacturer are well know in the UK west midlands area, and there is very little information available about it elsewhere - online or otherwise. Wasn't sure if I should come to you directly or just follow the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion guidelines. Apologies if I should have done the later. Regards Steve.Stevegray63 (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it per your request and removed the expired May 2011 WP:PROD tag, but it remains vulnerable to deletion as it is not yet encyclopedic and has no references at all. – Athaenara ✉ 00:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for restoration of a deleted article to my userspace

I would like to work on the article Mick Harte Was Here in my userspace. As the deleting admin, if you could restore the content you deleted to my userspace, I'd appreciate it. Regards, L H M 16:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 03:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton! L H M 01:53, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Porter

Please let me know why this was deleted last year? Savolya (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanporter (talk · contribs), who created the page in April 2011, tagged it for proposed deletion ("we were making wiki pages for class and our teacher changed the assignment and didn't want us to publish them right away ...") I deleted it as a request by sole author (G7). – Athaenara ✉ 00:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks with the help on the CSD U1's -- Have a happy new year! Tiggerjay (talk) 01:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, best of 2013 to you as well. – Athaenara ✉ 01:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request for Michael Falzon -actor

I blanked the page because it was going to be easier to take a deep breath and start completely afresh. Can I please have it undeleted so I can rewrite it properly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I hate thinking of names (talk • contribs) 06:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article - Eso Samardzic

Greetings,

I was wondering what I would need to do in order to repost this person "Eso Samardzic" ? as I would like to add this person onto Wikipedia as he is well known in Ex Yugoslavia along side those people: Dino Merlin and Svetlana Raznatovic.

I got this information and it said that I would need to contact you.

00:18, 30 March 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted page Eso Samardzic (G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page)
21:40, 31 March 2008 Onemic997 (talk | contribs) moved page Eso Samardzic to Eso Samardžić (revert)

Thank you kindly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onemic997 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Galloping Gertie (song)

I notice you deleted Galloping Gertie (song). I am notifying you that I created it again at Galloping Gertie; could you undelete the revisions of the article and move them to Galloping Gertie?--Laun chba ller 18:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Except for notability and primary sources tags and the WP:PROD (the tagger's concern was ' Could not find sources verifying song's notability beyond its use in Family Guy '), here's the total content deleted last May:

"This is a famous saloon piano song by Sam Fonteyn. It is used as the "Play me off, Johnny" music by the Vaudeville characters, Johnny and Vern, on Family Guy. This song shares a name with the nickname of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940), though it is unknown if the bridge got its nickname from this song.

"== Audio Sample ==

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfNxgdUEOF4

"[[Category:Songs]]"

Not much there ... – Athaenara ✉ 09:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; there isn't. Nothing more to add.--Laun chba ller 09:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your assistance please

You deleted the redirect Sarajudim (Guantanamo detainee -- not on the official list), as db-g7. Could you please tell me where it pointed?

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 23:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay - it was a db-g8 redirect to Sarajudim, which was a redirect you had tagged db-g7 after moving the article to User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Sarajudim, which now redirects to User:Geo Swan/Afghans repatriated from Guantanamo on 2003-03-23. – Athaenara ✉ 16:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 01:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Pearce (British actor)

Hello Athaenara. A few years ago in 2011, the article Richard Pearce (British actor) was deleted, causing a few red links to suddenly appear (see disambiguation page Richard Pearce and article The Adventures of Tintin, that I am trying to improve for FA. The red link in that particular article is not a point in favor for it, referring to Mr. Pearce's suddenly non-existent article. I understand the notability issue. My question is, can we get the deleted article back? Maybe then I can expand it a bit and we won't have red links. Cheers. —Prhartcom (talk) 21:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it per your request and removed the two-year-old WP:PROD tag. I hope it can be improved sufficiently to protect it from further deletion tagging (WP:AFD would be a possibility, although it probably couldn't be speedied or prodded again). Good luck. – Athaenara ✉ 13:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you, Athaenara. Yes, I suppose I'll have to work to improve this small article so that it won't be a black eye on the big article (that I'd rather be working on, that no one had been working on for two years). Thanks for wishing me good luck. Cheers. —Prhartcom (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dude perfect

Hi. Why exactly was the article on Dude perfect deleted? Was there a discussion? Also could you be kind enough to give me the content of that page? --cha 11:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was created three years ago by user Eaglerunner24 (talk · contribs), who edited it for about 15 minutes on 12 July 2010 and then blanked the page and added a {{db-g7}} tag to request deletion.

For a copy, you can ask one of the more than 150 admins in Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles (I'm not in it). – Athaenara ✉ 13:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request for Vikas Puttur

Youth Politician from India, It is under notice that you have deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikas_puttur the page citing " dependent of nonexistent page. hence, Bringing to your kind notice that the page shall be on the national secretary of the principle political party of india ie BJP, Mr Vikas Puttur, kindly go through the link http://www.bjym.org/national-body/ and you shall get to know about it, you can also depend on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anurag_Thakur who is the president of the same body. kindly undelete the page and allow it get published, with best regards.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.154.14 (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Ameritz

Hello! This is just a polite notification to say that Ameritz, an article you deleted, has been resurrected as a disambiguation page. Ameritz Karaoke, which was the subject previously at Ameritz, has been redirected to the song it covered because there is not enough information to justify a standalone article. Could you move the deleted revisions of Ameritz to Ameritz Karaoke please?--Laun chba ller 01:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steath (The Americans)

Uhm, this is definitely not housingkeeping. The redirect is currently at RfD, and is more likely to be kept than not. Wily D 15:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of one of my user pages

Hello, I noticed that you deleted User:MorbidEntree/tools, citing WP:U1. However, according to my memory and my CSD log, I didn't request the deletion of that page. If possible, could you undelete it please? Thank you. --MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) 15:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize; I studied the log and the page content today and cannot think why I thought you meant it to be deleted, other than the red link there (above your toolbox) to a page you had tagged for deletion. Kudos to Huon for restoring it for you while I was unavailable. – Athaenara ✉ 01:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Sonic the Hedgehog (film)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sonic the Hedgehog (film). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of Money and You

I created the page again, but added a few sources. SquishyZ1 (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Wikipedia user page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site.

The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Athaenara/Deletions_2011-2016.