User talk:Arunrajraju medayil

Welcome!

Hello, Arunrajraju medayil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 13:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arunrajraju medayil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Arunrajraju medayil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Arunrajraju medayil/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 13:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ezhavas

Hi, we have a policy for how we treat biographies of living people. For lists of people associated with a caste - such as List of Ezhavas - the relevant bit is perhaps better explained at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. Basically, you should not add a name to the list unless you can provide a reliable source that shows the person self-identifying as a member of the caste. This is the primary reason why your recent edits to that list have been reverted: you pretty much provided no evidence at all to support inclusion. - Sitush (talk) 14:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akathayyadi panicker

Hello Arunrajraju medayil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Akathayyadi panicker for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chembil ashokan

The article Chembil ashokan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jaaron95 (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Teachings

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Guru Teachings, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Maha Guru Teachings. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maha Guru Teachings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maha Guru Teachings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 11:10, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Guru Teachings

Hello Arunrajraju medayil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Guru Teachings for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mike1901 (talk) 11:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People from Vaikom (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People from Vaikom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 12:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Arunrajraju medayil! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 13:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam

Hello Arunrajraju medayil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayogam

Hello Arunrajraju medayil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalanayogam for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 20:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arunrajraju medayil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Arunrajraju medayil (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to provide the exact message you are receiving, including the IP or range involoved. If this is sensitive to you, please use WP:UTRS. Kuru (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:People from Vaikom concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:People from Vaikom, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vadakkan Pattukal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nayar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:People from Vaikom

Hello, Arunrajraju medayil. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "People from Vaikom".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 19:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may be deleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 09:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം

Hello Arunrajraju medayil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thursby16 (talk) 22:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 10:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	appreciation for better effort Medayil appan (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]