Jump to content

User talk:Ardo27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Arundodamani2004)

Thanks for your contributions to Government First Grade College Carstreet. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 11:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Arundodamani2004! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ardo27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Insert I have Created College article which is in Mangalore.I folloewed all the rules of Creating article.before I creating article I create it has draft then there are small edits are required so I edit the article then I just submitted for draft review.so please unblock me Arundodamani2004 (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on this account directly. I see that you edited about 20 minutes before making this request. If you are unable to edit, we need to know the exact message that appears when you attempt to make an edit. 331dot (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 13:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 23:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sir please tell me the specific reason for the reason of declined. Ardo27 (talk) 06:40, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Government First Grade College Carstreet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chandan Shetty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hassan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]


Hello, Ardo27. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:WeCare has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat. Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deepfriedokra were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Bro(Gagan Srinivas) (March 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nagol0929 (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UUCMS (April 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. S0091 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. S0091 (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Bro(Gagan Srinivas) (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Government First Grade College,Kavoor. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Government First Grade College, Carstreet. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I disclose conflict of interest? Ardo27 (talk) 06:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It says right there, third bullet point, 'disclose'. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sir,can you disclose conflict of interest with my draft article? Ardo27 (talk) 07:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think they're asking you to do that for them. Valereee (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kavoor moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kavoor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Government First Grade College Carstreet. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Ardo27! Your additions to Draft:Government First Grade College Carstreet have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kavoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tulu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Government First Grade College,Kavoor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 09:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

[edit]

Please stop moving articles. You're moving into the main article space drafts which aren't ready, in some of which you may have a conflict of interest (and therefore shouldn't be moving them in any case). You're also moving things into incorrect titles, either wrongly named or wrongly punctuated or both. This is starting to get disruptive, and may get you into trouble. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ardo27,
You're still doing pointless move, moving an article from Draft space to main space and then back to Draft space. This is disruptive editing and can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Do only necessary page moves. If you have questions about moving pages, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See below at the block message. I advised them to move the articles back to draft. S0091 (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Government First Grade College, Carstreet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government First Grade College, Carstreet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You've been blocked for a week for repeatedly moving pages out of draft before they are ready. Deb (talk) 13:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, they reached out to me on my talk page and I advised them to move the articles back to draft. They did move Draft:Government First Grade College, Kavoor back but not Government First Grade College, Carstreet. This was prior to Carstreet being nominated for deletion. S0091 (talk) 14:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Government First Grade College, Carstreet this article is had deletion notice.after the notice I did some changes in this article.Removed unreference resources and added some reliable references.This edits can help to save from deletion.Can you give some suggestions for me to improve the article? Ardo27 (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Until you've learned to create articles properly, please use draft space for all your articles and wait for the review. Most importantly, don't move articles that have failed review into mainspace. Deb (talk) 08:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ardo27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry for the mistake.I created many draft articles that are have to edit and then submit for review .so please unblock me.Thank youArdo27 (talk) 15:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariyamma Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urwa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'm pretty concerned about your understanding of what is and isn't ready for article space. I'd like to propose a block from article space. That would allow you to work in draft space and on talk pages. Valereee (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kavoor, Mangalore for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kavoor, Mangalore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavoor, Mangalore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 13:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spaces after punctuation

[edit]

Hi Ardo27. Nice, informative article on Kavoor Sri Mahalingeshwara Temple. One niggle is that you haven't put spaces after commas and full stops (periods if you use the US term). It spoils the appearance of what is otherwise good work. I've put spaces in the lead paragraph see diff here and suggest you go through the remainder and do the same. Please remember to include such spaces in your draft articles before publishing so as not to create work for other editors. Regards. Rupples (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. Ardo27 (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government First Grade College, Carstreet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namratha Gowda (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Top Government First Grade College in Mangalore has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namratha Gowda (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namratha Gowda (June 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 06:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ardo27. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sir Please unblock me. I have to edit so many draft articles. Without knowing i used old user id @Arumobileworld12 because I blocked for 1 week. So that reason I used old I'd. After that I contributed good articles. Or just set expiry date for unblock. Otherwise I will lose Wikipedia account. And draft article will be deleted. So please unblock me Ardo27 (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please set block expire. I want to edit articles. please I will never repeat this mistake again. Ardo27 (talk) 17:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ardo27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was created Wikipedia account in 2020 because of intrest in wikipedia.but I don't know how to use and create Articles in 2020 I just leave and don't use that user id. In 2023 I get interest to create Articles but i try to login I forgot my password and gmail and I created new account I didn't know the rules of Wikipedia while creating new account however I created then created some college articles as draft then 3 articles published and remaining other draft articles it need some edits so just keep it side. And now I know the Wikipedia rules and guidelines almost it's not try to create more user id then create violation. Now I contributing good articles to Wikipedia that arumobileworld12 old account you can delete it but Ardo27 is new and using this user id I contributed good articles so please unblock user id. Thank you Ardo27 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing secondary open request, only one should be open at a time. Aoidh (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ardo27 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request is almost incoherent. I'm not sure you have the competency with the English language to edit on this project. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please unblock my user id. Because I have pending so many draft articles to edit. Please can you help me? How can I request to unblock. Ardo27 (talk) 08:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ardo27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have created arumobileworld in 2021 after some years I want to create Articles so I didn't remember old user id and password so I created new user id after that I created draft articles and published. I have created so many draft articles if no edit within 6 months I will lost draft articles. I never do this mistake again please unblock me. I am too much interested in creating Wikipedia articles.please understand me. List of my draft articles

 Ardo27 (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Aoidh (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ardo27 (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, only one open unblock request at a time. Opening another will not get your block reviewed any faster or affect the outcome. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir. But when will block expire? They didn't set expiry time. Ardo27 (talk) 17:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your block is indefinite, meaning it will never expire until your block appeal is evaluated and an administrator decides that your appeal has merit. Until then, there is nothing more you can do except wait. There is a long backlog of requests, so your appeal may take a long time, perhaps several weeks. So, please be patient and allow the process to take its course. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Government PU College,Kavoor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Koragajja Swamy

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Koragajja Swamy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ardo27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Government PU College,Kavoor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Car Street, Mangalore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Namratha Gowda

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Namratha Gowda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vilas Nayak

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ardo27. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vilas Nayak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Koragajja Swamy has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Namratha Gowda

[edit]

Hello, Ardo27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Namratha Gowda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vilas Nayak

[edit]

Hello, Ardo27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vilas Nayak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Car Street, Mangalore

[edit]

Hello, Ardo27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Car Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]