User talk:Arjayay/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Arjayay, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Reverted

Mr. Arjayay User:Arjayay it is correct , Please check the link first

Kallars were listed as 'Criminal Tribe' during British regime under Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 due to their repeated offence of banditry,mass murders and rape. விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Which says "The British Government introduced the Act in 1870 and implemented it in 1914 on communities like Keezhakudi Kallar ... " - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Mr. Arjayay You are right, I agreed. But please once again go through the law. This law is not related to this -> (repeated offence of banditry,mass murders and rape)

Please read the below hindu article :

HISTORY & CULTURE Namma Madurai - Massacre in a village S. S. KAVITHAAUGUST 03, 2011 19:47 IST UPDATED: AUGUST 03, 2011 19:47 IST SHARE ARTICLEPRINTA A A

MEMORIES AND A MEMORIAL: The pillar at Perungamanallur. Photo: S.S.Kavitha

The pillar at Perungamanallur tells the tale of a little-known tragedy Anyone familiar with the history of modern India is likely to be aware of April 13, 1919; of General Dyer and of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to call the Perungamanallur killings, which took place on April 3, 1920, as the south Indian Jallianwala.

The black pillar with a burning torch on top in Perungamanallur tells the heartrending story of villagers who fought for their rights against an Act.

Before getting into the history of the pillar, it would be right to understand the Criminal Tribes Act that triggered the carnage. The British Government introduced the Act in 1870 and implemented it in 1914 on communities like Keezhakudi Kallar and Thogamalai Kuravar. The Act was first implemented on Keezhakudi.

In 1919, the whole of Piramalai Kallar community came under the scan of Criminal Tribes Act. According to the Act, the members of Kallar community had to register themselves by submitting their thumb impression at the respective police stations. In addition, male members above 16 years had to spend their nights in police stations and get police permission to visit their relatives.

As a result, villagers who resented being labelled as criminals, disobeyed the order. Residents of Perungamanallur were the first to oppose registration. Residents of Kaalappanpatti and Kaniyampatti joined them in the protest, which resulted in the firing. Soon the resistance spread to nearby villages like Melaurappanur, Poosalapuram and Sorikampatti. In the melee, scores of protestors were killed. “As per Government record, only 12 persons including one woman named Mayakkal were killed,” says Su.Venkatesan, who has authored a 1300-page novel, ‘Kaaval Kottam', dealing with life in Madurai region.

But the pillar has 16 names engraved on it. Probably many who got shot might were killed while fleeing, he says, adding that 63 people were subsequently arrested and tortured.

After realising that it was impossible to subjugate the people with force, the Government decided to implement welfare measures. It established schools, and introduced the Kallar Common Fund and the Kallar Panchayat System.

As expected, the memory of the massacre has now faded.

Recognising the importance of the village and massacre in the history of south India, Narayanaswamy Naidu of Tamil Nadu Farmers Association, in 1984, took out a farmers rally from the village. Only after that Perungamanallur came under the spotlight, remembers Venkatesan.

In 1991, Muthu Karrupa Thevar paid homage to martyrs and took the initiative of constructing a pillar in their memory, says Venkatesan.

Lawyer Sundara Vandhiya Thevan, who is carrying out research on Piramalaikallars, says the massacre victims were mass-buried at Punnaipatti near Usilampatti. “Now there is no trace of the mass burial, though some people claim to have installed a memory stone”, he adds.

Kasi Mayan, a villager, says: “The incident took place in the interior part of the village. For the sake of visibility, the villagers have constructed the pillar on the main road.” The old police stations still stand at Sindhupatti and Poosalapuram, telling the tales of a tragedy.

References

Draft page Cinque Vette Park

@Arjayay: Hi, could you give a look at our Wikipedia group project draft page (Draft:Cinque Vette Park, Lombardy)? We would be extrimely greateful if you could do so. We submitted it for review on the 29^th of November, but it has not been accepted it yet.Dervareser (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

• Could you please remove Pro-constitutional amendment camp link in Hong Kong Autonomy Movement, Localism in Hong Kong and Civic Passion–Proletariat Political Institute–Hong Kong Resurgence Order? Thank you. UU (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks Annu Ann George 12:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Arjayay!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
MRRaja001 ^(talk) 12:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Arjayay!

Happy New Year!

Arjayay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Kalariwarrior (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Please Understand

Dear Arjayay, I know now about that image. But that image is now short. Please don't remove it now. Have a nice day. God Bless You - User:Mumtazabdullahahsan1 (talk) 8:53 PM, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Mumtazabdullahahsan1 you are obviously not a new editor - perhaps you would like to tell us what your previous user name was ? - Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Margaret Durrell

Would you please stop the edit war? It was argued on Margaret's talk page whether she should have her own article. The main reason for keeping it was that she wrote an autobiography. Anyway, you can hardly call her a writer. P.S. Basically, Margo's only merit was to be portrayed (in a highly fictionalized manner) in Gerald Durrell's books, two TV adaptations and one movie. Other than that, nobody knows her. Pointing out (let alone in the lead) that Lawrence is Margaret's brother is hardly necessary; it's like saying that he was Nancy Myers's first husband. P.P.S. The same is true of their mother, who also has an article. Note that their father has an article, too. Does it mean we should mention (in the lead) that Lawrence (as well as Gerald) was their son? I don't think so. Taurus Littrow (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Roman Egypt

Firstly, thank you for your tireless fixing of my errors, especially the duplicate words I appear to enjoy leaving about, you're doing an indispensable job!

But this edit was not right: the plural of metropolis is "metropoleis" (cf. "necropolis", "necropoleis") and the people living there are called "metropolites". Too much Greek inflection I guess? Do you think this not simple enough for the lead? I suppose it looks as if it's a spelling mistake; if so it's probably not clear enough for the reader and I'll have to rephrase it! GPinkerton (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I note Wiktionary describes this plural form as "rare" (not what I would have thought!), but in this case it's a technical term in its original, Hellenistic context ... GPinkerton (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi GPinkerton - It's all Greek to me - but joking aside, I went to the article because it came up in my search for "a an", which I corrected, during which my spellcheck highlighted the other words I changed.
If the use is "rare", and it is not recognised by spellcheckers, I suspect I will not be the only person changing it so maybe a rewording would be appropriate. I don't agree with "dumbing down" and technical terms are fine in technical articles, but Roman Egypt is a general article that will be read by the general public, probably including a lot of schoolchildren, so I think it needs to be pitched at that readership. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

What is your Problem?

What is your problem?. If I am editing and making article better then what is your problem. - User:Abdullahmumtazahsan (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Abdullahmumtazahsan The problem is entirely yours - as already explained on your talk page, you are repeatedly making unsourced, and/or unreliably sourced, additions. On Wikipedia the BURDEN is on whoever adds information to provide references to Reliable sources. Not to create work for other people, who you expect to clean up after you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have blocked the user for 31 hours. Bishonen | tålk 16:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC).

Thanks Bishonen. I have also started an SPI - Arjayay (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

About Allophilia and Todd L. Pittinsky

Sorry I just realized that there was a message from you. I'm Aji, a new wikipedia user who doesn't know anything yet. I was commissioned by Prof. Todd L. Pittinsky to build him a Wikipedia Page and link it to Allophillia.

I really don't understand the mechanism of moving pages from draft to main article. Some sources say that I need to be an autoconfirmed user, I have already checked my contribution and I should have been autoconfirmed. However, the option to move page to article has not yet appeared. Then now the information appears that you have to wait about 3 months to move to the main article / delete the draft article. Do you have any suggestions or can help me, so that I can immediately connect Prof. Draft: Todd L. Pittinsky's page with Allophilia's Pages? User:Bernardusaji

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernardusaji (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Bernardusaji, this raises two major problems
Firstly, you have a clear WP:Conflict of interest, so should not be editing that page,
More importantly you are breaking Wikipedia's terms of use, as you have not issued a WP:Paid-contribution disclosure although you were "commissioned by Prof. Todd L. Pittinsky".
Please read both the articles connected by the blue links and follow the instructions therein - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Arjayay: Well, thanks for the suggestion. I've read what you have listed and put several contexts on the talk page.

Should be underline that neither Prof Pittinsky and I were knowing this kind of policy.

Its main purpose is to connect the Allophillia article's link with Prof Pittinsky's page because his name is listed.

There is no bad intention at all from us.

If this was wrong from the start, is there any suggestion from you? I have absolutely no problem if I am not directly allowed to edit the article again. I will inform Prof Pittinsky about the Wikipedia regulation.

How to find the right editor so that this page can be published without crossing the Wikipedia COI regulation.

The sources on Prof. Pittinsky's page are also credible, the same as his campus profile. There is no intention of exaggerating anything.

If you allow, is it permissible for the writing you provide on the talk page of Prof. Todd's page to be deleted first so that the article creation can be straightened out without giving any public embarrassment?. Bernardusaji (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Bernardusaji the need for a WP:Paid-contribution disclosure was clearly explained to you above, but you have continued editing without making the required disclosure - I'm not sure if you tried at Draft talk:Todd L. Pittinsky, but that is not how to do it. Please do that before making any otheredits.
In addition. do not remove other editors posts from talk pages, especially the post where I provided evidence of your COI editing - thus providing another example of your COI editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Me

Hello Arjayay. I have been unblocked from Wikimedia. Sorry for that. I have been realised my mistake. But it is long time. Please unblock me. I know this is Wikipedia. But I think you have Wikimedia account also. I promise I will not violate copyright from any images. Thank You. -- Weareme 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

••••🎄Merry Christmas🎄••••

"May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ..Merry Christmas.. and a ..Happy New Year.., whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you ..warm greetings.. for Christmas and New Year 2021."

Happy editing,
User:245CMR

I promise

Dear Arjayay, I know about sockpuppetry. I am so sorry for that. Now only my this account is unblock. Please don't block this. I promise I will not do this again. I have decided this will be my final ID - Abdullahmumtazahsan (talk) 17:00, 06 January 2021 (UTC)

Cite Error

Dear Arjayay: Can you tell what's creating the Cite Error on footnote #1 at Mervyn LeRoy? My thanks in advance. Lord Such&Such (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Lord Such&Such in this edit you removed <ref name=finler>{{citation|last=Finler|first=Joel W.|year=1992|title=The Hollywood Story|edition=Second|publisher=Mandarin|page=[https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory00joel/page/458 458]|isbn=0-7493-0637-8|url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory00joel/page/458}}</ref> - however the reference named "finler" was also being used in the infobox, using the "ref name=" parameter, so it looks for the reference named "finler" and can't find it - hence the cite ref. I've re-added the reference in the infobox. - Arjayay (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction. And Happy New Year.Lord Such&Such (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Help_Draft Article

Hi,

Firstly wish you a happy new year. This is Avinash Gorikapudi. I am facing a problem with Lakshmi Prathima Korada Profile. Whre it is in draft article. Can you help me out how to move that to main article. I tried all the ways. And this article should be in SaRiGaMaPa Icon 2021 main article as well under contestants.

Thanks, Avinash G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avinash.gorikapudi1 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

September 1971

While I appreciate the same frustrations you have with "attributions" to some guy who happened to take a photo of a landmark, it's a requirement on use of some of the illustrations. Chances are that any of the photos you click on that might have a silly attribution will also have language that says

"This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

If you can point to some change in policy that voids that requirement, please let me know.

I didn't make the rules, I just gotta live with them. Mandsford 17:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mafilendsford Those attributions are made on the "File" page - with all the other details about the image - NOT in each and every article that the image is added to - I very much doubt you have seen a "link to the license" (one of the requirements you have listed above) under an image in any article, because these details are covered on the image's "File" page which is deemed a "reasonable manner".
Somewhere there is a guideline about this, although I can't find it at the moment. That guideline allows credit to be given under an image in an article when the photographer is notable enough to have their own article - I'll keep looking for that guideline - unless a Wikipedia:Talk page stalker can help in the meantime - Arjayay (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mafilendsford - I've found it - it is MOS:CREDITS

Unless relevant to the subject, do not credit the image author or copyright holder in the article. It is assumed that this is not necessary to fulfill attribution requirements of the GFDL or Creative Commons licenses as long as the appropriate credit is on the image description page. If the artist or photographer is independently notable, though, then a wikilink to the artist's biography may be appropriate, but image credits in the infobox image are discouraged, even if the artist is notable, since the infobox should only contain key facts of the article's subject, per MOS:INFOBOX.

I think that covers my deletions - Arjayay (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

List of miscellaneous fictional animals

Dear Arjayay,

I'm sorry for the late reply. I haven't been on Wikipedia for several days now. I also apologize for posting my draft on the eponymous page mentioned above. I was wondering if it was okay for me to classify the whales, dolphins, and porpoises under "Cetaceans" though, since they are? I was also wondering if it was okay for me to remove them from the "Carnivorans" section because they do not belong with the Carnivora family. Also, last question, where can I advertise my draft to get better feedback about it?

Thanks.

Batypus (talk) 04:31, 8 January 2021‎ (UTC)

Birth Day Confirmation

Hello Arjayay This is Adnan I want to tell you that the mehwish hayat Birth Year is 1988 From the recently Sources from website and from her Official Twitter Account The Birth year is Mentioned 1988 as you can see here https://twitter.com/MehwishHayat So i think we need to added the Correct Birth Year And also recently i got the Two New Sources from websites And so kindly please help me at this matter Thanks

User:Itsadnanhere - Firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
As for Mehwish Hayat 's age - what you are linking to are self published sources - Twitter and Instagram - whereas Wikipedia uses reliable, Independent, sources
As discussed at Talk:Mehwish Hayat she suddenly appears to be claiming she is five years younger than she did in older, reliable, Independent, sources i.e. Pakistan Today and Gulf News
It is not uncommon for actresses, musicians and models to "change" their ages - Wikipedia uses the reliable, Independent, sources, not what the artist, or their agents, would like us to believe - Arjayay (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

References

Recent changes by an IP address

Hello! Recently some changes have been made by 223.229.142.5 in Biryani and Mughlai cuisine which were obviously promotional and non constructive. Please, assess the contributions made by this IP and whether or not it should be blocked from editing. A doxadius (talk) 07:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi A doxadius thanks for your message - I agree that those additions were advertising / spam - what you should do in such cases is issue warnings on the Editor's or IP's talk page - as I have now done. If you are unfamiliar with the range of warnings available please see Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Rawatsar Edit

Hello! I just saw a message from you. I am new to wikipedia and don't understand a tone. Thank you for reverting the edit made by me. Most of it happened accidentally because I did not realise that most of the previous edits were gramatical in nature. Although I have made a small factual correction. Thank you. 10 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Rawatsar - Firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages (not in actual articles) with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
As for your edits, you keep changing correct English to incorrect English - you may find it easier to edit Wikipedia in your own language - a list of which can be found at List of Wikipedias - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I am new to wikipedia and wanted to share my knowledge about the history of Rajasthan. The source had similar english used so I thought it better to spell it that way. Thank you for correcting. Rr987 (talk) 02:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Requesting to create an Article

Hello sir, Hope you are good. I'm requesting you to create an wikipedia article with "Atul Raghav". You can google about him for more information. On a very positive note, Waiting for your reply. Atul Raghav (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Atul Raghav - I don't create articles for other people. You seem to be trying to promote yourself, which is not what Wikipedia is for. - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply sir, but I'm not promoting myself. It's just. Google needs to show my achivememts in my field. And as a indian taekwondo player, I think this is needed. Hoping for a reply. Atul Raghav (talk) 11:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Atul Raghav - You clearly are trying to promote yourself - as you have been warned about by an Admin on your talk-page - Arjayay (talk) 12:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Angus Young

Angus Young was born and lived in Scotland for 8 years, so I don’t see a problem with him being listed as Scottish-Australian, why is the edit changed every time? Hookfang15 (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hookfang15 this has been the subject of edit-warring for some time, please see the hidden text on the edit page, immediately next to your addition, and look at the pages edit history - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello, Arjayay! You are receiving this barnstar because, according to this database query, you were the #2 most thanked Wikipedian of 2020, with 3047 entries in Special:Log/thanks in 2020! Thank you again for your contributions! Mz7 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Please check it

Dear sir, please check the article Kollam. I have update it. Is it ok. - Quetterry (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Gaur rajputs clan history

sir i myself belong to this clan and have been reserching since the past 15years on this topic.I want people to get more aware about this clan but people on wikipedia are vandalsing my article on gaur rajputs and are editing it again and again please help me out!Ii can not tolerate this stupid vandalistaion its our history dont destory it....PLus i have given references and external links please first check them and then take a action! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.128.9 (talk) 12:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello IP from Jaipur - Wikipedia has a strict policy of WP:No original research, and cannot accept what you "know" as such claims are not verifiable
Your last edits deleted one reference and added two "sources" neither of which appear to be reliable, independent, sources, and nor did they explain what information they were claiming to source. - Arjayay (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I want to Upload a Pic to the Harapanahalli Wikipedia Page

Hello Please help me to Upload a City New pic to Harapanahalli Wikipedia Page Darshan Kavadi (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Darshan Kavadi - that can be quite complicated so I'll break it down into small stages.
The first question is - did you take the picture yourself, and not copy it from the internet, a magazine, book or any other published source? - Arjayay (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

No But Definatelty ill take it

Darshan Kavadi (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Young brothers (Angus, Malcolm, George), Bon Scott and Dave Evans

What is the problem on leaving the nationalities the way they are? If they're only described as Australian, then they should be Australian born, but they're not. So, I think it's important to leave their description as Scottish-born Australians (in Scott's and Young's case) or Welsh-born Australian (in Dave Evans' case). And plus, George's birthplace is incorrect. He wasn't born in Bridgeton. He was born in Cranhill. TheSilkyAnteater (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

There is more. John Paul Young is described as Scottish-born Australian one his page. So what stops to Young brothers or Bon Scott to be described like this? TheSilkyAnteater (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Bee Gees buddy

Hey Arjayay, I saw that edit of yours. That range, 45.190.136.0/22, was blocked by Graham87 (sorry, Graham, I don't know what makes that easily readable or clickable for you and me), and I see now that I can block 2804:1810:E000:0:0:0:0:0/36 without any collateral damage. I wonder if Binksternet has dealt with this one. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Drmies - There can't be many editors from Santarém, Para, Brazil who have such strong opinions on Scottish/Australian musicians. I also suspect we have another new account, as announced in the post above? - Arjayay (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes. At User talk:2804:1810:E736:FC00:E96A:3B30:148:BD2D, I wrote, Block evasion by Brazilian IP Special:Contributions/45.190.137.219 and also the blocked users Marnogg and Gonramm. This person is obsessed with nationality. Binksternet (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Graham87, you're pretty clever: can you tweak the range of that 45.190 block to include the one just mentioned by Binksternet? Binksternet, thanks--I knew you'd know. I ran CU but that didn't give me anything new, no other accounts. If either one of you could write this up for an SPI, that would be helpful as a record, though I often wonder if an LTA page isn't more helpful for a case like this. Drmies (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Also AUS-burn (talk · contribs) (already blocked by Spencer) and TheSilkyAnteater (talk · contribs). And G. Picanço (talk · contribs), and Gustavo Picanço (talk · contribs). Drmies (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Drmies: That individual IP was part of the /22 range; I've unblocked it to make it show as such now. Graham87 16:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Graham87. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

You might want to see User:Arjayay/Brazilian Aussie for other accounts + IPs. - Arjayay (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, thanks to all of you. Good stuff. Please see my recent edits (to your page also), to see all the accounts I've blocked--I tagged them as puppets of User:Gustavo Picanço, though I wouldn't be surprised if there were older ones underneath. Drmies (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Winter War draft article

Bulgariansoviet1878 here, thank you for posting that message. I didn't know whether it was acceptable to post links to drafts, but my draft is now published as an official article. If you undid the change, I'll link to it again. Thank you! I'll be aware of this in the future.

Bulgariansoviet1878 (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Bulgariansoviet1878 - I see you have already done so - congratulations on your first article - Arjayay (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Images of Evry Cathedral

Help! I need your advice. I'm trying to expand the article on Évry Cathedral, the only 20th century built in France, and add images. The text is easy, because I have good sources, but images ae difficult, because the church was built in the 1980s. Somehow the French Wikipedia article has images, but there are none at all available in Wikimedia Commons, due to the recent date of the cathedral and a block on images. The only image on Commons shows the building in the distance, almost hidden by fog. For that reason I tried to direct people to the French Wikipedia so they could see what the church actually looks like. Do you have any idea how to deal with this? It's weird that images can be posted on the French Wikipedia but not on the one in English.

Many thanks for your good work, and your advice. Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi SiefkinDR - Thanks for the post, but I am not an expert on images.
I know French copyright laws restrict "freedom of panorama", but I've not seen a Wikipedia notice like that on those images in Fr.Wikipedia - it seems bizarre that they are allowed in France, which has such a restriction, but not in countries that do not have such a restriction.
Equally, Google images reproduces them, without comment. You could go through a google image search, frame by frame, to see if any have the correct licencing - but that could be a long and unproductive exercise.
I don't know who to ask - I used to ask User:Yunshui about images but he suddenly stopped editing on 16 June 2020, although I think there are still WP:Talk page stalkers watching his talk page, so it might be worth an ask.
Alternatively, you could ask the question at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions to see if they have a "work around", or can suggest where copyright free images are available. - Sorry that's the best I can suggest - Arjayay (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Petra Christian University

I agree with you. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

• Ha, I see that User:I Nyoman Gede Anila didn't--AmandaNP, are they still active in this article? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Active? They are blocked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

List of online payment service providers

Hello,

I have inserted a new name of a payment provider (Paysera) into the list of online payment service providers. Your decision to remove this record as there is none article about Paysera on Wikipedia is very clear.

Just a quick note. There is a draft article about this fintech: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paysera . The article was re-submitted more than a month ago and now waits for an editor view. Maybe you, as an editor, could review it? This would help to have a stand-alone article which - when finished - could be included in the list of online payment service providers.

--Frequency33 (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Frequency33 - as it clearly stated in the line immediately above where you left your original post "Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page"
As for reviewing your draft article, I am not a WP:New page reviewer, so I cannot do that. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

I am not

Dear sir, I am not a sockpuppet of Mumtazabdullahahsan1. Just see my contributions. - Quetterry (talk) 23:40, 13 Jan 2021 (UTC)

Oh yes you are were, as proved at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Weareme234 - Arjayay (talk) 18:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

How

What is citations ? - Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz (talk) 20:09, 31 - 01 - 2021 (UTV) — Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Los Angeles

Hmm not sure what happened. That rollback wasn’t intentional. It’s quite concerning since that is the second one today. Anyway carry on. I find no problem with your edit. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 19:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

No worries Jhenderson777 - I had a similar problem once - I seemed to be clicking things that I was sure I wasn't, but they were clearly in the edit history - my mouse died a few days later - I suspect it was shorting in its death throes - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Apologising for publishing an unsourced edit

My sincerely apologies, I joined Wikipedia by logging in very recently. So, I could not do the proper procedure while adding the citation or reliable source to my edit.

Now I’m learning that process

Therefore , please consider my unknown act as a mistake and forgive JaisriramJaisriram (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrator please look into persistent vandalism user

Administrator please take the necessary actions against user 188.232.28.60. They have already affected many sites, including Hansel and Gretel (2021 film). Thank you.EnshrineSnowVista (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi EnshrineSnowVista - I am not an admin, so I can't do any more than you can
I see you have been reverting their edits, but not issuing them with any warnings - without adequate warnings, any report to WP:AIV will simply be refused.
Please see WikiProject User warnings for the overview and Template index/User talk namespace for the range of warning templates - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Arjayay for the informationEnshrineSnowVista (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you so much for helping out in Treatment of South Asian labourers in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Very much appreciated. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 02:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Stars in Their Eyes episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

"Category:Celtic albums by by Finnish artists" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Category:Celtic albums by by Finnish artists. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Category:Celtic albums by by Finnish artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Healdsburg Historic Landmarks

I am at a loss on why a Healdsburg article is such a concern to editors. The work to identify hundreds of historic site and to then identify a dozen plus to be put on its formal Designated Historic Structures list was done by the City of Healdsburg and the City Council. This is well documented on several lists formally published by the City of Healdsburg --online and in print. Then, the official City Council Resolutions have been pulled from the paper documents. And, more newspaper articles and other official City web links have been documented. Healdsburg has chosen to use the term Designated Historic Structures rather than Historical Landmark or some other term. Yet, Wikipedia editors want this article crushed. The work done by Healdsburg officials seems no less important than that done by hundreds or thousands of cities across the USA.MikeVdP (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

MikeVdP I have no interest in the subject whatsoever. My interest in in upholding the guideline DRAFTNOLINK, which clearly states "do not link to pages outside the article namespace". All links to draft articles, user pages, sandboxes etc. in actual articles, contravene this, and are, therefore, removed. Shortly there should be an automatic block on the addition of links to drafts, which will make this task easier. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate word removed

Hi Arjayay - hope you're well. Thanks for all your work in removing duplicated words. You might have missed one here! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lugnuts - I think your counting is rather poor if you only think I missed one. And other things keep cropping up Also, although I am not a fan of Wet Wet Wet or The The, ironically, I've seen both bands. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Haha! I did think of The The. And Duran Duran. Or is that Duram Duram? And I have seen the band Live live... Take care. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

And "a a" can be a deletion mutation (as a geneticist would say) for "as a" rather than an insertion error for "a". Just happened on Cyndi Lee.... All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Chiswick Chap that was my bad - I usually spot those - I deliberately don't use any form of automation, or scripts, to make sure I read the thing properly, and have a pre-set edit summary of "duplicate word reworded" to cover such situations - apologies - Arjayay (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

No worries! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Madurai

Hello, Arjayay. You have new messages at Talk:Madurai#Citation style and volume of citation.
Message added --Bejnar (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thiruvarur

While I'm certain you had best intentions with your recent edit to Thiruvarur, it couldn't exactly be helpful as no edits by either of the two users (Vignesh Doss and Shakthi2803), one of whom you warned, have been contributive. Both users have been making alternating and often opposing edits in a kind of edit war since my last effort to cleanup at the part of the article here. I don't believe any of the 30-some additions by either since then had been sourced or constructive. For example, one user may add something about buses, which is unsourced, which will then be changed by the other to their preferred version, and will also add a totally unsourced extra 100,000 to the population figure. I wouldn't really care about any edit that just perpetuated this cycle, since its no substantive change to absolute quality either way, but your magnanimous presence on the edit history gave me hope. I am not skilled or patient enough to deal with the manual reversions necessary to return the article to my latest revision, if such efforts are only immediately counteracted by 30 messy edits from two users in two days. However, I would beg for your assistance in doing so, and not having them be erased by the two users, to start restoring a GA-rated article to actually being good. Thank you. Starkenborgher (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Starkenborgher thanks for your post.
I could see there was a lot of edit warring going on, and based on the few edits I looked at in detail, I thought one editor seemed better than the other.
Having now looked at their edits more closely, I see they are following each other around a number of articles. I wondered if they might be one and the same person using two accounts, so I looked at the Editor Interaction Analyser and their interactive timeline. Vignesh Doss has (currently) edited all the articles first and all 66 of his edits are to those 7 articles, while Shakthi2803 has edited the articles second and all of his 84 edits were to exactly the same 7 articles.
I have reverted Thiruvarur back to your last version and will look at the other articles later. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Starkenborgher - as you may have seen User:Shakthi2803 has now been indeffed - Arjayay (talk) 21:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Starkenborgher the editor has re-appeared as ‎2401:4900:4dd0:f6e1:1f2c:3f89:d1cc:ab9f (talk · contribs · WHOIS) - from Ciombatore. I have reverted all edits to date - If the IP stays static we can ask for it to be blocked - Arjayay (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

NOINDICSCRIPT

Just for the record WP:NOINDICSCRIPT does not refer to Indic script used in infoboxes for identification purposes. --Bejnar (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Bejnar - I don't see that exception anywhere in the guideline. The only exceptions are "articles on the script itself, articles on a language that uses the script, and articles on texts originally written in a particular script."
If you think I've missed something, please explain where - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 19:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The original guideline did not include infoboxes. However, you are correct, I was unaware of the RfC on Indicscript in infoboxes of April 2017 that changed the rule from "one" to "zero". I do note that not having the native name for a place often makes identifications in sources difficult. If the various Indian language Wikipedias were more complete, that would be less of a problem. And in many cases I can go back to the pre-April 2017 articles to find the appropriate name. Thank you for your time in replying.  --Bejnar (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

No worries Bejnar, I've been caught out citing guidelines that have changed since I last read them myself - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I want to know how to eliminate duplication of citation

Can you help me with information on how to avoid citation duplication when same citation is used inside a template info box and outside. Suhail Azwa (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Suhail Azwa there is no difference between references inside an infobox and those in the article, they both used "Named references" as explained at WP:NAMEDREFS - Arjayay (talk) 10:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thankyoy very much for your reply. I will work it out. Suhail Azwa (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

ICC PAGE

Internation Cricket Council (ICC) is not owned by BCCI or Indian Cricket Team. You are giving wrong information. Sukhjivan Ghuman (talk) 03:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sukhjivan Ghuman, unfortunately, that page is frequently vandalized, usually by IPs from Pakistan, although that particular vandalism was added by an IP from Sheffield, England as seen here
I have now removed it, although since Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit", the next time you could FIXIT yourself. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For your amazing amazing ability to to spot duplicate words words all over over Wikipedia that spell checkers checkers can't spot spot and helps the encyclopedia keep a professional appearance appearance, here is is a barnstar barnstar. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ritchie333 Thank you, thank you
(I do sometimes wonder how many people have a spellchecker, but don't use it, most of my finds are fairly blatant) - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for informing me. I didn't know that. The description at the infobox led me to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatill (talk • contribs) 17:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Jamshedpur

Arjayay I have seen that how you revert my edits. Please don't do so. I will now edit only Jamshedpur. There are many other users from Jamshedpur like Devx101, Weareme234 and Mdanusali etc. I will talk to these users and will work together as a teamwork. I have already messaged Devx101 only Weareme234 and Mdanusali remaining. Userline (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Userline you, as User:Weareme234, and any other name you want to try and hide behind, are globally, indefinitely, blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You keep creating new accounts, lying that you are not a sockpuppet, and being blocked again. This will continue until you stop trying to edit Wikipedia.
You may get away with another new account for a few days, weeks or months, but the more you edit Wikipedia, the easier it is to track you down.
When your sockpuppetry is uncovered, ALL your edits will be reverted, as has happened with your recent sockpuppets, so you are wasting your time.
Goodbye - Arjayay (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

What weareme234. I am not him. He is fully blocked Userline (talk) 18:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not Weareme 234. Sure. Even though I don't that he get blocked. I am here to meant to edit only Jamshedpur to make it a featured article. How much contribution he had made and you didn't delete it Userline (talk) 18:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Then just check Metteler he edited on Bokaro Steel City's economy section his main target. I am not a sockpuppet if you won't believe then I will prove it to you. Promise I am not a sockpuppet. Just check other. Even though weareme 234 have vandalized Jamshedpur. I am trying to improve Jamshedpur. Userline (talk) 19:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Weareme 234 added unsourced information but I am adding fully sourced informations Userline (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Firozabad

Sorry I don't know that it was copied. Everyacid (talk · contribs) 14:21, 01 March 2021 (UTC)

An edit

Hello sir please can you allow me to edit on Jamshedpur. I have vey important information. Someone said. I have also made edit on Bokaro Steel City is it OK. Please I want to make Wikiproject Jharkhand active. Everyacid (talk · contribs) 10:10, 02 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Will you be able to redirect KY 6116 from 6000-6999 to KY 6116 on 3500-6999 please

And im sorry for the inconvenience on 2000-2999 TheGs2007 (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheGs2007 - I'm not sure what you are asking - we don't have an article KY 6116, nor Kentucky Route 6116 and we don't have an article List of state highways in Kentucky (3000–6999) either. Can you explain further? Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

It should be in this article Kentucky supplemental roads and rural secondary highways (3500–6332) TheGs2007 (talk) 16:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheGs2007 - KY 6116 is in List of Kentucky supplemental roads and rural secondary highways (3500–6999) specifically, here - Arjayay (talk) 16:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

So im saying that it shows up in that article but not in the List of Kentucky highways 6000-699 TheGs2007 (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

OK TheGs2007 I think I've done what you were after - created the page Kentucky Route 6116 as a redirect and added the route maker symbol to the List of state highways in Kentucky (6000–6999) page - Please let me know if I have misunderstood - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok thank you TheGs2007 (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks you but can you show me how to create a redirect to a page? TheGs2007 (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheGs2007 rather than me repeating the detailed explanations, which include options, depending on how you edit Wikipedia, please see Help:Redirect and Wikipedia:Redirect
A lot, but by no means all, instructions can be found typing "Help:subject title" and/or "Wikipedia:subject title" in the search box - happy editing - Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

After i have learned how to use them, but it wouldn’t work TheGs2007 (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheGs2007 - sorry I missed your post earlier - I'm not sure what "didn't work" - as I can't see a failed attempt in your edits.
Before we go any further, please understand that Wikipedia only has articles about "notable" subjects, not about anything and everything. The general requirements are at WP:GNG, or summarised at WP:42
Your draft Draft:Kentucky Route 6161 is about a " 0.07mi (0.12 km) supplemental road. in the City of Louisville."
I don't know anything about Kentucky Route 6161, but I cannot imagine that this road has received "significant coverage" e.g. an article in a national newspaper or magazine, or chapter in a book, a TV programme, a section on a notable, independent, website, or in any other form. Without such "significant coverage" your article will simply not be accepted, so I suggest you don't waste any more time on it.
Sorry to have to be so blunt, but I have seen too many editors who ignored this basic principle getting frustrated - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Since you haven’t known about KY 6161 it is located in the City of Louisville Transportation map. It is located on image #7 in the top right corner. Thank you for letting me know TheGs2007 (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Warnings on IP talk page

HELLO Sir,

I have received these messages on my talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:150.107.241.30) but I haven't done any of these edits. In fact, I only use wikipedia for information. Please look into this if possible to rectify the mistake. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.241.30 (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello person using GTPL Broadband in Surat, Gujarat, this is not a "mistake". As it clearly states at the bottom of User talk:150.107.241.30, (but with my bold)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users

Someone using that IP address vandalized our pages, whether that was you or not, only you will know. The way to avoid warnings meant for other people is to create an account, and either stay logged in or login in every time you edit.
Please see WP:Why create an account for the benefits and "how-to" guide - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

IIT Kharagpur page vandalism

IIT Kharagpur page is vandalised by many users and i think it set a precedence for future possible vandalism by students as they are angry on the administration and are venting out their anger on the wikipedia page. So I request you to change the status of the page to semi protected or fully protected. Thank you. AmanSharma1996 (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi AmanSharma1996 - I'm not an admin so I can't protect it. You need to apply at WP:RPP, but I'd wait to see if the problem persists - they will not protect a page "in case", or based on a few edits, only when there is clear proof of continuing vandalism. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I am new to wikipedia so I am not aware of the rules and regulations. As you have reverted the disruptive edits so I asked you. AmanSharma1996 (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Guff

Hi,

Regarding the INSEEC Business School article, may you please let me know what do you define as "guff"? You added a banner about "puffery and guff", so I assume that you do.

Incidentally, I am quite shocked about the use of "guff". It is insulting regarding French culture. Have you read Montaigne, René Descartes and analyzed their influence on the Grande Ecole system to be able to say that?

This leads to the question: How should I edit this section to get rid of this banner then? I should describe this Buiness School as: barren, purely pragmatic and with no history or humanist values? And thus, when you do some anthropological, sociological and philosophical research about a Business School precepts, therefore, it's guff.

The content which you may qualify as "puffery and guff" is certainly the section about the honestus clerus, which doesn't infringe any copyrights, and is verifiable. Correct?

To me it seems like there is room for interpretation. Shall there be a section in Wikipedia's codex defining "guff", I will be happy to be enlightened.

I will be equally happy to know what are the criteria to get rid of "guff".

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onna Bugeisha 2020 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Onna Bugeisha 2020
I see you have posted similar comments at 4 user-pages, all of very experienced users, and since than your most recent edit was reverted by another experienced user. Consensus is against you.
You have, however, failed to address the question of your Conflict of interest and follow the appropriate guidelines
The INSEEC Business School is highly promotional, reading more like a prospectus than an encyclopedia article, and breaks numerous Wikipedia Manual of style guidelines - please see MOS:Bold and WP:IMAGESIZE as examples.
The article should be solely about INSEEC Business School, not about the Grande école system, which already has its own article, the "Values" section appears similar to a Mission statement which are to be avoided, WP:WPSCH/AG#NPOV covers colleges as well as schools, and you should also read Wikipedia:Avoid academic boosterism
The detailed curricula details and "fame by association" details of other institutions which make make it read like a prospectus.

To answer your question I should describe this Buiness School as: barren, purely pragmatic and with no history or humanist values? generally, yes, but we would accept a history specifically of this business school. Frankly, I cannot imaging many, if any, readers struggling their way through such a long and digressive article. Before proceeding further please address the Conflict of interest question.
I am currently moving house so am unable to help / comment further - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer

How can I reply to the conflict of interest? → I noticed that among Grande Ecole Business Schools, INSEEC had one of the worst articles on Wikipedia, hence I wanted to modify it. Would it be OK to migrate general Grande Ecole values and structure to the Grande Ecole article? → It would need edition too. Thank you for citing some excerpts from the Wikipedia codex, I will study them. I will make the values part lighter and more specific to INSEEC. Should I remove the academic programmes too? Onna Bugeisha 2020 (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

@Onna Bugeisha 2020: Forgive me, I'm not Arjayay, but they mentioned they are busy moving and cannot help you further, so I thought I would jump in and answer one of your questions. Arjayay has left instructions on your user talk page on how to declare a conflict of interest (COI) - please read through that message and follow those steps before editing any further.

If you don't have a conflict of interest, you can reply to Arjayay's message on your user talk page saying so. If you do, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI. If that page doesn't make sense, ask for help at The Teahouse, which is a place for newcomers to ask questions.

It's best to add the {{UserboxCOI}} template (or the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template, if you are being paid / compensated in some way for your editing) to your user page if you have a COI. Those steps are explained in the section "How to disclose a COI" that I linked above. Hope this helps - Whisperjanes (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Whisperjanes - beautifully explained - I may well re-use that explanation myself - thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Rgarding Chidiakahana page

Hi.Arjayay How can i prove This is not Unreliable sources.Please Guide.The director made three films before,also attached newspaper link.pls tell me how to Remove Unreliable sources/inline citations. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aycharumann (talk • contribs) 14:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Aycharumann I have already removed the "references" citing Wikipedia and IMDB. You need to change the External links into references, and insert them immediately after the information they are supporting, possibly in several places as there is a lot of information to support.
Although you have made a lot of edits, you seem rather unclear on this - please see Wikipedia:Citing sources particularly WP:REFNAME - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Because you thanked me

Arjayay, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! DoebLoggs (talk)

10:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)