User talk:Arcadian

If you are contacting me because I am an admin near the beginning of the alphabetical list, please first read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. --Arcadian (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Also, I occasionally receive messages from individuals looking for information about a medical condition affecting them or someone in their family. I can't provide assistance in these matters (see Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer), and I can't guarantee a response to each email. However, if you frame your inquiry in terms of the condition itself, I may be able to be of assistance. If you have a question and Wikipedia's page doesn't answer it, it is likely that other people have had the same question. Rather than answer the specific question via email or on a talk page, a more enduring solution would be to make the underlying article more complete or more clear. --Arcadian (talk) 22:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Other metabolic pathology

Template:Other metabolic pathology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MuscleLoyola

Template:MuscleLoyola has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 12:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Pheneticillin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pheneticillin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheneticillin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A8v (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of images in Gray's Anatomy: XII. Surface anatomy and Surface Markings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of images in Gray's Anatomy: XII. Surface anatomy and Surface Markings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of images in Gray's Anatomy: XII. Surface anatomy and Surface Markings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EMedicineDictionary

Template:EMedicineDictionary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Great to see you back

Wondering if you would be interested in helping with this project [Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force]. We are basically improving the leads of important medical articles to get them ready for translation into other languages. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for urinary system

Template:Eponymous medical signs for urinary system has been nominated for merging with Template:Urinary system symptoms and signs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 101 Damnations (book)

The article 101 Damnations (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. No references added since tagged in October 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nick Number (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infestation navs

Template:Infestation navs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Renaming of Chromosome Categories

Hello, Arcadian - I see that you're not real active on Wiki these days, but I do hope you will find/take the time to participate in the CFD discussion that is taking place regarding the series of categories that you created some time back for the genes on human chromosomes. I think your input would be very helpful, in particular regarding the X & Y chromosomes (as I outlined in my comment in the CFD discussion). Regards, Cgingold (talk) 05:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of images in Gray's Anatomy: I. Embryology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of images in Gray's Anatomy: I. Embryology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of images in Gray's Anatomy: I. Embryology (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4

Previous

Released: 1 July, 2015

Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is the fourth update, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. We've had a quiet time over the last half-year or so, so I've slowed down the release of this newsletter and will probably release the next one around the end of the year. If you'd like to provide some feedback, if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new

• A related WikiProject is formed, WikiProject Women's health
• Cerebellum, promoted in 2006, receives a long overdue featured article review
• Heart and Glomerulus receive a peer review
• Our article base explodes from about 10,000 to 12,775, with most new articles being redirects.
• Sympathetic nervous system, Autonomic nervous system and Parasympathetic nervous system all receive significant makeover, and cry out for more attention!

What's going on

The vermiform appendix, seen in the bottom left and the cause of much anguish when inflammed, stirs up an interesting discussion.

• Should Vermiform appendix be retitled to its more common name (Appendix)? The discussion continues!
• A large number of "back end" changes are made, and integration with Wikidata continues -- see the focus for more.
• Our set of cranial nerve-related articles receive a review by a subject expert

How can I contribute?

Our articles on the 13 12 cranial nerves receive a review from a subject expert

• If you're interested in a topic area, let other editors know by creating a 'drive' in that area
• Continue to reword articles in language lay readers can understand
• Search Wikimedia commons for high-quality coloured images that can be used to replace some of our older, lower quality images.
• Don't forget that anatomy isn't always about gross anatomy! A number of other fields, including articles about embryology and histology ("microanatomy") cry out for attention.

Issue focus - technical changes

This issue was originally going to focus on how far we've come as a project. However, that encouraging news can wait until next issue, as there are simply too many changes going on at the "back end" of our project not to write about. What do I mean by "back end"? I mean changes that are not necessarily visible to readers, but may have a significant impact on the way we edit or on future edits.

Templates

A number of visible changes have been made to our templates. Firstly, the way our templates have been linked together has changed. Previously, this was a small bar with single-letter links. This has been replaced by a light-coloured box contained within all our templates with fully-worded links, which provides links to relevant anatomy and medical templates. This should make life a lot easier, particularly for students and other readers who are struggling with the vastness of anatomical systems and their related diseases and treatments.

As part of this, almost all our templates have been reviewed and cleaned up. The previously confusing colour scheme has been removed and colour standardised. The titles have been simplified. References to "identifiers" in the titles of navigation boxes (such as Gray's Anatomy and Terminologia Anatomica numbers) have been removed. Where possible, the wiki-code of templates has been updated to give a cleaner, more standardised, format that is hopefully more friendly to new editors. The cleanup continues , please feel free to contribute or propose templates which need attention.

Anatomy infobox

Most of our articles have an infobox. Previously, there were 11 separate infoboxes for different fields, such as muscles, nerves and embryology. These have been united so that at the "back end", every template will take formatting directly from the main anatomy infobox -- however at the "front end", there is little difference for readers. This will make future changes much easier -- including adding new fields, formatting, and reordering the contents. Several changes have already been made: infoboxes now link to a relevant anatomical terminology article; contents are now divided into 'Identifiers' and 'Details' headings, making it easier to grasp content for new readers; and new fields have been added, including Greek and UBERON, with several more under discussion.

External links

An editor has reviewed all our template-based external links. These are the links that often fill the "External links" category, and sometimes used as citations. At least thirty different links sets, with the number of links stretching into the thousands, have been fixed, and if not functioning, deleted. A number of non-functioning dead links (with no archived websites available), and one or two others, have been deleted. This helps keep our 'external links' section relevant and functioning for those readers who want extra information about articles.

Wikidata

Perhaps our most important change has been integration with Wikidata. This is because of both its current uses and potential future uses. Wikidata is a service related to Wikipedia focusing on storing information. Data relating to a Wikipedia item (such as a muscle or bone, or even a template) can have related "structured" infomation stored systematically alongside it. For example, a muscle can have information about its embryological origin, nerve supply, and the relevant sections of Terminologica Anatomica (TA) stored alongside it. Much information that was stored within articles on infoboxes is now stored on Wikidata, including the TA, TH, and TE fields. An immediate benefit is that Wikipedias in every language will (as they update their own infoboxes, be able to automatically include this information. New data can be entered in a much easier format, and data can be batch entered by bots making future updates much easier Future uses include data visualisation. I personally am looking forward to the day when a reader can view a wikidata-based "tree", clicking mesoderm and seeing all of the derived structures, then selecting the intermediate mesoderm, then Pronephric duct, mesonephric duct and vas deferens. The possibilities of using Wikidata for data visualisation are really quite encouraging!

Our next issue will focus on how far WikiProject Anatomy has come in the past 2 years.

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BiowebUW

Template:BiowebUW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Safiel (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of images and subjects in Gray's Anatomy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Heart listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Heart. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Heart redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Gymnodiniales listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gymnodiniales. Since you had some involvement with the Gymnodiniales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Opabinia regalis (talk) 17:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

I'm nominating Robot (dance) for deletion. Regards Tapered (talk) 06:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Microcheilia

The article Microcheilia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Odontogenic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odontogenic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odontogenic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eponymous medical signs

Template:Eponymous medical signs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RockMagnetist(talk) 17:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skin physiology

The article Skin physiology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Microcheilia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microcheilia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microcheilia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Fleeing listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fleeing. Since you had some involvement with the Fleeing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ablepharon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ablepharon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ablepharon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Atony for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atony is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atony until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Family Practice Notebook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family Practice Notebook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Practice Notebook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

{{PDB Molecule of the Month}}

Hi, I've done a quick update of the {{PDB Molecule of the Month}} template that you created way back in '07. Let me know if you spot any problem with it. The PDB changed the way it formatted its links so it broke all the ones already in articles. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 11:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Medical conditions

Template:Medical conditions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings for urine

Template:Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings for urine has been nominated for merging with Template:Urine tests. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 21:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Inferior border

The article Inferior border has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely nonspecific. Readers highly unlikely to be searching for "Inferior border" without mentioning what the border is of

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 16:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Superior border

The article Superior border has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely nonspecific. Readers highly unlikely to be searching for "Superior border" without mentioning what the border is of

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 16:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Superior border for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superior border is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior border until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

No objection. --Arcadian (talk) 14:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs

Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs has been nominated for merging with Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scleroprotein disease

Template:Scleroprotein disease has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

• I wasn't the person who nominated this, but they failed to notify you, so here you go. ~ Rob^Talk 13:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Issues in the Cerebellum article

Hi,
I'm editor-in-chief of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, and we're about to consider a snapshot of the Cerebellum article for publication in this journal: Wikiversity Journal of Medicine/Cerebellum. This would make it easier for external sources to use and cite this work, and after we've advanced the journal these publications will be searchable in PubMed as well. Since you have been one of the most active contributors to this article, we would like to include you in the "author" list, but we want these to be the authors' real names. If you approve, you may edit that article to change your username to your real name, or include it in a reply to me. Otherwise, you will be attributed by a link to the history page of the Wikipedia article. Also, the work has undergone peer review, and I'd appreciate if you could have a look into the peer review comments, and help amending the mentioned issues before publication in the journal: /Cerebellum#Peer review. You may first look at its history to see what corrections have already been made by other authors.
Best regards,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomenclature disparities in MAC article

It has come to my attention that there are two entries on Wikipedia involving MAC:

    about MAI, 
    about MAC proper.

Five years ago a discussion was started on whether to merge the two entries, but no decision was reached AFAIK.

I am in email contact with people at a medical center renowned for its expertise in pulmonary diseases. However none of them has consented (yet) to spend the time necessary for the type of professional peer-review that I think these entries need.

Do you have any input on this matter?

Seniorexpat (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 13:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Arcadian. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Publishing Hippocampus in WikiJournal

Hi,

Would you like to join as an author in the project of having the article Hippocampus published in WikiJournal of Medicine? WikiJournal of Medicine is an open-access journal with no publication charges of any kind. Published articles will be given standard citation formats and DOI codes so that they can be cited by external works. Before publication, all articles undergo peer review, so after this is done I would like you to join the task of amending any issues that arise from it. I found you among the most active contributors to the article [1]. To be displayed among the main authors of the publication in WikiJournal of Medicine, you need to agree and sign the "Submission letter", and you should also write your real name. In any case, we'll attribute contributors by a link to the article history of Hippocampus.

Cheers,

Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Editor-in-chief, WikiJournal of Medicine

This article has now been peer reviewed by a neuroscientist, discovering several issues: Wikiversity:The Hippocampus#Peer review comments

I still hope you can help out in amending these issues. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter #5

WP:Anatomy newsletter (#5)

Previous - Next

Released: November 2016

Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is our fifth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. There hasn't been too much worthy of news, and I have less time to dedicate to this project, so I've slowed down the release of this newsletter.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new

• Adrenal gland, thyroid ima artery, Ear, Heart, Esophagus and Lung are promoted to good article status
• Our previous barnstar has changed to the new shiny "Golden galen" barnstar to celebrate contributions to anatomical articles
• We are featured in the journal Clinical Anatomy [2]

How can I contribute?

• Participate in discussions - a number of discussions such as those on our talk page or about our infobox would benefit from your opinion!
• Continue to add content to our articles
• Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!

Focus - how far we've come

How far have we come since our first newsletter... the answer is quite a lot! Here goes:

• Hundreds to thousands of articles improved and standardised by many, many editors.
• 14 new good articles created or added to our project [3]
• Improved quality of our articles - subjectively and objectively. GAs quadrupled from 5 to 16, B-class articles doubles from 62 to 115, C-class article well on the way to trebling from 219 to 611, Start-class increased from 1,082 to 1,570.
• Tens to hundreds of mergers performed between tiny, unedited articles - a remnant of our Gray's Anatomy (1918) heritage.
• Layout guidelines changed and layout standardised for the majority of our articles
• In the project space:
  • WikiProject Animal Anatomy created
  • 20-30+ new members
  • 200+ new editors welcomed with our new welcome template
  • Interdisciplinary category system to help new editors
• Active integration with wikidata in our infoboxes
• Overhaul of all of our navboxes
• Review and integration of all of our templates
• External link templates reviewed to ensure they all work
• To help improve anatomical literacy:
  • Creation of a suite of five Anatomical terminology articles, and overhaul of existing articles
  • Creation of the {{Anatomy-terms}} template created
  • Links provided in infoboxes
  • Simplifying anatomical terminology essay released

These are substantial improvements and my thanks go out to our many editors who played a part in this. These improvements are almost always the result of consensus, compromise, collaboration and discussion between multiple editors.

I hope we can continue to improve in the future. How can you help? Continue to edit, add content, and create a welcoming atmosphere so that new editors will join us.

Well done to us all, and the many anonymous editors who've helped along the way!

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Arcadian.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Surgeries

Template:Surgeries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arcadian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

SS in category

Someone is wondering what the SS is for in the title here[4]. Was that a typo? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RocheLexicon

Template:RocheLexicon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:YaleCranialNerves

Template:YaleCranialNerves has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Just becoming aware of your work

...and am impressed and thankful. Cheers. Le Prof [User:Leprof_7272] 73.210.155.96 (talk) 19:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPnotebook

Template:GPnotebook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bdelloidea (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Bdelloidea (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 00:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Colpodellidae

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Colpodellidae, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for this notification. --Arcadian (talk) 09:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Myeloid blood tests

Template:Myeloid blood tests has been nominated for merging with [[Template:]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about HP Enterprise Business

Hello, Arcadian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether HP Enterprise Business should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HP Enterprise Business .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Steve Quinn (talk) 03:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arcadian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter (#6)

Released January 2018  · Previous newsletter  · Next

Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our sixth newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.

I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.

Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

What's new

	new good articles since last newsletter include Thyroid, Hypoglossal nerve, Axillary arch, Human brain, Cerebrospinal fluid, Accessory nerve, Gallbladder, and Interventricular foramina (neuroanatomy)
	I write an Introduction to Anatomy on Wikipedia in the Journal of Anatomy [5]
	Vagina receives a lot of attention on its way to good article status.
	We reach two projects goals of 20 good articles, and less than half of our articles as stubs, in July 2017. [6]
	A discussion about two preferred section titles takes place here.

Introduction to WikiProject Anatomy and Anatomy on Wikipedia

We welcome all those interested in anatomy!

Seeing as we have so many new members, and a constant stream of new editors to our articles, I would like to write in this issue about how our project and articles are arranged.

The main page for WikiProject Anatomy is here. We are a WikiProject, which is a group of editors interested in editing and maintaining anatomy articles. Our editors come from all sorts of disciplines, from academically trained anatomists, students, and lay readers, to experienced Wikipedia editors. Based on previous discussions, members of our project have chosen to focus mainly on human anatomy ([7]), with a separate project for animal anatomy (WP:ANAN). A WikiProject has no specific rights or abilities on Wikipedia, however it does allow a central venue for discussion on different issues where interested editors can be asked to contribute, collaborate, and perhaps reach a consensus.

Project and article structure

Wikipedia has about 5,500,000 articles. Of these, about 20,000 fall under our project, about 5,000 of which are text-containing articles. Articles are manually assigned by editors as relating to our project (many using the rater tool). As well as articles, other Wikipedia pages in our project include, lists, disambiguation pages, and redirects. Our articles are improving over time, and you can have a look at our goals and progress, or last newsletter, to get a better idea about this.

Our articles are structured according to the manual of style, specifically here. The manual of style is a guideline, which "is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply", and prescribes the layout of anatomy articles, most of which follow it.

Our articles are organised in a particular way. Most articles have a infobox in its lead, describing key characteristics about the article. Because we have so many articles, articles are often linked together in different ways. An article tends to focus on the primary topic it is written about. Further information can be linked like this, or piped (like this). We use navboxes, which are the boxes at the bottom of articles providing links to similar topics, as well as hatnotes. Typical hatnotes in articles include {{main}}, {{see also}} and {{further}}. This lets us link to relevant and related articles. The bottom of articles also shows categories, which store groups of related articles.

Tools

For interested editors, our project offers a number of additional tools to help edit our articles. On our main page appears a log of the most edited recent articles. An automatic list of recent changes to all our articles is here. We have a list of the most popular pages (WP:ANAT500). To keep abreast of news and discussions, it is best to monitor our talk page, newsletters, and our article alerts, which automatically lists deletion, good article, featured article, and move proposals. We also have a open tasks page for editors to create lists of tasks that other editors can collaborate with. Articles are also manually assigned to a "discipline", so interested editors in for example, gross anatomy, histology, or embryology can easily locate articles via here.

Our project has all sorts of smaller items that editors may or may not know about, including a barnstar, user box ({{User WPAnatomy}}), welcoming template ({{WPANATOMY welcome}}) and fairly comprehensive listing of templates (here).

Invitation

We are always happy to help out, and I invite new editors, or for those with any questions relating to how to get around the confusing environment that is Wikipedia, to post on our talk page or, for a kind introduction to questions, at the WP:TEAHOUSE.

How can I contribute?

• Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask!
• Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
• Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
• Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

Nomination for deletion of Template:Human cell types derived primarily from endoderm

Template:Human cell types derived primarily from endoderm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Pharmacology User Activity Update

Hi there! I've noticed that you haven't been active on WikiProject Pharmacology. Per our policies, your status has been moved from Active to Inactive, which you can view here. Don't be discouraged, though--we'd love to see you come back and contribute to the project! Let me know if you need any help! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 18:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Interlobar duct

The article Interlobar duct has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition, unlikely to be expanded. Suitable for transwiki

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Interlobular duct

The article Interlobular duct has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition, unlikely to be expanded. Suitable for transwiki

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresenius Kabi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fresenius Kabi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.fresenius-kabi.com/company/history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KSFT ^(t|c) 15:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. --Arcadian (talk) 13:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Clarification

Greeting, and sorry to bother you, but I noticed you had edited Nuchal plane and that you are a physician. If you have the time I was wondering if you could give some clarification, or point me somewhere for such clarification, on the area referred to as the Nuchal plane? I note that the upper defining boundary of the Nuchal plane is the Highest nuchal lines but became confused as to the lower boundary and any divisions or sections. Apparently the lower section lies above the ridge of the condyloid canal. Figure 48 of the Bones, ligaments, joints, and muscles shows apparent upper and lower divisions (above and below the Inferior nuchal line) separated by the medium nuchal line.

I would appreciate any help you might provide. Thank you, Otr500 (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Sea Squirts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sea Squirts. Since you had some involvement with the Sea Squirts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 01:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cicatrizant

The article Cicatrizant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No available reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Madrenergic^talk 04:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Last thoracic nerve listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Last thoracic nerve. Since you had some involvement with the Last thoracic nerve redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arcadian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arcadian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Rotator listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rotator. Since you had some involvement with the Rotator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 22:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox medical condition

Template:Infobox medical condition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EMedicine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EMedicine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770592. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Biochemistry metanavs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Biochemistry metanavs, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Antinematodal agent for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antinematodal agent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antinematodal agent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DannyS712 (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cancerindex

Template:Cancerindex has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Conduction block listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conduction block. Since you had some involvement with the Conduction block redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ycanerol 16:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Oncological symptoms and signs

Template:Oncological symptoms and signs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Ф6 phage listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ф6 phage. Since you had some involvement with the Ф6 phage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:57, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

"Smallest splanchnic nerve" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smallest splanchnic nerve. Since you had some involvement with the Smallest splanchnic nerve redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dual-role transvestism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dual-role transvestism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dual-role transvestism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WanderingWanda (talk) 15:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for skeletal system and joints

Template:Eponymous medical signs for skeletal system and joints has been nominated for merging with Template:Eponymous medical signs for skeletal system and joints. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for skeletal system and joints

Template:Eponymous medical signs for skeletal system and joints has been nominated for merging with Template:Orthopedic examination. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

"Joint diseases" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joint diseases. Since you had some involvement with the Joint diseases redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Base of lung

The article Base of lung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable structure or article. Should redirect to Lung#Structure instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Superior border for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superior border is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior border (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Fallopian/Uterine Tube regions

You and/or User:Mikael Häggström appear to have been the author of several short articles in 2007 on regions of the Fallopian/Uterine tube. Someone has suggested they be merged into the main Fallopian tube article. I have professional expertise in Anatomy and concur with those actions but wanted to give you the courtesy of letting you know.
•It has been suggested that Ostium of uterine tube be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2019.
•It has been suggested that Infundibulum of uterine tube be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2019.
•It has been suggested that Fimbriae of uterine tube be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2019.
•It has been suggested that Ampulla of Fallopian tube be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2019.
Lapabc (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your a GOAT

Love what you do with Wikipedia

Hawkeye9876 (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

"Blood grouping and crossmatching" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blood grouping and crossmatching. Since you had some involvement with the Blood grouping and crossmatching redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

"Hepatic capillariasis" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hepatic capillariasis. Since you had some involvement with the Hepatic capillariasis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Symptoms involving head and neck

Template:Symptoms involving head and neck has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IowaHistologyInteractive

Template:IowaHistologyInteractive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

"Slurred speech" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Slurred speech. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Slurred speech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Smjg (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GeorgiaPhysiology

Template:GeorgiaPhysiology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. bender235 (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Adnexal and skin appendage neoplasms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adnexal and skin appendage neoplasms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnexal and skin appendage neoplasms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Strong Hebrew

Template:Strong Hebrew has been nominated for merging with Template:Strong-number. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Trialpears (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eponymous medical signs for muscles and soft tissue

Template:Eponymous medical signs for muscles and soft tissue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Hematological symptoms and signs

Template:Hematological symptoms and signs has been nominated for merging with Template:Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings for blood. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Complications of surgical and medical care

Template:Complications of surgical and medical care has been nominated for merging with Template:Transfusion medicine. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Cognition, perception, emotional state and behaviour symptoms and signs

Template:Cognition, perception, emotional state and behaviour symptoms and signs has been nominated for merging with Template:Disorders of consciousness. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Lymphatic vessel disease

Template:Lymphatic vessel disease has been nominated for merging with Template:Lymphatic organ disease. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Allergic conditions

Template:Allergic conditions has been nominated for merging with Template:Hypersensitivity and autoimmune diseases. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gonadal tumors, paraganglioma, and glomus

Template:Gonadal tumors, paraganglioma, and glomus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Congenital lymphatic organ disorders

Template:Congenital lymphatic organ disorders has been nominated for merging with Template:Lymphatic organ disease. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Arthropod infestations

Template:Arthropod infestations has been nominated for merging with Template:Acari-borne diseases. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:18, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Inflammation

Template:Inflammation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Myeloid innate immune system

Template:Myeloid innate immune system has been nominated for merging with Template:Myeloid blood cells and plasma. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anatomy navs

Template:Anatomy navs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Cerebral palsy and other paralytic syndromes

Template:Cerebral palsy and other paralytic syndromes has been nominated for merging with Template:Nervous and musculoskeletal system symptoms and signs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Medicine worksheet templates has been nominated for renaming

Category:Medicine worksheet templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Cardiopulmonary therapy

Template:Cardiopulmonary therapy has been nominated for merging with Template:Respiratory system procedures. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:DartmouthAnatomy

Template:DartmouthAnatomy has been nominated for merging with Template:DartmouthHumanAnatomy. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gray figure

Template:Gray figure has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MerckGeriatrics

Template:MerckGeriatrics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RXlist

Template:RXlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gray subject

Template:Gray subject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FPnotebook

Template:FPnotebook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Exrx

Template:Exrx has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ENotes

Template:ENotes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EMedicineHealth

Template:EMedicineHealth has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CrispThesaurus

Template:CrispThesaurus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Superficial anatomy of limbs

Template:Superficial anatomy of limbs has been nominated for merging with Template:Superficial axial anatomy. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nervous system and SS anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming

Category:Nervous system and SS anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Urogenital neoplasm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urogenital neoplasm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urogenital neoplasm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IowaHistologySlide

Template:IowaHistologySlide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:OMIM2

Template:OMIM2 has been nominated for merging with Template:OMIM. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nose, respiratory system, and TC anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming

Category:Nose, respiratory system, and TC anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Lymphoid system anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lymphoid system anatomy templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Early complications of trauma

Template:Early complications of trauma has been nominated for merging with Template:Trauma. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICD-10 Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 19:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Myeloid physiology

Template:Myeloid physiology has been nominated for merging with Template:Myeloid blood cells and plasma. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hemodynamics

Template:Hemodynamics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Glandular and epithelial neoplasm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glandular and epithelial neoplasm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glandular and epithelial neoplasm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Endocrine pathology

Template:Endocrine pathology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Lymphatic organ neoplasia

Template:Lymphatic organ neoplasia has been nominated for merging with Template:Lymphatic organ and vessel disease. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DiseasesDB2

Template:DiseasesDB2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ductal, lobular, and medullary neoplasms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ductal, lobular, and medullary neoplasms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ductal, lobular, and medullary neoplasms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Extracorporeal assistance, performance, and therapy

Template:Extracorporeal assistance, performance, and therapy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Water-electrolyte imbalance and acid-base imbalance

Template:Water-electrolyte imbalance and acid-base imbalance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Symptoms concerning nutrition, metabolism and development

Template:Symptoms concerning nutrition, metabolism and development has been nominated for merging with Template:Nutritional pathology. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Neurology, SS, and psychiatry disease and disorder templates has been nominated for deletion

Category:Neurology, SS, and psychiatry disease and disorder templates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lesions of spinal cord and brain

Template:Lesions of spinal cord and brain has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neuro procedures

Template:Neuro procedures has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs

Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs has been nominated for merging with Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Eponymous medical signs for cardiovascular system

Template:Eponymous medical signs for cardiovascular system has been nominated for merging with Template:Cardiovascular system symptoms and signs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Transcription factor and coregulator deficiencies

Template:Transcription factor and coregulator deficiencies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cerebral palsy and other paralytic syndromes

Template:Cerebral palsy and other paralytic syndromes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tick and mite-borne diseases and infestations

Tick and mite-borne diseases and infestations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings for blood

Template:Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings for blood has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MedlinePlus2

Template:MedlinePlus2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gray page

Template:Gray page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Template talk:Nervous system tumors

Is it acceptable for you to use this German table/version https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorlage:Navigationsleiste_Tumore_des_Nervensystems with a lot more new articles in your English template? Best regards, Wname1 (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chinese word for "crisis" for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chinese word for "crisis" is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese word for "crisis" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Joe (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Mikhail Lebedev

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist).

Proposed deletion of Mirth of a Nation

The article Mirth of a Nation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NBOOK and GNG; the review given appears to be the only meaningful coverage on a non-user-generated site. Neglected permastub that last got a non-gnoming edit in 2005.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 06:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

"Muscle fibers, fast-twitch" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Muscle fibers, fast-twitch. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9#Muscle fibers, fast-twitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amino alcohols

Template:Amino alcohols has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Project Osprey (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Banks (filmmaker)

The article Robert Banks (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ––FORMALDUDE^(talk) 07:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tenitramine

The article Tenitramine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Atony for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atony is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atony (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ajpolino (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the creations.

I can see that you don't edit much anymore. So I don't know when you'll see this. But I'm leaving this with you: Thanks for creating pages others wouldn't have thought about creating. I include myself on that "others" list. I know your articles are often tiny and sometimes get deleted. But they also sometimes get expanded or incorporated into Wikipedia in some other way. Stubs are a start. Sometimes they make it. Sometimes they don't. You usually create stubs that are worth considering as Wikipedia articles, or as something that should be merged into another article, at least. GBFEE (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

You created tensor fasciae latae muscle. Look at it today. It's just one example. This is an article I would have considered creating if it didn't exist, but it's not an obvious creation. You got it on Wikipedia early. So thanks for creations like this too. GBFEE (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

"Genet. Couns." listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Genet. Couns.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 7#Genet. Couns. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

".45 Caliber" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect .45 Caliber. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 27#45 caliber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:B03, B05, B06

Template:B03, B05, B06 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glass family

The article Glass family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 00:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

"Fish proteins" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fish proteins and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#Fish proteins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

"Binding sites, antibody" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Binding sites, antibody and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#Binding sites, antibody until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

"Illicit drug use" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Illicit drug use and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Illicit drug use until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

"Celivarone (SSR149744C))" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Celivarone (SSR149744C)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#Celivarone (SSR149744C)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Fumarase deficiency

Hello there respected friend! I wanted to let you know that after a couple years of very low activity due to legal blindness, I'm back and have noticed that the article on Fumarase deficiency AKA "Polygamists' Downs," has gone a little downhill. So many tweaks and small edits have lost or erased references that were once there and that "Inbred" word was put back in the lead paragraph and further down. You came to the article's rescue long ago. I cleaned up the wording a bit to try and keep things in line with Anthropological terminology. I will be looking to see what's new in the literature since you and I first took an interest in the article. I just wanted you to know I am active again thanks to eye surgery and that you may want to peak in there from time to time. Thanks for your immense help in the past and best wishes. LiPollis (talk) 05:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

"Vertex (urinary bladder)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vertex (urinary bladder) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 8#Vertex (urinary bladder) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

"Empress Helena" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Empress Helena and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 17#Empress Helena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Last Call Cleveland

The article Last Call Cleveland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guide

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hirolovesswords (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

"Reprod. Biomed. Online" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reprod. Biomed. Online and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 6 § Reprod. Biomed. Online until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

"His Autobiography" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect His Autobiography has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § His Autobiography until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Female congenital anomalies of genital organs

Template:Female congenital anomalies of genital organs has been nominated for merging with Template:Male congenital anomalies of genital organs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 07:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox medical intervention

Template:Infobox medical intervention has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox medical intervention (new). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

"Atherectomy, coronary" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Atherectomy, coronary has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 15 § Atherectomy, coronary until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

"Eopharyngia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eopharyngia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § Eopharyngia until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Neurocytoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neurocytoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurocytoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darcyisverycute (talk) 12:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Autosomal monosomies and deletions has been nominated for renaming

Category:Autosomal monosomies and deletions has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 08:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Cleavage stage, ovum" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cleavage stage, ovum has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 31 § Cleavage stage, ovum until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

"Diabetes with other coma" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Diabetes with other coma has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 6 § Diabetes with other coma until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

"Academic Medicine" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Academic Medicine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Academic Medicine until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sappinia amoebic encephalitis

The article Sappinia amoebic encephalitis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Everything on this page can all fit in Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis so it would simply be best to redirect it and merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Okmrman (talk) 04:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Sappinia amoebic encephalitis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sappinia amoebic encephalitis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sappinia amoebic encephalitis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Okmrman (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

"Flexes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Flexes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Flexes until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ARR RRR worksheet

Template:ARR RRR worksheet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nickps (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Bergey's volume 1 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Bergey's volume 1 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Plantdrew (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

"Metallic taste" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Metallic taste has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Metallic taste until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Eobacteria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eobacteria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eobacteria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Neurofibromin (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neurofibromin (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)