Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 31

< March 30	April 1 >

March 31

Template:Footer Buenos Aires Marathon Champions Men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Buenos Aires Marathon Champions Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Footer Hong Kong Marathon Champions Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Footer Hong Kong Marathon Champions Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Footer Buenos Aires Marathon Champions Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Footer Melbourne Marathon Champions Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Footer Hokkaido Marathon Champions Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These are not high level competitions which warrant navigation between its champions. The winner is largely decided by who the race organiser provides the greatest financial incentive to participate. An athlete's victory is not a highlight for prominent athlete and very rarely are such winners associated or grouped together based on their winning this race, except in the very narrow context of that exact race's history. SFB 21:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - Substantially more than half of the links are red links to nowhere. Navboxes exist so that readers may navigate among existing articles on related topics. These examples fail that basic test. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Guayaquil Marathon Champions Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not a high level competition which warrants navigation between its champions. The winner is largely decided by who the race organiser provides the greatest financial incentive to participate (see recent deletion of women's template) SFB 21:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Unity engine games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unity engine games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There's already a List of Unity Engine games article that covers which games use the Unity Engine, and the use of a particular video game engine is too wieldy for a navbox. Besides, the only thing in common between a lot of these games is their video game engine - different developers, different publishers, different platforms, you name it. Soetermans. T / C 14:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, incomplete, and better covered by a list article and/or category. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kurds infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 11. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MuscleLoyola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 11. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lutz and Smith Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lutz and Smith Films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The relevant Wikiproject advises against any filmography navboxes except director navboxes in order to avoid navbox creep. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion per nom and Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The relevant Wikiproject advises against any filmography navboxes except director navboxes in order to avoid navbox creep. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion per nom and Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Periodisation of Indian History

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 11. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Periodisation of Indian History (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Periodisation of Hinduism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Polly Draper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polly Draper (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. After trimming all the duplicate links (and acting roles), we are left with one directing credit, one writing credit and one TV credit. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, except for the writing credit, it's redundant to {{The Naked Brothers Band}} anyway. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added her acting credits, Thirtysomething and Heartbeat (TV movie)) as well as Brooklyn Boy and her family members Tim Draper, William Henry Draper III, William H. Draper, Jr., Tim Draper, Jesse Draper, Michael Wolff, Nat Wolff, and Alex Wolff (as they all have Wikipedia articles and all have worked together). ATC^{. Talk} 04:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't include acting credits in navboxes, and listing family members is not really relevant. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the Wiki guidelines does it say that we "don't list acting credits" in these templates because she is most known for her role on Thirtysomething and I wouldn't understand why you wouldn't list acting credits especially if the person is an actress. ATC^{. Talk} 18:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see here. Frietjes (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete/replace or repurpose as a family template. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think the family is important enough for a family template. Even the Category:Getty family don't have one of those! --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the fact that the Getty family doesn't have one is WP:OTHERSTUFF. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but I don't think the Draper/Wolff family are notable enough as a family to warrant a navbox. In fact, per WP:NAVBOX, "there should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template", so it would fail this guideline. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peter Landesman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peter Landesman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, only two films listed. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are notable films by notable directors. Two film are enough. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep for now, the director is still active. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Too few links to justify navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 2 films are not enough to justify a template. A lot with 3 films have been deleted in the past.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.