Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 16 July 18 >

July 17

[edit]

Template:Female genitalia frontal cross-section numbered

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 28. Izno (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Artisticswimming2020Olympics

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Non-admin adminstats templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 04:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are currently unused, and are from, mostly, former admins. These stats can still viewed with XTools, so i dont think, the templates are useful.--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 19:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a clarification for the benefit of others: does your rationale include accounts that are real and still active today, just former admins? Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 16:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CVU report

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion G7 by Fastily. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and this will (probably) stay unused. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 19:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talk archive navigation

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 6. Primefac (talk) 01:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox United States District Court case

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox court case. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox United States District Court case with Template:Infobox court case.
Merge as the district court case is redundant to a better designed template (infobox court case). Previous discussion of infobox USDCC resulted in no consensus with keep !votes concerned about the images of the court seals not showing up in infobox court case and the lack of parameters for things such as "laws applied." If you take a look at the test page, you can see that now the inverse is actually true. Infobox USDCC does not show the seal while infobox court case does. Infobox court case also includes parameters such as laws applied under its legacy parameters section while infobox USDCC does not. Even the infobox for the higher level courts (Template:Infobox COA case) is just a wrapper of infobox court case.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 18:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:English international schools

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:International schools in Brazil as all the links here are in the other navbox -- AquaDTRS (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019–20 Cymru Premier table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 25. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 03:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 Cymru Premier table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 25. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 03:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canberra Metro lines

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Above listed templates are now deprecated after transition to Template:Adjacent stations. – McVahl (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Superficial anatomy of limbs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Human surface anatomy and regions. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Superficial anatomy of limbs with Template:Superficial axial anatomy.
Same scope, and both boxes are quite small. I propose a merge to a template with a clearer title reflecting the scope, {{Human surface anatomy and regions}} Tom (LT) (talk) 03:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSE specified risk materials

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CrispThesaurus

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EMedicineHealth

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ENotes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template is unused, website appears to be dead and, based on the name also does not seem like a reliable source. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Exrx

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template links to a website that is clearly not a reliable source for encyclopedic information. Links should be removed and template deleted. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used twice, and it is unclear what value it provides to this website. It appears to link to a search engine on FDA which readers can access themselves, and does not provide any encyclopedic benefit. Additionally, the name is so convoluted I do not think editors are likely to continue to use this template. I propose deletion Tom (LT) (talk) 02:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FPnotebook

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gray subject

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RXlist

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MerckGeriatrics

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mesh2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ViralZone

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 27. (non-admin closure)   Kadzi   (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gray figure

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem to be used in article space. Most of the Gray's Anatomy 1918 content has now been placed on Wikipedia for upwards of a decade, so this particular template is also unlikely to be used. Therefore I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DartmouthAnatomy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:DartmouthAnatomy. Izno (talk) 18:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:DartmouthAnatomy with Template:DartmouthHumanAnatomy.
These templates seem to be trying to link to the same place (Dartmouth Human Anatomy), it's just that because they are divergent one links to dead links and one doesn't. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PiHKAL

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the navigational value of connecting all these substances because they were mentioned in a 1991 book. These substances can be linked once, in the primary article, and the navbox should be deleted in my opinion. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nootropics

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template has been blanked for about a year, and does not appear to serve a purpose. I suspect the reason it was blanked was because of a lack of reliable sources for inclusion of drugs. I propose deletion as it is not being used as a navigational aid. Ping to Seppi333 who blanked it and likely has an opinion. Tom (LT) (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Signaling peptide/protein receptor modulators

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 2. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afc b

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 31. Izno (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cardiopulmonary therapy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Cardiopulmonary therapy to Template:Respiratory system procedures as explained in the discussion. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cardiopulmonary therapy with Template:Respiratory system procedures.
Firstly, this template contains general disease links which the inclusion is unclear. Once these are excluded, the two templates seem to have the same scope and contents, so they are better placed together. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_17&oldid=1138134070"