User talk:Akhshartag

This is Akhshartag's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurkha has been accepted

Kurkha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Thanks again, and happy editing![reply]

Bkissin (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Akhshartag

Thank you for creating Kurkha.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alevism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 22:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Might input the infos later with sources, but some of this stuff is mentioned in this same article, just tried to make it more coherent Akhshartag (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just be sure to mention in your edit summary which sources in the text the changes you are making are based on, and never add something you just happen to know but for which no source is cited. This can be dreary at times, and often articles are left worse because of it, but strict verifiability rules are really essential to make this project work. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 23:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about things which don't really require a source? For example, because ali already is one of the twelve imams, i changed it to "prophets and messengers" so it reads better, how would I find a source for that specifically? It seems kind of apparent Akhshartag (talk) 23:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a reference to Ali to a reference to the prophets and messengers in Islam fundamentally changes the meaning, and so should not be done if you're not directly summarizing a different source which does mention the prophets and messengers instead of Ali. On the other hand, a reference to "Ali and the twelve Imams" could be changed to "Ali and the other eleven Shi'i Imams" without changing the source, because here there is no change in meaning.

It's often very difficult to find a source for something one already knows. A much better and recommended way to work is to read a reliable source, and then make changes to the Wikipedia article based on it. Don't start from what you know, start from reading a specific source. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 23:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rakesh Narwani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rakesh Narwani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rakesh Narwani (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rakesh Narwani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 09:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akhshartag! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 09:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.—Ermenrich (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theseus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phaedra and Aethra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pythagoras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mnesarchus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haplogroup J (Y-DNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriots.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melqart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heroes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deity equivalencies

I recommend you read this recent discussion at WT:CGR to gain an understanding of the current consensus on what is required before adding deity equivalencies to infoboxes. – Michael Aurel (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while I'm hardly offended, note that calling another editor an "idiot" is not recommended. See WP:NPA. – Michael Aurel (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Christian saints category

Hello, I have noticed that you have added the "Arab Christian saints" category to a multitude of pages of Saints from various countries in the Middle East/West Asia without backing up these claims. Please be aware that not only Arabs are present in these regions as many other ethnic groups such as Syrians (in a historical context referring to Arameans/native Levantines), Maronites, Assyrians, Greeks, Copts and others inhabit or inhabited these areas as well. If you wish to add information regarding the ethnicity of a Saint please provide a source when doing so. Red Phoenician (talk) 02:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So true lebanese people are white phoenicians Akhshartag (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Saint Salib

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saint Salib, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Abibus of Edessa

added a link pointing to Immolation

Theophoric name

added a link pointing to Abdisho

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abibus of Edessa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agreement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 23:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seraphim Rose, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It looks like you're also leaning towards edit-warring. Please refrain from disruptive editing. Let me know if you want to discuss things. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please respond here or on one of the talk pages where I will ping you for discussion. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arab Christians, you may be blocked from editing. This edit suggests that you are unwilling to respond civilly to other editors who have concerns about your editing. Please engage in discussion. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Apostolos the New, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnesia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to this hand

Nah nigga im still here

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 11:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: please note that 2003:C0:6F10:5B35:ECDF:AFB1:F639:1FD6 appears to be continuing Akhshartag's edit warring. Please consider a block on the IP and extended reblock on the account. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2003:C0:6F10:5B35:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) blocked 2 weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rakesh Narwani

Hello, Akhshartag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rakesh Narwani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Attallah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Isaac Attallah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and several issues with copyright violation of https://orthochristian.com/140813.html. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme just reset my wifi router Akhshartag (talk) 11:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]