User talk:Ajshul/Archives/2021/October

Bryce Hall (entertainer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bryce Hall (entertainer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that demonstrate significant coverage. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bryce Hall (entertainer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bryce Hall (entertainer). Thanks! —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 18:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Ajshul,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Ajshul/Archives/2021/October,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Downdetector moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Downdetector, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 17:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ajshul! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Task Center
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fightful

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fightful requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GameMine (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GameMine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GameMine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shane Wighton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Wighton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Wighton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Majlak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Majlak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Majlak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fightful Logo White.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fightful Logo White.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Ajshul/Archives/2021/October,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You are such a great editor, a certain highlight of intellect in the wikipedia community! 14442tt8479372 (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
42		Flemingdon Park (talk)	Add sources
18		Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine (talk)	Add sources
3		Dalhousie University Faculty of Engineering (talk)	Add sources
10,287		David Dobrik (talk)	Add sources
2,208		Myanmar Army (talk)	Add sources
616		Mobile game (talk)	Add sources
53		Google Clips (talk)	Cleanup
2,392		Kubernetes (talk)	Cleanup
243		United States in the 1950s (talk)	Cleanup
492		Tensor Processing Unit (talk)	Expand
107		Polymer (library) (talk)	Expand
290		Playrix (talk)	Expand
1,173		Steven Furtick (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
23		Time management game (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Cartoon Network (Russia & Southeastern European TV channel) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
52		Sentiocentrism (talk)	Merge
14		Dialogic pedagogy (talk)	Merge
15		Dialogic education (talk)	Merge
3,794		Napoleonic Wars (talk)	Wikify
7		Gustavo Cuervo Rubio (talk)	Wikify
1,605		ByteDance (talk)	Wikify
2		Gael Grunewald (talk)	Orphan
21		Willy Rudolf Foerster (talk)	Orphan
8		Phidippides cardiomyopathy (talk)	Orphan
12		Chloropentafluoroethane (talk)	Stub
32		Nicktoons (Central and Eastern Europe) (talk)	Stub
2		Atzalan golden salamander (talk)	Stub
183		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
4		Dalhousie University Faculty of Computer Science (talk)	Stub
2		José Félix Villarreal (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Thanks so much!!! Ajshul 😀 (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Biography of interest

Ajshul, You might be interested in a page I have been working on and have a long-term goal of improving. Marver Bernstein Many thanks. Zatsugaku (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Zatsugaku: Sounds great! I'd love to help out! What specifically are you looking to improve on the article at the moment? Or are you just looking to expand it and generally add more information?

@Ajshul: Thank you for the offer. Mostly general improvement. But long term to also build more cross references so that there is some reason to read about him. For example, with redistricting a major issue this year, the #Government section and cite 11 (Dixon) could drive some interest into the approach NJ took to address gerrymandering and his techniques for negotiating out of deadlocks. I am new enough to biography pages (all pages really) to not have a clear roadmap on how to improve the page other than just hunting around for more content for each section. If you have any suggestions, I’m anxious to learn. I am not an alum of Brandeis so I have limited contacts but have just begun to dig around in their university newspaper. Unfortunately, I see the online archives only go back to 2001. Similarly, their Office of the President archives only offer a catalog and no online content for him. While not an alum of Georgetown, I have a better chance of getting content from there. I have a tangental personal connection to him but after reading about him and noticing he didn’t have a page on Wikipedia, I felt that he was a historically relevant figure who was immensely respected but who preferred to work quietly. I’ve added a half-dozen wikilinks and can think of a few more but it would be nice to have someone with superior skills also engaged. P.S., if you are interested in glassblowing there is a bio needed for Finn Lynggaard re the Glasmuseet_Ebeltoft page (which I was working to enhance last year). Zatsugaku (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Zatsugaku: Awesome, I'll begin looking into it. Sound great!

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Wikipedia mini globe handheld

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)