User talk:Ajax.amsterdam.fan

Ajax.amsterdam.fan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ajax.amsterdam.fan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Stokes Soccerplex moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stokes Soccerplex, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martone-Mejail Field moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Martone-Mejail Field, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martone-Mejail Field (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pahunkat were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martone-Mejail Field and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martone-Mejail Field, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naeem Charles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naeem Charles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naeem Charles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 19:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GSU Soccer Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSU Soccer Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSU Soccer Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 F.C. Copenhagen season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Lange. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorrels Field for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorrels Field is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorrels Field until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GSU Soccer Complex (Grambling State)

Hi there! I've redirected this article for now as the subject doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. I've chosen to redirect. Please feel free to restore the article but only if there is sufficient evidence that it meets criteria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to merge the content into Grambling State Tigers if you feel that it warrants covering in that article. Thanks Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason why you decided to revert please? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GSU Soccer Complex (Grambling State) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSU Soccer Complex (Grambling State) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSU Soccer Complex (Grambling State) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring against AfD consensus at 2018 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament

Hey, I noticed that you have attempted to repeatedly recreate an article at 2018 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament. An article was previously deleted at that title following this AfD discussion. In order to recreate the article, you're going to need to either provide additional sources that address the notability concerns raised in the deletion discussion. Repeatedly recreating the article without addressing these concerns is a form of edit warring, and will lead to blocks if continued. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've continued to edit war. As my only action at the article has been to restore the outcome of the AfD, I consider myself uninvolved and will block you if you continue to revert the page without going through the appropriate channels. The appropriate way to argue for this article's recreation is to collect enough sources to establish that the subject meets WP:GNG, and then file a deletion review request at WP:DRV. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

County University Soccer Stadium

Hi there, thank you for your contributions. Please can you explain how the above stadium is notable? I did a search but could not find any evidence of passing WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD. Are there any secondary sources available? In other words, sources not from University of South Carolina? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it to draft for now. Please see if you can find secondary sources covering this in detail and then please feel free to submit through Articles for Creation Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to GSU Soccer Complex, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not restore the article against AfD consensus. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

County University Soccer Stadium moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, County University Soccer Stadium, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2018 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax.amsterdam.fan, I've explained multiple times that you can't just reinstate an article that has been deleted at AfD without providing significantly better sourcing. Use the time that you are now blocked from editing that page directly to look for sources that can establish the subject's notability (WP:THREE is an essay with good advice about what to look for), and if you find promising sources, file a case at WP:DRV, our deletion review noticeboard. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, no, I'm done with this. I don't understand why you care so much about it, but we can just move on from this whole thing now and get on with our lives --Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Harris (footballer) moved to draftspace as so far fails WP:NFOOTY

An article you recently created, Calvin Harris (footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published as he has not yet played a first class game (see WP:NFOOTY). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When they play such a game for FC Cinncinatti and you consider the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 18:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961 That was unneccesary, as he has played professional games. There are other players who have yet to play an MLS game. Next time, find a better reason if you want to delete it.

I don't actually want to delete anything, as I said above this player has not yet played a professional first class game - Wellington Phoenix Reserves are as the name suggests, a reserve side in a lower league, Wake Forest are a college side in a lower league - see the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues for what are considered professional leagues. As this player has not yet (and may never) play a game for FC Cincinnati he does not yet meet WP:NFOOTY or otherwise WP:GNG so it would be better in draft until he actually plays (less chance of actually being tagged for deletion there) JW 1961 Talk 20:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961 Yes, the name has "reserves" in it, but they play in the top tier of soccer in New Zealand. Therefore, it is relevant and the page should not be a draft

Thanks for that clarification and apologies, in that case I was misreading Wellington as a reserve side of an NZ league team and so he does meet NFOOTY and it can go live, the second version of the article has less history and no categories so I will have an admin move that one to Draft where it can be deleted and let the original (now draft) pass as an article JW 1961 Talk 20:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961 - unfortunately, the New Zealand Football Championship is not listed at WP:FPL so Harris does not yet meet NFOOTBALL. New Zealand has had professional teams compete in the Australian A-League before, though. Similar to how some professional Welsh teams compete in the English league system. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone so it's still a semi-pro league. We can still keep it as a page. If it matters that much, Harris did appear for the senior team for Wellington Phoenix. (Source: https://godeacs.com/sports/mens-soccer/roster/calvin-harris/5215) --Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax.amsterdam.fan, Spiderone Thanks, if the creator could add that reference to Wellington Seniors to the "Live" page It would help prove notability while the page can be tagged {{refimprove}} pending a mention of that game on a source such as soccerway or worldfootball, is that acceptable to all? JW 1961 Talk 21:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961, so should we add a box score/report for the game he appeared in?

Yes, as it was a senior appearearnce in a fully professional league, it therefore establishes notability beyond doubt, I would just tag the page with refimrove until that (or a Cincinnati game) shows on Soccerway or similar JW 1961 Talk 22:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with adding a report or anything similar for that game to evidence that he did actually play for the senior professional team at least once. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Calvin Harris (footballer) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Calvin Harris (footballer). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Calvin Harris (footballer)

Hello Ajax.amsterdam.fan I have added projects Football, Sports, Biography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Harris (footballer) moved to draftspace to make way for move

An article you recently created, Calvin Harris (footballer), is being moved to make way for the original article in mainspace JW 1961 Talk 21:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, it has sufficient information and sources, I don't see why it needed to be nominated for deletion.

Where are these sources showing significant in-depth coverage? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting help

Hi. I'm going to make some changes to your edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex. If offended, please feel free to revert, but thought you might like to know the correct way to format some of your comments. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaw Field (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaw Field (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaw Field (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, come on man, that’s not necessary. it’s a relevant article with primary and secondary sources. there’s no reason to delete it, as it is a soccer stadium for a popular college soccer team - Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 01:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SDSU Sports Deck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SDSU Sports Deck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDSU Sports Deck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Northeast Conference Men's Soccer Tournament

Hi there, as per recent consensus here and here, these tournaments were deleted and redirected to the main article. I have done the same with the tournament articles for the other years for now as none of them have any independent sources either. The history for the other tournaments have been retained should there be any content that might be worth merging to the main article. Thanks. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Lincoln Red Imps F.C. season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020–21 Lincoln Red Imps F.C. season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emina Ekic

The article Emina Ekic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. No pro debut yet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emina Ekic

The article Emina Ekic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I agree with User:BlameRuiner, this fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–21 Lincoln Red Imps F.C. season. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Following on from my message on 27 Jan, you have done a cut and paste move again on this article. When it is sent to draft, you are not allowed to just cut and paste the article back to mainspace as it ruins the attribution. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone, sorry about that, it seemed like the best and easiest way to make the page --Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. By the way, does this team receive any independent coverage? Gibraltar's league is semi-professional so does not meet presumed WP:NSEASONS notability, which is why I sent it to draft. Do you have in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2020–21 Lincoln Red Imps F.C. season

The article 2020–21 Lincoln Red Imps F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSEASONS as Lincoln is not a professional team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 1. divisjon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 1. divisjon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Thomas (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Thomas (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Thomas (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Govvy (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conference standings

If you update the standings, please also update the date... GWFrog (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GWFrog, what specific conference are you referring to? -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 17:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 Chicago State Cougars men's soccer team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Chicago State Cougars men's soccer team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Chicago State Cougars men's soccer team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: County University Soccer Stadium (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:County University Soccer Stadium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:County University Soccer Stadium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 07:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Georg Bjarnason

The article Georg Bjarnason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, only played for an Icelandic second level team, a US college team, and the U17 national team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Kjell Scherpen article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 10:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ethan Bartlow

The article Ethan Bartlow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Maybe worth draftifying until MLS debut (if it happens at all)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stats in infobox

For footballer / soccer player bios, only statistics from regular-season play are included in the infobox. Thanks. Seany91 (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of "El Cashico" for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article "El Cashico" is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"El Cashico" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stewart Johnson Stadium

The article Stewart Johnson Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show WP:GNG. Would have redirected to East Carolina Pirates, but it's not mentioned there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 Eredivisie

Can you explain all these changes?

Why does the onlyinclude-endtag have to be on a separate line?
Why do the |attendance= parameters have to be blanked?
And most of all, why should the match report be from the winning team's website? A Dutch report on EN-Wiki which most likely within 1 or 2 years is no longer accessible?

--Sb008 (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sb008: I removed the attendance number because there may be fans at the stadiums, as fans will be allowed back at stadiums starting May 16 (according to this article).

The match report should be from the winning team's website because it provides more information about the game than a box score does. -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 01:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How many fans were there at the stadions on 16 May? The latest official news is that there will be mo more fans at mational league matches. All the rest is speculation. And if a new descision is taken, the 0 can be changed any time. This is EN-Wiki and not NL-Wiki. So most likely the big majority of readers will not understand Dutch which effectively causes the report to be less informative. Besides, pages at soccerway stay "infinite" whereas news items at (club) sites mostly disappear within 2 years. If the link has not been archived, we end up with a dead link. --Sb008 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sb008: A "0" can always be added after the game is over and the attendance is official. The reports can usually be translated into English, so that isn't really a problem. We can also add two match reports, one with an actual recap and then just the box score. Or, a box score can be used after two years if the recap disappears. -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 01:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We go by the facts. Based on the current facts there will be no fans at the matches. If the facts change, we change Wiki. We don't leave things blank because they might change. E.g. we don't leave the date blank because it might change. We don't leave the stadium blank because it might (partly) collaps as happened to AZ not that long ago and therefore the match will be played elsewhere.
Everything can be translated into English. You know what, we get rid of all articles related to Dutch events and instead put a reference on the page to the corresponding article on NL-Wiki. We do the same for events from all other countries which have a Wiki for their language. Imagine all articles which no longer have to be watched for vandalism, spelling mistakes, inaccuracies etc etc. You don't ask or expect people to go translate things. Furthermore, Wiki is supposed to be neutral. Reports at the website from 1 of the involved teams are not likely to be neutral, especially if there were debatle events during the match. And last but not least, for each stage of the league there're references to Soccerway. Keeps matters consistant.

-----------------//------------- --Sb008 (talk) 09:50, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jannick Theißen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jannick Theißen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone:, there are multiple citations from reliable and independent sources. Please explain why you think those aren't reliable. -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 18:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are reliable and independent but they do not have any in-depth coverage of the footballer. Routine announcements of "Theißen transfers from x to y" is not significant coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone: It's still accurate and reliable information about a player going from one team to another, it doesn't need a full article if it's just a loan move or something like that. Having an article without in-depth coverage is better than no citation at all. -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jannick Theißen (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft does not appear to indicate that one of the sports notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a sportsperson or other subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the sports notability criteria (or other notability criteria) at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NFOOTY for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jannick Theißen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jannick Theißen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jordaine Jäger moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jordaine Jäger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone: ffs man, why does it matter so much 🤣

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jannick Theißen (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jannick Theißen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jannick Theißen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stokes Soccerplex

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stokes Soccerplex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Martone-Mejail Field

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martone-Mejail Field, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stokes Soccerplex (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The university's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stokes Soccerplex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stokes Soccerplex, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2021–22 AFC Ajax season, you may be blocked from editing. Sakiv (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakiv: bro you're the one being disruptive -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 14:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Football box collapsible|date=14 August 2021|time=TBD|round=|report=|team1=AFC Ajax|team2=[[NEC Nijmegen]]|stadium=[[Johan Cruyff Arena]]|location=[[Amsterdam]]}}{{Football box collapsible|date=22 August 2021|time=TBD|round=|report=|team1=[[FC Twente]]|team2=AFC Ajax|stadium=[[De Grolsch Veste]]|location=[[Enschede]]}}, What's this for God's sake??--Sakiv (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

:@Sakiv: lol what? it has all of the information necessary -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can't you see that it will be too hard for other users to edit your format?--Sakiv (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakiv: how would it be hard for other users to edit it? that makes no sense at all -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 15:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcel Johnen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcel Johnen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Johnen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil 665 07:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Hupe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jonas Hupe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone: i honestly don’t really care lmao -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antonio Brandt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonio Brandt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Brandt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme₁₄₉₉ 17:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for fleshing out my citation for Alfonso Vazquez, have a goat.

Pace2Pace (talk) 13:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katie Offer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Offer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Offer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone: do you seriously have nothing better to do? lmao that sucks -Ajax.amsterdam.fan

Please remain WP:CIVIL, however, the answer to your question is "no, I don't" Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:County University Soccer Stadium

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:County University Soccer Stadium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bishop Sycamore High School

The article Bishop Sycamore High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable event about a (possibly) non-existent school.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 02:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: mate this is a notable event that is gaining national attention, so there's no reason to delete the article -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ethan Bartlow

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ethan Bartlow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bishop Sycamore High School scandal

On 19 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bishop Sycamore High School scandal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Bishop Sycamore High School lost a televised football game 58–0, it was reported that the school did not teach its students? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bishop Sycamore High School scandal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bishop Sycamore High School scandal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Real Madrid 1–2 FC Sheriff Tiraspol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Real Madrid 1–2 FC Sheriff Tiraspol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Madrid 1–2 FC Sheriff Tiraspol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marco Rosa (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Rosa (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Rosa (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ethan Bartlow

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ethan Bartlow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2021 Atlantic Coast Conference men's soccer season without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Robertjamal12 (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertjamal12:, alright i gave a better summary now -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jordaine Jäger

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jordaine Jäger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jannick Theißen

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jannick Theißen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 NCAA Women's Tournament

I was just wondering if you would like to form a partnership of sorts with this year's tournament? For example, you could get the first crack at the game summaries and I could get first crack at updating the overall bracket or something like that. If you have an idea for a partnership, I would be happy to hear it. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoWarriors151718:, yeah that would sound good. i can’t always update all of the box scores, but i can try to do as many as i can

-Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mahari Cortijo

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahari Cortijo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jannick Theißen

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jannick Theißen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stokes Soccerplex

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stokes Soccerplex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Curtez Kellman

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curtez Kellman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonas Hupe

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonas Hupe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonas Hupe

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonas Hupe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Connor Klossek

The article Connor Klossek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Canto

The article Jonathan Canto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leon Augusto

The article Leon Augusto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaylan Marckese

The article Kaylan Marckese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Connor Klossek

The article Connor Klossek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We do not need articles on footballers playing below the professional level with only routine coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Mitchell Curry article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whelan Joseph

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whelan Joseph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Real Madrid CF 1–2 FC Sheriff Tiraspol

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Real Madrid CF 1–2 FC Sheriff Tiraspol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sairusi Nalaubu

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan,

Thank you for creating Sairusi Nalaubu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Whelan Joseph

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whelan Joseph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jordaine Jäger

Hello, Ajax.amsterdam.fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jordaine Jäger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Butler (footballer, born 2004) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Butler (footballer, born 2004) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Butler (footballer, born 2004) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HeinzMaster (talk) 01:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sairusi Nalaubu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sairusi Nalaubu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sairusi Nalaubu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sistorian (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Gozzo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luca Gozzo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elyse Iller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elyse Iller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elyse Iller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jada Newton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jada Newton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jada Newton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 21:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG: twice in the span of 30 minutes lmao touch some grass bozo

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Scott DeVoss

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Scott DeVoss, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]