Jump to content

User talk:Adyoo3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Adyoo3! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

November 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ricky Gervais may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | 2009 || ''[[lnside The Actors Studio]''|| Himself

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Gervais

[edit]

Adyoo3 (talk) 14:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please make sure anything you add to articles, especially those on living people, is supported by valid third-party sources? WP:BLPSOURCES is our policy on the subject. A discussion at Talk:Ricky Gervais would also be required before adding material like this to an article. Let me know if you need any more help. --John (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where would I put 3rd party sources on the main page?
Also can I create new articles about Ricky's new movies? Adyoo— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adyoo3 (talk • contribs)
Don't worry about formatting, just put the source on there with the info. But as I said, in a case like this it would be wise to post at Talk:Ricky Gervais first and see if people think this is worth adding. A cinema film will generally be notable again though you should include your sources. --John (talk) 06:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I have posted my Tv shows table at the discussion page...how long will it take to approve? I also want to create two new articles for Ricky's new movie Special Correspondents and Life On The Road Do they need approval to?

  • You would put the source next to the statement it supports inside of <ref>...</ref> tags. It could look like <ref>https://myreliablesource.newspaper.com/article</ref>. Don't worry about the rest of the formatting for now, as once there are some sources in there, someone will come by (you can {{Ping}} me if you wish) and format it for you. By looking at how they did it in the edit history, you'll have a reference for how to do it yourself in the future. A good page to read to get you started on understanding how to source articles on Wikipedia is REFBEGIN. As for your question about creating articles for a couple movies. Once the movies have independent reliable sources you can cite, then you are more than welcome to create them using the WIZARD or in your sandbox. Our help page on creating "your first article" may be a great resource to help you collect all the required materials to write a useful article.  :) Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 16:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


SOURCES

Can I use Ricky Gervais's twitter entries as a source? Adyoo3 (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It depends. If you suggest the edits on the articles talk pages, and ask for comments on the sourcing, this will likely get a better response. --Mdann52talk to me! 17:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Problem with pages Ricky Gervais linked pages

When I finish editing and adding verifications...will you follow me and check all articles?

Sources accepted?

Ricky Gervais's - Blog, Facebook, G+, Vne, Instagram, YouTube -live interview by me/fans/other stars - tv shows websites - news outlets - magazine, newspapers, webnews, other stars/actors comments/Twitter - photos from Gervais's Blog, Facebook, G+, Vne, Instagram or fans like posted on Twitter - YouTube channels from shows or fans

Does any of these sources need permission?

Thank youAdyoo3 (talk) 06:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on Talk:Ricky Gervais Nick (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


What is wrong with citation?

It is working right here but not in the actual article Derek TV Series

Thank you adyoo 5am 20 November2013 JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In two places you had written <\ref> (with a backslash) instead of </ref>. I fixed it with this edit.
"Naked URLs" like that are not a good idea - you should learn to use {{Cite web}}, which you can get at from the editing toolbar - see Help:Referencing for beginners. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


New Articles

I have submitted Life on the Road, but I forgot how to put up the second article. What is the code. Is it possible to speed up the process of review? Thank you Adyoo3 (talk) 05:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: please don't post actual copies of your articles on this talk page, it makes it confusing to find where the actual questions and replies are. The right place for a new article is in a draft page, with a name that starts with"Draft:". When you are ready to submit a draft for review, put {{subst:submit}} at the top of it. No, there isn't a way to speed up the review process, your article will have to wait its turn in the queue with the others. JohnCD (talk) 12:36, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Please check my draft. And how to link. Also posted on talk Ricky Gervais. Adyoo3 (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adyoo3: first, you haven't asked a question, and second, you've already posted on the talk page of the article you want reviewed; this is THE best place to put the request, so making a request on your talk page is not particularly useful. Primefac (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Article. I posted on Talk Ricky Gervais. I need some help with reviewing this article. Adyoo3 (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Life on the Road has been accepted

[edit]
Life on the Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 18:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:Special Correspondents, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. APerson (talk!) 00:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft, "Special Correspondents"

[edit]

I've assumed that you want to submit your draft, so I've placed a submission template on Draft:Special Correspondents, declined the one at your sandbox as a duplicate of that one, and marked Draft:Special correspondents for deletion (since it's an exact copy of its capitalized twin). APerson (talk!) 00:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. APerson (talk!) 00:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Adyoo3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! APerson (talk!) 00:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


New help request

[edit]

Linking articles

I need help with Linking articles I am trying to link the movie Life on the Road in the Ricky Gervais page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Gervais#Film to the new article of mine that was published recently. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Life_On_The_Road I tried doing the basic link but it did not work.

By the way, how do I start a new topic on this talk page? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adyoo3 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 6 January 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Links are created by double square brackets, like this: [[Life on the Road]] (it will look like this: Life on the Road). However, you shouldn't link to the draft but directly to the accepted article, not to the draft (which in fact is merely a remnant of the review process). See Help:Links for more on links.
You can start a new topic on this talk page by editing the lowest section and adding a new section heading in a new line, created with double equality signs, like this: == Topic of the new section ==
The "Desktop" view also has a "New section" link at the top of the page, but I think that was considered superfluous in the mobile view. Huon (talk) 20:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Special Correspondents, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Life on the Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doc Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (January 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
See WP:CRYSTAL. An article will not be appropriate unit lthe beginning of Principal Photography.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talk Show Appearances By Ricky Gervais (January 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 21 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 22 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ricky Gervais may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • for-his-26th-appearance-on|title=|work=Late Show with David Letterman|accessdate=22 January 2015}</ref> In 2008, he helped Letterman read out the Late Show Top Ten List, Top Ten Stupid Things
  • of The Office, to promote Cemetery Junction. Another time, he was there to talk about his series [[Life's Too Short] and [[Johnny Depp]] who was there to promote his own movie was also present,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ricky Gervais, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TBS and Conan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 29 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ricky Gervais
added links pointing to Today, Conan, This Morning and The View

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello A. Please note that with this edit you added a second link to the list of episodes. This template {{main|List of Extras episodes}} creates a link to the episodes article so there is no need for a second one in the sentence just below it. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 22:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Entry into a Table

[edit]

How do I put a new entry in a table at this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Gervais Without messing the table up.

It's for 2004 win Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy|Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy


ThanksAdyoo3 (talk) 12:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Help:Tables. What exactly do you want to include? I see, that award in 2004 is included already. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 16:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The help page Edgars2007 linked to explains how to create and modify tables, but I don't think the article on Ricky Gervais should have entries for awards won by The Office, as opposed to awards won by Gervais himself - and as Edgars2007 said, we already have the latter. Huon (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. BenLinus1214talk 15:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (March 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Gervais again

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions there. I trimmed some of the material as we cannot use tabloid material on an article on a living person, and the sheer volume of material was excessive. Please don't add any more. --John (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't restore this excessive material. --John (talk) 06:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I hadn't read your note that's why I was still editing the page. I didn't understand why tabloid material is not used and what is it defined as? I'm not sure if I was suppose to talk here or my page, sorry. Adyoo3 (talk) 06:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Take a look at WP:BLPSOURCES. --John (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking at some of the material you are adding, I think it would be better if you proposed any further material in talk first before adding it. --John (talk) 10:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with the entry I made about Ricky's cat, I had citations. I thought I could just add to an article without asking especially if it's appropriate. I was just helping, maybe I got carried away as I just joined 3 months ago. Please tell me the correct way to go about adding to and article. Thank you. Adyoo3 (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at some of the material you are adding, I think it would be better if you proposed any further material in talk first before adding it. --John (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Adyoo3. You have new messages at APerson's talk page.
Message added 19:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

APerson (talk!) 19:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes on draft article on John Casey

[edit]

Thanks for the suggested changes to the draft article on John Casey, which was submitted today. I reinstated the phrase 'seems to have been' as it is not certain that Casey was one of the Irish 'Whiteboys'. The secondary sources have made this assumption on the basis of what is probable. I also reinstated the specific wording about their marriage and move to Gundaroo as these were not rights easily obtained by convicts. Casey and Purcell applied three times to the colonial authorities before they were allowed to marry and then had to carefully seek permission to settle in Tallagandra. The wording was very specific to reflect the efforts undertaken by them, which is why I have undone the proposed edits. Thanks for your interest in the draft article. I hope the reasons for not accepting the changes are clear. MPCR (talk) 06:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grading articles

[edit]

See: Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment#Grades.

I'm showing you this because you graded an obvious stub article as a B.

Really short articles are stubs, if it's something more than that then it's a "start", if it has some structure and references and length then it's a C, and if you're gonna grade an article higher than a C then you're gonna have to take a really good look at it. B-Class criteria are quite strict: Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment/B-Class_criteria. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:29:39, 14 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Slonsky

[edit]


Dear Adyoo3, You recently rejected my redraft of my article. You have pasted the exact same thing the first reviewer said. Can you be more specific so I know what to change? I submitted a careful rewrite with correctly cited sources. I used existing wikipedia pages with nearly same content. Those are published and with typos no less! Why have you refused my article? It is not an "advertisement" as you simply state. slonsky

Slonsky (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FamiTracker (draft)

[edit]

No hard feelings at all; I had a nagging suspicion that there wasn't enough material to pass GNG right off-- thanks for your review. Couple questions though. I did cite a couple of unrelated, third-party sources (Gamasutra, TidBITS and Redbull), and your comment under the decline header seemed to imply there were nothing but primary sources. I realize that ideally an article should have unaffiliated sourcing outnumber affiliated, of course, but WP:PRIMARY stipulates that for relatively uncontroversial, factual information, primary sources are acceptable if they aren't puffy or promotional in nature and if there's no other place or source that covers the details to that degree. I realize there's very little coverage to date in detached sources about FT which makes it difficult to pass GNG, of course, but I did find good nonprimary sources in equal number to the primary, and I'm not sure if you took that into account - at least, based on the comment you made, it didn't seem that way. Would you mind clarifying? BlusterBlasterkablooie! 11:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nadeem_Bhabha

[edit]

Hello,

I tried my best to update the article. Please take a look at the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nadeem_Bhabha and let me know if tone is better to submit.

I appreciate your help.

thanks Nadeembahoo 11:46 am, May 15, 2015

18:13:23, 17 May 2015 review of submission by Garypakulski

[edit]


Garypakulski (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Re: Tom W. Ross Is the problem that the articles from the Albuquerque and Santa Fe newspapers (in addition to the other sources discussing his work) about the subject are not sufficient to justify this profile or is the problem that these articles are not accessible enough? The "It Zwibble" and "Slightly Cracked Egg" series are iconic works of children's fiction. I was quite surprise to find nothing about this individual in Wiki. I have copies of the referenced stories, but recognize that it will be difficult for others to check them. Any suggestions for making this acceptable (assuming I am unable to find other pieces from national publications) or is it a lost cause? Thanks. Gary Pakulski[reply]

16:41:48, 18 May 2015 review of submission by 80.57.95.64

[edit]


Hello, I have used the subject's company website only to provide a full listing of awards/exhibitions. 11 independent sources are referenced. Would this article be accepted if the references to the subject's company website are removed? Thank you!

80.57.95.64 (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal from AfC Participants

[edit]

I'm very sorry for having to do this, but I'm afraid you don't yet seem to have a good grasp of policy or the ability to communicate well with newcomers. AfC is a very important process for the English language Wikipedia, and I have received several complaints of confusing and inaccurate comments left on drafts by you. I really appreciate your contributions, but perhaps it is best for you to come back when you are more experienced and have gotten more of your own drafts through AfC as well. Again, I apologize, and please come back in the future, but you do not seem to have the necessary experience and grasp of Wikipedia policy at this time. Thank you for your understanding. Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Page Draft:The Naked Convos

[edit]

Hi Adyoo3,

You reviewed the above draft here Draft:The Naked Convos and turned it down. First, thank you for taking the time to have a look at the draft. Now, my main issue is that the complaint about having secondary sources probably require special circumstances. The website is a Nigerian website and all sources quoted (outside of the website itself) are secondary to the website. There aren't many sources with relevant information on the site and its activities. The websites referenced mostly reported on the activities on their own and I have taken some time to screen out paid press releases when possible. All references from the website itself are relevant because there are no other sources backing up the information. I hope there can be special consideration given for this particular draft.

Please do reply soon. Thank you.

Seryxme (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ollie(cat) (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Libby norman was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Libby norman (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page regarding Ollie(cat)

[edit]

Hi Adyoo3 and thanks for your message. I appreciate that you have sources for the article, but as I stated in my decline comment, I don't think the cat is WP:N notable enough. Just because the cat is the pet of a celebrity doesn't make it notable – despite the social media presence. However, I accept that the cat does have some fame and there appear to be other animals that have made it onto Wikipedia with similar credentials. Perhaps look at the other cats that have made it onto Wikipedia here List of cats. You are welcome to continue working on the article and then resubmit. My advice would be to add Ollie's name to List of cats so it is integrated into the encyclopaedia. I'd also suggest toning down your article so that it is more encyclopaedic. For example: 'He enjoys taking photos of Ollie while she sleeps and regularly wished his followers good night with a selfie of him and his favourite furry companion' could be simplified to 'He takes photos of Ollie sleeping and includes her in selfies on his own Twitter feed' – so that we lose the non neutral language. In general I would shorten the article, lose some of the trivial material and ensure that you tidy up the article – for instance, why no copy under the Other media heading and why do you list the Twitter feed twice under External links? I'll be happy to take another look once you have tidied up the article. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 08:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brailsford & Dunlavey

[edit]

You accepted this at WP:AFC and it has been deleted. While this happens from time to time and drafts are accepted with the best of intentions, the comments at the deletion discussion cast very serious doubts upon the acceptance. It was, at best, premature.

I see you have been removed for the AFC list of participants (above).

The outcome of your premature acceptance is a bewildered new editor who has asked me on my talk page for help, help I am unable to give because the text and references were accepted and have been deleted. Please consider with greater care what you do when you accept or decline a draft should yo return to reviewing in the future. Fiddle Faddle 13:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Naked Convos

[edit]

Hi, someone asked questions at the teahouse about this draft and so I was looking at its sources. You rejected it for lack of notability and independant sources. However, it has recieved or been nominated for some impressive awards, and these are backed up by sources independant of the topic. Also, while the draft uses lots of non-independant sources (which I agree is not great), there are some good independant review etc. type sources from newspapers in there. Can you let me know more details so I can properly help the author? Thanks! Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Correspondents (June 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Supdiop was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Special Correspondents instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Supdiop talk 19:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nadeem_Bhabha

[edit]

Hello,

Please take a look at the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nadeem_Bhabha and let me know if it is better to submit.

I appreciate your help.

thanks Nadeembahoo 3:17 am, June 8, 2015 — Preceding undated comment added 19:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:41:00, 8 June 2015 review of submission by Mrbusiness95

[edit]


I wanted to get in contact with you to get some input on how I should go about fixing up the page for "Carl James" in terms of finding more reliable sources. I realize now that the Wiki reference to "Living Colour" can not be used, I thought it would be useful since the link was right there and his name was being referenced. So at your earliest convenience can you please get back to me for further instructions. Thanks in advance. Mrbusiness95 (talk) 22:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Mrbusiness95 (talk) 22:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:03:07, 5 July 2015 review of submission by Hollywoodresources

[edit]


Hollywoodresources (talk) 01:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Is it possible where you can point out exactly the issues in the the submission? I've tried to make it formal (except for the quotes) and it is rejected. Are the informal quotes okay or are they not allowed and this is the problem? Any assistance would be appreciated, as this is learning process for me. Thank you.

Your draft article, User:Adyoo3/sandbox/

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox/".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:10:49, 2 August 2015 review of submission by Balzgana

[edit]


Balzgana (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My reviewer declined my submission stating that it Need sources talking about the subject not just links to art galleries. However I do not agree with this as I tried to reference my sources correctly and if you look at the references list the first words are the actual in bedded links to where they talk about Paul Friedlander and the second one is the original source of websites. For example - [1]

Please reconsider as I've seen pages with less references or otherwise could I be given advice on what to do so this page could go 'live'? Would it be necessary to remove the information that cannot be referenced?

Many thanks

References

  1. ^ Molina, Angela (17 May 2006). Timeless Universe Press Release ""Timeless Universe". Paul Friedlander". http://www.salaparpallo.com/. Retrieved 19 April 2015. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); External link in |website= (help)

Your draft article, Draft:Talk Show Appearances By Ricky Gervais

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Talk Show Appearances By Ricky Gervais".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Life on the Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Arnold. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cocktail Molotov

[edit]

Please explain why you thought the sources here were not reliable. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (please Reply to icon mention me on reply)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ollie(cat) concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ollie(cat), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ollie(cat)

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ollie".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Special Correspondents concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Special Correspondents, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Special Correspondents

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Special Correspondents".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 20:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ollie (cat) concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ollie (cat), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 March

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ollie (cat)

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ollie".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Adyoo3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adyoo3&oldid=1142834194"