User talk:AdamDeanHall/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Woah

Good job, bro. I was just passing through, trying to catch up on an episode of DH that I missed, and I found fake summaries from shows that air in about a month. So, I checked who edited it, and it was you. And then, I saw your talk page, and it seems like no one likes you. Also, you apparently have anger issues and believe that you own the Desperate Housewives articles. Get a life, dude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.235.157.236 (talk) 07:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Wow. I see you're adamant on keeping your fabricated little spoilers on the episode lists page, so, it's whatever. Still, anyone coming by here could read almost any single one of the comments on your talk page and realize how pathetic of a person you must really be. And since it seems that the DH pages are all you seem to have, I won't try to ruin that for you. Hahahaha.

Re:

Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy overrules personal opinion in this particular instance. As I said before, I know little or nothing about the subject, so you might want to ask WP:TV. I can tell you, however, that unless the episode becomes notable after its airing date, it is likely to remain deleted. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Not if I give you a reliable source for that episode, it won't. Here it is: http://www.tv.com/desperate-housewives/mirror-mirror/episode/1231080/summary.html Will you accept this reliable source so that the "Mirror, Mirror" page will be re-created, yes or no? AdamDeanHall (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I think you aren't quite understanding the fact that the individual episode must itself be notable on its own, simply airing on television does not make it so. You really ought review WP:EPISODE for more on this. –xeno (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

AdamDeanHall, you must understand that the episode itself isn't notable. You should wait until after it airs. Btw, tv.com was dubbed an unreliable source, due to the fact you could edit it yourself. A _talk 14:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I, as well as other editors, have explained this several times. The individual episode has to be notable be itself for an article to be created. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I've told you several times; unless the episode has gained notability last night, you should do nothing. Thank you. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

This TV

The cite is within This TV's infobox and I though I added it within the article body. Nate • (chatter) 20:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I readded the cite, it looks like it was removed in a subsequent edit. Nate • (chatter) 20:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: YOU are never to edit List of Desperate Housewives episodes ever again!!

Who do you think you are?!?! I edit any article I want. In case you forgot, wikipedia is a FREE encyclopedia! The article is not yours so you can say who can and who can't edit it. See WP:OWN. — Jhn* 22:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Adam, you seem to have a serious problem with your temper, and it gets the best of you at times. You're not doing either Wikipedia or yourself any good when that happens. Let me suggest that you take an extended wikibreak, especially from Desperate Housewives, before one is forced on you by an extended block for incivility. Ward3001 (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

David Spade and Nicollette Sheridan

Following a query on Editor Assistance, my attention was drawn to these edits that I have reverted. Gossip magazines are not reliable sources and per WP:BLP, biographical articles on living persons are held to a higher standard of verifiability than all other articles. In addition, see WP:NOTSCANDAL - wikipedia is not a scandal/gossip site and this rumor and gossip is far from encyclopedic. I hope this clarifies why these rumors don't merit inclusion until they are confirmed by a very reliable source. Mfield (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Border Security USA

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Border Security USA, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

article on a TV series that has not yet been aired and although it may become notable at that point, WP is not a crystal ball. Article also lacks reliable third-party sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Crusio (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

2008-2009 Television Page

Since it seems to be you and I that edit the page a lot, I wanted to get your opinion on something. Do you think we should make a new schedule for the spring because some of the shows on the fall/winter schedule don't air until April. Plus by creating a new schedule it will not stretch each days schedule on a whole page. Let me know what you think. --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Yes, I think we should make a new schedule for the spring. That's a very good idea. Thanks for the suggestion. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, great! :) --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 00:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Housecat Housecall

Hey just to let you know, Housecat Housecall's official site HousecatHousecall.com says "New Episodes Coming Summer 2009".TomCat4680 (talk) 20:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Eva Longoria Parker

Hi, I reverted your edit per WP:TABLOID, as the source itself says that it is rumored, and the source doesn't appear to meet WP:RS either. --Terrillja _talk 16:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I want to ask you. After Eva Longoria married to Tony Parker and she has a new surname and her full name is Eva Longoria Parker. So how about she change a new surname? 'Eva Longoria Parker' to 'Eva Longoria Andromeda' if she married to another one who has a surname is Andromeda. --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 21:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't think so. Thanks, anyway. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Civility

Don't expect to get far with your numerous civility violations...71.126.234.45 (talk) 04:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mysteries from Beyond the Other Dominion

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mysteries from Beyond the Other Dominion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable cable show

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J.Mundo (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Leslie Stevens (actress)

A tag has been placed on Leslie Stevens (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Firestorm (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

WCPX i logo

I've seen you've been reverting on WCPX without a valid reason. I see that you have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I assume you know about the FUR. In the situation as it is now, the logo is not acceptable for use on the article as it lacks a FUR for that page. You may add it back when it has a FUR. Thanks and have a nice day. єmarsee ^(Discuss) 01:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed, took all of 2 minutes. The bot just can't read non-templated fair use rationales, and the article was not listed. Emarsee could have done the same thing in the time it took to revert.--Terrillja _talk 01:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Swoosie Kurtz is coming to "Desperate Housewives".

The way you wrote it was like gossip.

"Attention, all housewives and husbands!! Swoosie Kurtz is going to pay a visit to Wisteria Lane!! Who is she interested in? That is the mystery."[1]
JayFS89 (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Katherine Heigl leaving Grey's

The bit about Katherine & T.R. leaving is second-hand... there's no confirmation from the actors themselves yet. I think we can leave this off until then. Tabercil (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Edie Britt Quotes

Stop removing the quote, i don't see any reason why Edie should not have a quote on her page when the other 5 housewives do --82.39.152.89 (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Well i feel that the quote that I used shows her characteristics better --82.39.152.89 (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me about the change.

Thanks for informing me about "The Spectacular Spiderman" coming to Disney XD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamborghini man (talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

SyFy (TV channel)

Not only is it WAY too early to be trying this, but if Sci Fi does go through with the name change, then the existing article would be moved properly to preserve the edit history, not a new article made. Its the same channel, just a different spelling of the name. In either case, that will not happen until JULY when the new name launches per WP:CRYSTAL. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Lucie not Lucy

Please don't mispell the name "Lucy" ever again.

Your very rude quote keep repeating appear in other people talk page. Especially when people corrected the right thing, you will change back to you think is right but actually is the wrong word. Under official web is clearly stated the title is The Story of Lucie and Jessie. As you said people is spelling wrong, apparently you did't even google or wiki the word or Lucie. Title wasn't equal to the character name. --SayNoToSelfish (talk) 05:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

2009–2010 United States network television schedule

Please note that Grey's Anatomy, Dancing With the Stars and Private Practice have yet to be officially renewed for the 2009-2010 TV Season. You can't just add them to the page because they will 'probably be picked up.' If you want to discuss the matter see the discussion page. Many thanks! Richardm9 (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Story of Lucie and Jessie, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ono (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Story of Lucie and Jessie, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove references from pages, as you did to The Story of Lucie and Jessie. If you do, you will be blocked from editing. Ono (talk) 15:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles

I want to draw your attention to the fact the the EW.com source of information in regards to the cancellation of this show is a blog. Blogs are not an acceptable source for citing information in Wikipedia. By extension any report that cites a blog also should not be used in a Wikipedia article. The 'news report' you added to the article cites the EW.com blog and therefore is generally not acceptable for use here. I have removed the source you provided in the article. I would also like to encourage you to ensure that you are posting an acceptable source. --TreyGeek (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Colors DH

I just wanna know why you remove season 6 ? And why you remove the colors ? It was better ! 86.207.189.197 (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Because Desperate Housewives hasn't been renewed for another season as of yet. AdamDeanHall (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

What?

NOT ridiculous!! Because the character you are referring to, Edie Britt, is going to die in this Sunday's new episode of Desperate Housewives and there is nothing you can do to stop it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC) [2]

My God, you're such a freak show!

It is idiotic to have a hidden name in a template. 83.93.105.103 (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Back in Business (Desperate Housewives)

I have nominated Back in Business (Desperate Housewives), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back in Business (Desperate Housewives). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- A ^talk/_contribs 22:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Live Well HD Network

I have nominated Live Well HD Network, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Well HD Network. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TheAE talk/sign 23:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Manual of style (writing about fiction)

I would like to recommend you to read this carefully. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Regarding your edits to ECW on Sci Fi, that is NOT considered a reliable site. Do not put the info back in unless you have a reliable source. Perhaps use the talkpage of ECW on Sci Fi. TJ Spyke 21:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

DH

Dude, ABC officially says THIS is the name for that episode. I do know there is already an episode with that name, but ABC says it's "Everybody's Says Don't". Bardman (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe it is too early do pick date of premiere episode 6x01 of Desperate housewives. If you saw, episodes 4x01 ("Now you know") and 5x01 ("You're Gonna Love Tomorrow") they issued by last sunday of september so I know it will be september 27 2009 year. It is kind of tradition. since 2007 year in DH. Michu1945 (talk) 13:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

4th and Long

You should make a page for the new SpikeTV show 4th and Long. It is a show where sixteen guys compete for a chance to be a Dallas Cowboy. Justastud15 (talk) 03:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Edie Britt

If you can't provide reliable sources for having Edie's age as 50, birth year as 1964, and death year as 2014, leave them out. Wikipedia isn't the place for Original Research. Thanks, Ono (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Edie Britt said in episode "dress big" (episode 17 season 3) that she have a 40 years old. It was 2007 year. So she borned in 1967. Michu1945 (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Edie Britt 2009

Sorry for actualy adding stuff that's true --Hithere2008 (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I dont mean to sound rude or anything, but this isnt the first time that I have seen a message that you left on a talk page and thought it was not acceptable by wikipedia policies. Everyone is welcomed to edit wikipedia, even if there edits are or are not correct (see assume good faith. I suggest that you see etiquette to learn how wikipedia expects it editors to behave. see here Thanks, Ono (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Izzie Stevens

Please stop removing relevant information from the infobox for the article Izzie Stevens. Simply providing an episode link is insufficient context, which doesn't place her first appearance in the chronology of the show itself, or date it in the real world. The information is valid and important for casual readers who may not be intimately familiar with Grey's Anatomy. Frickative 19:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Bree

If you are keeping writing Bree as Hodge, how do you expect people who have seen only the first 2 seasons to find information about this character in the navbox? I am sorry but you seem to claim some ownership on some articles.-- Magioladitis (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

MJ

I noticed when you changed "MJ" back to "M.J." it had two periods at the end. I suppose this is acceptable. I don't know if there's a rule. Since some editors were spelling it "MJ", I thought maybe I had figured out how to solve the problem.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

WNUA

You completely botched this rewrite of a page. You never cut-and-paste a page to a new title, and as it is a radio station, you never identify it by it's branding in the title, but by the calls (which for now, are unchanged). Now this has to be fixed, so keep this in mind next time a format change comes. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Speculation

Please stop adding speculation to the article Desperate Housewives (season 6), as this is a blatant contravention of Wikipedia guidelines. Once these characters have been confirmed, add 'em to the article. Until then, don't. Thanks, 86.157.136.37 (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Edie Britt Age?

Episode: Look Into Their Eyes and You See What They Know (Season 5 episode 19)
Gabrielle Flashback: Edie told her in the night when she got divorced with Carlos, that he would die before 50. When the camera stopped the flashback, Gabi said, that who had predicted that he would die before 50. Since she had 50 years and we had, in series, 2014, she had to borned in 1964. Michu1945 (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Look, mister, if you can't provide a reliable source of Edie Britt's birthdate, just leave the Edie Britt page alone! AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I can provide a reliable source of Edie Britt's birthdate!!! It was episode "DRESS BIG" (season 3 episode 17). Edie went to Carlos in Mike House. Suddenly she said: I'm a forty-year-old party girl. Do you think that I don't know that my days are numbered?" . It was end of whole season - 2007 year. 2007 - her 40 = 1967. When she died, in 2014, she had 47 years old. Michu1945 (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Better choice of words

Hello AdamDeanHall. Might I recommend a better choice of words for the heading of this edit? Dare seems like a harsh word to me. ^blurred_peace ☮ 21:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

reliable source of Edie Britt's birthdate. What is it?

I thought that, when some informations are mentioned about in desperate housewives, it is a reliable source? So, in your way of thinking, Susan Mayer maiden name is not Bremmer or something like that? Michu1945 (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

be carefull!

Some heads up for the WP:3RR. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

What is your problem!

MIKE AND SUSAN are the couple married at the end. Why do you keep deleting it! The ABC synopsis already said so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.10.238 (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Look, Mike and Susan were married in the Season 3 episode "Getting Married Today". Their marriage was destroyed in the Season 5 episode "You're Gonna Love Tomorrow". Mike and Susan weren't re-married in the end of Season 5. That's why the identity of the mystery bride has to remain a secret until the season premiere. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Adam

You've already been warned not to attack people verbally. You do not own the desperate housewives articles, so every person on Wikipedia has just as much of a right as you do to edit them. I suggest you take a good look at the wikipedia policies that you violate regularly, such as WP:Civility, WP:NPA, WP:AGF and WP:Ownership of articles. And I notice that you enjoy telling people that you tell to NEVER edit an article again that they will be banned if they do. You are not an administrator, so you really do not have the power to enforce that threat. Furthermore, your threat is baseless, as someone is not going to be banned for making a good faith edit. Thanks, Onopearls ^(t/c) 18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Let me back up what Onopearls is saying, and add a further statement. Adam, I would like a response from you here stating your understanding of Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles. If you don't do so and continue this same type of editing, I plan to make a WP:ANI report. That would be at least the second complaint about your incivility. Think about it, and please give us some details here regarding what you plan to do to change this kind of editing. Ward3001 (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I will never use personal attacks on other people ever again. And you're right. I don't own any of the articles. I also understand Wikipedia's policies about personal attacks and ownership of articles. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Would you be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of two weeks, since those are the articles where your problems tend to occur? Ward3001 (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I would be willing to not edit or comment on any articles related to Desperate Housewives for a period of no more than two weeks, since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please put a two-week protection tag on articles related to Desperate Housewives so that I'll know I won't edit or comment on those articles since those are the articles where my problems tend to occur? Please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not an admin; I'm just trying to help you stay out of trouble. I can't force you to do anything. I really don't think a protection tag is needed. I think you just need a two-week period of not editing those articles so you can let go of some of this sense of ownership that gets you into trouble. But that's completely up to you. If you can avoid personal attacks and ownership without doing that, there won't be a problem. But if you continue with the attacks, I think know what will happen. Ward3001 (talk) 20:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Couldn't I just keep editing any of the Desperate Housewives articles, this time without using personal attacks and ownership on anyone? Like you said, it's completely up to me. Right? AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

That's your choice, just as it has always been your choice to edit without personal attacks and assuming ownership. My biggest concern is that you don't have a good track record on those articles, and a number of editors are now watching your behavior, myself included. Any admin who reviews your edit history and comments on your talk page probably won't have much sympathy. I personally would take a wikibreak from articles that seem to get me into trouble. But the choice is yours. Ward3001 (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Some advice

Hi. Since you are safe from 3RR right now I would like to give you some advice. First of all WP:3RR read "Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period, whether or not the edits involve the same material, except in certain circumstances.". So when you see something that you don't agree just stay WP:CALM and wait some hours before editing the same article again.

Moreover, always remember to report any disagreements to the article's talk page as soon as possible. It is very likely more editors will see the problem and act. If you think an editor is adding false claims use both the article's talk page and the editor's talk page to discuss the issue.

If things get really worse report the problem to WP:ANI.

It is good that you are using the edit summary now. I am very happy for that. Happy editing! I was abou to sleep now, so I don't have time to be more detailed. Have a nice evening/day. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Please don't change the format of dates without good reason, as you did to List of Meerkat Manor episodes. Most British people and many people internationally write dates in day-month-year order, e.g., 12 December 1904. Most Americans use month-day-year order, e.g., December 12, 1904. If the article is about an American topic, use month-day-year. If it is a British or European topic, use day-month-year. If neither, leave it as originally written. Many Americans or British people take offence if an article about their country, written in their local version of English, is changed around to a version they don't use. So please do not do that.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Meerkat Manor is a UK series. Please stop trying to change its date formats to the American format. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Episode information for next season...

There is absolutely no need for it at all at this time and it can definitely wait until August. You're going on complete speculation with this information and generally until a network releases episode information there is no need for it. I will continue to revert these unsourced assumptions when I see them. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 23:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

ECW

You will have to do a normal request at WP:RM since this is controversial. Yes the channel is Syfy now, but according to WWE [3] the show's name is still "ECW on Sci Fi". Since they say that is the name of the show, that is what the article should be called. TJ Spyke 15:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of That TV

I have nominated That TV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nate • (chatter) 00:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives

Hi. So aside from making estimated guesses as to the cast order/listing, what proof do you have? Otherwise we should probably open up a discussion on the talk page. Also, leave the kids off the also starring list that haven't already been listed. There's no proof of their contract status. Alexisfan07 11 July 2009

What is wrong with you???

You decide to edit the Desperate Housewives article and erease and change lot of things that i wrote in the article. Firs of all if you are going to change something you must say your reasons to do that, and second you edit the info that i wrote, and just that info, you did not improve the article, you just erease my changes...Fortunato luigi (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Fortunato luigi

July 2009

Your recent edit to Mischa Barton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES - episodes

why did you delite the episode 6x04 and the titles 6x03-6x05??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desperateone18 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

List of Desperate Housewives episodes nominated at FLRC

I have nominated List of Desperate Housewives episodes for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

DH Season 6 Cast List

Hello, AdamDeanHall, maybe I was a bit rude to you in the comments for my edits to the season six cast list, and that leads nowhere, so I apologize and I will try to reason with you. I put the cast in alphabetical order because we don't know for sure it how the billing will go. Remember, Andrea Bowen has been absent from one season. And when she does come back, you don't know if she'll be credited after Ricardo Chavira, just because she was in the previous seasons. Maybe this time she'll be credited after Dana Delany, presumably because every star who joins is usually credited after the stars from the previous season. Yes, Andrea isn't a new castmember, but since she wasn't a regular in season five, maybe this time she'll be credited after those who were, or even after those who will be more notable the next season. Season four comes to mind as a good example of that: we all thought Dana Delany would be credited after Nicollette Sheridan because she was a housewife and that had happened to Alfre Woodard in season two, and we all assumed that Joy Lauren would be credited before Lyndsy Fonseca because she had been a regular since season two and Fonseca was new to the cast. But Delany, being the new star, was credited after every past regular from season three, and Lauren was credited after Fonseca because Dylan was much more notable to season four than Danielle. Also, Jeffrey Nordling, as an adult, will most likely be credited as "star" instead of "also star", and Maiara Walsh, as a youngster, will most likely be billed as "also star". But no one knows for sure by now, no one knows their billing or their order of billing in the credits. So I think they should be listed in alphabetical order until we know for sure, wouldn't you agree? Please, think about it. -- Renaboss (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

A new press release has been made available, this time for the second episode, and you can see it here; you'll notice the cast order has changed from the previous press release, which means these aren't exactly following the billing of the season. Maybe we should bring the cast list back to its alphabetical order and change it when the season actually premieres. - Renaboss (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Error

In this article: 2007–2008 United States network television schedule the edit [4] is a mistake. I have seen the site [5] and it is written: House - TEU (# 10) and NCIS (# 14), so the colors are still wrong. You can fix them? --RanZag (talk) 22:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

List of Desperate Housewives episodes

Hi, I noticed that you were making quite a few edits to the above article. Are you going to address the issues brought up at the FLRC as well? Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Wild Bunch (2010 film)

The article The Wild Bunch (2010 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL,WP:HAMMER,WP:NFILMS etc

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite 23:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Person Vandalizing List of Noggin Programs

• It seems to be me that he is going to have to be blocked because he doesn't show any sign of reformation. As soon as the edit block was removed from the page, he swooped back in and added the nonsense content again. Agent0042 (talk) 11:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Question

With Noggin rebranded as Nick Jr., will Moose a. Moose and Zee still host, because I feel they would be the perfect two to host Nick Jr.? Please respond when you can. Bob.--75.4.143.117 (talk) 03:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. And right now, I don't care!! For all I know, Happy Jack of Romper Room fame could be hosting the new Nick Jr.. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I wish that Moose A. and Zee would stay, but Adam's right-- at this time there is still very little info about the upcoming change. Hopefully something is heard soon. The lack of info is annoying. Agent0042 (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Defying Gravity (TV series) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.    GameShowKid – talk – evidence   00:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Walt Disney Company, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Nickelodeon (TV channel)

This kind of edit is completely inappropriate. If you're going to undo me, explain why my edits were inappropriate, don't just ask me to leave the page alone. If you believe these logos are necessary, you're welcome to explain why, but in the mean time, please don't treat me like a vandal. J Milburn (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

If you would like to discuss the old logos being removed from the Nickelodeon (TV channel) article please do it at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#NFCC #8 and #3 are critically important. Powergate92Talk 02:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Walt Disney Company. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 20:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr. (TV channel)

Is there a reason for why you removed "(now shown on some MTV Tr3́s affiliates)" and "(now shown on Cookie Jar Network)"? as Allegra's Window and Doug are now on some MTV Tr3́s affiliate like KEJR-LP here in Phoenix and The Busy World of Richard Scarry is now on Cookie Jar Network. Powergate92Talk 01:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angie Bolen

A tag has been placed on Angie Bolen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Season will start in some months. Character with 0 appearances

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Magioladitis (talk) 23:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Angie Bolen

I have nominated Angie Bolen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angie Bolen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 06:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

"Try That Again and I'll Have You Blocked"

Please don't. It's counterproductive and you aren't any sort of mod or admin, so you really don't have any direct power to block anyone. I agree these people messing around with the list of Nick Jr. programs are a problem, but they're editing by IP, so it's difficult to really get a handle on them... Agent0042 (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Defying Gravity (TV series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.  GSK (talk ● evidence) 01:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

RE: Some vandalizer keeps adding Kathryn Joosten to the main cast list on the Desperate Housewives page.

Hi there, you asked me for help. The problem is, most vandals often don't have accounts, so we can't really talk to them by leaving them messages in their talk pages, and besides, I am not an admin, so I don't really have the power to block anyone. The person keeps adding Kathryn Joosten to the main cast list because she was listed between Dana Delany and Drea de Matteo in the press release for the first episode of season six, however, in the next two press releases the cast order has been changed again and again. I say, yet again, maybe we should revert the list to its alphabetical order, because the official press releases have only brought confusion with them, we still don't know the exact order. -- Renaboss (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Why are you doing that?

Why are you putting in the lo-qual PNG of the TeenNick logo back in the article? I'm not angry, just confused. Although I must say that the hi-qual SVG of the logo I uploaded could use a little work. <:(
~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 18:46, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

The reason why I am putting in the lo-qual PNG of the TeenNick logo back in the article is because I don't like the hi-qual SVG of the logo you uploaded. That logo had a small "T". I like the PNG logo with the large "T" better. AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

You shouldn't be editing things out of articles based on your personal preference. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 14:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Edit Britt

Why is it that her last appearance has to be marked as her death scene? She was last scene as a hallucination? Why do we have to keep it like that? AND don't EVER tell me what to do or I will report you to an administrator because you act like you own the page. You don't, so stop yelling at me. Arjoccolenty (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Removing episode summaries at the Grey's Anatomy page

Adam,

I noticed you removed the summaries for each episode I added to the List of Grey's Anatomy episodes (season 1 and 2). You stated that they belonged in their respective pages. Why do you think that? For seasons 4, 5 and 6, there are summaries for almost every episode. I think there should be for all seasons. I'd like to add them again, but I'll await your reply and your reasoning behind it. Thanks.

140.166.125.78 (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Civility

I'm saying this again, but you've already been warned not to attack people verbally. You do not own any article on Wikipedia, so you have absolutely no right to tell people to never edit certain ones again. I once more urge you to take a good hard look at those WP policies that you seem to plow through on a regular basis, such as WP:Civility, WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:NPOV, and WP:Ownership of articles. You vowed to assume good faith, and to stop demanding that people quit editing articles relating to Desperate Housewives, Grey's Anatomy, and the plethora of others you heavily edit. However, you have already done it again several times. You should really work on that. Thanks, Onopearls ^(t/c) 09:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives Cast

"The general convention, per the TV project guidelines, is that we list all roles that are deemed as main characters by the producers and network. That is to say, it is a function of their contract status, and not of our opinion as to who is important and who is not. As well, we don't differentiate based on seasons, former or current status, and so on. Again per the guidelines, if the infobox listing is considered to be too large, it can be replaced with a link to the "Characters" section."IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

why are you so arrogant?IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 23:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Ownership

Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dude1818 (talk) 01:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Nicollette Sheridan

Hi there! The source you have found to say that Nicollette Sheridan will be appearing in Deathly Hallows doesn't appear to be very reliable; it looks like a fansite with no official links to Sheridan or any press mention so seems to conflict with Wikipedia's reliable sourcing policies. Do you have any more sources which are reporting her casting? If this site is the only one I think it would be best to hold of until we have more confirmation. Thanks. Gran² 20:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I thought that was the most likely scenario, thanks. I'll remove it. Gran² 15:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Nick Bolen

His name is spelled "Dominic" not "Dominick". If you go to IMDb amd watch the beginning of episode 5.7 "Careful the Things You Say" you will see that at 1:17 into the episode, Julie is writing a letter to Nick and has spelled his name "D-o-m-i-n-i-c", without the "k" at the end. That is the most common spelling of the name, even when the nickname "Nick" is derived from it. BurienBomber (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Carlita's Secret

I have nominated Carlita's Secret, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlita's Secret. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 21:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Walt Disney

Thanks for fixing that link - it had me baffled. I hadn'd spotted the line break in the middle of it! -- Timberframe (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Empire State (TV series)

The article Empire State (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to document this; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize

Your edit to Lane Kiffin, while funny, is not helpful. Enigma^msg 18:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hey, you seem to be adding id= and title= and decapitalizing the {{Imdb title}} and {{Tv.com}} templates. There is no need for that, neither is it suggested, or shown, in the template documentation. Take a look at a templates documentation for the most preferred use of it. As well, don't remove references solely because they are dead. See WP:LINKROT for more information. _Xeworlebi ^(t•c) 15:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello AdamDeanHall! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 271 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Karen Kopins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Lynda Mason Green - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Justina Vail Evans - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

La Femme Nikita

Hi, I would like to invite you to contribute to the newly created La Femme Nikita wiki.--Gonzalo84 (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Omar Benson Miller

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Omar Benson Miller. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Benson Miller. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Over the Edge (1999)

Just so you know, I reverted your edit partially because of Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. "Cancelled" and "Canceled" are both correct (the former is the British spelling, the latter is the American spelling). The other reason is because the rest of the article is written in American spelling, and the MOS says a article should use 1 spelling standard (not some US and some UK). TJ Spyke 01:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Edie Britt vs. Williams

I've noticed there's a bit of a disagreement regarding the Edie Britt article. In the introductory paragraph, it states that her name is Edie Britt and that it was formerly Williams. You've reverted all attempts to write it as Edie Williams, with Britt being a former last name. Many editors, including myself, disagree with you. There are topics on the article's talk page, but you haven't contributed. I don't think you should continue to revert these changes without discussing them. Edie died while she was married to Dave Williams. She acknowledged Williams as her last name, thus Britt would be her former name. Please discuss this either here or on the article's top page. We need to resolve this. We can't have one person dictating changes without discussing them, especially when there is a disagreement. Thank you. Akcvtt (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives)

The article A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives)

I have nominated A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

John Barrowman in "Epiphany"

John Barrowman has stated he is set to appear in five episodes of season six. He appeared in 6.18, we already know thanks to spoilers and promotional images and press releases he will appear in episodes 6.19 and 6.21, and it is safe to say he'll be in the last two episodes of the season. However, no press release, promotional image or spoiler has indicated that he will be in episode 6.20. In fact, Angie Bolen isn't even set to have a story in that episode, she was contracted to only appear in 20 out of the 23 episodes this season, she's been absent from two shows already (6.12 and 6.15) and she will most likely be absent from "Epiphany" too. There is no proof of that, but there's also no proof that she will appear, and even less proof that guest star Barrowman will as well. - Renaboss (talk) 10:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Ugly Betty

Sorry about that. The title was the same in two different sources except for the capitalization. I eventually chose the "original".Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives)

A tag has been placed on A Little Night Music (Desperate Housewives), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Desperate Housewives: episode 6x23

If from this side we look at it you are right. They thank for the understanding. Michu1945 (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Source for Transformers 3 voice actors?

Hi. May I ask what your source is for Weaving, Adler and Welker being in Transformers 3? Thanks. --uKER (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

My only source for those actors come from the official Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen website. Here's the link: http://www.transformersmovie.com. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

You do realize that Revenge of the Fallen is Transformers 2 and you're editing the Transformers 3 article, don't you? --uKER (talk) 07:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, Adam...

I hope it's okay with you that The Hub (TV network) was relocated to Discovery Kids until October 10. I'm not angry about this, but why'd you take out the relaunch date in the template for the article?
~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 22:07, 1 May 2010 (EDT)

Because the change from Discovery Kids to The Hub won't take place until October 10th. So no relaunch dates in the template for the article. AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:ENGVAR reminder

As Steve Irwin was Australian, his article should not be changed out of Australian English. That means date formats and spellings (e.g., honour) should remain as they were before your changes. —C.Fred (talk) 15:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Kathryn Joosten - Main season 7

WHY DID YOU CHANGE IT.... STOP BEING A DICK... AND LEAVE IT AS IT WAS.... >:(... YOUR'RE NOT THAT POPULAR ON HERE, ARE YOU... I WONDER WHY.. BECAUSE YOUR'RE JUST A DICK... REPORTING YOU.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.237.74 (talk) 23:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I am not a dick. Don't call me that again. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Two and a Half Men renewal

I noticed the edit that you did here: [6]. If Two and a Half Men is being renewed through the 2011-2012 season, that means it will have 2 more seasons not 3. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Bleep My Dad Says

Hi! The lasted reference you added here to Bleep My Dad Says was not working (at least not for me). When I found the same ref to fix it, I realized that the original source was TVGuide. I fixed the reference at the article, but used the primary publisher instead. Hope you don't mind. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Stop changing the title back to Bleep My Dad Says. It doesn't matter if you don't like the profanity. That is the official title that CBS gave it and you need to respect that. Complain to CBS, but stop changing it on Wikipedia. It is vandalism to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.24.10 (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I have reported 66.213.24.10. He changed it back but I have reverted.Checker Fred (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Adam! I can see that you have been correcting all Bleep My Dad Says Articles that list the show under it's (currently) official title $#*! My Dad Says and the previous title $#!+ My Dad Says. While I think it's fair enough to leave these as 'Bleep...' for now, if the show debuts in September with the "$#*!" title then it'll have to be used for wikipedia listings. (Richardm9 (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC))

Time conventions in text

Hello. I have reverted your edit, which reverted my correction of the times as written in the text at Bleep My Dad Says. Please see WP:MOSTIME (which I mentioned in my initial edit summary) for guidelines. In part:

12-hour clock times end with dotted or undotted lower-case a.m. or p.m., or am or pm, which are spaced (2:30 p.m. or 2:30 pm, not 2:30p.m. or 2:30pm).

Thus, your continued use of 8:30PM Eastern/7:30PM Central is wrong. It should read 8:30 pm Eastern/7:30 pm Central, (or, alternatuively 8:30 p.m. Eastern/7:30 p.m. Central.) Please stop changing it. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Qubo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It's unlikely that qubo will air Star Trek: The Animated Series as it's owned by CBS. Also do not add info like that if it's unsourced. Powergate92Talk 19:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. serioushat 01:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Megan Edwards

The article Megan Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No significant roles. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joel Silverman

A tag has been placed on Joel Silverman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joel Silverman

The article Joel Silverman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Keith Jones (Desperate Housewives)

Hello AdamDeanHall, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Keith Jones (Desperate Housewives), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. —mono(how's my driving?) 20:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Episode lists

I suggest you familiarise yourself with Template:Episode list#Sublists. It explains how episode lists are split and that the tables from season articles are transcluded to the main list, rather than creating two separate lists, as you have tried to do with your recent edits at List of Grey's Anatomy episodes. Duplication serves no purpose and can be detrimental as it usually results in errors when somebody edits the list at the list article but not in the season article, or vice versa. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hi - why do you keep reverting to broken versions of the {{Episode list}} template in the Grey's Anatomy season articles? Using an apostrophe in Grey's breaks the transclusion, so it's necessary to use code. Also, with [7] this edit you're also reverting several valid fixes - removing the citation templates, and reverting to an incorrect header style per WP:MOSBOLD. Why exactly do you keep reverting? Frickative 15:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Sci-Fi to Syfy

I've reverted your edit to Syfy, as you changed interwiki links to the new name without even verifying that those languages had changed their article names (and, in fact, they had not, rendering those interwiki links incorrect). In the future, I would suggest not touching interwiki links. We have plenty of bots that patrol the sites making such changes in a controlled fashion.

I'll also add that this edit was also inappropriate, as you simply bombed the page changing every instance of "SyFy" to "Syfy" regardless of how it was used. In the process, you changed a direct quote, which should never be done regardless of errors in the quote. Just please be more careful in the future. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:28, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

The Deep End (TV series)

Hi there, I've been making major edits to that article. At the moment, I want to ref the ratings, share and ranking. May I know where you got the figures? I tried searching for them but couldn't find them. Cheers, Bejinhan talks 06:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello? Bejinhan talks 03:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I got those figures from the website TV By the Numbers. AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Bejinhan talks 05:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to disturb you, but another quick question, what was Jason Carpenter's(played by Dave Giuntoli character role? Bejinhan talks 10:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I do not know. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Remember Paul

Please move Remember Paul to Remember Paul?. From the official DH Facebook page: "the title of the premiere episode...drum roll please... Remember Paul?". Edenc1 • Talk 14:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Twisted Whiskers Show

The article The Twisted Whiskers Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:CRYSTAL; there's no way this can pass WP:GNG when it doesn't exist yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Chromancer ^talk/_cont 09:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Twisted Whiskers Show

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Twisted Whiskers Show. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twisted_Whiskers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twisted_Whiskers - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vinithehat (talk) 17:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Toonzai

Hi, about the date The CW4Kids changed to Toonzai, I think it's August 14, 2010 that this happened. I saw no differences in the logo on September 18, so how is it in preview form from August 14 to September 11? Also, I think the name of the page should be Toonzai (without an exclamation point) because that is nowhere in the logo. About the talk page message, don't make the heading so long, and there is no need for two of them. Even though it was about two articles, we're dealing with the same thing. Readopedia (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

This is not vandalism, by the way. I do think that maybe I should have messaged you before I changed that, but I had no intention of vandalizing the page. I just don't think anything changed on September 18 that wasn't there on August 14. Readopedia (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)