User talk:Michu1945
Maiara Walsh is already on the cast list. Don't put her on the guest list of the page I Guess This is Goodbye (Desperate Housewives).
[edit]Now get this straight: Maiara Walsh is already on the cast list of Desperate Housewives. Why, you ask? Because I said so. So take my advice: Don't put her on the guest cast list of the page I Guess This is Goodbye (Desperate Housewives). AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:39, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
No more of the Spoiler TV website. From now on, you will post spoilers from The Futon Critic.
[edit]No more of the Spoiler TV website. From now on, you will post spoilers from The Futon Critic. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
March 2011
[edit]Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Carrie Bradshaw. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Please don't add years to character articles unless that year is given in the series. Most TV shows are not in real time, so calculations based on stated ages are usually contrary to any real-world intent.
Also, the bold text you are creating in character boxes is contrary to Wikipedia's Manual of style, and contradicts what is done in other articles. Please don't do this without first establishing consensus on this change -- the place to try this might be Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. / edg ☺ ☭ 20:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Desperate Housewives
[edit]Well, why did you change all my edits without telling me why ? You thing you're god ? 109.214.216.3 (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Well, you learn me nothing. It's just I have more websites than you for references of what concerned Desperate Housewives. You'll see ! Bye sweetie. 109.214.216.3 (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited List of Desperate Housewives characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julie Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
You can't add four dead "Desperate Housewives" characters on Desperate Housewives (season 8) and Finishing the Hat without a reliable source.
[edit]Look, you can't add four dead Desperate Housewives characters on Desperate Housewives (season 8) and Finishing the Hat without a reliable source. Either find a reliable source or don't find it at all. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Wisteria Lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dana Glover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
The Nanny
[edit]Please stop arbitrarily rearranging the order of the episodes in season 6. Standard policy is list them in order of air date, not by order of production. I realize that it seems illogical the finale episode did not air last, but that's simply how it happened. The sixth season had an extended hiatus, and CBS decided to air the intended finale before the sweeps ended. NBC did the same thing with Law & Order: LA, and the continuity of that show was even more mangled than this show. Davejohnsan (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Barney Rubble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Finishing the Hat
[edit]I deleted all that extraneous information because a lot of it was unsourced and the section was WAY too long. I talked about it on the talk page and left it open to discussion for three days, and nobody replied. Unless you have a reason for undoing my revision I will do it again today. Please respond to the talk page. I'm open to discussion. Small5th (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Finishing the Hat
[edit]If you want references, just rewatch this episode and whole first season. You will find it. Soon you, I mean all of American users of wikipedia, will need references to the fact that they live. Michu1945 (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Please read "Wikipedia:No original research" then. Majority of the Notes are Original Research. Small5th (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Spoiler TV
[edit]Michu, Spoiler TV is not a reliable source for any content here on Wikipedia. If you can link the episode titles to the producer's twitter account directly, that's fine. But you can't rely on Spoiler TV. They make a lot of guesses and assumptions, and are largely fan-submitted, making them completely unreliable. Please do not use them to source future episode data. --Drmargi (talk) 20:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia has strict guidelines about using boldface. WP:MOSBOLD specifically states that boldface should be used to "highlight the article title, and often synonyms, in the lead section (first paragraph)". That is not the case at all with the GCB character section. There are many other film and television series articles on Wikipedia that follow this guideline. as well, of not bolding actor and character names. Please follow this guideline from now on please. QuasyBoy (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happily Divorced, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Schneider and Christopher Rich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chromolume No. 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Adams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Regarding this edit. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 20:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Michu1945. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your edit to The Song in Your Heart
[edit]I undid your edit to the article because it is grammatically incorrect. — Gestrid (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- "And I am lazy af" you forgot to add"... Michu1945 (talk) 16:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You are correct about the timeline of events, though. For some reason, I did not realize the previous version of the text was factually wrong, which is worse than being grammatically wrong. Come to think of it, I did think while I was watching the episode that it was weird how pregnant she was in the episode if they had just been married. — Gestrid (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Michu1945. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Michu1945. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)