User talk:BurienBomber

Okay, thanks, I thought it was about the album version, because on the huwiki I never use the single infobox, just a song infobox. Cheers, Diaby ^talk 19:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed new policy

As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:

A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say

• Support.

or

• Oppose.

Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Edwin Newman

The New York Times issued a correction in their Internet article that Newman died on September 13, not August 13. Chris (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

You were right. I stand corrected. Sorry about that. Chris (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

One source

I had cited only one source but kept having the post taken down because I was told "there is only one source." So I cited as many reliable sources as I could find. If there is only one source, it should be Deadline Hollywood, which broke the story several hours before anyone else, and which I had correctly cited in the first place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.205.246 (talk) 04:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I confirm that Buddy Morrow has passed away. Citations will be forthcoming.Eurodog 01:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Drew Holcomb

182 on the Billboard 200 isn't big, but it's enough for WP:MUSIC — the album just entered the charts this week, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Deprodded, cleaned up and added source for charting album. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

1992 in film

I am preparing to update the 1992 notable deaths section. You're mor ethan welcome to aide in the process. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 12:23 26 April 2011 (UTC)

A long-overdue award!

		Death Star
		This Death Star award is given for all your hard work on the Recent Deaths pages. WWGB (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Cassandra Hodges

Hi, Cassandra Hodges commited suicide by Hanging on June 27, 2011 Her cause of death is listed on the Tarrant County Medical Examiner page. all you have to do is type in june 27 and scroll down the page & her name is listed. At least have the time to do the homework before putting down whatever or before removing something.

http://mepublic.tarrantcounty.com/mepublic/Default.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.128.18.180 (talk) 19:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

The cause of death needs to be included in the source listed for her death. Also, the link you have provided does not work (run time error) BurienBomber (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I know there a run time error it just happen about a five minute after i put it up. runtime error does happen from time to time does not mean it bad link it will be back up shortly. so u telling me Medical Examiner proof just because there isn't a link that guides proof to ur feet isn't proof? is not actually proof? by the way Her Death serial toe tag number is 1107977 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.128.18.180 (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I don't make the rules for the page. In any case, her entry on the June Deaths in 2011 page will be deleted in 2 weeks if she does not have her own wikipedia article by that time. BurienBomber (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Make no different to me anyway she wasn't that famous anyhow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.128.18.180 (talk) 20:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Cerati

Why do you call vandalism to what I'm doing in the article Gustavo Cerati? Look what I'm doing and then think. I'm helping and contributing, in no way am causing damage to the article. Read carefully and see that you're wrong: Wikipedia: Vandalism. 190.101.43.197 (talk) 20:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Ice hockey deaths

Hi BB, you may wish to contribute to this discussion as you are mentioned: Talk:Deaths in 2011#Degree of detailing of the crash victims' background. Regards, WWGB (talk) 09:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Doris Roberts

Because the census was in April and her birthday is in November. The census enumerator asked the age of the person as of his or her last birthday. Quis separabit? 18:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Let's diffuse the situation

I've moved our back and forth down a bit into it's own subsection. We really need to set away the sticks and discuss. I'm a stubborn prick, but I'm game for a compromise, if you'd like. Rusted AutoParts 01:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Reply

The current format makes it seem he wrestled in a company called Hall of Fame. Typically HOF inductions are included either to the beginning or the end of an article, like so:

• Roddy Piper, 61, Canadian Hall of Fame professional wrestler.
• Roddy Piper, 61, Canadian professional wrestler, Hall of Fame. Rusted AutoParts 17:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

It's fine that you want to discuss changes, but talking behind my back/not responding to my replies doesn't exactly help either. Rusted AutoParts 17:49, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

You didn't even give me a chance to respond to your replies. You posted this section on my talk page less than 45 minutes ago. BurienBomber (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I added a missing ")" after WCW in the entry so that is now clearer which organizations he worked for and there is a ";" before the HOF mention. It now reads:

• Roddy Piper, 61, Canadian professional wrestler (WWE, NWA, WCW), Hall of Fame (years inducted).

this is very similar to the second example you listed above. Hulk had the HOF, with the years, mentioned in front of the word "wreslter" and WWGB moved it to after. My main point in the whole thing is that if we are listing the HOF, then it should include the National Wrestling Hall of Fame inductions as that is a true hall-of-fame (The WWE is mostky a story line one and no one votes them in) that encompasses there entire career. Is it possible to for you to move this section to the deaths talk page so that others can comment? Thanks. BurienBomber (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm fine either way. If that's the consensus of 3, then I can't argue against it. Personally it seems a bit misplaced on the entry, but like I said, I can get behind consensus. Rusted AutoParts 18:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BurienBomber. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

3RR

Friendly reminder about WP:3RR. Rusted AutoParts 02:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Bring it on. I am pulling my archives. I have dozens samples of you violating this over the last 6 years, including the fact that you have now changed the George Michael entry 4 times after it was brought up on the Talk Page and there was no consensus what soever for your reverts. BurienBomber (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I can easily pull archives of your disgustingly uncivil remarks towards me. Or you can just agree to either civilly disagree with me and discuss it without calling me a dictator, or leave me the hell alone. Rusted AutoParts 02:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I will gladly leave you alone and stop calling you a dictactor once you stop acting like one and actually work with people. If someone makes a challenge and opens it up for discussion, you wait until a consensus is reached instead of acting unilaterally. I have been an editor for ten years here and have never had a single problem with any other editor other than you. I highly doubt you can say the same thing about yourself. I am standing up for what is right. If I lose my account over Faith v. Last Christmas, then so be it. BurienBomber (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Its only you who has this "dictator" lens about me. I don't claim ownership of the article. I don't pick credits to add in because "ONLY I DECIDE WHAT THIS PERSONS NOTABLE FOR". I have had disagreements with editors, but it doesn't mean I'm incapable of going with consensus. There was no consensus on Michael. All it was was you sniping at me. I don't tend to want to converse with people slagging me off at any chance as opposed to being civil in their disagreement with me. It sets the tone I find. I will not pretend to not have instigated uncivil conversations. I did, and have regretted them. But here you're going around calling me a "biased dictator bully" whenever you get the chance. Would you want to work or talk with someone like that? In past discourses I likely wasn't kind towards you, and if so I'm sorry. But I've resolved to approach things differently, and I'd like it if you dropped the dictator lens. That way we can maturely and civilly discuss the matter, as opposed to bad feelings being generated. Rusted AutoParts 02:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I apologize for calling you a dictator. Can I go with stubborn? BurienBomber (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I am fairly stubborn, but I'm trying to work on it. Rusted AutoParts 02:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Nicole Bass

Well, seeing as that's the case I've moved her to the 17th but hidden until it's confirmed. That was immensely irresponsible of her girlfriend though. Rusted AutoParts 17:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Martin Landau

I don't really understand the push for North by Northwest here. As a film yes it's a substantial film in general, but not in Landau's case. I would say Crimes and Misdemeanors is a far more integral part of his career. He was Oscar nominated for it and appears frequently predominant in obituaries. NBN does too but mixed with his other film appearances Rusted AutoParts 05:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BurienBomber. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Patrick Cryne

If he merits an article feel free to create a stub! GiantSnowman 09:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BurienBomber. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

“I Can Still Make Cheyenne”

You must provide a source saying that “I Can Still Make Cheyenne” is about Lane Frost. Otherwise, I have deleted that statement. Zredman (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)