User talk:Abirlal

Let me know what your exact problem is, i'm always on your help, drop a message with the exact problem's link , so that i may fix it easily. And always try to follow

Wiki guidelines. Loves from heart

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome to Abir-lal's talk page

A page you started (Shyampur High School) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shyampur High School, Abir-lal!

Wikipedia editor Chandan Guha just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add references.

To reply, leave a comment on Chandan Guha's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chandan Guha (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,611	Jessica Jung (talk)	Add sources
95	Universities and colleges of West Bengal (talk)	Add sources
8	Ukhrid (talk)	Add sources
17	Burdwan Raj College (talk)	Add sources
7	Netaji Mahavidyalaya (talk)	Add sources
4	Pandit Raghunath Murmu Smriti Mahavidyalaya (talk)	Add sources
30	Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma University (talk)	Cleanup
32	Microsoft Fingerprint Reader (talk)	Cleanup
2,722	Kumkum Bhagya (talk)	Cleanup
44	Government Museum and Art Gallery, Chandigarh (talk)	Expand
17	Indian Institute of Information Technology, Ranchi (talk)	Expand
35	Asansol Engineering College (talk)	Expand
30	Birati (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4	Chhatwan (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
554	Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
255	Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham (talk)	Merge
10	Academic Hinduphobia (talk)	Merge
4,054	Gorillaz (talk)	Merge
62	Kalyani Government Engineering College (talk)	Wikify
59	National Association of Students of Architecture (talk)	Wikify
23	Vishwa Bharati Public School (talk)	Wikify
3	Gisara (talk)	Orphan
2	Ganrapota High School (talk)	Orphan
3	2015 Peru bus accident (talk)	Orphan
26	Khatra (talk)	Stub
14	Mahuda Junction railway station (talk)	Stub
4	Andharthaul (talk)	Stub
3	Achuri (talk)	Stub
9	Harmasra (talk)	Stub
3	Barikul (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing at The Teahouse

Please, can I politely ask you to refrain from answering questions at The Teahouse, your command of English is not sufficient to give clear enough answers, which is confusing to new users. Theroadislong (talk) 17:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, sir Theroadislong. Thank you for let me aware about my fault. But please say how can i overcome my problem? And can back to teahouse as a useful host. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited here for more than 10 years with over 87,000 edits and I rarely answer questions at The Teahouse because I don't consider myself sufficiently knowledgable yet, perhaps you need to read more answers rather than answering questions yourself, that way you learn as do I. Theroadislong (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir Theroadislong, i will surely follow your footsteps and will not answer to the questions inwhich i have no much idea. Sorry for previouis mistakes. Pardon me. I'm a learner. Thank you. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 18:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, Abirlal, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Rnhelp (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.Theroadislong , i noticed master editors have also two accounts, and they say it in their userpages themself. I use the account not to vandalize , for test edits, or softworks. Thank you. Be polite before blocking anyone. And i have no multiple accounts. I have only alter account named Rnhelp. Thank you. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 11:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you talk to yourself thus "Thank you Rnhelp for your recent contribution on my user page. You may like to edit more actively , for suggestions ask help from SuggestBot . Have a nice day." Theroadislong (talk) 11:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong That was a test edit , to know how to encourage new users in edit. Is it not safe to do on your own test account ? , I love all editors, you also. If you propose i may clear that Rnhelp is my account in my userpage. Thank you. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to disclose that you are editing using two accounts on each user page. Theroadislong (talk) 11:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind attention Theroadislong, i will surely do so. Nice to get you on my talk page. It is the best way to solve a problem, blocking can't change our character nor solve a problem. Have a nice day. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to User:Rednova-india? --bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What the exact problem is Bonadea ?. I'm asserting that i have two accounts named User:abirlal, for secure edits, and User:Rnhelp for test edits from unsecure computers. If you want i may deactivate User:Rnhelp . I have no connection with any other accounts. I'm an artist(fine art) . Search on google . Write Artist Abirlal. Thank you for your attention. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Rednova-india (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, i just joined wikipedia at that time, and had no fixed idea about what is vandalizm or what is the meaning of advertisement . To be honest i wanted an article of my name, i'm a reallife artist. You may google 'Artist Abirlal'. But now i can understand my faults. Please see that i have not made this mistake recently. It was an old accident. Please pardon my faults. Or if you don't do so, i will be made to leave Wikipedia forever. Thank you. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sock account unblock needs to be on master account Amortias (T)(C) 12:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Old accident? Vandalism? Spam? You are blocked for using multiple accounts in a way not consistent with what is allowable. WP:sockpuppetry. I guess what is needed is for you to list all your other accounts, explain why you used them how it was wrong, and how you will not do that again. This is just a start. Forever, maybe 6 months you can request the WP:standard offer. Don't know what other thoughts others might have. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Dlohcierekim, I told you that I had no idea about anything as i just joined at that time, even what is WP:sockpuppetry. Therefore, i created three accounts. And started test editings , i created same article after several rejections. I did like stupid. And now i can understand my faults. You have noticed, i have not used that accounts any more. Abirlal is my prime account and Rnhelp is an alter for public computers. And i'm honestly saying what i have done that stupidity. But at present time i have a little idea about what is wrong or right in Wikipedia. I need help to get rid from this block. Please help me. I do not want any other accounts, please let me use this account, it is my only original account. You have blocked others, good. In future i will not create any other account but please consider this account. I'm truely felling sorry for such mindless work. Permit me to edit wikipedia. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk)

Decline reason:

Sock account unblock needs to be on master account Amortias (T)(C) 12:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Worth noting that you only became visible on Wikipedia due to your efforts to become a host at the Teahouse, where you claimed to be well versed in the primary policies of Wikipedia. As sockpuppetry is one of the core challenges which editors must combat on the encyclopedia, and one which arises with a high amount of frequency, for you to plead ignorance is not credible. Moreover, your claim above was that it was your ambition to create an article about yourself, which is a blatant and flagrant violation of the conflict of interest policy, another core principle of the encyclopedia. If you truly wish to make substantiative and valuable edits to the encyclopedia, I would suggest that you familiarise yourself with the policy which governs editors here for the duration of your ban, and consider whether or not you are actually willing and able to enhance the encyclopedia. Stormy clouds (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sir Stormy clouds, please read carefully and try to make out what i tried to say. I told that i opened the accounts, when i just joined. And it is 1 year ago. Therefore, at that time i had no idea about any terms and conditions of Wikipedia. But in present i have a little. Another hand, i said that i do not want the other accounts, but please let me use this. Only Abirlal. Please unblock my account, so that i may continue editing. I will not do the stupidity again by creating a number of account.Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, please unblock me , and let me edit. I know i'm blocked for *creating multiple accounts.(which i created 1 year ago) my reason= i was new at that time, and i did not know the policies. Sir, though i created that accounts , but i just tried to create an article(just to know how to edit, even i did not know that direct page creation for new editor is not alloweded) . And when i came to know about the rules (before 8 months) , i rejected using other accounts. It is a big fault i have made by creating multiple accounts. How they were used? When i created that accounts , i tried to create an article with my name( at that time i did not know that editor can't create their own encyclopedia themself). But when they were rejected , i used another account to recompose this stupidity. I realise today that it is a hilarious act. Accounts I Created *Rednova-india *Rnhelp *Rednova *Abirlal(active account, let me use this only). Why should i be unblocked ? *I have understood my all faults and i'm feeling very sorry. *I'm asserting that i will not do the mistake again. *And i have made edits more than 140 pages, so, today i have some experiences. *I'm asking to let me use only this account. It is my original account i.e 'Abirlal.' *it is my 3rd request, and if you do not unblock me, i have no other options to edit wikipedia when i love the website too much. What will i do after being unblock? *Firstly,I will once again read all the primary policies. *I will not create any other account in future. *I will edit the encyclopedia a little as i could. *I will suggest new user to avoid such violence i did. *I will create some article inwhich i have much idea, with secondary sources. *I will try to respect new editors. *I will try not to be blocked again. *I will act in future as a resonable editor. Please unblock me. I'm requesting for unblock for last time, i have noting to say more clearly. Please, pardon my faults, and give me a chance Vanjagenije. Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Yamla below, all of these accounts were engaging in inappropriate edits, which could be grounds for a block even if it wasn't a socking concern. As this is the third unblock request and all that has happened on this talk page has been wasted admin and volunteer time, I am also revoking your talk page access. You may appeal in the future through WP:UTRS, but I would suggest waiting six months before doing so, and not using any other accounts between now and then. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've been engaging in block evasion. I'll also note that the accounts you used to evade your block were editing inappropriately and you haven't really addressed your long history of inappropriate edits, in your unblock request. As such, it's probably unlikely anyone will trust you until you demonstrate you can stop violating WP:SOCK. WP:SO provides a way for you to demonstrate this. I'm not choosing to decline your unblock request because I declined your request on one of your sockpuppet accounts. I'll leave the review to another admin. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

i'm requesting for unblock, please say is my request need more information? And is there any chance to get rid from the block ? What should i do now ?Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to wait for an administrator to respond, however it's likely you'll need to request the unblock on your original account. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please say, why no administrastor is coming , though i requested unblock hours ago? Is there any problem in my request process ? Should i look for unblock ticket ? If not please say what to do in such condition ? Abirlal Mukhopadhyay (talk) 02:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Be patient. Unblock review is a priviledge, not a right, and you've already had more than one rejected recently. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 03:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another one gone. Please declare all of you sock accounts if you want to stand any chance of making a return. Stormy clouds (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Abirlal/sandbox

Hello, Abirlal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 17:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saltora Dr.BC. Vidyapith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saltora Dr.BC. Vidyapith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltora Dr.BC. Vidyapith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Newhaven lad (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]