User talk:Rednova-india

Welcome!

Hello, Rednova-india, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abirlal Mukhopadhyay, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hammersoft (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abirlal Mukhopadhyay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abirlal Mukhopadhyay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hammersoft (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Artist Abirlal Mukhopadhyay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Artist Abirlal Mukhopadhyay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abirlal Mukhopadhyay

Hello Rednova-india,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abirlal Mukhopadhyay for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rednova-india, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

Reverting nominations for deletion requires some evidence that you are correcting the issues pointed out by the nominators

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 07:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abirlal Mukhopadhyay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abirlal Mukhopadhyay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 16:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

requesting unblock

Requesting Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rednova-india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, please unblock me , and let me edit. I know i'm blocked for *creating multiple accounts.(which i created 1 year ago) my reason= i was new at that time, and i did not know the policies. Sir, though i created that accounts , but i just tried to create an article(just to know how to edit, even i did not know that direct page creation for new editor is not alloweded) . And when i came to know about the rules (before 8 months) , i rejected using other accounts. It is a big fault i have made by creating multiple accounts. How they were used? When i created that accounts , i tried to create an article with my name( at that time i did not know that editor can't create their own encyclopedia themself). But when they were rejected , i used another account to recompose this stupidity. I realise today that it is a hilarious act. Accounts I Created *Rednova-india *Rnhelp *Rednova *Abirlal(active account, let me use this only). Why should i be unblocked ? *I have understood my all faults and i'm feeling very sorry. *I'm asserting that i will not do the mistake again. *And i have made edits more than 140 pages, so, today i have some experiences. *I'm asking to let me use only this account. It is my original account i.e 'Abirlal.' *it is my 3rd request, and if you do not unblock me, i have no other options to edit wikipedia when i love the website too much. What will i do after being unblock? *Firstly,I will once again read all the primary policies. *I will not create any other account in future. *I will edit the encyclopedia a little as i could. *I will suggest new user to avoid such violence i did. *I will create some article inwhich i have much idea, with secondary sources. *I will try to respect new editors. *I will try not to be blocked again. *I will act in future as a resonable editor. Please unblock me. I'm requesting for unblock for last time, i have noting to say more clearly. Please, pardon my faults, and give me a chance.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You aren't asking for this account to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rednova-india (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]