User talk:AWESOMEDUDE0614/archive

Archive of User talk:AWESOMEDUDE0614

Your draft article, Draft:Devin Purcell

Hello, AWESOMEDUDE0614. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Devin Purcell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devin Purcell (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devin Purcell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Devin Purcell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AWESOMEDUDE0614! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devin Purcell (March 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penn Federal Republic

The article Penn Federal Republic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable micronation. There are only 5 results for a Google search of "Penn Federal Republic".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penn Federal Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penn Federal Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn Federal Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

YODADICAE👽 17:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Please stop writing about yourself and things you've made up. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Devin Purcell

Hello, AWESOMEDUDE0614. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Devin Purcell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Penn Federal Republic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Penn Federal Republic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted, since it was substantially the same as the previous version, which was deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn Federal Republic. Suggestion: if you continue to misunderstand what "reliable sources" are, you may run into more difficulties in other parts of the project. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Move

Hello, I was wondering if you could revert the deletion of User:AWESOMEDUDE0614/sandbox , as when I moved an article out of there, it was deleted, and I have nothing of the information and page that I put there. Once I copy it I will take it over to a MyPage. I spent a lot of time on that article and it was deleted within thirty seconds, so I would like to be able to copy my work to fix everything that it was deleted for. Thank you so much. AWESOMEDUDE0614 (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. No, you moved that content, so all of its history went to the now-deleted article. What you might ask for is for Penn Federal Republic to be restored (and I see you already wrote up something on Talk:Penn Federal Republic, but I don't see why--you created it earlier, it was really nothing at all and the deletion discussion was clear, and when you put it up again it was basically the same thing. So there may be an admin who is willing to restore it, but I am not going to do it, because there is nothing I see in there that has any potential--in other words, it seems like a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST to me. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. Do you have any administrators you could refer me to? Thank you for your response. AWESOMEDUDE0614 (talk) 15:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ohnoitsjamie, your name was still on my clipboard... Drmies (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, Awesomedude, I don't know. I do not think you created all this stuff to improve our beautiful project, and at any rate you did not spend a lot of time working on making this stuff look good and sound encyclopedic. Ohnoitsjamie, after looking at this, besides all the other matters, I'm starting to be more convinced that an indefinite block is the way to go here. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - WP:WEBHOST, WP:MADEUP, WP:NOTHERE are all applicable I'd say; furthermore, if you truly believe your creation is notable, I'd say WP:CIR applies as well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - What? I do not understand why that would be necessary, maybe my article was not good enough for Wikipedia, that is fine, but not being able to do anything at all, I don't believe that is necessary. AWESOMEDUDE0614 (talk) 17:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay, I believe it probably falls under WP:CIR. Sorry for wasting your time. AWESOMEDUDE0614 (talk) 18:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! AWESOMEDUDE0614, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi AWESOMEDUDE0614! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I make an article with a conflict of interest?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rainbow Unicorns (song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rainbow Unicorns (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mvqr (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi AWESOMEDUDE0614! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, First Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject:Micronations" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect WikiProject:Micronations and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#WikiProject:Micronations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MicroWiki has been accepted

MicroWiki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dege31 (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Avon Grove High School September 2022.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Avon Grove High School September 2022.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.avongrove.org/schools/high-school/~board/avon-grove-high-school/post/aghs-weekly-newsletter-091622. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]