User talk:69.124.80.253

November 2021

Hello, I'm KN2731. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Real Housewives of New York City, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Real Housewives of New York City, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ctrlwiki • 05:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Real Housewives of New York City, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2022

Hello, I'm Smallangryplanet. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Real Housewives of Dubai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Smallangryplanet (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:UwU

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:UwU, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Peace symbols, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarheel95 (Talk) 21:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District. Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Real Housewives of Cheshire, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2023

Hello, I'm Wham2001. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Real Housewives of New York City without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wham2001 (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to 13 Reasons Why, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at The Real Housewives of Dubai, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NP83 (talk) 01:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. — Manti core 03:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 69.124.80.253! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Manti core 03:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sally Obermeder

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sally Obermeder, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Real Housewives of Atlanta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Real Housewives of Atlanta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills (season 3). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. CocaPopsRather (talk) 22:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

Hello, I'm The Night Watch. I noticed that in this edit to The Real Housewives of Miami (season 6), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Night Watch (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Old Bethpage, New York. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Real Housewives of Atlanta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Real Housewives of Atlanta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip: Turks & Caicos have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 14:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. The citation needed request is there for a reason, and the list of previous vice principals is unsourced and non-encyclopedic. Meters (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School. Meters (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have spent months trying to add the same unsourced material about non-notable alumni and former staff. Enough. Read WP:EW and stop. Meters (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Real Housewives of Sydney, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Real Housewives of New York City, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am incredibly sorry for anything I did wrong, whatever it was I didn’t mean it 69.124.80.253 (talk) 21:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am terribly sorry for what I did wrong. I understand what I have been blocked for, and I will NOT continue to cause damage or disruption. I swear by every god that I will make useful contributions instead, and I will honor my entire life to this.69.124.80.253 (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a little over the top. We don't need you to swear to God or to promise to devote your entire life to anything. All we need you to do is as you were asked by Yamla above. If you have useful contributions you want to make, please tell what those might be. 331dot (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to be able to edit again. I swear to god I won’t do anything wrong. I promise that I will always contribute in a positive way. I don’t have much time left as I am currently fighting stage 3 lung cancer and it is worsening. I just want to go back to doing what I love because it makes me happy. I hope you find this message convincing enough to allow me to contribute to Wikipedia again. If it doesn’t, please let me know if there is anything left for me to do to try and get unblocked. I would really appreciate it69.124.80.253 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is still over the top. And you haven't said what constructive contributions you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not reviewing this, but as I said above, " If you have useful contributions you want to make, please tell what those might be." You haven't done that. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I find it a little rude that you ignored my request but I respect your opinion, it is ok for you to not understand my situation. I would just like to be able to edit some pages because I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. I’m not sure if there is anything else I could do to convince you, so I might just give up I am running out of time anyway. I hope you have a blessed day as I probably won’t be talking to you again if I can’t edit 69.124.80.253 (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion. Please sign in to your account and make your request there. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still haven't said what constructive contributions you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By which we mean, a specific example of an edit you want to make, or what topics you will edit about. "Edit some pages" could mean anything. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to edit topics I’m personally interested in. I don’t want to be a bother but I feel like this is getting dragged out. I honestly don’t even know why I was blocked but I h ope you have a blessed day. 🙏🙏🙏 69.124.80.253 (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And please explain this edit [1], which appears to be an admissionof socking. Meters (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for what I did, and after these past weeks, I have been able to reflect on my actions. I apologize for the damage I have caused to Wikipedia, and I hope that you will be able to accept my sincere apology. I understand what I have done wrong, and I swear to god that I will NEVER do it ever again.

Decline reason:

It's still confirmed block evasion. Please sign into your account and make your request there. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Please describe what you did, what you will do instead and what constructive edits you would make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made grammatical errors, incorrect information, and I have not included citations on some edits. In the future, I will never make a grammatical error, never write incorrect information, and always include a citation. I will also try to donate some of my paychecks to Wikipedia because i know that it is a good cause :) 69.124.80.253 (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what the WP:GAB says about giving money. It does not go to this encyclopedia, btw. It goes to the foundation that owns it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, noted :) 69.124.80.253 (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello! I'm TheTechie. Your recent edit(s) to the page The Real Housewives of New York City appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School. Despite all your promises in your various unblock requests, here you are right back at the same article with the same edit. Meters (talk) 02:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Meters. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Stay off my talk page. Meters (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Plainview – Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This is at least the fifth time you have attempted to add this alumnus. She does not have a Wikipedia article to show her notability, and simply being on a reality show is not sufficient. See WP:WTAF Meters (talk) 04:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then maker her a Wikipedia article and maybe add her 🫤 im not sure why you make my time in Wikipedia so difficult. I just want to edit pages with correct information because I live in this town. Maybe if you did some actual research on the topics I want to add, you would let me. Jennifer is my aunt and I literally know she went to this high school. Why does she need a Wikipedia page herself? She is on the Wikipedia page for real housewives and I provided six articles for you to look at, but you clearly didn’t. I’m not sure why you are so rude to me. Please respond appropriately or I will report you for starting an edit war. Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place. You are clearly here to build this wonderful encyclopedia. 😊 69.124.80.253 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Yes I read your sources to verify that she did attend the school, but the sources do not establish her notability. Simply appearing on a reality show is not sufficient to show notability. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. In particular, alumni lists are restricted to people who have existing English Wikipedia articles to show their notability. There are very limited exceptions, which do not apply here. Since you claim she is your aunt, you should not write an article about her since you have a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. And no, I'm not going to write an article about her for you since I doubt she is notable.

I'm not being rude to you. You left an attack on my talk page so I banned you from it. You have been blocked three times for your edits, most recently for three months by user:Ad Orientem, and you immediately started making the same type of edits (and sometimes the identical edits) when your latest block ended, despite having promised to stop several times during your multiple unsuccessful unblock requests. This will not end well if you keep it up. Meters (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Again. This is getting old. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not sure why I have been blocked

Decline reason:

This IP is the source of extensive disruption. If you were not responsible for this, please request an account via WP:ACC. 331dot (talk) 07:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.124.80.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not sure why I have been blocked? I never really use Wikipedia maybe someone from my same ip adress need help

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.