User talk:30Diana

July 2022

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Venezuelan merengue—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Venezuelan merengue, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Venezuelan merengue. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Music of Venezuela. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you actually intend to give sources for what you are adding? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or are you just going to persist that it's the truth? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content - Oscar de la Renta

Please stop removing cited content just because you don't like it, or you will be blocked again. ... discospinster _talk 00:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bachata (music)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bachata (music) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyvercetti098 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Music of Puerto Rico. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tommyvercetti098 (talk) 14:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]