User talk:Tommyvercetti098

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sint Maarten into Commonwealth Caribbean. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:DanCherek, thanks for letting me know, I'll be sure to take note of that the next time I copy text from another article 👍 Tommyvercetti098 (talk) 04:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your edit to Music of Puerto Rico has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This was on January 14. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa, I'm sorry for any inconvenience this might've caused you, do you think if I do a lot of paraphrasing and remove the least important information and rely on other sources for this matter, do you think it's gonna reduce the risk of copyright? Asking for a friend because both reggae and dancehall have received notable population in Puerto Rico, especially since reggaetón evolved from those genres from Panama and Jamaica and I don't think it would do any good if you removed the reggae and dancehall section entirely from the Music of Puerto Rico Tommyvercetti098 (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a bunch of your work again, and placed a fact tag, this time because you added a bunch of text unsupported by your three citations. The third citation was unreliable, so I removed it along with its accompanying text. Basically, the only facts that were supported were that two of the listed artists were notable. You violated WP:No original research by making a bunch of statements about the music and the audience. Binksternet (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable, I'll find better sources in order to prove those statements, a million apologies and many thanks 👍 Tommyvercetti098 (talk) 00:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Music of Puerto Rico. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at English language in Puerto Rico

Hello Tommyvercetti098. There is an open discussion at English language in Puerto Rico which you may want to contribute to. Thanks, Mercy11 (talk) 21:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research at English language in Puerto Rico

Hello Tommyvercetti098:

Your edits here are in violation of Wikipedia's policy as they constitute Original Research. To help you understand what can and cannot be added to WP articles, a discussion was opened 2 days ago at the article's Talk Page, here, and to which you were then invited via your personal Talk Page here. If you wish to contribute to the article English language in Puerto Rico, you should head to the discussion at the article's Discussion Page stated above; if not, please note that Original Research is not allowed at WP and that you may be blocked from editing after knowingly and repeatedly violating the same policy.

Best regards, Mercy11 (talk) 04:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Holiday music" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Holiday music has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Holiday music until a consensus is reached. older ≠ wiser 17:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sleeper hit, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]