Jump to content

User talk:14GTR/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1886 Atlantic hurricane season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indianola, Moron and St Vincent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coronet Bay, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass Highway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John le Carré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesse Agler for deletion

A nomination is taking place as to whether Jesse Agler should be deleted or not. The discussion is held at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Agler and everyone is welcome to join in on the discussion. However do not remove the AfD notice on top. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

1858 and 1859 AHS

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know I have partially completed drafts of 1858 and 1859 in the making, and I intend/hope to get them published soon. I'm all for collaborative effort, I just wanted to make sure we're on the same page so neither of us end up wasting our time writing duplicate content. Best, Juliancolton (talk) 02:28, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

1856-1859 Atlantic hurricane seasons

Hi 14GTR! I noticed that you have been working on the remaining Atlantic hurricane seasons, like 1856, 1857, and maybe 1858 and 1859 (with a potential collaboration with Juliancolton). Anyway, I wasn't sure if you intended on getting them to GA yourself (as in being the nominator). I probably should have ask you about this earlier, because I just nominated the 1856 Atlantic hurricane season for GA.--12george1 (talk) 03:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Re:1856-1859 Atlantic hurricane seasons

Hi 14GTR, it's me again. Let me rephrase what I said. Did you want to nominate the 1856 Atlantic hurricane season for GA before I messed with it? At this point, it is what it is. But did I "steal" an article that you wanted to get to GA? If so, I apologize for that. During the previous few months, I was using the 1853, 1854, and 1855 Atlantic hurricane seasons as DYKs and GAs for the WikiCup. When I suddenly noticed that someone (turned out to be you) created the 1856 Atlantic hurricane season, I immediately got to work and ignored whoever whoever made the article and what their intentions were. Again, I apologize for this. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ella Naper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 1850 Atlantic hurricane season, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 1850 Atlantic Hurricane Season. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I saw you've been editing for a while, and you do good work! I hope the recent encounter with 12george1 doesn't deter you. You're a good writer and I hope you keep it up. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 14:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Of course! I meant what I said, I hope you keep writing. You have skills that the project could definitely use. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey there, it's me again. So, since I see you editing the 1850s Atlantic hurricane seasons, I was wondering what thoughts you had on what'll happen when 1858 and 1859 are eventually published. What should we do with 1850–59 Atlantic hurricane seasons? And specifically 1850? I'm curious if you had any thoughts. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey, since you did such a good job with the 1850s seasons, I think you should do the honor of splitting off 1859 :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Juliancotton has produced a perfectly good draft of the 1859 season, see here, but has yet to post it as an article. When he does then, obviously the 1850-59 page can be deleted. Best regards 14GTR (talk) 07:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evelyn Dunbar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Country Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward Ardizzone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to British Expeditionary Force
War Artists' Advisory Committee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Patrick Hall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Charles Cundall) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Charles Cundall, 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good to see a new page that isn't about a footballer or a wannabee pop singer!

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Many thanks;- don't worry it'll be a very long time before I write an article about a footballer or a wannabee pop singer. 14GTR (talk) 06:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

TC articles

Hey man! I hope you haven't given up editing tropical cyclone articles. You're a good writer, and we could use an editor like you :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, nice to hear from you again; I haven't given up on looking at old TC seasons but for the moment I'm mostly looking at war artists from WW2, but will return to TC's in due course. Hope all is well.14GTR (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Ah cool. Yep, all's been well. I'm working on some Pacific typhoon articles. They're sort of the graveyard of the project, since there's so many storms that did so much damage, but the WP coverage is pretty scant. Typhoon Vera, one of the most important Japanese typhoons, has a rather lousy article, so I'm currently working on storms over there so they're not so bad. Enjoy your time in the past in WW2! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Cardiff WikiMeet

Hi. Just letting you know that we've now got a dedicated space upstairs ar the Urban Tap House. See you there! --Rhyswynne (talk) 09:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks, I know the Urban Tap can be a bit of a maze upstairs but I'm sure I'll find the meeting. 14GTR (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bernard Hailstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ministry of Information
Lowes Dalbiac Luard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Newmarket

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Platt (artist), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.westendatwar.org.uk/page_id__161_path__0p4p.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Milton Platt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt
John Platt (artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt
John Platt (computer scientist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt
John Platt (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt
John Platt (settler) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt
John R. Platt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Platt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Thomas Monnington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bernard Meninsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[http://www.modernbritishartists.co.uk/bernard_meninsky.htm Modern British Art]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Henderson (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Transport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Keith Henderson (artist)

Harrias talk 00:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laura Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pathe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Ravilious, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Service Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Ernest Everett Just: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I did consider leaving a message on the users' talk page but after seeing their User Page, now deleted, I really didn't want to engage with them at all, but thanks for pointing me towards those Template messages. Regards 14GTR (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Ruby Loftus

I've spun off some of the excellent content you added to Laura Knight to create an article for Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring. I'm going to nominate it at DYK. Thanks for all your great writing on art. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your welcome, you have added some really good material to create the new article. I saw the painting last year at the Laura Knight Portraits exhibition at the NPG and enjoyed writing about it and Knight in general. I seem to recall seeing a photograph of Knight and Loftus together so I'll see if thats available.14GTR (talk) 07:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your new section on Stanley Spencer

Thanks for your new section on SS, which reads well and as far as I know provides the correct facts. Two constructive comments: a) It could do with a main citation nearer to its starting point - did you base it all on one source or did you merge several? b) It draws attention to the need for a further new section on his WW2 War Artist work - especially the important shipbuilding paintings. These are of course already included in a minor way, but for their artistic importance and social commentary, they merit a complete new section. BW, --Dendrotek 15:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Hi Dendrotek, thanks for your kind comments; my intention is to add three more sections to the article,

  • Port Glasgow 1939-1945
  • Resurrection pictures 1945-1950
  • Final years.

The first of these is almost done and the other two should be finished later this week. The 1932-38 section was based on the Tate Catalogue - hence the single citation. BTW, I like the Chronology section you added. Regards, 14GTR (talk) 08:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I would like to co-operate with you and agree that these Sections will be a good step. I'll keep off them for now. Glad you like Chronology. I may continue to add small cited items particularly on Early Life. I am thinking of categorizing a selection of SS's works into broad subjects e.g. Biblical, Gardens/botanical, Portraits, maybe Allegorical, War Artist etc., then put into a Wiki Table (? how these work) the Galleries at which they may be seen. Not to reproduce them in Wiki though, which causes problems with copyright. Having suggested this, I should add that I don't set myself deadlines for my Wiki pootling! BW --Dendrotek 13:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good - I know some artists have those Wikitables as seperate pages to their main article - which might be the way to go with Spencer as you would be looking at a very long list indeed. 14GTR (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Great - could you please tell me the titles of a couple of artists with Wikitables?--Dendrotek 16:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, this is one of the better examples, List of works by Vincent van Gogh. Plenty more in the category at the bottom of that page. 14GTR (talk) 08:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, the Articles on VvG are well done, aren't they! But a Wikitable like that is more ambitious than I intended at this stage. In particular, it would take me into copyright concerns. Because Spencer was relatively recently alive and still has a lot of family in the Thames Valley whose sensitivities I respect. Rather than the VvG Tabl, the copyright situation is more like Francis Bacon, for example. I suppose one could claim Fair Use? See for example File:Triptych May-June, 1973.jpg ? What do you think bout that? Otherwise, I am inclined to start with a Table containing links to places on the web where one may see some representative works of Spencer on approved Gallery Sites e.g. Tate Britain, Spencer Gallery, Birmingham etc. without trying to put Thumbs with hot links into Wikipedia? BW. --Dendrotek 22:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, give it a go. 14GTR (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, have you undone my mods to the biographical section headings? Also, Patrons - War Artists Advisory Committee seems to have disappeared from the Bio Info box? I can't see anyone else working on SS at present.--Dendrotek 11:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I did, those extended headings you added made the article look a mess. Nor is there any need to include WAAC in the info-box - the article has plenty on them already.14GTR (talk) 11:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi - "a mess" is just your personal opinion - only one reader of millions! You might at least have informed me first, maybe I could have shortened them. I don't think any of the headings should be bare dates. And re WAAC - what's about them in the body of the Article is not the point. The WAA Committee were important patrons, so they should be in the box. Organisations as well as individual people are often important patrons of the arts. Again, you didn't inform me before chopping it - a bit rude. On a more constructive note, are you familiar with adding categories? If so, perhaps the Article should have a WWI War Artist category too. Would you like to add it?--Dendrotek 19:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


Work on painters

Hi, I just added the "Your Paintings" link to Charles Cundall (as one of their "popular artists"), but while I was there I saw you had already used the link and have been creating lots of pages using their links already. Thanks for your work, as I enjoyed reading a few of your painter articles, so I hope you decide to keep making more! Jane (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your appreciation. Funny you should mention "Your Paintings" I think its a great resource and use it a lot, normally as a 'Reference' to which museums have works by the artist, but obviously others add it under 'See also' or 'External links'. Has there been a discussion somewhere on a preferred way ? 14GTR (talk) 09:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

No, not really. I downloaded the whole dataset and have been trying to match it up to another set of painter names. I have tried a few times to talk them into a collaboration, but they are nervous about it. Along with some folks from the UK we set up a project page here WP:Yours. Like you, I think it's a fantastic resource and use them a lot. I love the fact they can host all that modern art, something we can't do on Wikipedia. Jane (talk) 11:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks - I'll put that page on my watchlist.14GTR (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, 14GTR. You have new messages at Sintaku's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring

Another good hook. Cheers. Victuallers (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Sydney Carline) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sydney Carline, 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting, but I'm not sure about the last para: it reads as though one vist to John Nash was enough to kill him!

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Good point - I'm sure it was the weather that particular evening that led to the pneumonia, I'll add a few words to make that clearer in the morning.Thanks for doing the page review.Many thanks 14GTR (talk) 23:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Spoor Broome Library may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • csuci.edu/collections/lagomarsino/index.htm]</ref> and the ''Camarillo State Hospital Collection]''.<ref>[http://www.library.csuci.edu/collections/hospital/index.htm]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Nash (artist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • date= |work=Imperial War Museum Collections Search |publisher= |accessdate=21 February 2012}}</ref>]] ''Ruined Country'' and ''Spring in the Trenches''. Nash used his opportunity as a war artist to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Nash (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantegna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Documents relating to the News International phone hacking scandal, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Chronological list of key documents relating to the illegal acquisition of confidential information by employees and other agents of news media companies in conjunction with the phone hacking scandal.. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to News International phone hacking scandal may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *{{Timeline-event|date=7 July 2011|event=''The Telegraph'' reports that relatives of British soldiers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Chronological list of key documents relating to the illegal acquisition of confidential information by employees and other agents of news media companies in conjunction with the phone hacking scandal. a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Ravilious

(Ping) Please see the article's talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Aitken, Lord Beaverbrook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederic Dodge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis C. Lowell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sara Lilly

The article Sara Lilly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All this is unverified and probably unverifiable - there's no longer a CV on IMDb and no record there of her acting/music career. Music was self-released digitally and I don't believe an Amazon sales chart is proof of notability. This is effectively an unsourced BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem; please proceed.14GTR (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Orpen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Apologies for disturbing, but I wondered if you had seen my questions at Talk:Hall of Remembrance about your revert on that article. Thanks. -- Theramin (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but as I see you have been editing recently, I'd be grateful if you could explain what your edit summary of "IWM image credits required; more apt format." means. I was bold, you reverted, so now please can we have the discussion. Thanks. -- Theramin (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

It is totally inappropriate to include so many images in such a short article nor does it reflect the uncertainity about the composition of the list; since I started it I've revised it several times and expect to do so again. The IWM website specifies the format in which they want the use of works in their collection to be acknowledged and it is a courtsey to do so.14GTR (talk) 07:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I've replied over on the talk page. -- Theramin (talk) 01:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

"Your paintings" painters list

Hi! Thank you so much for the work you've been putting in identifying painters on the Wikipedia:GLAM/Your_paintings#Artists_by_birth_period.

One thing in future though, could I ask you if at all possible to make the edits on Wikidata, rather than (only) directly on the pages? The reason is that I have got a script now to update the lists from the information on Wikidata, but it doesn't take into account edits directly on Wikipedia -- so there's a real risk changes made directly to the wikipages may get overwritten and lost. (Also, if edits are made on Wikidata, they immediately become accessible to all sorts of other projects using the data).

So for example, in the 1875 list, I see that you've been able to identify "Paul Ayshford Methuen" with the wiki article Paul Ayshford Methuen, 4th Baron Methuen. This doesn't have a Wikidata entry set up in the list, but if you go to the article, then look down the sidebar of the page on the left hand side, to the 'tools' subsection, second from the bottom there is a link to Wikidata item, which in this case should take you to d:Q7149146. Almost all articles on Wikipedia have now got identified links like this to Wikidata (with the exception of some disambiguation pages and redirects).

Once on the Wikidata page, if you scroll down, the second section is called "Statements", and if you scroll down to the bottom of that, you should be able to see an "add" link on the right hand side, on its own below the other statements. If you click this, Wikidata will then let you add new information about the item.

Hitting this 'add' link should bring up a new entry-box on the left saying "Property". Starting to type "BBC Your Paintings" into this box brings up a choice of properties we can add -- in this case, it will be to add the "BBC Your Paintings artist identifier", and paul-ayshford-methuen can then be added in the entry-box that becomes available immediately to the right of this. Hitting "save" immediately to the right of this then confirms the edit, and saves the property. I have actually just made this edit.

In the same way, one can add the property "VIAF identifier", and set this to "23211318"; and if there were a Commons category, one could add that as a property and set its name (missing out the word "Category:").

The results of these additions can then be seen in the 'pretty' version of Wikidata, called Reasonator. Once you have enabled it (go to a Wikidata page, then 'Preferences' in the bar next to your user-name at the top of the page, then check 'Reasonator' second from the bottom of the section 'Wikidata-centric' and save), now on any Wikidata page there should be a link 'Reasonator' at the bottom of the sidebar on the left. Click this, and you will see what Wikidata knows about the subject presented in a slightly more accessible form, eg this for Paul Ayshford Methuen -- including in the 'infobox' area in the right hand side now a link to VIAF, a link to the "Your paintings" site, and a link to the English wikipedia. This is also where the "Commons category" link would appear. (And "Commons creator page", if it exists and has been set).

The next time the painters list pages get regenerated, they should now automatically include the link Paul Ayshford Methuen, 4th Baron Methuen (without a question mark now, since it's been drawn directly from Wikidata); and the VIAF number.

Yes, I appreciate that at least to start with it may seem more of a chore than just editing the Wiki pages directly. And unfortunately there isn't the satisfaction of seeing the results change instantly -- not until the whole set of list pages is regenerated. But on the upside, going this route makes it possible to regenerate the pages much more systematically and keep them updated, and gets the information into the system in a form where (with luck) it should soon be usable in all sorts of different ways.

So my apologies for changing the way things will need to be done. But I hope that, once you get into it, you'll find that editing the Wikidata pages isn't so onerous. And the big advantage is it now lets us do so much more with the data -- so that rather than being trapped on a single page, the linkages can now (or very soon) be usable anywhere; as well as allowing cross-queries to be run such as eg "which 'Your Paintings' painters also have identifiers in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography" ?

So thanks for bearing with this,

All best, Jheald (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hmmmmm.... a lot to think about there. I hope the changes I made didn't cause any problems for you. I tend to look at those pages every few months to see if I can spot anything, fairly obvious, to be updated/corrected or when I create a new article on someone who is listed. When that happens and the redlink under En.WP turns blue will that be carried over to Wikidata or will I need to amend their entry there ?. Thanks for taking the time to explain all this. Best wishes 14GTR (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations on your new article. Much better than the one I started at The Menin Road. I think I'll give up on the Nash brothers, if you are going to do them so well.

Do you think the pre-emptive disambiguation with "(painting)" is required? If so, I see that Menin Road is a redirect to Battle of Passchendaele, so perhaps the Menin Road should do the same. I'll leave you to decide. Happy editing. -- Theramin (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

OK - many thanks. Take care.14GTR (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I wonder if you could you possibly explain what "IWM criteria" are? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

When you download a image from the IWM website it specifies how they want usage of the picture acknowledged and that is what those alpha-numerical codes are. I don't know of any other museum that asks for that, usually the institions name is enough, but they do and it's a reasonable and easy thing to do.14GTR (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Ah yes, I see, thanks. Reasonable and easy for the editor, certainly. But for the reader? and without any explanation in the article? Is that a requirement for the caption as well as the image file? I've made mistakes in the past when I have misinterpreted what is meant by "acknowledgement" and have added photographer's names to captions, only to be told that they need appear only at the image file. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

I doubt if many people, if any, notice them: irrespective of the WP requirement I would always add the photographer's name to a caption as well.14GTR (talk) 16:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, I think some readers will be confused and will expect to see a location for the work. I'd be tempted to add a link like (Art. IWM ART 1154). But what is that IWM "acknowledgement" requirement exactly? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

I can't see it confusing anyone. I've two books on Nash beside me at the moment and all the WW1 & WW2 images in them use exactly the same notation.14GTR (talk) 17:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Haha. I really don't think we can expect the average reader to have "two books on Nash beside them... with exactly the same notation," can we? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC) p.s. perhaps you could direct me to a description of that acknowledgement policy at the IWM website, or wherever? Many thanks. I've opened a topic for discussion on the Talk Page.
I wonder would you care to make an input over there?? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 1

Hi! Thank you for subscribing to the WikiProject X Newsletter. For our first issue...

Has WikiProject X changed the world yet? No.

We opened up shop last month and announced our existence to the world. Our first phase is the "research" phase, consisting mostly of reading and listening. We set up our landing page and started collecting stories. So far, 28 stories have been shared about WikiProjects, describing a variety of experiences across numerous WikiProjects. A recurring story involves a WikiProject that starts off strong but has trouble continuing to stay active. Most people describe using WikiProjects as a way to get feedback from other editors. Some quotes:

  • "Working on requested articles, utilising the reliable sources section, and having an active WikiProject to ask questions in really helped me learn how to edit Wikipedia and looking back I don't know how long I would have stayed editing without that project." – Sam Walton on WikiProject Video Games
  • "I believe that the main problem of the Wikiprojects is that they are complicated to use. There should be a a much simpler way to check what do do, what needs to be improved etc." – Tetra quark
  • "In the late 2000s, WikiProject Film tried to emulate WP:MILHIST in having coordinators and elections. Unfortunately, this was not sustainable and ultimately fell apart." – Erik

Of course, these are just anecdotes. While they demonstrate what is possible, they do not necessarily explain what is typical. We will be using this information in conjunction with a quantitative analysis of WikiProjects, as documented on Meta. Particularly, we are interested in the measurement of WikiProject activity as it relates to overall editing in that WikiProject's subject area.

We also have 50 people and projects signed up for pilot testing, which is an excellent start! (An important caveat: one person volunteering a WikiProject does not mean the WikiProject as a whole is interested; just that there is at least one person, which is a start.)

While carrying out our research, we are documenting the problems with WikiProjects and our ideas for making WikiProjects better. Some ideas include better integration of existing tools into WikiProjects, recommendations of WikiProjects for people to join, and improved coordination with Articles for Creation. These are just ideas that may or may not make it to the design phase; we will see. We are also working with WikiProject Council to improve the directory of WikiProjects, with the goal of a reliable, self-updating WikiProject directory. Stay tuned! If you have any ideas, you are welcome to leave a note on our talk page.

That's all for now. Thank you for subscribing!

Harej 17:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
  • New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
  • TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 2

For this month's issue...

Making sense of a lot of data.

Work on our prototype will begin imminently. In the meantime, we have to understand what exactly we're working with. To this end, we generated a list of 71 WikiProjects, based on those brought up on our Stories page and those who had signed up for pilot testing. For those projects where people told stories, we coded statements within those stories to figure out what trends there were in these stories. This approach allowed us to figure out what Wikipedians thought of WikiProjects in a very organic way, with very little by way of a structure. (Compare this to a structured interview, where specific questions are asked and answered.) This analysis was done on 29 stories. Codes were generally classified as "benefits" (positive contributions made by a WikiProject to the editing experience) and "obstacles" (issues posed by WikiProjects, broadly speaking). Codes were generated as I went along, ensuring that codes were as close to the original data as possible. Duplicate appearances of a code for a given WikiProject were removed.

We found 52 "benefit" statements encoded and 34 "obstacle" statements. The most common benefit statement referring to the project's active discussion and participation, followed by statements referring to a project's capacity to guide editor activity, while the most common obstacles made reference to low participation and significant burdens on the part of the project maintainers and leaders. This gives us a sense of WikiProjects' big strength: they bring people together, and can be frustrating to editors when they fail to do so. Meanwhile, it is indeed very difficult to bring editors together on a common interest; in the absence of a highly motivated core of organizers, the technical infrastructure simply isn't there.

We wanted to pair this qualitative study with quantitative analysis of a WikiProject and its "universe" of pages, discussions, templates, and categories. To this end I wrote a script called ProjAnalysis which will, for a given WikiProject page (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek) and WikiProject talk-page tag (e.g. Template:WikiProject Star Trek), will give you a list of usernames of people who edited within the WikiProject's space (the project page itself, its talk page, and subpages), and within the WikiProject's scope (the pages tagged by that WikiProject, excluding the WikiProject space pages). The output is an exhaustive list of usernames. We ran the script to analyze our test batch of WikiProjects for edits between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, and we subjected them to further analysis to only include those who made 10+ edits to pages in the projects' scope, those who made 4+ edits to the projects' space, and those who made 10+ edits to pages in scope but not 4+ edits to pages in the projects' space. This latter metric gives us an idea of who is active in a certain subject area of Wikipedia, yet who isn't actively engaging on the WikiProject's pages. This information will help us prioritize WikiProjects for pilot testing, and the ProjAnalysis script in general may have future life as an application that can be used by Wikipedians to learn about who is in their community.

Complementing the above two studies are a design analysis, which summarizes the structure of the different WikiProject spaces in our test batch, and the comprehensive census of bots and tools used to maintain WikiProjects, which will be finished soon. With all of this information, we will have a game plan in place! We hope to begin working with specific WikiProjects soon.

As a couple of asides...

  • Database Reports has existed for several years on Wikipedia to the satisfaction of many, but many of the reports stopped running when the Toolserver was shut off in 2014. However, there is good news: the weekly New WikiProjects and WikiProjects by Changes reports are back, with potential future reports in the future.
  • WikiProject X has an outpost on Wikidata! Check it out. It's not widely publicized, but we are interested in using Wikidata as a potential repository for metadata about WikiProjects, especially for WikiProjects that exist on multiple Wikimedia projects and language editions.

That's all for now. Thank you for subscribing! If you have any questions or comments, please share them with us.

Harej (talk) 01:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Raymond Coxon. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 14GTR. You have new messages at Weegeerunner's talk page.
Message added 21:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Weegeerunner (talk) 21:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 14GTR. You have new messages at Talk:Raymond Coxon.
Message added 21:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Weegeerunner (talk) 21:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 3

Greetings! For this month's issue...

We have demos!

After a lengthy research and design process, we decided for WikiProject X to focus on two things:

  • A WikiProject workflow that focuses on action items: discussions you can participate in and tasks you can perform to improve the encyclopedia; and
  • An automatically updating WikiProject directory that gives you lists of users participating in the WikiProject and editing in that subject area.

We have a live demonstration of the new WikiProject workflow at WikiProject Women in Technology, a brand new WikiProject that was set up as an adjunct to a related edit-a-thon in Washington, DC. The goal is to surface action items for editors, and we intend on doing that through automatically updated working lists. We are looking into using SuggestBot to generate lists of outstanding tasks, and we are looking into additional options for automatic worklist generation. This takes the burden off of WikiProject editors to generate these worklists, though there is also a "requests" section for Wikipedians to make individual requests. (As of writing, these automated lists are not yet live, so you will see a blank space under "edit articles" on the demo WikiProject. Sorry about that!) I invite you to check out the WikiProject and leave feedback on WikiProject X's talk page.

Once the demo is sufficiently developed, we will be working on a limited deployment on our pilot WikiProjects. We have selected five for the first round of testing based on the highest potential for impact and will scale up from there.

While a re-designed WikiProject experience is much needed, that alone isn't enough. A WikiProject isn't any good if people have no way of discovering it. This is why we are also developing an automatically updated WikiProject directory. This directory will surface project-related metrics, including a count of active WikiProject participants and of active editors in that project's subject area. The purpose of these metrics is to highlight how active the WikiProject is at the given point of time, but also to highlight that project's potential for success. The directory is not yet live but there is a demonstration featuring a sampling of WikiProjects.

Each directory entry will link to a WikiProject description page which automatically list the active WikiProject participants and subject-area article editors. This allows Wikipedians to find each other based on the areas they are interested in, and this information can be used to revive a WikiProject, start a new one, or even for some other purpose. These description pages are not online yet, but they will use this template, if you want to get a feel of what they will look like.

We need volunteers!

WikiProject X is a huge undertaking, and we need volunteers to support our efforts, including testers and coders. Check out our volunteer portal and see what you can do to help us!

As an aside...

Wouldn't it be cool if lists of requested articles could not only be integrated directly with WikiProjects, but also shared between WikiProjects? Well, we got the crazy idea of having experimental software feature Flow deployed (on a totally experimental basis) on the new Article Request Workshop, which seeks to be a place where editors can "workshop" article ideas before they get created. It uses Flow because Flow allows, essentially, section-level categorization, and in the future will allow "sections" (known as "topics" within Flow) to be included across different pages. What this means is that you have a recommendation for a new article tagged by multiple WikiProjects, allowing for the recommendation to appear on lists for each WikiProject. This will facilitate inter-WikiProject collaboration and will help to reduce duplicated work. The Article Request Workshop is not entirely ready yet due to some bugs with Flow, but we hope to integrate it into our pilot WikiProjects at some point.

Harej (talk) 00:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
  • Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

given your expertise: Kenneth King (artist) should be in List of Irish artists but i do not know his date of birth. Lugnad (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Feel free to add him to the list, even without a date. BBC Your Paintings has a single ship picture by a Kenneth King born 1939, would that be him ?. I have some reference books at home I can check this evening as well. Best regards. 14GTR (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

It has to be him (so you do have expertise). My compliments. you mention the BBC Your Paintings. that subject matter is what would appeal to him. He had served in the RN; so an Irish VC ...
Thanks for establishing his date of birth. 1939. I visited him few years ago, he looked elderly then. Yet he had boundless energy, running art classes for his neighbours on a pro bono basis.
A few days ago, I uploaded one of his pictures and the article: Irish Willow I left a question on its talk page. Remember, here on Wikipedia, there was a time when lots of articles had "trivia" sections and then there were purges, I fear that it is similar trivia. But others think otherwise.
Is there any significance to his signature? It is in English in the BBC Your Paintings picture. It is in Irish in the Irish Willow. I just noticed. Only curiosity.Lugnad (talk) 00:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Interesting artist - thanks for bringing him to my attention. I don't know about his signature but I would go ahead and add the 'lucky' sailors material to the Irish Willow article - maybe trim it a bit. I'll see if I can find a better source for King's DoB. 14GTR (talk) 06:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

thanks - I'll try to get https://www.siopagaeilge.ie/products/Beathaisn%E9is/product10-18.htm [1] Lugnad (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

A page you started (List of painters from Estonia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of painters from Estonia, 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor Djembayz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for compiling this list! By the way, it's always good to have citations, even on lists ... :)

To reply, leave a comment on Djembayz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Elizabeth Polunin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Elizabeth Polunin, 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.


The Signpost: 03 June 2015

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

  • Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
  • Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
  • Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
  • Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.
Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 4

Newsletter • May/June 2015

Hello friends! We have been hard at work these past two months. For this report:

The directory is live!

For the first time, we are happy to bring you an exhaustive, comprehensive WikiProject Directory. This directory endeavors to list every single WikiProject on the English Wikipedia, including those that don't participate in article assessment. In constructing the broadest possible definition, we have come up with a list of approximately 2,600 WikiProjects. The directory tracks activity statistics on the WikiProject's pages, and, for where it's available, statistics on the number of articles tracked by the WikiProject and the number of editors active on those articles. Complementing the directory are description pages for each project, listing usernames of people active on the WikiProject pages and the articles in the WikiProject's scope. This will help Wikipedians interested in a subject find each other, whether to seek feedback on an article or to revive an old project. (There is an opt-out option.) We have also come up with listings of related WikiProjects, listing the ten most relevant WikiProjects based on what articles they have in common. We would like to promote WikiProjects as interconnected systems, rather than isolated silos.

A tremendous amount of work went into preparing this directory. WikiProjects do not consistently categorize their pages, meaning we had to develop our own index to match WikiProjects with the articles in their scope. We also had to make some adjustments to how WikiProjects were categorized; indeed, I personally have racked up a few hundred edits re-categorizing WikiProjects. There remains more work to be done to make the WikiProject directory truly useful. In the meantime, take a look and feel free to leave feedback at the WikiProject X talk page.

Stuff in the works!

What have we been working on?

  • A new design template—This has been in the works for a while, of course. But our goal is to design something that is useful and cleanly presented on all browsers and at all screen resolutions while working within the confines of what MediaWiki has to offer. Additionally, we are working on designs for the sub-components featured on the main project page.
  • A new WikiProject talk page banner in Lua—Work has begun on implementing the WikiProject banner in Lua. The goal is to create a banner template that can be usable by any WikiProject in lieu of having its own template. Work has slowed down for now to focus on higher priority items, but we are interested in your thoughts on how we could go about creating a more useful project banner. We have a draft module on Test Wikipedia, with a demonstration.
  • New discussion reports—We have over 4.8 million articles on the English Wikipedia, and almost as many talk pages as well. But what happens when someone posts on a talk page? What if no one is watching that talk page? We are currently testing out a system for an automatically-updating new discussions list, like RFC for WikiProjects. We currently have five test pages up for the WikiProjects on cannabis, cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and Ghana.
  • SuggestBot for WikiProjects—We have asked the maintainer of SuggestBot to make some minor adjustments to SuggestBot that will allow it to post regular reports to those WikiProjects that ask for them. Stay tuned!
  • Semi-automated article assessment—Using the new revision scoring service and another system currently under development, WikiProjects will be getting a new tool to facilitate the article assessment process by providing article quality/importance predictions for articles yet to be assessed. Aside from helping WikiProjects get through their backlogs, the goal is to help WikiProjects with collecting metrics and triaging their work. Semi-automation of this process will help achieve consistent results and keep the process running smoothly, as automation does on other parts of Wikipedia.

Want us to work on any other tools? Interested in volunteering? Leave a note on our talk page.

The WikiProject watchers report is back!

The database report which lists WikiProjects according to the number of watchers (i.e., people that have the project on their watchlist), is back! The report stopped being updated a year ago, following the deactivation of the Toolserver, but a replacement report has been generated.


Until next time, Harej (talk) 22:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Freeth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
  • Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
  • Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
  • American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, 14GTR, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 21:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Books and Bytes - Issue 13

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
  • Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
  • Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
  • Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Patrick Hennessy(Painter)

If you believe these two issues are still open then let's see if we can resolve them.I believe they are resolved otherwise I would not have removed the tags.Please let me know what your concerns are.snowpatrol 21:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seascaper (talkcontribs)

Unless you are prepared to come forward with valid reasons for your action of re-instating the two tags I shall assume that you have withdrawn your objections and I shall remove the tags.Should anyone else have any objections to my removing these tags then please come forward now.snowpatrol 21:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seascaper (talkcontribs)

No, those tags are still valid. 14GTR (talk) 11:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC) It is not sufficient to just state that the tags are valid without giving a proper explanation in each case.Do not try to act as judge and jury in this matter.As I have already requested last month,let me know what your issues are so that they can be discussed rationally.snowpatrol 20:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seascaper (talkcontribs)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 20:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 5

Newsletter • October 2015

Hello there! Happy to be writing this newsletter once more. This month:

We did it!

In July, we launched five pilot WikiProjects: WikiProjects Cannabis, Evolutionary Biology, Ghana, Hampshire, and Women's Health. We also use the new design, named "WPX UI," on WikiProject Women in Technology, Women in Red, WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health. We are currently looking for projects for the next round of testing. If you are interested, please sign up on the Pilots page.

Shortly after our launch we presented at Wikimania 2015. Our slides are on Wikimedia Commons.

Then after all that work, we went through the process of figuring out whether we accomplished our goal. We reached out to participants on the redesigned WikiProjects, and we asked them to complete a survey. (If you filled out your survey—thank you!) While there are still some issues with the WikiProject tools and the new design, there appears to be general satisfaction (at least among those who responded). The results of the survey and more are documented in our grant report filed with the Wikimedia Foundation.

The work continues!

There is more work that needs to be done, so we have applied for a renewal of our grant. Comments on the proposal are welcome. We would like to improve what we have already started on the English Wikipedia and to also expand to Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Why those? Because they are multilingual projects and because there needs to be better coordination across Wikimedia projects. More details are available in the renewal proposal.

How can the Wikimedia Foundation support WikiProjects?

The Wikimedia Developer Summit will be held in San Francisco in January 2016. The recently established Community Tech team at the Wikimedia Foundation is interested in investigating what technical support they can provide for WikiProjects, i.e., support beyond just templates and bots. I have plenty of opinions myself, but I want to hear what you think. The session is being planned on Phabricator, the Wikimedia bug tracker. If you are not familiar with Phabricator, you can log in with your Wikipedia username and password through the "Login or Register: MediaWiki" button on the login page. Your feedback can help make editing Wikipedia a better experience.


Until next time,

Harej (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

A page you started (Ursula Wood (artist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ursula Wood (artist), 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor Megalibrarygirl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for writing this article! Very interesting!

To reply, leave a comment on Megalibrarygirl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

Patrick Hennessy(painter)

Having spoken to a number of Wikipedians a few weeks back regarding the structure of the lead section. One of the editors helped me by doing an example of a lead.All I have done is refine that lead.This I was assured I could do. I'm not quite sure what you're motives are for continually objecting to my edits regarding this article. Whilst I'm here,can you also explain to me how you managed to upload images of artists paintings onto a Wikipedia article? I was lead to believe that this was strictly copyright.snowpatrol 20:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seascaper (talkcontribs)

Seascaper, You need to read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and indeed the other guidelines in the sidebox on that page on how to edit. The changes you made today made the Hennessy article worse - you made the lead unacceptably short (again) and introduced unreferenced links into the text. No doubt if I had put the appropriate tags at the top of the article you would have objected to that as well. You have made a vast number of edits to that page but have yet to make the effort to learn how to do the simplest things properly. You even made a mess of leaving a message here tonight. If you want to learn to edit to a high standard you need to change your attitude to other editors and stop throwing accusations around, (I'm not quite sure what you're motives...). As for uploading pictures, I would forget that and learn the basics first. You might want to start by reinserting the edits I made today. 14GTR (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

14GTR When I spoke to editors ClemRutter and WereSpielChequers recently. They informed me that references were not required in the lead section. ClemRutter had a hack at the lead(his words)and all I have done is refined the lead.With regard to the length of the lead.As WereSpielChequers stated in his entry dated 10/11/15-17.18 add to it yourself if you feel it is too short. Finally aggressive responses like the one you have just sent are not acceptable on Wikipedia or anywhere else for that matter.I was just enquiring how you were able to upload images on a lot of the articles on artists you edited.Presumably I will have to ask elsewhere.(snowpatrol 21:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seascaper (talkcontribs)

Seascaper, No, you clearly were not just enquiring how you were able to upload images, you were also questioning my motives for editing WP. I guess it is easier for you to accuse me of aggression rather than take my advice and learn the guidelines for good quality editing and stop making so many mistakes. More specifically, I did extend the lead today and you cut it back. Would you prefer I add a 'lead too short' tag to the article instead ? 14GTR (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Kennington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parachute Regiment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Kensingtons at Laventie

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isabel Hardman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Okay I'll edit it again even though it wasn't as bad as you make it seem. Can you help me then because this is for a final project at my university and frankly I'm not failing this assignment that I've been working on for a while. It's need to be up by 2pm tomorrow and frankly it can be deleted on Saturday. I'm just making the post to complete the assignment but I'm also trying not to insult or mislead anyone so I'm coming to you hat in hand for some help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcampbell30 (talkcontribs) 17:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm happy to try and help although I'm far from clear what your objectives are. I'll format one of the references you have added and tighten up some of the text - anything that looks like a sweeping statement is problematic. Precise statements are always better.14GTR (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
  • Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Margaret Lindsay Williams
added a link pointing to The Telegraph
Peter Prendergast (artist)
added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 6

Newsletter • January 2016

Hello there! Happy to be writing this newsletter once more. This month:

What comes next

Some good news: the Wikimedia Foundation has renewed WikiProject X. This means we can continue focusing on making WikiProjects better.

During our first round of work, we created a prototype WikiProject based on two ideas: (1) WikiProjects should clearly present things for people to do, and (2) The content of WikiProjects should be automated as much as possible. We launched pilots, and for the most part it works. But this approach will not work for the long term. While it makes certain aspects of running a WikiProject easier, it makes the maintenance aspects harder.

We are working on a major overhaul that will address these issues. New features will include:

  • Creating WikiProjects by simply filling out a form, choosing which reports you want to generate for your project. This will work with existing bots in addition to the Reports Bot reports. (Of course, you can also have sections curated by humans.)
  • One-click button to join a WikiProject, with optional notifications.
  • Be able to define your WikiProject's scope within the WikiProject itself by listing relevant pages and categories, eliminating the need to tag every talk page with a banner. (You will still be allowed to do that, of course. It just won't be required.)

The end goal is a collaboration tool that can be used by WikiProjects but also by any edit-a-thon or group of people that want to coordinate on improving articles. Though implemented as an extension, the underlying content will be wikitext, meaning that you can continue to use categories, templates, and other features as you normally would.

This will take a lot of work, and we are just getting started. What would you like to see? I invite you to discuss on our talk page.


Until next time,

Harej (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

Books & Bytes - Issue 15

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
  • #1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
  • New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon

You are invited...

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Ipigott (talk) 08:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 7

Newsletter • February 2016

This month:

One database for Wikipedia requests

Development of the extension for setting up WikiProjects, as described in the last issue of this newsletter, is currently underway. No terribly exciting news on this front.

In the meantime, we are working on a prototype for a new service we hope to announce soon. The problem: there are requests scattered all across Wikipedia, including requests for new articles and requests for improvements to existing articles. We Wikipedians are very good at coming up with lists of things to do. But once we write these lists, where do they end up? How can we make them useful for all editors—even those who do not browse the missing articles lists, or the particular WikiProjects that have lists?

Introducing Wikipedia Requests, a new tool to centralize the various lists of requests around Wikipedia. Requests will be tagged by category and WikiProject, making it easier to find requests based on what your interests are. Accompanying this service will be a bot that will let you generate reports from this database on any wiki page, including WikiProjects. This means that once a request is filed centrally, it can syndicated all throughout Wikipedia, and once it is fulfilled, it will be marked as "complete" throughout Wikipedia. The idea for this service came about when I saw that it was easy to put together to-do lists based on database queries, but it was harder to do this for human-generated requests when those requests are scattered throughout the wiki, siloed throughout several pages. This should especially be useful for WikiProjects that have overlapping interests.

The newsletter this month is fairly brief; not a lot of news, just checking in to say that we are hard at work and hope to have more for you soon.

Until next time,

Harej (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

Jane Hawkins

Thank you for the additional information - I had no idea where in the UK she was even from. I didn't have the resources to find out more. ☕ Antiqueight haver 19:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your welcome - it's more by luck than anything else I found a reference for her.14GTR (talk) 20:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

Books & Bytes - Issue 16

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
  • Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
  • A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
  • Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 8

Newsletter • March / April 2016

This month:

Transclude article requests anywhere on Wikipedia

In the last issue of the WikiProject X Newsletter, I discussed the upcoming Wikipedia Requests system: a central database for outstanding work on Wikipedia. I am pleased to announce Wikipedia Requests is live! Its purpose is to supplement automatically generated lists, such as those from SuggestBot, Reports bot, or Wikidata. It is currently being demonstrated on WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health (which I work on as part of my NIOSH duties) and WikiProject Women scientists.

Adding a request is as simple as filling out a form. Just go to the Add form to add your request. Adding sources will help ensure that your request is fulfilled more quickly. And when a request is fulfilled, simply click "mark as complete" and it will be removed from all the lists it's on. All at the click of a button! (If anyone is concerned, all actions are logged.)

With this new service is a template to transclude these requests: {{Wikipedia Requests}}. It's simple to use: add the template to a page, specifying article=, category=, or wikiproject=, and the list will be transcluded. For example, for requests having to do with all living people, just do {{Wikipedia Requests|category=Living people}}. Use these lists on WikiProjects but also for edit-a-thons where you want a convenient list of things to do on hand. Give it a shot!

Help us build our list!

The value of Wikipedia Requests comes from being a centralized database. The long work to migrating individual lists into this combined list is slowly underway. As of writing, we have 883 open tasks logged in Wikipedia Requests. We need your help building this list.

If you know of a list of missing articles, or of outstanding tasks for existing articles, that you would like to migrate to this new system, head on over to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Requests#Transition project and help out. Doing this will help put your list in front of more eyes—more than just your own WikiProject.

An open database means new tools

WikiProject X maintains a database that associates article talk pages (and draft talk pages) with WikiProjects. This database powers many of the reports that Reports bot generates. However, until very recently, this database was not made available to others who might find its data useful. It's only common sense to open up the database and let others build tools with it.

And indeed: Citation Hunt, the game to add citations to Wikipedia, now lets you filter by WikiProject, using the data from our database.

Are you a tool developer interested in using this? Here are some details: the database resides on Tool Labs with the name s52475__wpx_p. The table that associates WikiProjects with articles and drafts is called projectindex. Pages are stored by talk page title but in the future this should change. Have fun!

On the horizon
  • The work on the CollaborationKit extension continues. The extension will initially focus on reducing template and Lua bloat on WikiProjects (especially our WPX UI demonstration projects), and will from there create custom interfaces for creating and maintaining WikiProjects.
  • The WikiCite meeting will be in Berlin in May. The goal of the meeting is to figure out how to build a bibliographic database for use on the Wikimedia projects. This fits in quite nicely with WikiProject X's work: we want to make it easier for people to find things to work on, and with a powerful, open bibliographic database, we can build recommendations for sources. This feature was requested by the Wikipedia Library back in September, and this meeting is a major next step. We look forward to seeing what comes out of this meeting.


Until next time,

Harej (talk) 01:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for expanding the Meredith Frampton article and helping to bring more people to his beautiful art. MagistraMundi (talk) 09:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks - much appreciated. I only wish I could find out more about him... 14GTR (talk) 11:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

I wish the same. Is there a forum where one could ask for living friends and relatives to give information? His work gets lots of interest on Twitter, so perhaps someone there could help, like Art in Society. (I'm not on Twitter myself.) MagistraMundi (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
I wouldn't use Twitter as a source. When time allows, I like to spend a day or so in a library gathering material for articles. The reading room at the Tate is particularly good. The next time I'm there, I'll do a search of their sources for Frampton and see what turns up.14GTR (talk) 14:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

Bruce McMillan (sport shooter)

Hi. Please read WP:NAMB. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helen Biggar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unity Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

  • New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
  • Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
  • New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 9

Newsletter • May / June 2016

Check out this month's issue of the WikiProject X newsletter, featuring the first screenshot of our new CollaborationKit software!

Harej (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

Books & Bytes - Issue 18

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

  • New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
  • Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
  • TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
  • OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey 14GTR! I hope you are doing well. I just stumble across Christopher R. W. Nevinson and made some minor edits, but it occurs to me that the article would pretty quickly pass WP:GAN. You should nominate it for sure! There are very few things, reviewers are likely to comment on, and from my perspective they would likely be very minor. Sadads (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sadads, thank you for your kind words - I really enjoyed working on that article, so I'm glad you liked it. I've yet to put anything forward to GAN, so Nevinson might be a good place to start. I'll let you know how it goes. 14GTR (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Sure thing! {{ping}} me if the review does something odd (every once in a while they will), but I would be very suprised if that article has very minor changes/requests from the reviewer! Sometimes it takes ~ 1 month or two until someone reviews, sometimes it will be quick. Keep up the good work. Sadads (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
OK - I've put the nomination in. So, lets wait & see. 14GTR (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

A page you started (Evan Charlton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Evan Charlton, 14GTR!

Wikipedia editor Damibaru just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good! However, to an ignorant reader, one might describe what an HM Inspector of Art is.

To reply, leave a comment on Damibaru's talk page. Learn more about page curation.

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

Académie Julian

Thank you for your recent edit to Académie Julian. There is a dispute concerning this page, please look at Talk:Académie Julian#Lists of notable professors and students and if possible help us to reach a consensus. Thanks. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)