Jump to content

User talk:122.187.144.98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 122.187.144.98, has made edits to Indian Human Spaceflight Programme that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Ratnahastin (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin i didn't understood you bro i know twitter is not reliable but here's a clause we use nasa and spacex tweets in ref. If someone wants to cite a recent spacex livestream they have to do by citing twitter only. Why because they are official reliable sources. Same way in india Times of india is a reliable newspaper. I cited the tweet of a reporter who manages space news section of this newspaper and has never posted rumours in Twitter and written a controversial or fake news on times of India. So he proves ultimately reliable. He never gives rumors. You must revert your revert. Tomorrow headlines and times of India will write the same article either himself or his fellow workmates. Here's his bio: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toireporter/author-Chethan-Kumar-479220652.cms (he is the Michael Sheetz, Eric berger, Jeff Foust of india) 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can i restart editing 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I dont want to fall in Wikipedia 2 revert rule 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know the importance of astronauts while making Alexander Grebenkin, Marina Vasilevskaya Expedition 70 and Soyuz MS-25. So don't treat me a vandalist. (A common misconception of my character from admins).@Ratnahastin 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ratnahastin thanpage is already filled with citations of articles written by him like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Human_Spaceflight_Programme#cite_note-71 @Ratnahastin I promise tomorrow he publishes the article I will replace the ref 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ratnahastin promise done substituted this https://m.timesofindia.com/india/iaf-video-gives-glimpses-of-gaganyaan-astronauts/articleshow/104137769.cms @Ratnahastin 122.187.144.98 (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Grebenkin has been accepted

[edit]
Alexander Grebenkin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne @Artem.G can you approve Draft:Expedition 70 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IP user- there is currently an existing redirect at Expedition 70- I'm just waiting for an Admin to delete the page then I can accept that article. Qcne (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok take your time 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok by the time i saw this reply redirect is deleted @Qcne 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne just another help while making this article I saw a dead link and I just did an attempt to make the deleted and drafted page again, I.e, Draft:Cygnus NG-20 please approve this too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 04:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also accepted! Qcne (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was asleep :) draft has now been approved. Qcne (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem @Qcne we all have to sleep once or even twice a day and our coordinates may also no match, hehe 122.187.144.98 (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, 122.187.144.98. Thank you for your work on Beliaghata metro station. User:Alalch E., while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Beliaghata metro station , may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to List of Kolkata Metro stations. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.

This article about a yet unbuilt metro station is not quite there yet in terms of sourcing proving notability under WP:GNG, as the sources don't discuss the station as the station (as a structure), but talk more generally about the line and its extension, so it's hard to see them as in-depth coverage; stations aren't inherently notable under WP:NTRAINSTATION; restore with more and better sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 08:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please revert back Barun Sengupta metro station, Ritwik Ghatak metro station, VIP Bazar metro station, Gour Kishore Ghosh metro station, Nicco Park metro station, Nabadiganta metro station in whole phase 2,3 metro stations in this line they exist but not Beleghata Metro station. Most of them are poorly sourced or non sourced. For phase 1 I will translate bengali wiki and write 122.187.144.98 (talk) 10:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alalch E. If all above 1 line pages are not reverted bring back my page 122.187.144.98 (talk) 10:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will do so during the day, and, in the future, you are very welcome to restore these articles from redirects with content expansions which will reference new sources that will undeniably appear. Sincerely —Alalch E. 11:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I have left a comment on the Kolkata Metro Line 6 talk page, which you may find interesting: Talk:Kolkata Metro Line 6#Existing station redirects and their inconsistent (and some probably incorrect) pipes —Alalch E. 12:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alalch E.: Bro i didn't said to remove phase 1 stations. I said i will write uding bengali wiki. Revert them and send to draftspace. I will ask for approval at draft and learn the things i need to expand other stations and beleghata stations 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned the stations to remove 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are the names 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://mtp.indianrailways.gov.in/view_detail.jsp?lang=0&id=0,4,268&dcd=2878&did=1676279370260AC4541B231E4C9483AF997FE69C59DFB
https://mtp.indianrailways.gov.in/view_detail.jsp?lang=0&id=0,4,268&dcd=2944&did=1678687952246C74A39BF3B3E81D6ECE3E63D1CAA21EE
https://mtp.indianrailways.gov.in/view_detail.jsp?lang=0&id=0,4,268&dcd=2928&did=16780040808116CE47284EBEA5D0164E2D93341A549E5
Link fir the three respectively @Alalch E. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Give me some time please, I will explain everything to you. In the meantime read Help:Page history to understand how the articles were not actually removed, they were redirected; see Wikipedia:Redirect. Your willingness to improve these articles is appreciated. It is just about the right timing. In their current form, they are not useful to our readers. But they could be in the future. —Alalch E. 16:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understood you anyway since i have to create a draft i am moving forward with that in this week@Alalch E. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just remembered i can go back in history and get the starting material that is previous page for my draft that i wwnted you to revert 122.187.144.98 (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's right! —Alalch E. 21:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I linked the articles then you didnt said anything @Alalch E. Mate 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just went by reading talk and found you said its unbuilt but its nearing completion FYI https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipN6BV24Cqehe-f7EP8N6wy5jqVAZGllGFZLBMS3=s2668-w2668-h1264-rw 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alalch E. Mate as per the promise, i have made Draft:Jyotirindra Nandi metro station Draft:Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station (phase 1 stations, negligible articles on later stations so will think in 2024) please approve them. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Unfortunately, you copied copyrighted content. Please, instead of copying, try to summarize yourself it using your own words. I will post a generic but informative template notice about copyright violations:
Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Jyotirindra Nandi metro station has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Alalch E. 16:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't looked at the other two drafts yet in detail, but they seem to have the same problem. —Alalch E. 16:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just for my information, How can we say its copyright violation when the thing belongs to indian government. https://mtp.indianrailways.gov.in/ 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As is stated at the bottom of the page, "© 2016 All Rights Reserved." Material on that site is not free to reuse. —C.Fred (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It follows {{GODL-India}} as per what I know {{GODL-India}}122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a copyright concern, it would be for the text used in the article, not the underlying data. That would create the grey area of whether the text is "documentation" for purposes of GODL. —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They just mention it and We follow it as a law for every image, text, etc worldwide 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any issues of copyright is managed by Ministry of Railways (India) not Metro Railways, Kolkata. Our Indian copyright law are a bit confusing @Alalch E.@C.Fred 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not entirely convinced that the provions of GODL make it safe for Wikipedia to copy text in this way. If it was, {{Template:GODL-India-text}} would need to be used on the page; it's only used in one article currently. I suspect that editors are hesitant to rely on this license. Commons volunteers have doubts: c:Special:Permalink/800693269#Is an screenshot under GODL-India?. Please, give me a few days to research this a bit more, but in the meantime you are very welcome to work on these drafts in a way that does not consist of verbatim copying. Just take the most important statements from the sources and express them using your own words, in an encyclopedic manner. I think that the stations are probably notable and the goal here is to have these articles, not the opposite. —Alalch E. 21:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aah if i chose to make articles without the links its a bit cumbersome way as no other cites mention such intricate details in their own way 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have to take inspiration and build a page like Taratala metro station, it is descriptive without the main cite refs @Alalch E. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The biggest thing is my words must be proved and not become the prohibited element that is original research @Alalch E. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On deep search you must get thid https://bangla.aajtak.in/kolkata/story/kavi-sukanta-metro-station-of-orange-line-a-homage-to-young-poet-sukanta-bhattacharya-rjk-525795-2023-03-12 kind of cites where original metro railway article is copied 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Expressiblility in own words is hard for me but will try after getting a non copyright source 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean non copyright violation source 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alalch E. Mate I need just one help is translating bengali Wikipedia enough to have an article made for hmms, jnms, ksms (I mean are the article's upto the mark for us?) Translation is easy if article is fit for us 122.187.144.98 (talk) 03:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alalch E. I worked today on Draft:Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station via help of Taratala metro station and bengali version of the draft page. Comment if something is off track before approval request @C.Fred you can assist 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody here, aaah @Alalch E.? 122.187.144.98 (talk) 01:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm very busy today, I will try to reply soon. Other editors can help you. Please ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE —Alalch E. 10:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Volten001. I noticed that you recently removed content from International Space Station without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You need to support your edits by citing reliable sources Volten001 ☎ 15:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I left edit summary and cited ref there @Volten001 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's not how you are supposed to do it. I also noticed that it's not the first time your edits have been reverted especially on International Space Station. Additionally, most of your edits include removing content without sufficient reason or reliable sources to support it. Kindly refrain from doing that for now and try other ways of improving articles. Thank you Volten001 ☎ 15:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have just noticed that you've reverted my edits which means if I revert yours again it will eventually result to edit warring and I know better what that means (Please read this to understand better - WP:EDITWAR). Kindly read what and try to understand what I wrote up there. Thanks and happy editing Volten001 ☎ 15:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
you have to know the structure of International Space Station first 122.187.144.98 (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
iss missions until launched are kept as waiting list in scheduled missions. Then after launch we move them to currently docked/berthed. After mission undock, we simply delete or remove them out of iss page. Missions come and go as time flies away. This has been happing since years. I have started providing refs for removal but still edit warring occurs. All this confusion started once pending changes protection was added. Most admins lacks this knowledge of the page and disapprove my edit. I have said this repeatedly to them but problem persists @Volten001 122.187.144.98 (talk) 16:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Volten001 I have long discussions on iss talk page for this. Iss is a candidate of Recentism and things change continuously 122.187.144.98 (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We must add Template:Current spaceflight at top. Should i revert back. I have learnt zbouf the struture after deep analysis of page history, i am not a vagabond vandalism of iss page, but treater me as iss page updater. @Volten001 122.187.144.98 (talk) 16:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you that instead of either approving or reverting you came to discuss. I have created pages on wiki, so have some faith in me. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from TechnoSquirrel69

[edit]
Hello, 122.187.144.98. You have new messages at Talk:International Space Station.
Message added 16:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Expedition 70 has been accepted

[edit]
Expedition 70, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 08:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cygnus NG-20 has been accepted

[edit]
Cygnus NG-20, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 08:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne another page Draft:Soyuz MS-25 made please approve 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Marina Vasilevskaya 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, 122.187.144.98. Thank you for your work on Expedition 70. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks@SunDawn 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright confusion (#I_have_sent_you_a_note_about_a_page_you_started part 2

[edit]

@C.Fred @Alalch E. We use isro materials, text, pics etc when it's "© Copyright 2023 ISRO. All Rights Reserved" 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give examples of where this happens? —C.Fred (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrayaan-2#cite_ref-52 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred they follow same privacy laws https://www.isro.gov.in/Website_Policy.html 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{Template:GODL-India}} is enough all isro images follow this. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I compared the source to our article, and there is no copying text or close paraphrasing, so there is no issue with copyright. —C.Fred (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Check this article once Chandrayaan-3 please it's has 3 links. And BTW ask any of your other indian friend and explain me the copyright laws of our country more properly @C.Fred bro 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not reading through the entire article. If you think there's a particular passage that's copied, let me know, but I'm not going hunting. —C.Fred (talk) 19:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok chillax @C.Fred bro. I have filed an RTI till then reverting my request to approve article 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Till its answered, should i keep the text in my draft. I am not publishing the draft now so Wikipedia isnf hurted now. Draft is like ny talk page. Not affects wiki till approve 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It will be good 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jyotirindra Nandi metro station has been accepted

[edit]
Jyotirindra Nandi metro station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do a favour @Sohom Datta that approve Draft:Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station and Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave those for other reviewers :) Sohom (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please contact and tell them to review@Sohom Datta bro 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station has been accepted

[edit]
Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Alalch E. 21:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have made various edits to the draft before accepting it, please take a look at the page history and review them. Thanks again for the article.—Alalch E. 21:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks mate please approve Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alalch E. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Soyuz MS-25 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Soyuz MS-25. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ozzie10aaaa that's from spacenews.com and it's there on wiki since ms 21, 22, 23, 24. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ozzie10aaaa substituted copyvio things from this draft and earlier pages, now saying International Space Station is not a copvio 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@StartOkayStop issue resolved. Not that wiki tool shows more copyviombut actually those sites have copied and pasted free nasa one http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-astronaut-tracy-c-dyson-receives-third-space-station-assignment from which I made my article @Ozzie10aaaa 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of this and have added a banner to the bottom of the page to help clear up any confusion. Since NASA is a public domain source you are allowed to copy text from it. I already plan on accepting the draft, I am just waiting for an administrator to delete the page at Soyuz MS-25. Let me know if you have any questions. StartOkayStop (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nasa is free to be exploited by us 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soyuz MS-25 has been accepted

[edit]
Soyuz MS-25, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

StartOkayStop (talk) 22:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@StartOkayStop thanks for your contribution just approve Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 09:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@StartOkayStop one more draft Draft:Marina Vasilevskaya 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do not review drafts in order and I do not review them based on requests. I might look at them later but I cannot promise that I will review them. Please be patient, they will be reviewed eventually. StartOkayStop (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, 122.187.144.98. Thank you for your work on Soyuz MS-25. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: please approve Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marina Vasilevskaya has been accepted

[edit]
Marina Vasilevskaya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@InterstellarGamer12321 I would appreciate if you approve Draft:Kavi Sukanta metro station too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for approving this btw 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@InterstellarGamer12321 can you approve Draft:SpaceX CRS-29 or ask someone for that ask the missing elements I will add 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@122.187.144.98: there is currently a redirect at this title in mainspace, so it cannot be immediately accepted. It may be WP:TOOSOON to send this article into mainspace, so I would recommend waiting for the missing information (e.g. the CubeSats) to be released before it is accepted. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Simply it removed as it is revealed before launch day 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@InterstellarGamer12321 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX CRS-30

[edit]

SpaceX CRS-30 will be launched on 4 March 2024! Now get cracking! 142.162.35.37 (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So late first we must focus on Crs 29@142.162.35.37 make it first on wiki 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK! 142.162.35.37 (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Helping hand

[edit]

@Mackensen Hemanta Mukherjee metro station is renamed to Hemanta Mukhopadhyay metro station and Jyotirindra Nath Nandi is renamed to Jyotirindra Nandi metro station metro station so please link the Wikipedia articles to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30632588 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q65090385 respectively where lua map error exists (don't want to pollute other's talk pages) 122.187.144.98 (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mackensen (talk) 12:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kavi Sukanta metro station has been accepted

[edit]
Kavi Sukanta metro station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 08:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 08:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a schedule

[edit]

You can follow the schedule here [1]. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234 I am not concerned about myself but for users, most don't know,the cite 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I,follow the cite 122.187.144.98 (talk) 02:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm FULBERT. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nauka (ISS module), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FULBERT (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT bro let me edit I forgot a word in my mind and stopped at "its----" I searched back and was going to add I have citations in hand and I am adding let me add bro. I do broken edits bro. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@122.187.144.98 Thanks for letting me know what happened, and good next steps with your continued editing. FULBERT (talk) 00:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to 2023–24 Mohun Bagan SG season. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not see main acl page if youmwant citation i will add 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Cricket at the Summer Olympics. Nagol0929 (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagol0929 I didn't do content removal but content updating I give refs for the edits i do. I explain my edit summary everything I make a edit that could be controversial Cricket at the Olympics read this discussion 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nagol0929 please give me permission @Wjemather will also support this edit 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nagol0929 I know the importance of pages seen while making like Alexander Grebenkin, Marina Vasilevskaya Expedition 70 and Soyuz MS-25. So don't treat me a vandalist. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@122.187.144.98 alright just make the edit again and i personally wont revert it but make sure you use edit summaries Nagol0929 (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nagol0929 just got the confirmation that voting is left not to end until 16th so dropped today's plan 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
alright sorry if i made a mistake Nagol0929 (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 17:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okkkk i will look into using it 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket at the Olympics

[edit]

At this stage, and despite the misleading headline, per cricinfo "Cricket (is) one of five sports recommended for "potential inclusion" with a final decision to be taken by the IOC later this week". Please wait until that final decision has been made before updating any relevant articles. Thanks. wjematherplease leave a message... 17:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks @Wjemather 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Wjemather pages are outdated for the info of a sport active or discontinued at Olympics since 2012-16 please update them 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceX CRS-29 (October 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
SpaceX CRS-29 was a commercial resupply service mission? And its launch date is 6 November 2023? Doesn't seem right to me. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannes Maximilian sorry that was a silly mistake done by me while editing. I borrowed text from SpaceX CRS-27 and forgot to change was to will be or is. I just changed it as per needed. Anything more bro. If not is it ready now for mainspace. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned borrowing in this edit message https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:SpaceX_CRS-29&oldid=1175161715 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SpaceX CRS-29 has been accepted

[edit]
SpaceX CRS-29, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Maximilian please approve Draft:Tang Shengjie too. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Maximilian Draft:Jiang Xinlin also. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 19:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tang Shengjie (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Maximilian tell the type of citations needed I will add in both articles 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Maximilian I have taken all types of citations that I used to write my articles. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CGTN, and Twitter (X) are unreliable sources, please don't cite them. You need to find good sources that discuss the subjects. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Maximilian i have changed as per what you needed please approve now 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Boyh pages are ready btw now as far as i see after flaws removed 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jiang Xinlin (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne can you approve Draft:Jiang Xinlin and Draft:Tang Shengjie 122.187.144.98 (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jiang Xinlin has been accepted

[edit]
Jiang Xinlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tang Shengjie has been accepted

[edit]
Tang Shengjie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne, nice to meet you again mate!! Please approve Draft:USA-349 on getting your free time. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Qcne, please approve Draft:SpaceX CRS-30 once you are free. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 03:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just waiting for an Admin to speedily delete the Mainspace redirect, may take a few hours. Once done either I or someone will move it to Mainspace. (ping me if the redirect is gone and its ready to be moved) Qcne (talk) 09:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you mate —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 10:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mars Sample Recovery Helicopter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagol0929 it is a constructive edit 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry it was a mistake Nagol0929 (talk) 12:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: USA-349 has been accepted

[edit]
USA-349, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 03:39, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht @Diannaa I created a Draft:Progress MS-25 and waited for citations to finish page construction and drafting in the meantime I forgot this draft and saw @Lazaro Fernandes did the work and made the mainspace article directly that is Progress MS-25. So since my draft is of no use now since the mainspace article is ready can anyone of you two delete it? 122.187.144.98 (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Easiest way is for you to put {{Db-g7}} at the beginning. You are the only significant author and that is the "I *really* don't want it anymore" template. :)Naraht (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht please approve Draft:Shooting Star (spacecraft) 122.187.144.98 (talk) 03:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to International Space Station have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 04:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See mynpage contributions i do updation there and this was one kind of updation. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 05:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cygnus NG-18 into Draft:Cygnus NG-21. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:08, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk this someone copied it during Cygnus NG-19 and it was copied by me during making my Cygnus NG-20 and then i made this draft using this Cygnus NG-20 page so indirectly done. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 06:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cygnus_NG-20&oldid=1175152154 is the edit during Cygnus NG-20 @Red-tailed hawk 122.187.144.98 (talk) 07:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shooting Star (spacecraft) (December 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No relevant improvement. Most of this is based on what those affiliated say which is not independent. Also, a lot is speculation and I note it still says the launch will occur in 2023 which seems unlikely at this point. If this is resubmitted again without substantial relevant improvements, the draft may be rejected meaning it will no longer be considered.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 122.187.144.98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spacecraft Launches

[edit]
@S0091 or @Naraht please approve Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024, Draft:2024 in spaceflight (July–December) Draft:2024 in spaceflight (January–June) Draft:List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024 all are interconnected after discussion at Talk:2024 in spaceflight#Splitting the page. And please I left a invisible comment on 2024 in spaceflight before orbital launches section. Please un-invisible that and remove the whole orbital launches and suborbital launches that I have copied in above drafts. Hope if possible for you. 2024 will just start. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 04:09, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please make a dummy edit for both of the two drafts (add a line somewhere) including the information in the edit summary with the URL (or at least the oldid) of the version of 2024 in spaceflight that you copied the information from. The easiest way to see that is to bring up the version from the history and look at the URL. This is to maintain the history. Let me know if you need help on this. (for example, if it was copied from the most recent version of 2024 in spaceflight, then you'd add oldid=1191696114 to a small edit to both of the new drafts.Naraht (talk) 04:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh i know by drafts rejection theirs a template called AFC comment {{AFC comment|1=............}}that admins posts their reviews can i use it and add at top of redirects, split pages (this was only done). Can normal draft creators can use it and post the page attribution and all other things needed??? @Naraht 122.187.144.98 (talk) 04:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to put this through AFCH, it isn't needed. (I'm simply going to do a move)/ And all of those reviews and comments get stripped off the article when it moves to mainspace. Easiest is just to add the dummy edit. You can then edit it again and remove that. It just needs to include what version it was copied from (best guess)Naraht (talk) 04:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks i am doing that got a basic notice template. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 07:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Naraht thanks for the cooperation in advance 122.187.144.98 (talk) 07:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 in spaceflight (January–June) (December 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 in spaceflight (July–December) (December 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok but approve the other two so that i can request or by just asking any fellow editor to make the redirects casually.@DoubleGrazing 122.187.144.98 (talk) 08:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing please approve them the redirect wizard is automatically declining as main article is still drafted. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 12:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about, approve what? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024 and Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024, the above two redirects are of these pages. I cannot claim for redirects of these pages until they are approved. @DoubleGrazing 122.187.144.98 (talk) 14:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those drafts will be reviewed once someone picks them up. Be patient, the waiting time these days is only a couple of weeks, as we spent all last month clearing up the backlog.
And no, there's obviously no point in creating redirects for articles that don't exist. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Matter closed. Thanks for your cooperation 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024 has been accepted

[edit]
List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024 has been accepted

[edit]
List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 16:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 122.187.144.98 (talk) 18:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht please approve Draft:Falcon 9 B1058 when you are free. It is a veteran booster some ample resources and citations provided RIP B1058 (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
RIP B1058 At this point, your account has 275 edits. You should be able to remove the AFC templates and then move it yourself to mainspace. Let me know if you have any issues. You can still start articles in Draftspace if you are more comfortable, but you are an established user. (The training wheels for the bike can be removed :) )Naraht (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Means how to move to mainspace? Blank draft and paste on page directly?? Or like an admin approves? This page was made as IP editor so was in draft. @Naraht RIP B1058 (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
RIP B1058No, you *don't* blank and paste, that loses the history. I'm backing up on some of my earlier comments. Since it was created by AFC, it should be finished by a reviewer, and so I'll do it.
Being a reviewer takes 500 edits (and a few other things). See (Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation) to use the AFC helper tool which explains it.
Also, I tried to approve it using the AFC Helper tool, but there was already a redirect with that name with some edits on it (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falcon_9_B1058&action=history) . N2e did some categorization and information on the Redirect. So I marked it with a {{db-g6}} which will indicated that an administrator should delete the redirect (someone *could* object to that, but *highly* unlikely on a subject such as this).
I've put the redirect on my watchlist, so that I'll see when an admit deletes it (or someone objects) and presuming the deletion, I'll review it with the move.Naraht (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice i will remember this in future RIP B1058 (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extra rows to sticky tables

[edit]

I thank you for all the work you've done adding the sticky tables to so many pages. However I think you need to correct a great many of them. There's two issues.

The first is that many of the tables you've made sticky don't actually need it. The purpose of sticky table headers is for _long_ tables, not _all_ tables. Notably, at least on Firefox, it deletes the lines between the table headers making it harder to read. Could you please remove sticky tables from any tables that are not long?

The second issue is the following. The way you've been adding them to tables is incorrect. You've been adding new rows to every single table you add it to.

For example the first row of the table may look like along with some or none extra entries in this line:

|-

However rather than changing that line to:

|- class="is-sticky"

you've been instead changing it to

|-

|- class="is-sticky"

on two separate lines, creating an extra row. This throws off some macros like row counters and things that act on the first row of the table and similar things. Can you please go and fix all the pages you've changed to not include an extra row? Ergzay (talk) 07:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Ergzay a day is needed, but i will. for me it took 2 days to add them, so a cumbersome process. My idea might be wrong i add to many tables thinking if the table goes out of my screen it is long else small. I never knew the 2nd point so the problem. 122.187.144.98 (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ergzay does this apply to
|-
Where it has already something like style background on it RIP B1058 (talk) 06:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 If it already has something then you just add to it, for example if it already has a class, just add it to the list of classes, if it has no classes then add the class field. If you have a specific example you want to ask about then link it here. Ergzay (talk) 06:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ergzay Say as in List of Tiangong space station spacewalks
It is
|- bgcolor="#ccccff"
|- class="is-sticky" RIP B1058 (talk) 06:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hushah!!, sat today completed today, what you asked here. RIP B1058 (talk) 09:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 I took a look at that page and the change looks correct. Ergzay (talk) 11:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. RIP B1058 (talk) 11:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 @122.187.144.98 On the Starlink page that you just changed you should look at Help:Table/Advanced#Tables_with_sticky_headers instead. The "sticky header" template works significantly better, but it only works for sortable tables, but that's what's used on the Starlink page. You should use the stick header template instead wherever you can as it works in many more situations and is less buggy. Ergzay (talk) 15:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I will mind it for the future. (My main aim was that if you are in middle of a table while viewing by a cell/mobile phone, you can relate the cells with header) RIP B1058 (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Tagging @122.187.144.98 is of no use now, btw) RIP B1058 (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 You appear to have broken some pages like List of Satish Dhawan Space Centre launches. You put the class entry before the first line of the table instead of before header of the table. If you check and scroll you'll see that it's incorrect. I'm not sure where else you may have made this same mistake. Ergzay (talk) 07:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected RIP B1058 (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Finding other locations tomorrow RIP B1058 (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RIP B1058 Additionally in other tables like Comparison of solid-fuelled orbital launch systems the second table on this page doesn't work correctly as some of the header entries disappear. Ergzay (talk) 07:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you can't get it to work correctly on a table, you should remove it from the table. Ergzay (talk) 07:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please go fix this on any table that has this incorrect, additionally, some of these tables are sortable, so you should be using the {{sticky header}} template instead. Ergzay (talk) 07:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok planned after new year onba free day like 28 dec. Needs time to be invested RIP B1058 (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cygnus NG-21

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cygnus NG-21 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Cygnus_NG-18. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

(I, RIP B1058 the editor who edited formely via this ip address)
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I have discussed this during my IP editor era at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:122.187.144.98#Copying_within_Wikipedia . I hace linked this ip address in my user home page. The claim of being from https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Cygnus_NG-18 is false as this article originated from who made Cygnus NG-18 during https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cygnus_NG-18&oldid=1016883973 in english Wikipedia and then someone copied it during Cygnus NG-19 and it was copied by me during making my Cygnus NG-20 and its draft and then i made this draft using this Cygnus NG-20 page so indirectly done. I had cedited the copying within wikipedia in this edithttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cygnus_NG-20&oldid=1175152154 on Cygnus NG-20. Evdn if the article really originated from handwiki (no chance afaik as its a sister website of English Wikipedia, Wikipediais main website) as @Beatgr RIP B1058 (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See the handwiki version says {{Sourceattribution|Cygnus NG-18}} at the end of that page that tells us that the original source is Cygnus_NG-18 that has public domain label so it means that this is a tottally false, erroneous speedy deletion claim and the article from a templatessource code that is written and accepted during Cygnus NG-18, Cygnus NG-19, Cygnus NG-20 must not be resisted for thus draft. RIP B1058 (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2607:F7A0:10:8:AE1F:6BFF:FE99:BDD0 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

2607:F7A0:10:8:AE1F:6BFF:FE99:BDD0 (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:122.187.144.98&oldid=1210586309"