User:Spongie555/Archive 1
Welcome!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Spongie555! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 talk 05:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Our Lady of Covadonga, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://traditioninaction.org/SOD/j225sd_OLCovadonga_9-07.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Our Lady of Covadonga
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Our Lady of Covadonga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Søren Hald Møller. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
re: your message
[edit]Hi Spongie555, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 00:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Pictures
[edit]Im still getting new to Wikipedia and i want to know how to add pictures. Like in this article Cheryl Cox my infobox looks wierd without the picture. If you can leave a replay on my talk page that would help on how to do it.
Spongie555 Spongie555 (talk) 04:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Spongie555,thank you for your message
- You should be able to find out more about adding pictures in Wikipedia:Images
- Basically the code to add a picture looks like this:
- [[File:Example.png|thumb|left|alt=Example alt text |Example caption]]
- where File:Example.png is the name of the image
- this will give you the following result:
- In the case of adding an image to an infobox, as in your example Cheryl Cox
- The blank infobox will look like
{{Infobox Officeholder
|honorific-prefix =
|name =
|honorific-suffix =
|image =
|imagesize =
|order=39th Mayor of Chula Vista
|term_start=2006
|term_end=
|predecessor=Steve Padilla
|successor=Incumbent
- You simply fill in the info in the image = section (you may have to add this, if it doesn't already exist) i.e:
{{Infobox Officeholder
|honorific-prefix =
|name =
|honorific-suffix =
|image = Example.png
|imagesize =
|order=39th Mayor of Chula Vista
|term_start=2006
|term_end=
|predecessor=Steve Padilla
|successor=Incumbent
- Try it and see, but don't forget to press the ‘Preview’ button until you are happy with the result, then ‘Save page’.
- I hope this helps.
- Please let me know if you need any more assistance.
- Kind Regards -- Marek.69 talk 04:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cox c.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cox c.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Org-shm1.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Org-shm1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.
If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 72.94.170.27 (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cox c.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Cox c.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:3rd_Avenue_Sign.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:3rd_Avenue_Sign.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 04:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
re: your message
[edit]Hi again Spongie555, I've left you another reply on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 21:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Org-shm1.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Org-shm1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξxplicit 00:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!
[edit]
Hello, Spongie555/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, and come to the Project talk page, where you can join in our discussions about Catholic-related articles. It is also a good place to come if you have any questions. Feel free to discuss anything on the project, but please remember to sign all your comments, and help us to make all of the many Catholicism-related articles much better. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Xandar 19:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
[edit]The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Getimage.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Getimage.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 04:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
re: your message
[edit]Hi Spongie555, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 23:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Someone listed you as a DYK nominator
[edit]Hi, your nomination of Chula Vista, California for DYK has been denied because it is neither a new article, nor has it been expanded fivefold or more in the last five days. Please see Wikipedia:Did you know for more details about DYK nominations. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Upon further investigation, I discovered that, even though you were listed as the nominator, you did not actually make that nomination yourself. It was done by an IP. So please just ignore the above. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 00:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of St. Pius X Church (Chula Vista), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.saintpiusx.org/OurParish/parishHistory.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of St. Pius X Church (Chula Vista)
[edit]A tag has been placed on St. Pius X Church (Chula Vista) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Getimage.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Getimage.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FinalRapture - † ☪ 20:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:SanPasqual.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:SanPasqual.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 22:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
FAC withdrawn
[edit]I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Communism article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. This article has citation tags and is not ready for FAC-- please consider peer review. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]Hello Spongie. It's come to several editors' attention that you appear to be uploading copyright violations—specifically, uploading images under claim of free use. Images like File:2108206-Third Avenue Sign-Chula Vista.jpg and File:Blog downtown chula vista.jpg do not belong to you; to confirm that the copyright holder allows free use, we need things like verified correspondence or similar. Your justifications for why images "have no copyright" (e.g., "Has no copyright as it is a painting and the author is deseased.") are based in misunderstandings of copyright law. Please read Wikipedia:Public domain, WP:NFC and consult guides such as this or other editors if you aren't sure about where protections apply, however continuing to upload violations will lead to a block. If you have any questions you can ask editors experienced in images, such as User:Jappalang or User:Elcobbola. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 16:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Blog downtown chula vista.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Blog downtown chula vista.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
This image is purely decorative at the moment; hence, it could be deleted from the project. Wikipedia desires to be a resource for anyone to use; i.e. anybody can use what is on Wikipedia for any purpose: to sell, to modify, to give, to teach, etc. Parts of the community recognizes that for some things, it might be impossible to get free material. That is why the project set down the 10-criteria WP:NFCC for fair use of copyrighted material; as a compromise, the criteria are stricter than what the US government would consider in determining fair use. Please read WP:NFCC. At the moment, this image could not pass NFCC#8 (contextual significance). The seal does not help readers visualize anything significant about the city that cannot be said with words, and there is nothing in the article that actually discusses the history or design of the seal. Furthermore, you must give a detailed source: "The logo may be obtained from Chula Vista, California." does not really tell people where this image was obtained from. It would help you to follow David Fuch's advice above in learning the policies and guidelines that govern image copyrights for this project. Jappalang (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:2108206-Third Avenue Sign-Chula Vista.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:2108206-Third Avenue Sign-Chula Vista.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jappalang (talk) 22:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Stephen Colbert
[edit]I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Stephen Colbert article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Sorry for my late reply, but thanks for the barnstar you've given me. --TIAYN (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
[edit]Hey Spongie —Preceding unsigned comment added by RenderedGEAR (talk • contribs) 22:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
yes Spongie555 (talk) 22:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Thank you for the barnstar
-RenderedGEAR (talk) 10:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 04:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I've removed it from all but 2 pages, please note to use non-free media there needs to be STRONG justification for it's use, and that justification needs placed on the image page, note how I put rationale for the two uses on the image page. — raeky (talk | edits) 04:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Once again, please stop submitting featured content candidacies (as you just did for List of heads of state of Spain) if you are not the primary contributor; please familiarize yourself with WP:FLC instructions, which you did not follow, and the featured list criteria, which the list clearly did not meet. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for John McCain
[edit]Please note the criteria is the article must be 5 days old or newer, which this isn't, or expanded 5 fold, which it hasn't. CTJF83 chat 00:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Battle of San Pasqual
[edit]Hello Spongie555, regarding your assessment of Battle of San Pasqual, can I ask why you've assessed it as a B class article? Its not really a big deal, but for the Military History project the general rule is that an article requires at least one (if not more) inline citations per paragraph to be considered a B class article. Currently the article does not meet this criteria so for the Military History project it should only be rated as a Start class article in my opinion (the project doesn't use C class, so if an article doesn't qualify for B class for Milhist, then it is either a start or a stub). The criteria can be found at WP:MHA, you can also list articles there for independent assessment or take part in the assessment of other people's articles against the criteria. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Comment Sorry I didn't know about the citation for each paragraph. Spongie555 (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- No worries, its all part of the learning process. Its good to see someone taking an interest in assessments. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or one of the other Military History project co-ordinators (or any other project member for that matter). Have a good day. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- The Battle of San Pasqual now has one citations in every paragraph is it B class ready? Spongie555 (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
re: your message
[edit]Hi Spongie555, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 20:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
July 2010
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Noob Tube, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Whisky drinker | HJ's sock 01:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- It wasnt vandalism becuse the sentence i undo had information on the equipment used for noob tubing. The sentence said the name of the attachment put on a gun for noob tubing. The words in the parenthesis wasnt me that wrote that it was an IP. Spongie555 (talk) 04:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
WP:Bhutan
[edit]Welcome onboard! Well myself and Nvvchar are really the only ones working on Bhutan and another editor also did a bit of work on the rivers anda nother stubbed the remaining monasteries but no the project itself is not active. We've developed a number of articles to GA such as Takshang and Punakha Dzong but right now I'm busy with other projects. I did start Template:Gewogs of Bhutan (basically municipalities) which needs formatting and then the articles started. You could help with that/and or expand articles on towns in particular. Dr. Blofeld White cat 09:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you can renom the Thimphhu article if you wish. It will still need a little work but has a chance of passing GA with some copyediting/fixes. Dr. Blofeld White cat 09:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks mate! Dr. Blofeld - 15:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 09:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Koji Gyotoku
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Koji Gyotoku at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 07:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
How does X work?
[edit]{{helpme}} I dont know how to add name for refernces like in Koji Gyotoku. How do you make it so you can add a name so its not in big red letters on the bottom. Spongie555 (talk) 05:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, I have now fixed it for you. It looks like just typing error, so don't worry about it. If you have any more questions, feel free to email me or ask on my talk page. Cheers, sonia♫♪ 07:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Koji Gyotoku
[edit] | On August 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Koji Gyotoku, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Congrat. Well done.-- N.V.V. Char Talk . 06:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar award on Bhutan. It is particularly sweet since I have worked in that country in the 1960s and 70s as a young engineer, developing Hydropower Projects. In fact, the first GA artilces of Bhutan were done by Dr Blofeld and me and we also contributed to GA upgrade of Druk Air. By the way, will you be able to get some pictures of the Dechencholing Palace? I tried on flickr but the author refused to release the picture under free licence. If you could also get some refernces on the palace it would be helpful. I have seen your artile on the Football coach of Bhutan. Very nice work.-- N.V.V. Char Talk . 06:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- I can probably find a picture of the palace more then refernce. Even though ive never seen the palace i know someone from Bhutan on who can send me a picture. Spongie555 (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- You can see the draft article in my User:Nvvchar/sandbox/Saptha Badri page. I have used the img provided by you in the Infobox. The text needs to be substantially expanded to qualify for DYK nomination. You can add the other imgs of the palace in the gallery section. -- N.V.V. Char Talk . 09:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello from Russian WikiProject Bhutan! Unfortunately, I can not help to choose Featured picture in the Russian Wikipedia, because in the Russian Wikipedia does not choose Featured pictures. Featured pictures for the Russian Wikipedia are selected on the Commons:Featured picture candidates. I support you on Commons. --Impro (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- oh ok. Well let's see if the picture can make it on commons. Hey maybe Russian WikiProject Bhutan and the English Bhutan WikiProject try working with each other. Spongie555 (talk) 07:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's good idea. Russian WikiProject Bhutan was created in June 2010. (At this time the English wiki-project has been inactive.) In June and July 2010 in the Russian wiki was created 359 articles about Bhutan. Some articles were translated from the English Wikipedia, a part of them has been supplemented and were created some new articles. We saw that in the English Wikipedia is often given the wrong coordinates of the Bhutanese villages and other facilities. Some articles are not authoritative sources. (For example, Dorji Namgyal.) Pay attention to this article. I think the first paragraph tells about one person, and the second paragraph - about the other person. In addition, for each of these people have another article in the English Wikipedia. --Impro (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment left on template
[edit]Hello,
I noticed you left a comment on Template:EurovisionInvite. I assume this was accidental, and I have moved it to WT:ESC, so other users will see it and can respond. CT Cooper · talk 08:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
article assistance
[edit]Thanks for your offer to get involved in your article. I specialize in WP:CHICAGO and Michigan Wolverines articles for the most part. These days I have little time for anything else.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Bután King Candidate Image in Spanish Wikipedia
[edit]Hi Spongie.
I can't undestand your question in my talk page spanish. Please, tell me again over here. What's your problem with the nomination exactly?, Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, You can nominate again or change your nomination. Just you can't only vote --Wilfredor (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Very nice image, I don't have objeccion with the new proposal --Wilfredor (talk) 18:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Dechencholing Palace.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Dechencholing Palace.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Bhutan sportsmen
[edit]Hi! I did only one article on Bhutan Olympic Committee. However, I do not have much knowledge about sportsmen in Bhutan. Their famous national sports is Archery and they are equally crazy about football. You may like to write about the famous in these fields. This book reference [1] will provide you with lot of info on all aspects of Bhutan, including famous sports persons. The full text of the book is available in google under book search. -- N.V.V. Char Talk . 09:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
New Articles about Bhutan
[edit]Hi! I think that the English Wikipedia needs page, where we could see new article WikiProject Bhutan. This page can be on the project page or on the portal page. (Answer me in English, please. It is very difficult to understand the text that Google translated from English into Russian.) --Impro (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Bhutan squad
[edit]Hi there, regarding your query on the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics talk page, you can find info on the Bhutan squad here Athlete Biographies. Cheers, ANGCHENRUI Talk♨ 12:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Tang Chuu
[edit]Dr. Blofeld had suggested that I could put up an article on Tang Chuu. I think he has material to improve the article. I was late in putting it up and saw only after putting up the article that Dr. Blofeld had gone on Wikibreak. I feel it would be wrong for me to put it up for DYK now. Thanks and cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 03:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Carlos Quentin
[edit]This guy is interesting to me. What you need to do is fully cite his articles. Basically for each fact in the article google a source and use {{cite web}} to WP:ATT the fact. If you have any trouble I will help you format a few citations so you can get the hang of it. If you can not find stuff, let me know, but this guy is an easy WP:GA for an interested person. If you really need help beyond this advice ping me. I may be willing to do a bit more.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Bacon Challenge 2011
[edit]
Hi, Spongie555, and welcome to the Bacon Challenge 2011! The goal of this event is to expand as much bacon-related content as possible, so get started whenever you can! A side event to the Bacon Challenge is the Bacon WikiCup 2011, an event where participants in the Bacon Challenge have a chance to score points for creating and expanding bacon-related content, all while trying to score as high as they can. Be sure to submit all your bacon-related contributions to the submissions page in order to score points. At the end of the Cup, the winner will get a nice trophy along with all other participants receiving a medal for their efforts (virtual, of course; don't go waiting by your mailbox for it). For any questions or comments regarding the Challenge, please head on over here, and for any questions or comments relating to the Cup, go here. Thanks and good luck. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
VPC closures
[edit]Hi Spongie555! Actually everybody can close VPCs and you are more than welcome to help out. Simply follow the steps as explained at WP:VPC#Closing procedure. Current rules require consensus support with a minimum quorum of 4 for promotion. Consensus generally has been interpreted as a 2/3 majority, but in case of disputes, it is up to the judgement of the closer to determine, based on the merits of the arguments presented and the criteria. As an unwritten rule, each candidate is closed by an editor which was not involved in the voting, so that the closer's neutrality cannot be disputed, however where there are no disputes this is less important. Candidates can be closed after one week, but often is worthwhile waiting a bit longer to establish clear consensus (for instance when a candidate already has three support votes). Wish you happy editing. --Elekhh (talk) 03:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- You shouldn't be afraid of closing VPCs as not promoted. Actually is much easier and quicker than promotions. There is a huge queue there and it doesn't look good at all. Any VPC which has been sitting there since more than a week can be closed, and if it has less than 4 support in a month than there is nothing to worry about closing it as not promoted. Images can also be renominated at a later stage when there is more activity. --Elekhh (talk) 03:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Map of Chicago 1830
[edit]Unless there is a new policy, I think you erroneously promoted Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Map of Chicago 1830. Even if you voted support, which you did not document on the page, it would still be one short.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- You have to put your vote on the page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- O.K. If you vote for an image, you are not suppose to close it. So we have a new quandry.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- As much as I would like to see this promoted, I think you need to talk to some other picture veterans about closing it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- O.K. If you vote for an image, you are not suppose to close it. So we have a new quandry.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Spongie, a VPC needs four (4) supports to be promoted. This FPC does only have three supports and therefore your closure is incorrect. --Elekhh (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Have a barnstar!
[edit]
|
The WikiProject Barnstar | |
| Thanks for contributing and helping out on Valued pictures. I'ḏ♥One 04:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC) |
Bhutan
[edit]I have not done any FA article yet. It is very taxing. I don't want to go through that exercise at this stage. Thanks for the suggestion. -- N.V.V. Char Talk . 07:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
I agree. Spongie I don't think you know how much is required and how much patience is needed for FAs. The reviewers during the FAC are extremely demanding and identify the tiniest of errors and most of it seems very trivial in comparison to the major work needing doing all over the project. Nvvchar is right. more effort should be going into expanded stubs and promoting to GA and start decent new content. Dr. Blofeld 13:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Take a barnstar
[edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| Tasty bugs, WP:VPC --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 06:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
Hello
[edit]It's called Flaz Plaza and its based in National Flag Square, very close to place where was notorious Bayil prison (which is demolished).--NovaSkola (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
geocoding
[edit]Hi!
You can read my answer here
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Flag and Logo of Chula Vista
[edit]Hello. I've finally uploaded the images You requested, although I'm still unsure if I licensed them properly... Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Thompson Chicago plat 1830
[edit]Since you voted at WP:VPC, I thought I would let you know about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Thompson Chicago plat 1830.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
[edit]
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
Orphaned non-free image File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Help maybe?
[edit]Wowm you've got a habit of picking difficult articles! An FA by October 2011?Best of luck! The article is in a terrible state at the moment. Its in what I'd term a "Philippine class" state. SImilar to articles on places in the philippinrd it has long lists and little comprehensive text/mostly unreferenced. What I suggest is that you make a User:Spongie555/sandbox and first of all find as many reliable sources as you can to use to write it. Dr. Blofeld 08:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I've cleared the article to set it on its way. It needs an enormous amount of work to even get it to GA level let alone FA. I hope you are up for a challenge. If you can find plentiful sources to write it/get books from the local library etc I'll edit it occasionally and help direct you. I gather this is your home town? Lucky you,the weather is hot and sunny! You should take loads of decent pictures of notable landmarks if you live there or live nearby. Dr. Blofeld 10:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
|
Your flag has been removed, as it was a non-free image. Feel free to choose another. J Milburn (talk) 10:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Vatican staircase
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your valued picture nomination was promoted
[edit] |
I think you can.
[edit]It turns out there was a mix-up at Wikicup sign-ups where your image was automatically removed as copyright. It has been pre-identified as Public Domain, so I removed the fair-use tag and brought back the flag you inserted. mechamind90 06:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, what Mechamind said. Sorry for not getting back to you; I only just noticed your message and thought "damn, I didn't reply to that!" J Milburn (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Re: 1858 San Diego hurricane
[edit]Actually, I don't think I can help with that article. I honestly don't think the article should exist. Don't get me wrong, the storm probably happened, and it's pretty notable, but all (seriously, all) of the references of the storm stem from the same source (the Chris Landsea document), which is problematic. It's the same reason we don't have an article anymore on the 1842 Spain hurricane, since its existence was merely gleaned from a bunch of different primary sources (but the fact it was a tropical cyclone only from one source). If the article were built up much more, it would merely be a rehash of the Landsea article. Adding any other data (such as statistics, mentioning of other storms, etc) wouldn't be directly related to the storm. I honestly think it should be merged with, say, List of California hurricanes, or List of Pacific hurricanes before 1900. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! I debugged Portal:Bhutan and create the necessary pages. Now please fill the red links on these pages: Portal:Bhutan/Selected picture, Portal:Bhutan/Selected article, Portal:Bhutan/Selected biography. --Impro (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The Milhist election has started!
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Protocol
[edit]For future reference, if you vote on a nomination, you are not suppose to close it in general.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Your valued picture nomination was promoted (crown)
[edit] |
Orphaned non-free image File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:City-of-chula-vista-seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foreign Minister of Bhutan, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.slmfa.gov.lk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2316&Itemid=75.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Flag of Bhutan
[edit]Needs a bit of work I think. Dr. Blofeld 08:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Re:
[edit]Hi - oh yeah, I'm definitely interested. I'm presently travelling but I'll be back by Saturday, so I will start work then. Shiva (Visnu) 10:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Benjamin Franklin 1767.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
|
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Images
[edit]Copyrighted same as elsewhere I believe. You can only upload images of deceased people and claim fair use.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Isidore Heller House
[edit]It is unclear to me why you promoted Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Isidore Heller House with only three supports.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Is there consensus to promote with only three supports now?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
VPC passed
[edit] |
 |
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Bhutan Barnstar of National Merit | |
| For your contribs to Bhutan-related --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 01:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| this WikiAward was given to Spongie555 by Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) on 01:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC) |
ANI
[edit]I have mentioned you in a discussion at WP:ANI#TonyTheTiger. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thank you!
[edit]Hi - thank you for the star :) I really appreciate it. Shiva (Visnu) 23:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Spongie555, this image you nominated fell short of the five supports required for promotion. But I think it's mostly because of reduced activity at FPC at the moment. It could probably pass given another chance; perhaps you would like to renominate it in a couple of months. Cheers, Maedin\talk 06:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again, the minimum is five supports altogether, not four. It was very close, :) Maedin\talk 06:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
RE: Question
[edit]Before answering, how did you find me... I'm just wondering..
- The Communist Party USA has denounced North Korea many times, especially in the later years after the collapse of the communist bloc in Europe. However, before the collapse most communist countries allied themselves with the USSR and its allies. The crimes the North Korea have committed were not known at the time, because most the western media centered itself around the USSR and Communist China. But back to your question, no they don't support North Korea, at least not officially. They do however support Cuba officially. It this a good enough answer to your question? --TIAYN (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Kim Jong-un image up for deletion
[edit]For your information, the image you suggested uploaded to the Kim Jong-un article, File:KimJongUn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion. Lampman (talk) 13:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Just stumbled upon this article in WP:GAN, but I can't review it as I know some major contributors to the article too well to neutrally judge it against Wikipedia:Good article criteria. However, I would like to point to you that the article currently fails criterion 3b:"it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail" and needs a complete rewrite. Especially sections "Districts of Thimphu", "Architecture", "Culture". The presence of "Motithang Takin Preserve" in Architecture and "Health care" in "Law and order" is absurd. You can go through Wikipedia:Good articles/Geography and places for comparison. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
review request
[edit]Hi - I just opened an editor review, and I request you for some advice on how I can prepare myself for adminship. I will greatly appreciate your feedback :) Shiva (Visnu) 15:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Pete Gray photo
[edit]Just a 10-minute look through Google and a few treasured websites that I have links to, I did not find too many good photos of Mr. Gray, and none in the free-use realm. However, you might like this photo. It is of good size and clearly shows the player in full, a case could be made for fair-use I suppose, but I could not locate who might have snapped the photo.Neonblak talk - 06:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:President Rutherford Hayes 1870 - 1880.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
|
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 b.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular talk 21:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
|
VP
[edit]Can you please close Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/GoldenGate Bridge. Also these days you are nominating very few images of Bhutan. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 01:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Emperor penguins also, Why don't you archive your page now. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 13:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Or just wait a week. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 13:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Time is up now. I am your relative living in india. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 02:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Or just wait a week. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 13:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
You seem to be very interested in this area. Please join us! --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 11:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thanks!
[edit]Hi - thank you very much :) Bhutan-Kuwait relations is coming up, but as Russia has no relations with Bhutan, any data about that should remain in the main Foreign relations of Bhutan article unless something significant happens in that direction. Shiva (Visnu) 09:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Thimphu you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Thimphu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Aaron north (talk) 01:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Valued Picture Barnstar
[edit]
|
Valued Picture Barnstar | |
| Thanks for awesome VP images! Antonu (talk) 07:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC) |
Its not just a sample, its that I'm actually rewarding you! Antonu (talk) 07:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
THank you
[edit]Thank you, we'll see what i can do there ;). --Vrysxy! (talk) 04:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
VPC promoted
[edit] |
New userbox
[edit]I have created a new userbox for you: User:Spongie555/Bhutan portal. I have also made some minor improvements at Portal:Bhutan. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 02:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- If so, I will help. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 02:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Chris Young
[edit]Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Constitution of Bhutan
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Constitution of Bhutan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Syed Kazim (Talk | Contribs) 02:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Archive
[edit]Hey! You should consider archiving your talk-page. :) --Syed Kazim (Talk | Contribs) 02:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 03:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
[edit]Message added 03:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Invitation to join WikiProject Bacon !
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Bacon has been created, and you are cordially invited to join, and list yourself as a participant at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bacon#Participants!
- You may also feel free to add the userbox - {{User Bacon}} - to your userpage, to indicate your participation in the WikiProject.
- The Wikipedia:Bacon WikiCup is also ongoing, more info about that at User:SuperHamster/Bacon Challenge 2011, and User:SuperHamster/Bacon WikiCup 2011.
Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 08:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for joining WP:WikiProject Bacon! Feel free to post questions, concerns, comments, suggestions for improvement to the WikiProject, updates on related events and goings-on, etc, at the talk page, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bacon. We now have six members so far, yay! Thanks again for signing up as a participant, -- Cirt (talk) 20:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Constitution of Bhutan
[edit] | On 18 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Constitution of Bhutan, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
VP
[edit]Is there anything else at User:Ctjf83/Pictures you think would be good for me to nominate for Valued Picture? CTJF83 chat 21:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- I need to work on my pic taking skills....which specifics? :) CTJF83 chat 21:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just 1 out of 90ish?! What in general needs to be fixed on the others? CTJF83 chat 21:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
_mod.jpg) |
You asked for help with the Chula Vista article. I'll be glad to take a look at it and make any improvements that seem useful, but I have to tell you I don't know anything at all about Featured Articles and Good Articles and what it takes to be one. Maybe after I get past a major time commitment I have this week, I'll try to learn a little. What are some of the things this article still needs, in order to be judged worthy of GA or FA status? --MelanieN (talk) 03:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. There's an awful lot of "citation needed" tags in the history section, and the Geography, Education, and Culture sections could definitely use some help. I'll see about doing some cleanup next week when I have more time. --MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- It might be easier to write a book about Chula Vista than it would be to edit this article to FA without 3rd party references. Ameriquedialectics 00:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
VPC Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 (2nd nomination)
[edit]Hi Spongie555, when things are not perfectly clear one can ask for clarification from those who made unclear statements. When closing such tight contest is good to explain the assumption on which the closure was based, so that if any of the assumptions was wrong it can be detected afterwards. My reading is that everybody is in favour of the image, with two preferences for the original version (Tony and me), one for the alternative (yourself), and two neutral. This gives a slight advantage for the original, however strenghtened by the fact that it was the preference of the nominator, which makes it a clear promote of the original for me, if my reading is correct. PS. Would be good if you would start archiving your talk page as it starts to get heavy and slow. --Elekhh (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm I'm a bit confused now about your question. It is one image with two versions, five supports according to my count, slight preference (2 vs 1) for the original. PS. I understand the talk page works for you, but might not be advantageous for those visiting your talk page. --Elekhh (talk) 04:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Uranus2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
|
Talkback
[edit]Message added 19:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
[edit]
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | |
DYK nomination of Dual system of government
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Dual system of government at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination
[edit]Can you please close this: Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Polar Bear. I was absent for a couple of days due to the lack of internet connection.
- It has been done. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Dual system of government
[edit] | On 28 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dual system of government, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]Thank you very much for acknowledging my effort in those Brazilian-history related articles. However, editor Astynax deserves as much credt as I do. Re-writing the article on Pedro I is something that has been going around my mind since ever. It is something that I really want to do, since his life was far more interesting than of his son, Pedro II. However, I'm having an issue with another article I nominated (Pedro Álvares Cabral) which is leading me to a frustrating brawl. And that is taking away my interest on continue working on Wikipedia. Anyway, thank you again! Cheers, --Lecen (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Spongie, are you good at Commons rules for copyright of pictures? --Lecen (talk) 22:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Could you take a look at Pedro Álvares Cabral and tell me if you see anything wrong on its pictures? --Lecen (talk) 23:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 06:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Valued Picture proposal
[edit]Hi, As you are a regular contributor to WP:VALUED, you may be interested in this.. Thank you, Acather96 (talk) 07:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Picture question
[edit]Do you have any specific suggestions for taking a skyline picture across a river, to get it up to FP quality? It would be nice to have that an FP and Davenport, Iowa an FA. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 01:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Suggestions on who? Since you are there a lot, you prob know who takes good pics. Also critique on File:I-74 Bridge.jpg if it could be a VP? CTJF83 chat 01:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Bhutan
[edit]Hi. Bhutan article is WAY off being comprehensive enough. Its worse in depth than the Thimphu article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
VPC
[edit]Can you please close these nominations:
- Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/San Francisco City Hall
- Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Fiji Goshawk
- Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Solar system
- It has been done. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 02:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Discussion on naming style for San Diego neighborhoods
[edit]Hello, Spongie555! I see that you are a participant in WikiProject:San Diego. There is a discussion currently going on which might be of interest to you. It concerns the naming style for neighborhoods of the city of San Diego. Currently most San Diego neighborhoods are named in the pattern Point Loma, San Diego, California. The primary proposal at the renaming discussion would change that name to Point Loma; the alternate proposal would change it to Point Loma, San Diego. --MelanieN (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Valued Picture nomination of File:Six weeks old cat (aka).jpg
[edit].jpg) |
Bacon
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Valued Picture nomination of File:Execution of maximillian mejia miramon.png
[edit] |
DYK for I Love Bacon!
[edit] | On 15 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article I Love Bacon!, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the cookbook I Love Bacon! has a recipe by Cat Cora (pictured) for "Pig Candy Ice Cream" which contains chopped bacon? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Pretender
[edit]The answer is very simple: Luís of Orléans-Braganza. Unfortunately Wikipedia has several awful mistakes on Brazilian royals. Among them, the ridiculous suposedly pretension to the French throne. Gaston of Orléans, the Count of Eu, not only renounced his French citizenship, but also his position as a Frenhc Prince and became a Brazilian citizen and royal. But since I have no interest at all on anything related to after-1889 Brazlian-monarchy related history (that is, Brazilian "monarchism"), I never bothered to fix that. Anytime you might want to exchange thoughts, feel free to do so! Regards, --Lecen (talk) 10:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, he was an Emperor, although never counted as such. I explain. When Brazil became independent, the Holy Alliance ruled the world. The Hispanic American republics had been independent for more than a decade and no country in Europe recognized them as such, which prevented them of making trade deals, for example. That ended up destroying their economies, and the countries went into chaos, with civil wars, rebellions, coups, dictatorships, etc... All that you know already. João VI wanted to prevent that. He had to make sure that in the eyes of the European powers, the new South American monarchy had legitimate roots. So when Portugal recognized the independence of Brazil, João VI aknowledged the Brazilian throne as an off-shoot of the Portuguese throne, that is, a branch. Separated, but a branch. To do that, Brazil recognized João VI as an Emperor who ceded his sovereignity to his own son. Both were co-emperors for a short period, from 1825 to 1826, when João VI died. Since the peace treaty was deplored in Brazil, that was never taken for serious. Nonetheless, it helped Brazil establish ties with the European nations. --Lecen (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Taunay was the son of a French teacher of Pedro II. He fought in the War of the Triple Alliance nad ws part of a very famous and disastrous military operations called "Withdrawn of Laguna", of which a book he later wrote about and that became a classic. He did not pursue a military or politic carrier for long after that, intead he focused on his literary career, of which made him one of the most famous writers in Brazilian history. Thus, he was neither a great politician and even less a statesman. The category "statesmen" in the template (notice that it is not "politicians") is reserved for figures considered "statesmen" by historians, not simply famous, renowned, influential or great politicians. That is why politicians who were very powerful and influential in their lifetime (such as former regent and prime minister Marquis of Olinda or the Viscount of Itaboraí, one of the main leader of the Conservative Party) but not regarded as "statesmen" are not in the list. The idea of the template is to allow the reader to easily read vital articles that will make him/she understand the Imperial era. And it is. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
North Korea
[edit]No we should include there results because the Asian Games is for the U23 squad. Druryfire (talk) 13:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
[edit]
|
VPC help
[edit]Can you promote this nomination fast:
- Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/63 building --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 11:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
[edit]
|
VPC
[edit] |
Merry Christmas
[edit]Merry Christmas
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Extra999 (talk) at 04:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC).
Flag of Bhutan again
[edit]The GAN is looking not so good right now, so can you look at the article and make some changes to the citation templates? I made some of the other changes and made note that there are no official flag days in Bhutan. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Christmas Card
[edit]DYK for Dratshang Lhentshog
[edit] | On 27 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dratshang Lhentshog, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Dratshang Lhentshog is the Commission for the Monastic Affairs of Bhutan? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Chula Vista
[edit]Thanks for contacting me. Unfortunately, I have other projects I'm currently working on, but if you need assistance in reaching older sources or for copyediting, let me know. It would be great to see that article reach FA in time for its anniversary. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 13:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Tsa Yig
[edit] | On 1 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tsa Yig, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Tsa Yig refers to the legal code enacted by the founder of Bhutan, Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal, around 1629? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 20:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Jo Tong Sop
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Jo Tong Sop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar
[edit]Whoa! Thanks! I really wasn't expecting to receive a barnstar at this time... I'm not really active anymore on the wiki (well, it's summer in this side of the world, so I have more time for it, but I'm not really doing anything important here) but I really appreciate it. Thanks again. Diego Grez (EMSIUB) (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- hehe. Glad you liked them =D Diego Grez (EMSIUB) (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Bhutan
[edit]Hi. I will try to make some improvements to Thimphu later this week. I will nom it myself when I think its ready.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Empire of Brazil FAC is now open!
[edit]Empire of Brazil is now a Featured Article candidate. Your opinion (either as support or oppose) is welcome. Here is the page: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Empire of Brazil/archive1. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 18:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
[edit] |
Hello, Spongie555/Archive 1! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 03:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Jo Tong Sop
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Jo Tong Sop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm still doubtful about how much credence this article should give the North Korean government's claims. If the question posed to them was "Was the team subjected to a six-hour public humiliation?" then answering "The team is currently practicing for the Asian Games" does not disprove the claim of the six-hour public humiliation. And if the question was "Was the team manager Kim Jong-Hun fired and forced to join a construction crew?" then answering that "The team is currently practicing for the Asian Games" doesn't explain what happened to the former manager, given that he has in fact been replaced. I'm not even convinced that the North Korean government has denied that the team was subjected to a six-hour public humiliation, much less that such an event didn't take place. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not in the mood for supercentenarian articles now. Maybe sometime in the future. Why don't you work on it, using Ponticelli as an example? ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 23:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tend to skip around myself too. It's hard to focus solely on one article, so I usually work on a couple at a time. I could help you if you want to bring Buckles to GA or FA, though. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Read Wikipedia:Good article criteria. If you want, I can help you on individual stuff, like copyediting and referencing. Just ask me, and I'll look over any article for you. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- First, you should work on expanding it with reliable sources. I know you can add some stuff. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 22:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- I created an archive index User talk:Editorofthewiki/Archive index where I list the archives and the month. At the beginning of every month, I cut all of the messages from my current talk page and move it to the next archive. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 23:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- First, you should work on expanding it with reliable sources. I know you can add some stuff. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 22:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: Bhutan
[edit]I'm very glad that you like images that I put for the Kings of Bhutan! Thank you very much. As for an image of Prime Minister Jigme Thinley, maybe someone else could put it? Can you do it? Right now, I'm working on some other articles, and I have no time for Bhutan at this moment. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of National symbols of Bhutan
[edit] Hello! Your submission of National symbols of Bhutan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Zuma
[edit]From what I've read, Zuma is a "supplemental character" to the Aztec (that seems to read like a sidekick). I don't know if any other universities have the same situation. It's probably not an issue to add it as long as a source is included indicating it's official. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Bhutanese legislation
[edit] | On 16 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bhutanese legislation, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in the case of budget bills and urgent matters, a bill must be passed in the same session of Parliament in Bhutan? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: message on my talk
[edit]Hi Spongie, I'd love to but at the moment I'm using public internet so I'd get on to it if time allows. Thanks, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 11:03am • 00:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Camp Minnewawa
[edit]Thanks for the suggestion about Camp Minnewawa. I never heard of it but it sounds interesting. Turns out the San Diego area was just full of now-closed military bases. I did the article about Camp Kearny and I have it on my list to do one about Camp Elliott - also Camp Matthews at the site of what is now UCSD. I'll add Camp Minnewawa to the list. I don't suppose that photo is in the public domain, is it? --MelanieN (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information about the Camp Matthews article. I wonder how I missed it? --MelanieN (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Re: the Star-News, I'll take a look but might be too busy with Real Life to do much in the next week or two. Thanks for the invite. --MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- BTW reading the caption about Camp Minnewawa, I see that it was not an Army camp; it was a CCC camp. That would make for different searching and (possibly) less notability. Again, I'll take a closer look later.
- About notability, I was just thinking that army/navy/marine installations tended to get a lot more publicity and leave more of an imprint. But a CCC camp was a big deal too so we should be able to find something about it. I'll try, anyhow. --MelanieN (talk) 04:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting! That's a great link about Camp Otay/Camp Weber. Definitely needs an article. I notice the article refers to a Camp La Mesa, of which Camp Otay was a sub-post; does that also need an article? I'm sorry I can't do anything about these articles for the next couple of weeks, but I will definitely put them on my to-do list for when I get some time. --MelanieN (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- I wonder if we might do some kind of combined article about the CCC camps in San Diego County? There were a lot of them, and while they might not all have been notable individually, as a group they might be. Some are gone without a trace, and some (like Pine Valley) were converted to other uses. Do you have any idea how other areas have dealt with their CCC camps on Wikipedia? --MelanieN (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting! That's a great link about Camp Otay/Camp Weber. Definitely needs an article. I notice the article refers to a Camp La Mesa, of which Camp Otay was a sub-post; does that also need an article? I'm sorry I can't do anything about these articles for the next couple of weeks, but I will definitely put them on my to-do list for when I get some time. --MelanieN (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- About notability, I was just thinking that army/navy/marine installations tended to get a lot more publicity and leave more of an imprint. But a CCC camp was a big deal too so we should be able to find something about it. I'll try, anyhow. --MelanieN (talk) 04:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- BTW reading the caption about Camp Minnewawa, I see that it was not an Army camp; it was a CCC camp. That would make for different searching and (possibly) less notability. Again, I'll take a closer look later.
- Re: the Star-News, I'll take a look but might be too busy with Real Life to do much in the next week or two. Thanks for the invite. --MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Jo Tong Sop
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Jo Tong Sop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Hello! Your submission of Jo Tong Sop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: Halo Waypoint
[edit]Hey Spongie. If you did not know, Wikipedia's articles are bound by notability guidelines for inclusion. Since Waypoint itself is not a notable website with multiple stories about it published in reliable sources, it doesn't get an article on Wikipedia. However, since it's a valid search term, we create a redirect to the relevant topic (the Halo series, where the infobox has a link to Waypoint.) Hope that answers your questions. If you have any others, ping me on my talk (I won't be watching this page.) Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
[edit]
| |||
DYK for Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs
[edit] | On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Jigme Thinley, the current prime minister of Bhutan, served as Home Minister before becoming prime minister? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for National symbols of Bhutan
[edit] | On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National symbols of Bhutan, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Bhutan is also known as Drukyul, which means Land of the Thunder Dragon? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
GA invite
[edit]I am retiring from GA creation. My last one is at GAC right now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
RE: Dickinson
[edit]I don't think I'm going to be able to help you unless you find some decent referenced. The two you have only mention him in passing, and don't really assert much notability, much less the basics of a biography. Also note that being called a "colonel" in the nineteenth century doesn't necessarily denote a military rank; it wasn't uncommon for an officer in a local militia or paramilitary police force to give themselves lofty titles like that. Unless you can readily establish an Army or Marine commission, it's not likely that any potential article could be established as a military biography. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: California 125
[edit]Hi, thanks for noticing my work. However, after working on California State Route 186, I'm not totally interested in working on another California highway. However, I can suggest talking to User:Rschen7754, the US Roads Project's California mastermind about how to get help giving it a shot or seeing if he wants to do it for you. If not, you can go to the U.S. Roads Project talk page for some assistance. Someone's sure to help you there. Thanks for the offer though!Mitch32(Transportation Historian) 04:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Bacon WikiCup
[edit]Well thank you for the note! And sure, I'll join the wikicup, though I appear to have shot into 3rd place with just the ice cream article... Perhaps I've miscounted. Worm 09:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, by all means. --JB82 (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
wikicookie
[edit]
Thank you for all the hard work you have done on the Chula Vista article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: Little league
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.