Jump to content

User:Ronhjones/Adminship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Toolbox
»VandalismUTMRCHUGTW
»WikipediaAfDBLDYKFACFARGAN (vg) • GARRfA
»AdminDASHAIVANANIRAARFPPUAARMAC/NIANB
»ToolsAPATSCIUELCGLBCONIPLOECPHSPROJSQLWCHKRWLHWHOIS
»OtherCOPYCSDDELNPNULPARSEUBX (vg) • UW-warn
Toolbox format stolencopied from User:Thingg


User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 131
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 46
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 68
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 16
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 78
Requested RD1 redactions 8
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 10
Open sockpuppet investigations 60
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 8 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Meets minimum criteria, no articles deleted, no behavior issues Mach61 17:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

This is borderline... no deletions, but quite a high proportion of their articles have outstanding cleanup tags. I might have granted it if it was a self-request but as it is,  Not done. – Joe (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Meets minimum criteria (by a hair), no articles deleted Mach61 17:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Haha hi, thanks. I'm not very active anymore due to the need to continue getting my life together but will probably return to creating articles someday. I occasionally review pages and always check GNG, policies, etc before creating articles. I have no interest in wasting time or causing trouble! originalmesstalk 07:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done – user hasn't created an article in two years. – Joe (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights to help reduce the New Pages Patrol workload. I focus on classical Greek topics and have translated many pages from the Greek Wikipedia, having created over 50 pages so far. With these rights, I could streamline my contributions and make the review process easier. Thank you for considering my request. StuggerMax (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done, I see there were some issues with copyright and sourcing when you started editing, but they haven't reoccurred recently. – Joe (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm not really sure AWB is the best tool for that; images are usually only used on one or a few pages, and AWB is more for mass-changes. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your use of AWB appears to have been removed rather than for inactivity - can you explain why or how you will use AWB within the rules and guidelines going forward? Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I believe WP:CATALOT and WP:RATER are better tools for these tasks. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

I would like to use AWB for fixing various puntuations and citations issues found on WP:NPP and articles within my scope as sometimes it's hard to notice it. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I need to add 'Flag of X District' and 'Flag of Y Region' categories to around 3,000 Slovakian flags, doing just about 5% manually took a full day. EnzoTC (talk) 04:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

I write to request permission to use AutoWikiBrowser to facilitate identification of duplicate references; I understand that the tool only identifies exact duplicates, and that I must check every edit before saving it. spida-tarbell 𐡸 (talkcontribs) 21:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

There are about 200 templates at Category:South Korea pop music group navigational boxes, Category:Girl group navigational boxes, and Category:Boy band navigational boxes that are members of content categories and shouldn't be per the guideline at WP:CAT#T. Hoping to automate their removal. RachelTensions (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 02:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights I need to help I make good edits that are very good I help revert vandalism Gladcape2013 (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

petscan:29601810 shows several hundred biographies with inconsistent categories. Depending on the subject, the solution is either replacing Category:Year of birth missing (living people) with Category:Year of birth missing, or adding Category:Living people. It's very repetitive (even with HotCat), but I don't think a bot could reliably decide which solution to apply. I'm requesting AWB access because it seems like the right kind of semi-automated tool for this job. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Hello, I am unable to move article from sandbox to main page. I have had the account for more than 4 days and have made the 10 edits. Please advise thank you Casa del Espiritu Santo (talk) 19:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You made exactly one edit before making this request, and you haven't created a sandbox pages on this Wikipedia, so I'mn not sure what you are even talking about. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I have another account that is semi-confirmed, I have this account mainly for image uploading, and I need to edit some semi-confirmed articles to update the images. Bramnickatriot (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

@Bramnickatriot what other account? Please use that account to post a reply here, so we can confirm that it's you. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
User:12.47563.OH Bramnickatriot (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
@Bramnickatriot can you please confirm from that account that you are the same person? Also, you should disclose your alternative accounts on your userpage. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
@Elli I can confirm I am the same in both accounts. 12.47563.OH (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 18:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

I would like extended confirmed access because 1. I would like to improve my editing and have more opportunity and 2. because I would like to edit Article:Wikapedia to fix grammar and punctuation. MersmanD (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done There are many, many (literally millions of) articles you can improve without this user right. We generally don't grant it early without a very compelling reason. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 03:43, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights: I have been a Wikipedia editor for several years and I would like to make basic edits to pages that are locked for recent political reasons. Thank you for your consideration :) ELKelly23 (talk) 03:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You have made about 35% of the number of edits required to automatically be granted this permission and you have provided no real reason why you should be granted it early. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 03:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Been Editing and contributing for 3 years and may have significantly less edits but have 274 contributions of perfect quality and now will be engaging myself more in Wikipedia. Thankyou theusualhuman (talk) 07:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done User:Ujjwal Sharma (India)] has no edits to the English Wikipedia that have not been deleted. Donald Albury 14:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
They appear to have changed their name while this was pending, but I'm only seeing like five live edits and maybe twenty deleted ones, so way short of enough to even consider granting this early. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Hi! I'm applying again as a reviewer, my last time apply on this new page reviwer was declined because my account wasn't 90 days and doesn't meet 500 mainspace edits and i have a contest article deletion. Now it was meet my criteria of 90 days (which is 91 days now i think), 500 mainspace edits and the article was I mentioned it was my article Namumula and the decision is to keep. I created 7 articles (one of my article was approved using AfC), 2 disambiguation and some redirects. I want to participate because i want to share my knowledge and to experience this, and to help lessen the backlogs and delete some unnecessary articles. Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 06:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 06:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Hey man im josh, when can I reapply again? Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 05:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
3 months might be a good waiting period. If you apply too soon after a rejection, it may not demonstrate to the WP:PERM admins that you've had enough time to learn and calibrate to previous feedback. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Please also reconsider how you tag articles that need work - this is really excessive. If you drop this many tags on something you find in the NPP queue you're going to drive people crazy. -- asilvering (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Asilvering!
I see you reverted some speedy deletion, The two speedy deletion - this and this. The two are already existed in the main article (Maki (singer) and My Mother, My Story), that's why i flagged as speedy deletion. Would you mind to revert it because it's abandoned and it's existing in the wikipedia article. Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 07:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
@Royiswariii: Technically whenever, but moving too quick is unnecessary. I understand you want to help and you're eager to do so, but there's no reason to rush it. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
@Royiswariii, both of those are incorrect CSD tags. Please read the guidelines at WP:CSD very carefully before tagging any more articles. -- asilvering (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to request NPR rights. I have prior experience with AfC and NPP, so I'm familiar with the process of reviewing new pages. I'm confident in my understanding of notability guidelines and can easily spot paid/COI editing, as well as unreliable and branded sources. I am also familiar with WP:DP, WP:NOBITING, and CSD

I understand the importance of careful, fair reviews and will do my best to uphold the quality of content on Wikipedia. Thank you! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover


I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)

A reasonable number of moves, but I not seeing any WP:RM/TR requests and am concerned by this RM which – based on the previous RM – seemed doomed to fail in the first place. This discussion also looks to be going against you. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I only can say I'll be responsible if you grant me this right. I can participate in more TM, I just need to get usedd.to them. Yes it failed however I understood the norms and moved similar articles to Countryname. I opposed to Anatolian plateau because there are other geographical units that use capitalization in similar contexts. — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 01:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Legendbird. Thanks for your enthusiasm. The good news is: you can already revert obvious vandalism! If you'd like to help out, you can go to Special:RecentChanges and revert obvious vandalism. There are a few tools you can install, like Wikipedia:Twinkle to make this easier, and automatically warn vandals too. I'd be happy to grant you PCR once you've gained some experience with these tools. For now, I can't see a track record yet to see if you've understood vandalism enough, so I'll be marking this as  Not done. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I like helping out and reviewing recent changes, and I would like to be able to contribute further by receiving pending changes reviewer rights. Imconfused3456talk 01:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have done TWO rollback rights request, and I am happy to say that I have surpassed 200 mainspace edits and have also surpassed 1 month of Recent Changes Patrolling.I love the ability to help, and I already love to prevent vandalism with the help of Ultraviolet and Twinkle. I am ready to join the rollbacker force to get access to more tools, like AntiVandal and Huggle for even faster response. Don't worry, I won't bite the newcomers unless necessary! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 13:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). MusikBot talk 19:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 01:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 17:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey! This is Cooldudeseven7 again, and i'm just asking if there is any progress on this Rollback case? Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 11:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
I've randomly sampled your recent edits and I'm seeing an unacceptably high number of serious mistakes. In addition to the error above, I found:
  1. Here, you offered poor advice and almost inappropriately moved the page to userspace. Pages like this are not acceptable on Wikipedia, even in the userspace.
  2. Editors may remove warnings from their talk pages at any time, meaning this revert followed by these warnings (1, 2) and subsequent AIV report are extremely inappropriate
  3. I'm not sure why you felt the need to insert a {{Static IP}} template here. Not a helpful edit. Also worth noting that this doesn't belong in a section header, which breaks the page formatting.
I think you need to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works (i.e. quit RC Patrol for now and go make article contributions instead) before applying for advanced permissions. To be clear, RC patrol isn't a race to see who can revert the most edits, so please don't treat it as such. Closing as  Not done. -Fastily 23:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, but am I not allowed to ever submit again because of these or are you just saying wait a bit? Cooldudeseven7 tea talk 00:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
You can resubmit at a later time. I would recommend waiting a good amount of time, addressing comments left above, and making sure you are ready and qualified. You may also want to consider WP:CVSCHOOL, after addressing the feedback above. (Non-administrator comment) Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 13:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Cooldudeseven7 tea talk 11:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template)

I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 17:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Diff by diff:
1. Completely forgot that there is a warning template for NOTFORUM. The last time I used that warning was all the way on Sept 13 [7] which is more than a month ago. Completely skipped my mind.
2. I have no explanation on this one; I probably just forgot.
3. No explanation either.
The earlier failures seem to be one off mistakes I made that happen to be close together, but the revert that happened just today is definitely very unfortunate for me not to warn. The sea of reverts I've made mostly have warnings other than the above, so I don't exactly know how I managed to forget to warn at all. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again. TheWikiToby (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes. I promise a warning/explanation for every revert I perform from now on. TheWikiToby (talk) 21:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor