User:Ikip/results
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="#Logical_Information_Machines"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Logical Information Machines</span></a></li>
Total number of articles up for deletion review on 27JAN10 @ 03:06:58 UTC: 13
The result was keep. The books about him make notability clear. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Effectively unreferenced BLP that I had trouble finding any independent sources for. Prodded as promotional with self-interested sources, prod was seconded, and then was contested. Gigs (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Two non-notable young businessmen, articles created by User:51Give, which is the name of their "social entrepreneurship business." The most significant coverage I can find on either of them in anything like a reliable source is a one-sentence mention in China Daily (Google Translate version here). Is 51Give a WP:NOBLECAUSE? Maybe, but its principals are not there yet in terms of notability. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that WP:NOTNEWS applies here. NW (Talk) 02:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
All he was arrested for was a multiple weapons charge and a few other things. All he is known for is one event. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
A company developing industrial automation software. Author's name suggests blatant COI. Scant evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was deleted and redirected to travertine, which already contains more information on travertine flooring than the most recent version does. Prior version read like a sales brochure and was a likely copyvio; stubbed version had no context. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Article had 3k of content a month ago, deleted to a one-liner by two edits from different anon IPs, on the very probable grounds of being lifted from commercial advertising. The big content was a reasonable stub, but too suspicious to restore. The small content is too poor to let survive. I've AfDed this rather than speedying it, just in the hope that someone might pick it up and rework it (In which case, keep it), otherwise it ought to be deleted. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article:
Non-notable doctor who got news coverage after being unfortunate enough to be cut down in a car accident. No other coverage. No notable achievements for being a great surgeon or researcher, or a notable health bureaucrat. Getting a condolence from the local member of parliament is not enough, as they send out hundreds of congratulations/condolences each month for constituents eg, doing well in a high school exam, getting selected in a state youth sports team, turning 100 years old, a local sporting/ethnic/religious club opening a new building, etc. We are not going to have an article for every police officer, firefighter, state emergency service volunteer etc who was killed in action, bushfires, etc, politicians routinely attend funerals of these people YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was merge to Military of Malaysia. The original reason for deletion isn't really valid. The keep arguments are overall stronger than the delete arguments, but fail to address the issue brought up that the article is a content fork that gives undue weight to unrelated events. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
POV fork and attack page in violation of BLP Monkeyassault (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Appears to be non-notable. Only nine google hits for search ' "Julien Abbott" power racer', and (apart from this page) only one of these appears to be relevant. Google has no hits to verify the information currently in this article. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 01:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Bringing this to AfD as a PROD is likely to be contested. No real notability established. Seems to be an attempt at self-promotion. Nymf talk/contr. 01:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Freeware application which fails GNG. JBsupreme (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
A non-notable product. Wikipedia shouldn't list every type of penetrating oil on the market. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unilease for a similar AfD. Wizard191 (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable software script which fails GNG. JBsupreme (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC) <infobot> huh? 10:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 18:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article:
DELETE PER WP:BIP... just kidding. This was nominated roughly four months ago with a no consensus result. Some people asserted that a blog article was sufficient for sourcing. I contend that it is not and would like to bring this before the community once again to see if we can finally achieve consensus on this, one way or the other. JBsupreme (talk) 00:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
|