User talk:Fob.schools

Welcome!

Hello, Fob.schools, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you helpful editing in the realm of schools. Have you discovered Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools yet. Please do sign up, and get involvedYour contribution and experience will be appreciated. If you like to link to my page you can see the areas that I am working User:ClemRutter#Making sense of schools. ClemRutter (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reigate Grammar School

I have closed the report you placed at WP:RFPP. I have to advise you that the IP(s) were editing in good faith, as they backed up their evidence for why the school should be a "Public school" and not an "Independent school" with a source (even if you don't agree with it or think the source is insufficient). You reverted more than four times, so broke the three revert rule, but you have stopped. Be advised that had I seen the report this morning and acted it on it, you would have been blocked for edit warring. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Šibenik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bunny Carr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clontarf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Steven (Editor) (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to BT Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC) <copied from talk page of Zackmann08 (talk · contribs) after his removal of it>[reply]

You templated and reverted me for ‘unexplained removal’. I did explain in my edit summary that the text I removed was an irrelevance. That’s not unexplained. You may disagree with it, but it’s defini not unexplained. Fob.schools (talk) 09:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fob.schools. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pingin obverse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pingin obverse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of ports in Northern Ireland moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of ports in Northern Ireland, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. According to WP:LISTVERIFY it is not sufficient to rely on citations on linked articles. b uidhe 05:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox port

Hi Fob.schools. Thanks for writing. As you say, the parameter "location" is already there, but it refers to the piece of land where the port is when you arrive by land. Many "locations", like Boston, DC, etc. have several rivers, coasts and bodies of water. The parameter "waters" could explain what is the sea, bay, river, lake, estuary or whatever where the port is located when arriving sailing. You are right I did not edit the template documentation. I was going to do so later on. Sorry.--Banderas (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barge Port in Palatka

In response to your post last month on the WikiProject Florida talk page, I have proposed a name change for the Barge Port (Palatka, Florida) article at Talk:Barge Port (Palatka, Florida)#Requested move 19 September 2020. Please take a look and participate. - Donald Albury 21:18, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reigate again.

Following your post on another editor page I took a look at Reigate School| to give you a bit of support. I added a few cn tags, and a comment on Talk:Reigate School. I revised the assessment up- but, as you got here first - I left it there! --ClemRutter (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Your edit to Reigate School has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Canterbury Tail talk 12:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

School uniform info was inserted and lifted directly from this link. A couple of words edited out doesn't a non-copyvio make. Canterbury Tail talk 14:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Galataport

Hi — I was creating an article on Galataport, and when I hit publish, it said you had meanwhile created a redir in the same space. Not quite sure why you decided to do that at this precise moment in time — was it triggered by the redlinks I placed in a few articles prior to creating this one? Anyway, just to say that I've replaced your redir with the article. If you disagree, ping me and let's discuss. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I did it was that it is the same place as the Port of Istanbul, is it not? There is no reason to have separate articles. Fob.schools (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, no — it most certainly is not; it's no more the 'same place' than, say, the St Katharine Docks is the 'same place' as the Port of London.

Secondly, it would be nice if you could tag the article's creator and/or substantial contributors (and I do count myself as the latter) when proposing things like merger or deletion. Incidentally, the same goes for replying to me on your talk page, which I don't find out about unless you ping me. (And I did specifically ask you to ping me, did I not?) Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you? Sorry I missed that. I find pings annoying so generally I dont. But here goes @DoubleGrazing:. It is entirely optional to notify interested parties. My view is that you will see the merge templates anyway, so there is no necessity to do so. Fob.schools (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ye, I did ask you to, because that's the only way I know if/when you've replied (on this page). As for whether you find pings 'annoying' isn't really my problem — that's like saying you find e-mail replies annoying. And no, I do not 'see the merge templates anyway', whatever that means. But thanks all the same for teaching me how WP works. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CBS Westland Row for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CBS Westland Row is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Westland Row until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging experienced editors

Before tagging by far more experienced editors than you with nonsense of Copyvio Violation templates you should make yourself comfortable with our copyvio Policies entirely! You now marked your own created article as a copyvio violation. I added one phrase which is not copy-pasted at all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fob.schools Please stop spamming my talk page, an administrator will soon have a look at your complain. But I am not sure if you did yourself a favour with this, it is highly questionable if your article provides sufficient notability to have an article on its own, it is better merged into the article for arrecife. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Port of Alcanar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Port of Alcanar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Synge Street CBS

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Synge Street CBS you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Synge Street CBS

The article Synge Street CBS you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Synge Street CBS for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Port of Alcanar

Hello, Fob.schools. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Port of Alcanar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Port of Alcanar

Hello, Fob.schools. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Port of Alcanar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Port Kembla, New South Wales. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 12:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Conleth's College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:We Dont Know Ourselves Cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Dont Know Ourselves Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]