Jump to content

User:Chzz/PRODlog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pre-2010 are archived here.  Chzz  ►  19:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

[edit]
This has now been somewhat sourced, but has turned into a bit of a battleground. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Spam concerns have been addressed, with some major editing.
Two sources added; not convinced the NY Times one is 'significant coverage' but AGF on the other (in Turkish)
This was deleted, but then recreated, again with primary sources and advert. I have submitted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessLab. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Various press-coverage has now been added, so whilst it lacks appropriate ref details (esp for quotes), it does now appear to meet N guidelines  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Redirected to Cheek, which makes sense. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to Simon Cowell#Personal life Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Was taken to AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Thin Kids by another editor, and kept  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Asked an editor from the AFD User talk:Michig#The Thin Kids to see what they think now.  Chzz  ►  07:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
And again User_talk:Michig#The_Thin_Kids_again  Chzz  ►  11:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Bit complicated; taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosgeologiya.  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Not sure why the AFC was closed no consensus, so asked User talk:King of Hearts#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosgeologiya.  Chzz  ►  07:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to Hair coloring  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to List of living supercentenarians  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to Veeran Sundaralingam  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

[edit]
Subsequent to release, this has become notable. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
An offline ref added, remains a bit of a quotefarm with poor referencing, but possibly OK for N. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Was later AFD and deleted. Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to Tracy Beaker Returns  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Appropriately redirected to Tracy Beaker Returns  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I changed this immediately to a BLP PROD; contested; taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusto Barcia  Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept following discussion (no consensus) but still tagged, needs work.  Chzz  ►  01:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Has now been reduced to a stub; tenuous notability. Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Epic Pet Wars: PROD; notified: Dude1818 (talk · contribs) 03:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Gharakh: PROD; notified: Alecjan12 (talk · contribs) 03:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: Previously speedy-deleted, I can find no references at all to show that this is notable (or, indeed, true)
  • Hellen Dausen: PROD; notified: Maxy1993 (talk · contribs) 07:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: This person does not (yet) appear to meet notability guidelines. There are 0 hits from Google News. The possible entry into a future competition seems to fail WP:CRYSTAL. I can find no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources per WP:GNG / WP:BIO.
  • Technosys: endorsed PROD. 10:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable company (WP:N), lacking 'significant coverage in independent, reliable sources' per WP:GNG, WP:CORP.
Retro NZ computing; see discussion on User talk:Ausgangskontrolle#Proposed deletion of Technosys. Chzz  ►  11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Following which, I chose to tag it as needing additional refs, etc. Same user had problems with another article, and seems to misunderstand V.  Chzz  ►  01:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
I still don't think this passes notability, but in deference to this discussion I've decided not to pursue this one.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
1 year later, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technosys  Chzz  ►  11:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


May 2010

[edit]
Redirected to TV show now  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Fletcher  Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia McKenna Bruce  Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Contested with no explanation; looks like a list. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Forum on Urbanism  Chzz  ►  13:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Was deleted 25 May 2010, was remade later; has a little bit of refs now.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Press-release sources; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Targeting  Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I reverted myself on this, and helped fix it. Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karma: A Very Twisted Love Story  Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Was deleted (at the time) and later re-written entirely.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Just-about meets N now.  Chzz  ►  13:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Possibly now notable, though one source used for asserting N is quite negative, so we'll see. Chzz  ►  13:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


June 2010

[edit]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Greer  Chzz  ►  14:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept, as the evidence of publication was deemed to satisfy N.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyola Public School Chzz  ►  14:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

(WP:NOT) - please refer to WP:FIRST for basic advice, and check the business FAQ.

Has a single source of a mag; tagged as 'one source' and N concern. Chzz  ►  14:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Redirected to Saint Thomas, Barbados  Chzz  ►  14:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
  • SnagFilms: PROD; notified: Badtzy (talk · contribs) 18:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: All references are press-releases; this org does not appear notable, per requirements; I cannot find significant coverage in independent, reliable sources - a few passing mentions, and blogs. There are some hits on "trueslant.com" but I can't open those; this looks like an advert, and without appropriate sourcing, I think, actually, it might even come under CSD as "needs to be fundamentally rewritten" - but I think it's worth the debate here, to see if others can source it.
Was deleted 29 June, rewritten later with some slightly better refs.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Some refs have been added, but does not appear notable. Chzz  ►  14:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


July 2010

[edit]
Tagged as ad; there are RS out there, but needs rewrite.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Has now been pared down to something acceptable. Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Was deleted, restored, deleted again a few times...it's been released now, so OK. Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

[edit]
Although cleaned up, still does not appear notable, so Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIVA (Liqueur).  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
...and it was deleted via AFC, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIVA (Liqueur) (1d + relist)  Chzz  ►  22:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • BigTop: PROD; notified: Dwayne (talk · contribs) 02:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
  • OpenGL Driver Monitor: PROD 02:35, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: Appears to fail notability guidelines, I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. This topic should probably be in an article about the driver itself, but as there is no referenced content, a merger seems pointless.
  • Nen (Hunter x Hunter): endorsed PROD. 03:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
  • ChinaJoy: PROD; notified: China JOY2010 (talk · contribs) 05:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Reason: I tagged this article for speedy deletion under criterion G11 and although that speedy-deletion was declined, I stand by the statement - it "does nothing but promote some entity" and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. I queried the CSD removal here, a week ago, no response so far. The author of the article has since been blocked as a username violation (User:China JOY2010. I do not agree with the use of Wikipedia to advertise, and the article lacks any kind of appropriate independent references. Whilst I am aware that, potentially, a valid article could be written on this topic, and I am cognisant of WP:BEFORE, I do not see how this can be 'fixed' through editing, as there is no referenced material other than the primary source claims.
See various notes and discussion; probably should have been CSD, but no response on that.  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

[edit]
Sensibly redirected.  Chzz  ►  03:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

[edit]
See next entry  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor Series (2010) (discussion ongoing)  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
After various discussions, this was kept in AFC, largely I feel due to volume of supporters who did not seem to make policy-based arguments; but I decided to drop the stick. As far as I can see, there is no policy-based reason to keep it. Yes, it'll be notable after it happens, so - well, just 'meh' really. Don't want the DRAMA of DRV.  Chzz  ►  22:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Because a previous version was deleted via AFC in 2008, the PROD was removed; hence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Beast (2nd nomination).  Chzz  ►  09:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
...and deleted, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Beast (2nd nomination)  Chzz  ►  22:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Two sources were added. Borderline notability now.  Chzz  ►  23:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
PROD removed by author; notability questionable  Chzz  ►  23:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted via AFD  Chzz  ►  23:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

[edit]
Was discussed on my talk, now in User_talk:Chzz/Archive_27#New_Guns_N.27_Roses_album - seems the author is OK for the PROD to continue.  Chzz  ►  20:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Was also tagged for speedy, seconds after my PROD. Author removed CSD; went to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhpAnts.  Chzz  ►  20:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

[edit]

December 2010

[edit]

January 2011

[edit]
  • Phoenix Jones: PROD; notified: Dream Focus (talk · contribs) 08:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Reason: This individual does not appear to meet inclusion guidelines WP:BIO / WP:GNG - the news source mentioned is a blog, stating that the photographs were taken by the individual. Even if there were coverage of this story (which I cannot find), it would fail on the basis on being just one event.

February 2011

[edit]

See also WP:VRS.

March 2011

[edit]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Flowers  Chzz  ►  11:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


April 2011

[edit]

May 2011

[edit]
Disputed; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit Card Babies  Chzz  ►  12:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)