User talk:Knurftendans

This user may have left Wikipedia. Knurftendans has not edited Wikipedia since August 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Knurftendans, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Nehwyn 08:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Destil Trappers

A tag has been placed on Destil Trappers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MER-C 09:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FC Groningen

Hi, do you know where can we check the squad numbers ? thanks. Jor70 11:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Category:Date of birth missing

Good evening. Per the discussion about privacy concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of birthdays, date of birth should generally not be added to the biographies of living non-public or semi-public figures. So far, that policy has been interpreted fairly strictly with a pretty high bar being set for the definition of "public figures" who are assumed to have given up their rights to privacy.

By the same token, we should not be adding Category:Date of birth missing to articles unless we have made the case that the person meets the "public figures" threshold. Otherwise, we're just baiting new users into adding content even though the community has already said that we shouldn't include that particular data point. Category:Year of birth missing is okay but the exact date is often not. Thanks for your help. Rossami (talk) 23:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it would help if you gave me a few examples of the people that you consider to be clearly "public". I've been doing a lot of work cleaning up that category and I can tell you that there were definitely some non-public people on the list. I would urge you, though, to read the policy page. The bar has been set pretty high for those who are truly "public" figures. They have to be people who have taken a deliberate action to publicize themselves pretty aggressively. National-level politicians, international-level actors, etc. Much below that level quickly gets debatable. And while we should sort those debates out on the article talk pages, the policy requires us to err on the side of protecting privacy.

Your closing comment was "If the person wants to keep this information about him/her a secret it will probably never appear as it is not known." Unfortunately, that is not the case. Birthdates are often knowable if you take the time and effort to look. (You could, for example, research my background, make some guesses about where I was born, go in person to the county courthouse and pay your $2 and get a copy of my birth certificate.) The physical barriers to access provide some protection for the person's privacy. When we publish a birthdate electronically on the 14th most popular website in the world, however, you have removed all barriers and implied protections.

Tony Blair's birthday is known. Tony Blair also has staff who watch his accounts and who are on the lookout for identity theft. Some top-name sports stars are equally famous and also pay for the extra protection. Tom Corcoran, on the other hand, probably doesn't even know that he has a Wikipedia article, much less that someone was looking to find and publish his birthdate. I would seriously doubt that he the extra precautions that a truly public figure would consider normal. Rossami (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Rhoney

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Laura Rhoney, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. RHB 16:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cue sports

Given all the work you did creating basic articles for everyone notable in the 2006 WPA Men's World Nine-ball Championship, I thought I would extend an invitation to join WikiProject Cue sports. We can certainly use more people with your level of attention to detail and competion of a project once started. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Job Bulters

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Job Bulters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 21:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danish footballers

When you have made infoboxes for other Danish footballers (as fore example Ivan Nielsen), you have included statistics for their club careers - but no sources are given for these stats. Could you please either provide a link for the data, or write which book you have it from? Thank you. Poulsen 07:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks so much :) Poulsen 07:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armeinan football clubs - good new work but please state your sources. Why are you getting the info from? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 12:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also please add all the new clubs to List of football clubs in Armenia thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 12:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK then try to add an external link -surely there must be an online reference somewhere. The coverage of teams in Armenia was pretty poor -its great you are filling in the picture ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 12:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you give some link to back it up - it is just to verify it - the open nature of wikipedia means that this is very important as otherwise anybody can create something. I don't know whether you know but a new department of wikipedia has recently started to address criticism of this to ensure that every article is referenced and reliably sourced ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 12:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 13:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing is to link articles. E.g see the Kapan page. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 13:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E.g a section on the main Yerevan article Sport - linking the Yerevan footabll clubs. All the best - I'll leave you to it now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 13:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign footballers playing for Dutch teams

I don't think they should be included in WikiProject Netherlands, because they are only tangentially related to the Netherlands. Having said that, we may include them in a new WikiProject, Dutch football, as a daughter of both WikiProject Netherlands and WikiProject Football. Such a WikiProject would also cover Dutch footballers, managers, stadiums, competitions, football clubs and national teams. A ecis^Brievenbus 21:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, shall we propose Wikipedia:WikiProject Dutch football? A ecis^Brievenbus 21:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Dutch football. A ecis^Brievenbus 22:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Jeroen Straathof, was selected for DYK!

On July 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jeroen Straathof, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 17:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi, seeing as you edit Dutch football-related articles a lot, would it be possible for you to give Piet Hamberg some editing? Punkmorten 21:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Michael Mols

I've heard of pinch hitter, in baseball but never in football. If it's a popular phrase in the Netherlands then I've no qualms about it being in his article. I thought you might have been an American soccer fan trying to introduce baseball language into an article about a European footballer. - Dudesleeper · Talk 11:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Sherif / Sheriff

Apologies on that. I was using an automatic spelling checker, so it (understandably) didn't realise that Sherif was a name, not a rank (Sheriff). Thanks for reverting, and happy editing! Giggy _U^CP 22:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		Armenian Barnstar of National Merit
		I, VartanM, hereby award you this Barnstar of National Merit for the work you have done to improve the coverage of Armenian football related articles. Keep up the great work!
		_{this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~}

Thanks

		The Original Barnstar
		Nice work on starting biographies for the remaining 2007 Tour de France cyclists! Severo^TC 21:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Gonsalves

Well, it is not only "my" information. There was a long discussion about the squads from the 1912 tournament: Football at the 1912 Summer Olympics - Men's team squads. Part of it you can see here: [1]. Also there exist a book about all international football games, which also includes the squads from 1912. Sorrily I do not have this book. The name is something like: Full list of international soccer games? I hope this is helpful :) Doma-w 14:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni van Bronckhorst

Yes, I was not only counting domestic league appearances. I don't get why count just domestic leagues, that's so far from reality. Also, the information is wrong since there is no direct reference about that count and the key for "App (Gls)*" is "* Appearances (Goals)". For readers, "Appearances" means any appearance (even friendlies), not only domestic leagues. Please, if you want keep that way, place a direct reference or change the key to something like "* Appearances (Goals) Only domestic league". Thanks.--ClaudioMB 17:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's weird count only domestic league appearances, but, it wouldn't be wrong if there is an explanation. However, count only domestic league appearances and show as appearances, without any explanation about that, that's is very wrong, because that is wrong information. If it's wrong information, it does not matter what the community wants, the information is wrong and must be changed. Tell me how the readers (the most important people for Wikipedia) will understand when they read that information, they will say "oh yes, appearances means domestic league appearances, not all appearances". Also, if other players' articles are also wrong, all of them should be changed. I've changed all players from FC Barcelona. I repeat here, it's only necessary explain what appearances is that about, do not need change the numbers. Thanks. --ClaudioMB 23:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to discuss a correction of a wrong information, Wikipedia does not belong to the community. Anyone could fix anything without ask the permission from anyone else. But, as I was going to fix the information, I read the observation 1 for Senior clubs. There, there is a specification for appearances. That's awkward, since there is an observation for App (Gls), where the specification for appearances should be. An observation for Senior clubs should explaining something about Senior clubs, not appearances and goals. It's not good, but, at least, it is there. So, I apologize for my mistake. What I'll do, it's to ask for a change in the box observations to fix that misplaced information. Just one more thing, it's wrong and dangerous to believe everyone should do what a community wants. Any community couldn't ever have supreme power. If it is wrong, it's wrong, period. Thanks. --ClaudioMB 00:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. I'll try to put it in another away. If you look the infobox of Giovanni van Bronckhorst's article or any other player's article, the title for the appearances and goals is "App (Gls)*". If you read on the bottom what the * is about, it says "* Appearances (Goals)". It does not mention anything about only domestic league appearances. Just above the "App (Gls)*" title, there is the "Senior clubs¹" title for that part of the box. If you read what the number ¹ is about, you read "¹ Senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only". There, you have the information about the domestic league only appearances. I'm wondering if you ask 10 people to read that and tell how many times Gio played for FC Barcelona, how many you'll say "he played 105 times, but just domestic league games" or "he played 105 times". Like I said before, it's not wrong because the information is there, but could be misread for readers that are looking for a specific club appearance. I'll try to discuss this in the discussion page of Template:Football_player_infobox. I would never change that before a discussion, because it's not about fix something, but improve it.--ClaudioMB 14:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Hello Knurftendans, Isis4563 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hello there, Knurftendans

HELLO KNURFT, THIS IS VASCO FROM PORTUGAL, user nº217.129.67.28.

I can see that i was wrong in MICHAEL MOLS' STATS, and, since you appear to have a good grasp on Dutch sport and since i had no other reliable source other than NL.WIKIPEDIA, I (NOT YOU) WILL STOP REVERTING THAT, MY FRIEND! 60 games-8 goals IT IS...

Dankiu vel, have a nice weekend (or wikipend!) FROM PORTUGAL, VASCO AMARAL

Barnstar

Football Barnstar

Voor uw werk met Nederlands voetbal. Vooral Ajax! :) JACO PLANE • 2007-08-19 00:45

Dank u dank u, maar dat "vooral Ajax" dat kan niet he, bij een Feyenoorder ;) Knurftendans 07:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, maar voor een Feijenoorder doe de anders behoorlijk je best voor ons Joden :) Hee, ik ben alleen maar blij met de renaissance die jullie momenteel meemaken.. maakt de competitie ook een stuk interresanter! groetjes! JACO PLANE • 2007-08-20 22:44

Ze staan nu eenmaal op de eerste plaats als het gaat om de alfabetische volgorde, vandaar dat ik eerst daarmee begon. Maar om je gerust te stellen zal ik me hierna bezig gaan houden met Feyenoord ipv AZ. Trouwens, kan jij niet eens een training bezoeken en de spelers op de foto zetten zoals ik bij de meeste Feyenoorders heb gedaan? Knurftendans 22:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zou ik graag doen, alleen ik woon momenteel in Geneve. Ik ga wel naar de wedstrijd woensdag... Hopelijk kan ik daar een paar mooie plaatjes schieten. JACO PLANE • 2007-08-20 23:04

Dat zou mooi zijn ja, vergeet Blaise N'Kufo niet he ;) Veel plezier en succes gewenst in ieder geval. Knurftendans 23:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Zal N'Kufo zeker niet vergeten. Groetjes, JACO PLANE • 2007-08-20 23:11

Rinus Michels Award

Nog een vraagje, weet jij wie de oeuvre prijs voor de Rinus Michels Award in 2006 & 2007 heeft gewonnen? Ik kan het nergens vinden. Ohh, en mocht je iets weten van Piet de Visser, nog zo'n artikel waar ik bijzonder weinig over kan vinden. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2007-08-20 23:20

Ik heb even gekeken, maar ik kan inderdaad ook niks vinden over die oevreprijs. Het artikel over Piet de Visser zit al aardig in elkaar, al heeft ie natuurlijk veel meer gedaan dan wat er nu staat, daar heb je helemaal gelijk in. Wellicht kan een beetje research naar wat de teams presteerden in de jaren dat hij er werkte wat nieuwe informatie opleveren. Knurftendans 09:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax

Waarom heb je er zo veel problemen mee dat ik die ene zin toevoeg? Bayern Munchen heeft hetzelfde gewonnen als Ajax en bij hun staat het ook. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AFCA (talk • contribs) 15:50, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Fair use disputed for Image:FannyBK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FannyBK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ariën Pietersma

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ariën Pietersma, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ariën Pietersma seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ariën Pietersma, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Qhays Shayesteh

An article that you have been involved in editing, Qhays Shayesteh, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qhays Shayesteh. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? A ecis^Brievenbus 23:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Benjamin van den Broek

An article that you have been involved in editing, Benjamin van den Broek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin van den Broek. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? A ecis^Brievenbus 19:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dolf Kerklaan

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dolf Kerklaan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolf Kerklaan. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? A ecis^Brievenbus 08:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Virgall joemankhan.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Virgall joemankhan.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patrick allotey.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Patrick allotey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 03:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liane bahler.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liane bahler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 03:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Naveen Perwani

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Naveen Perwani. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Perwani. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Knurftendans! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 130 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Mickaël Delage - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Boudewijn Poelmann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lars Elgersma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vincent Kortbeek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Fred Blankemeijer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tamás Pető - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Edwin de Graaf - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rob Conradi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jordi van Bremen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rob Penders - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Rutger Worm

12. Paul Jans

13. Raymon van Emmerik

14. Dominique Scholten

15. Remon de Vries

16. Marc Höcher

17. Patrick Pothuizen

18. Ramon van Haaren

19. Robert Fuchs (footballer)

20. Hans Mulder

21. Dustley Mulder

22. Jurgen Wevers

23. Frank van Mosselveld

24. Patrick van Diemen

25. Vladan Kujović

26. Olaf Rompelberg

27. Roy Bejas

28. Niels Kokmeijer

29. Jeffrey Vlug

30. Jasper Bolland

31. Jahri Valentijn

32. Ramon Leeuwin

33. Leroy George

34. Tim Cornelisse

35. Raymond van Driel

36. Rihairo Meulens

37. Bram van Polen

38. Jaime Bruinier

39. Colin van Mourik

40. Michael Jansen

41. Ronnie Reniers

42. Niels Vorthoren

43. Edwin Hermans

44. Steef Nieuwendaal

45. Delano Hill

46. Niels Wellenberg

47. Frank van der Struijk

48. Maikel Visser

49. Rob Wielaert

50. Sergio Zijler

51. Marcel Kleizen

52. Marnix Smit

53. Fung Kwok Wai

54. Philip Williams (snooker player)

55. Naveen Perwani

56. Manan Chandra

57. Angélique Vialard

58. Hanna Mergies

59. Anuja Thakur

60. Ramona Belmont

61. Jaique Ip

62. Fu Che-wei

63. Liu Cheng-chuan

64. Luong Chi Dung

65. Konstantin Stepanov

66. Sandor Tot

67. Jeff de Luna

68. Kuo Po-cheng

69. Jharome Peña

70. Roy Apancho

71. Marco Tschudi

72. Ryu Seong-woo

73. Lee Kun-fang

74. Kevin Uzzell

75. Karen Marcano

76. Siti Safiyah Amirah

77. Tanya Petty

78. Marie Ramirez

79. Piritta Kantola

80. Teresa Piccini

81. Rebecca Simpson

82. Sofia Granda

83. Mor Aviram

84. Melody Yeung (bowler)

85. Daniela Esposito

86. Veronica Lalande-Lapointe

87. Priscilla Maaswinkel

88. Evgenia Tsarkova

89. Beatrix Pesek

90. Edgardo Ruiz

91. Reydnier Chavez

92. Caio Pizzoli

93. Or Aviram

94. William Nimick

95. Philippe Huber

96. Adrian Ang

97. Saeed Al Hajri

98. Lucas Legnani

99. Thierry Sacco

100. Ryan Leonard Lalisang

101. Mohammed Al Qubaisi

102. Seoung Joon-baek

103. Achim Grabowski

104. Mai Ginge Jensen

105. Aumi Guerra

106. Lisa John

107. Helen Johnsson

108. Jason Walsh

109. Petter Hansen

110. Mike Sanderson

111. Danny Wintjens

112. André Hanssen

113. Brian van Loo

114. Danny Holla

115. Ondřej Švejdík

116. Robin Hofman

117. Ronald Graafland

118. Ferry de Haan

119. Rudy Jansen

120. Sigourney Bandjar

121. Henrico Drost

122. Mitchell Piqué

123. Theo Zwarthoed

124. Johan Voskamp

125. Jarda Simr

126. Sebastiaan Steur

127. Ruud Vormer

128. Christiaan Kum

129. Tininho

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordi van Bremen

The article Jordi van Bremen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maikel Visser

The article Maikel Visser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rob Conradi

The article Rob Conradi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FC Omniworld squad

Template:FC Omniworld squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Walsh

The article Jason Walsh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. I don't think 3rd or 4th in a competition is notable enough.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 12:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Simpson

The article Rebecca Simpson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. I don't think 16th in a competition is notable enough.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philippe Huber

The article Philippe Huber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any significant coverage in reliable source to show notability for this unreferenced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 15:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HFC Haarlem squad

Template:HFC Haarlem squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caio Pizzoli

The article Caio Pizzoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unsourced WP:BLP has only a claim of questionable notability (placing 21st in a tournament.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Scientizzle 17:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naveen Perwani

The article Naveen Perwani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Williams (snooker player)

The article Philip Williams (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hanna Mergies

The article Hanna Mergies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roy Apancho for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Roy Apancho, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Apancho until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^Communicate 21:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryu Seong-woo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryu Seong-woo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramona Belmont

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ramona Belmont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saeed Al Hajri

The article Saeed Al Hajri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem notable. Might even be a hoax

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manan Chandra

The article Manan Chandra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP (marked since January 2009)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fung Kwok Wai

The article Fung Kwok Wai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP (marked since January 2009)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marco Tschudi

The article Marco Tschudi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 15:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Konstantin Stepanov

The article Konstantin Stepanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 15:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FannyBK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FannyBK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tyler Edey

The article Tyler Edey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not provide reliable sources to show that the subject meets WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dkchana (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Angélique Vialard

Hello, Knurftendans, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angélique Vialard whether the article Angélique Vialard should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Angélique Vialard, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 13:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hanna Mergies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanna Mergies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Mergies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 13:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Walsh (ten-pin bowler)

The article Jason Walsh (ten-pin bowler) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to fail WP:GNG as the bowler has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Walsh (ten-pin bowler) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Walsh (ten-pin bowler) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Walsh (ten-pin bowler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Simpson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Simpson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Simpson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 05:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerrit bij de Leij

The article Gerrit bij de Leij has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable amateur snooker player who has never appeared on the Main Tour.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evgenia Tsarkova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evgenia Tsarkova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evgenia Tsarkova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 14:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2007 Kingdom Games

The article 2007 Kingdom Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports event. Unreferenced as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Events at the 2007 Kingdom Games

The article Events at the 2007 Kingdom Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lloyd doesburg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lloyd doesburg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coert Beerman

The article Coert Beerman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Successful businessman but not encyclopedically notable. No sources to support passing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Ward (snooker player) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Ward (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ward (snooker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Monty (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin van Pernis

The article Martin van Pernis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Source searches turn up nothing which suggests he passes either WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, just business profiles which don't really confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 13:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angélique Vialard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angélique Vialard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angélique Vialard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:36, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dennis Lion

The article Dennis Lion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable coach. Lacks independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:33, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lazy beauty marianne hasperhoven D4Q0313 .jpg

The file File:Lazy beauty marianne hasperhoven D4Q0313 .jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerard Meijer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerard Meijer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Meijer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mooonswimmer 00:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melody Yeung (bowler) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melody Yeung (bowler) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Yeung (bowler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For creating the article on Henrico Drost, representing a huge body of work covering Dutch soccer. Thank you for being an awesome Wikipedian! gidonb (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerrit bij de Leij for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerrit bij de Leij is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerrit bij de Leij until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naveen Perwani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveen Perwani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Perwani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]