Template talk:Final Fantasy VII chronology

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 26 July 2021, see discussion.
No consensus, 16 July 2021, see discussion.
Keep, 2 July 2021, see discussion.

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Square Enix

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles

Request for Comment - Template's Existence

Big question - should this template really have been spared from deletion in a recent discussion? Some editors raised what they thought was valid points, and the nominator withdrew on the belief that was the case. But I am not certain they were justified, and that the nominator withdrew the discussion too soon. What do you think:

YES
NO

GUtt01 (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GUtt01: you're asking to revise the consensus that was just established under a week ago. I recommend this brought up in WT:VG.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a suitable RfC. Even though a withdrawal isn't strictly speaking suitable for a nomination where there is a delete !vote; inciting an RfC over whether it should be closed or not is not suitable. I recommend opening a discussion at WT:VG and discussing the template. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]