Jump to content

Talk:Wild Arms (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWild Arms (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 3, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 7, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Game Name

[edit]

The correct title of the game is Wild ARMs. In the game, it's specifically noted that ARMs stands for something... but it's been so long since I've played the game, that I can't remember what. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.227.57 (talk • contribs)

It is not. Please see Talk:Wild Arms series for details. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It stands for Ancient Relic Machines. Though if I'm not mistaken, Wild ARMs 2 gave a different meanings. Buy you're right in that it should be "ARMs" rather than "Arms."--WishfireOmega (talk) 11:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, it should not be ARMs. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 04:02, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wild_Arms_series#Objection_to_Title_Capitalization

To Do

[edit]

It's been a while since I played, so I don't have much to say as for a description.

  • Add description
  • port data from series article where appropriate
  • find a cover
  • Add more screenshots (in game etc)
  • Reference to sequels

You cannot add your personal opinions

[edit]

You should read the posting methods of Wikipedia before posting. This is NOT a game review site, and thusly you should refrain from phrases like "this game is very good" or "extremely lovable characters", etc.

Number of Players

[edit]

It's true the game is only 1 player, but both controller ports are able to control the game, I figure we should mention this somewhere. I'd play with my brother a lot. (Split up party control during battle) --Zeno McDohl 15:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's right, if you have two controllers plugged in then the second controller can basically do anything that the first one can, so in a way it's two-player. Quite fun for battles, but there's always squabbling about who gets to control who... Dragonfly888 17:58, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Character list

[edit]

Because the heroes only appear in WA and WA:ACF, I think we don't need another page for them. We could just list their information etc on the WA page. --Zeno McDohl 18:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Move completed.

[edit]

The title "Wild Arms" was improperly capitalized. I have moved this talk page manually at the request of Zeno McDohl. Apologies for the inconvenience... --E. Megas 23:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GApassed

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

It looks pretty good. A copy-edit may be needed to weed out issues and redundancies for the FA push, and script cites for the story section are also a good idea. Passable on the whole; nice job. — Deckiller 03:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alter Code F

[edit]

Was the merge really necessary? The game apparently has remade graphics and soundtrack, new dungeons, characters and FMVs. Wouldn't that be enough for its own article? Haven't played the game though. --Mika1h (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've played the game all the way through, even some new sequences not outlined or told in the original game are in it. It should get its own article myself. (iyeru42-Guest) 66.168.19.135 (talk) 04:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It could probably get a decent stand alone article, but everyone including myself is too lazy to write one. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I, too, support the split. Punkalyptic (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Likely mis-translated words...

[edit]

OK, so I was wondering if we can/should add a section for likely mis-romanized names, since there are quite a few around. A few examples I came upon just now:

  • Belial, not Berial. Katakana for both is ベリアル.
  • Marduk, not Malduke. Katakana for both is マルドゥーク.
  • Ka Dingir, not Ka Dingel. I'm not sure about the katakana, but since "Ka.dingir.ra" is listed as the Sumerian word for Babylon meaning "gate of the gods," I can't help but ignore that. The Sumerian reference also helps establish the fact that マルドゥーク more likely was meant to romanize to "Marduk."

I know trivia sections are frowned upon, but is there anything that can be done?

--Yoshiaki Abe (talk) 22:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy's backstory has misleading language

[edit]

Because it talks about him being from a small village and then immediately talks about the mayor of surf village it implies that he was born and raised there. This is misleading. Through flashbacks it has revealed he spent time living in other locations as well as traveling with his grandfather. There's some major spoiler there too, but I don't know the rules about that

I don't think the village shown in his childhood flashback was even visitable in game, so the section needs at least that much redone. Unless I am mistaken? S.R.Osuna (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Wild Arms/GA1

ACF Infobox Issue

[edit]

I have a 1024x768 Monitor (yeah, boo, boo...) and the infobox pushes down the last two paragraphs of the sub-article ACF. Removing the {{-}} template fixes this, but causes it to overlap with the refs. 24.241.229.253 (talk) 14:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Into the Wilderness source is incorrect

[edit]

The main theme is apparently a remix of the theme used in the trailer for Day of Anger (a 1967 western), and not the theme for the wild bunch from My Name is Nobody. It's completely misattributed.

Adumbrodeus (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wild Arms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria because there are numerous uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in fixing this up, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 06:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Wild Arms (video game)

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending

This article has numerous uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Yet another driveby nomination with absolutely no attempt to fix the situation yourself, which would be easily doable since most of the article is still sourced. Seriously, stop with the frivolous delisting as it's tatamount to disruptive. Focus on fixing it first, and attempt to delist if the article is unfixable without a major rewrite of all content. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    He posted about it a month ago—Talk:Wild Arms (video game)#GA concerns—and apparently no one is maintaining the article. Degradation in the article's quality isn't the nominator's burden to correct. This is easily a multi-hour project to bring the article back up to quality. czar 13:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wild_Arms_(video_game)&oldid=1255161824"