Talk:Warlocked

Warlocked has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Head Size

@GamerPro64 I noticed that the article in its entirity including wikitext markups and hidden data accumulates to 1.1k words. According to the HEAD guidelines, I would advise that you sort the head to only have 1 paragraph, and move the extra information to a different section. PerryPerryD 20:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A sincere Apology

@GamerPro64 I apologize greatly for my previous GA Review on this article, I have re-read this article, and I noticed that my judgement was completely wrong, This article deserves a much better review than the one I have given it, and I apologize. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 17:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Warlocked/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr Salvus (talk · contribs) 18:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I've decided that this would be my first GA review ever. I'm gonna review this tomorrow. Dr Salvus 18:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
Pass	The reviewer has left no comments here

Discussion

@GamerPro64:, you've litteraly written an excellent article. Unfortunatley, not being a native speaker, I'll have to review the grammar tomorrow (and I'll be helped by a friend who's got a better English). It's my first review, so I apologise for possible errors. Do remember to add a caption as the photo doesn't have it. Dr Salvus 21:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean the photo does have a caption. GamerPro64 21:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GamerPro64, oh sorry, hadn't seen it Dr Salvus 21:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64 today, I'm very sick (I may have contracted Covid), so won't be able to review the grammar for a few days. Dr Salvus 16:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64, I'm fine enough to do this and I'm 99,9% asyntomatic. These are my friend's grammatical corrections.

Music for Warlocked was composed by Jeroen Tel. -> The music for Warlocked was composed by Jeroen Tel.
A sequel was planned for the Game Boy Advance titled Wizards but was cancelled. -> A sequel was planned for the Game Boy Advance titled Wizards but it was cancelled.
The studio later went on to make unrelated games for other consoles [...] -> The studio continued to make unrelated games for other consoles [...]

That's what I've got. Dr Salvus 19:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All done. GamerPro64 04:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr Salvus Thank you for your GA Review, I appreciate you resolving the issue of the previous review I left. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from BlackShadowG

Hi, @GamerPro64:, I have translated the entire article into Chinese and nominated a GAC there as well. Our editors found that the "Development and release" section is too short, I think these two sources [1][2] may be helpful in writing this section. --BlackShadowG (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]