Talk:Warhawk (1995 video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Whoever wrote this article must believe they have a decent vocabulary. They're wrong.

More information on the PS3 remake please...

"Dubious" comparisons with C64 game

Please discuss this matter at Talk:Warhawk (Firebird game). Thank you. Fourohfour 16:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No criticisms?

Why no mentions of reviews? Or why this game is universally reviled for its low budget full motion video? --72.202.150.92 04:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To (finally) answer both points...

I added one link to a review from Gaming Target.
^{[citation needed]} ;)

--an odd name 00:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

War hawk

You are invited to participate in Talk:War hawk#Requested move 21 May 2019 about whether War hawk should be moved to Hawk (foreign policy). R2 (bleep) 16:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Windows version

Do we have more information about the Windows version? It may have been available in Japan in some capacity, I've spotted plausible box art and screenshots. Theclaw1 (talk) 01:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm skeptical; box art is so easily counterfeited these days. You can even find a completely different back cover than the one you've linked over on GameFAQs. Obviously at least one of them must be fake, so there's no reason to think they aren't both fake. And the front cover is identical to the PlayStation version front cover aside from the platform logos, which are easily cut-and-pasted. As for the screenshots, is there any reason to think they aren't from the PlayStation version? Martin IIIa (talk) 04:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Martin IIIa found this [1] that it was in development Timur9008 (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I wasn't skeptical that it was in development, just that it was released. But I'll add that to the article, thanks. Martin IIIa (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the source! Yeah I haven't found if it was released. Timur9008 (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]