Talk:Video game–related health problems

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

This article has some good points, but it surely can be improved. The fact that it contains statistics makes this a strong article. It is better to have supporting evidence from studies than to just having statements. It is neatly organized with different topics in the contents as well: Musculoskeletal issues, vision problems, and video games and obesity. However, it would be a better article if there were more contexts stated. I feel like the topic sentences are great, but there are not much of commentaries. Also, it would be great if the statistics were in every content and further explanations on the studies. Stating the names of the people who performed the studies would make it even stronger. Overall, this is a great article to relate on my Argument essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:8AD8:A00:30EA:793:1388:841 (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article is written like a book and is based off of opinions

so basically rewrite or get rid of it is what I'm saying 24.246.136.200 (talk) 21:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]